A retrospective study of predictive factors for unexpectedly prolonged or shortened progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line targeted therapy

Survival of patients receiving systematic therapy for metachronous or synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

Background

The differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients according to treatment, type of metastasis, and Heng criteria risk are unclear. In this study, we compared survival according to various such parameters.

Methods

Between 2000 to 2014, 214 mRCC patients, of whom 171 (79.9%) were intermediate-risk and 43 (20.1%) were poor-risk, were retrospectively selected; 126 (58.9%) patients were treated with immunotherapy (IT) and 88 (41.1%) with targeted therapy (TT). Moreover, 144 patients had synchronous mRCCs (67.3%, SM) and 70 had metachronous mRCCs (32.7%, MM). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and CSS.

Results

During a median 4.2 (1.0–70.4) months of systemic treatment and 98.3 (4.8–147.6) months of follow-up, the median PFS and CSS were 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8–5.5) and 13.8 (95% CI, 9.8–18.3) months, respectively. The PFS and CSS were significantly better in the MM (5.9 and 21.3 months) and intermediate-risk groups (5.2 and 18.3 months) than those in the SM (4.4 and 9.6 months) and poor-risk groups (2.7 and 5.8 months), respectively (p < 0.05). Further stratification showed that TT produced significantly better PFS than IT in intermediate-risk patients with SM and a treatment-free interval (TFI) < 1 year, and in those with MM with a TFI ≥1 year (p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival outcomes according to various other subgroup stratifications (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Dividing patients into specific subcategories helps to better predict therapeutic outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5900-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Association of Androgen Receptor Expression with Renal Cell Carcinoma Risk: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The relationship between androgen receptor expression and renal cell carcinoma risk remains controversial. This study is aimed to investigate the clinical significance of androgen receptor expression in renal cell carcinoma. A computerized bibliographic search of Embase, the PubMed, and Web of Science combined with manual research between 1977 and 2017 was conducted to explore the association between androgen receptor expression and clinicopathological features of renal cell carcinoma. Data were analyzed by a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 analysis software. Eleven retrospective studies with 1839 renal cell carcinoma cases were finally included according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. It was found that there was no significant difference between androgen receptor expression and susceptibility, pathological type, metastatic status, metastatic type (lymph or distant metastasis) and cancer-specific survival of renal cell carcinoma (P > 0.05). However, positive androgen receptor expression was demonstrated to be significantly associated with male patients, lower pathological grade, and earlier tumor stage of renal cell carcinoma (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.30-2.19, P < 0.0001; OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.49-2.85, P < 0.0001; OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.30-6.12, P = 0.009; respectively). In conclusion, higher androgen receptor expression was correlated with male patients, low tumor grade and early stage of renal cell carcinoma. Based on current results, androgen receptor-inhibited target therapy for renal cell carcinoma patients may be of limited benefits and should be taken into more evaluations.

A retrospective comparative study of progression-free survival and overall survival between metachronous and synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma in intermediate- or poor-risk patients treated with VEGF-targeted therapy

Introduction

The aim of this study was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between metachronous and synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinomas treated with VEGF-targeted therapy.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2014, 93 (78.8%) intermediate- and 25 (21.2%) poor-Heng-risk patients, including 32 (27.1%) patients with metachronous and 86 (72.9%) patients with synchronous renal cell carcinoma, were enrolled retrospectively. PFS and OS values were compared according to the number of risk factors and treatment-free interval using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic risk factors were also evaluated using a Cox proportional hazard model, with a p-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results

During a median 5.0-month treatment and 59.3-month follow-up, analysis of the PFS/OS of SM (5.2/9.6 months) and MM (9.6/20.1 months) yielded a significant difference in OS (p = 0.010). However, there was no significant difference when Heng risk groups and treatment-free interval were considered (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in PFS (hazard ratio: 1.81) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.19) with increasing number of Heng risk factors among patients with synchronous renal cell carcinoma and a treatment-free interval <1 year. Metastatic type, anemia, and neutrophilia were significant predictive factors for OS in multivariable analysis (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The metastatic type of renal cell carcinoma (synchronous or metachronous) significantly affects survival; metachronous type is associated with more favorable outcomes than synchronous type. However, after stratification according to Heng risk factors and treatment-free interval, the differences in survival between metachronous and synchronous type were insignificant.