Occult invasive cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy: a multi-center retrospective study of 89 cases

Mexican consensus about surgical treatment in early-stage cervicouterine cancer

Introduction

Cervical cancer is a public health problem in our country and worldwide. Less than 25% of cases are diagnosed in the early stages, where survival is more remarkable than 90% at five years. Here, we review surgical treatment in the early stages of cervical cancer.

Methodology

A literature review was carried out in the MEDLINE database. The search was mainly limited to the English language, with priority given to systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis and randomized studies. However, only retrospective or observational evidence was found for some topics.

Results

The standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer is hysterectomy, and its radical nature will depend on the tumor size, lymphovascular permeation, and tumor-specific prognostic factors. Furthermore, the type of surgery (hysterectomy or trachelectomy) will rely on the patient's desire to preserve fertility. Nodal evaluation is indicated as part of the treatment from stage IAI with PLV. However, the sentinel lymph node is more relevant in the treatment. The incidental finding of cervical cancer after a hysterectomy requires a multidisciplinary evaluation to determine the therapeutic approach. Less radical surgery has been described as oncologically safe in low-risk groups.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment in its early stages has evolved in recent decades, making it more individualized and seeking less morbidity in patients without compromising their survival.

Complementary surgery for cervical cancer patients inadequately treated with extrafacial hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate surgical outcomes and survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients who underwent complementary surgery after an extrafacial hysterectomy METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer, who underwent extrafacial hysterectomy initially and thereafter underwent complementary surgery were reviewed retrospectively. Complementary surgery consisted of radical parametrectomy, proximal vaginectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were evaluated. Histopathologic subtype was squamous cell carcinoma in twelve patients, adenocarcinoma in six patients and adenosquamous carcinoma in two patients. Route of surgery was laparotomy in 19 patients and laparoscopy in one patient. Two patients were staged as stage 1A2, nine were staged as stage 1B1, four were staged as stage 1B2, one was staged as stage 2A1, one was staged as stage 2B and three were staged as stage 3C1. The median tumor size was 16.5 (Range, 4-40) mm. Grade ≥ 3 complications related to surgery occured in 8 (40%) patients. Four of them were managed intraoperatively and recovered problem free. Remaining four (20%) needed reoperation. Pathology reports revealed involvement of parametrium in one (5%) patient, involvement of the proximal vagina in one (5%) patient, matastasis to pelvic lymph nodes in 3 (15%) patients. Five (25%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Consequently, 5-year and 10-year cumulative survival was calculated as 94%.

CONCLUSION

Complementary surgery and radiotherapy show similar oncologic outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer who had undergone simple hysterectomy initially. Complementary surgery is associated with slightly higher rate of morbidity compared with radiotherapy, however significant proportion of complications can be noticed and repaired intraoperatively.

The safety of fertility preservation for microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

PURPOSE

This study sought to evaluate the safety of conservative treatment in the management of patients with microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched to collect correlational studies published in English between January 1949 and May 2018. Series reports that evaluating the oncological prognoses of patients with microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma who were treated with fertility-sparing surgery versus hysterectomy were pooled for meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8 articles with 1256 patients were collected, including 7 retrospective reviews and 1 prospective study. Only one (0.08%) patient had parametrial involvement. Positive margins of surgical specimens were identified in 6 patients (2.2%). Lymph node metastasis was found in 5 patients (0.4%). The progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 99.3 and 98.2%. Fertility-sparing surgery had no adverse impact on recurrence or survival (P = 0.524 and 0.485, respectively). Regarding potential selection bias, significantly more patients with stage IA2 tumors than those with stage IA1 disease were treated with hysterectomy (P < 0.001). The trial sequential analysis indicated that the cumulative number of patients failed to meet the required sample size (number of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for patients with microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma is excellent. Fertility preservation is at least appropriate for young women with stage IA1 adenocarcinoma. Further studies are still warranted to evaluate the safety of this procedure in managing patients with microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma.

Radical parametrectomy after 'cut-through' hysterectomy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Time to consider this procedure obsolete

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to identify predictive factors in patients with a diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy in order to avoid a radical parametrectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent radical parametrectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at MD Anderson Cancer Center and at the Instituto de Cancerologia Las Americas in Medellin, Colombia from December 1999 to September 2017. We sought to determine the outcomes in patients diagnosed with low-risk factors (squamous, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous lesions<2cm in size, and invading<10mm) undergoing radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The median age was 40.4years (range; 26-60) and median body mass index (BMI) was 26.4kg/m² (range; 17.7-40.0). A total 22 patients had tumors<1cm and 8 had tumors between 1 and 2cm. A total of 6 (33%) of 18 patients had evidence of lymph-vascular invasion (LVSI). No radical parametrectomy specimen had residual tumor, involvement of the parametrium, vaginal margin positivity, or lymph node metastasis. None of the patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 99months (range; 6-160) only one patient recurred.

CONCLUSION

Radical parametrectomy may be avoided in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer detected after a simple hysterectomy. Rates of residual disease (parametrial or vaginal) and the need for adjuvant treatments or recurrences are very low.