Pooled safety analyses of ALK-TKI inhibitor in ALK-positive NSCLC

Small Molecule Inhibitors as Therapeutic Agents Targeting Oncogenic Fusion Proteins: Current Status and Clinical

Oncogenic fusion proteins, arising from chromosomal rearrangements, have emerged as prominent drivers of tumorigenesis and crucial therapeutic targets in cancer research. In recent years, the potential of small molecular inhibitors in selectively targeting fusion proteins has exhibited significant prospects, offering a novel approach to combat malignancies harboring these aberrant molecular entities. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of small molecular inhibitors as therapeutic agents for oncogenic fusion proteins. We discuss the rationale for targeting fusion proteins, elucidate the mechanism of action of inhibitors, assess the challenges associated with their utilization, and provide a summary of the clinical progress achieved thus far. The objective is to provide the medicinal community with current and pertinent information and to expedite the drug discovery programs in this area.

[Chinese Expert Consensus on Management of Special Adverse Effects Associated with Lorlatinib]

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions represent the second most common oncogenic driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As the new class of 3rd generation of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), lorlatinib has shown robust potency and brain-penetrant clinical activity against a wide spectrum of multiple resistance mutations within the ALK domain detected during crizotinib and 2nd generation ALK TKI treatment. Lorlatinib is generally well-tolerated with unique adverse drug reaction/adverse event, including hyperlipidemia and central nervous system effects, which are mostly mild to moderate severity and manageable through dosage modifications and/or standard medical intervention. For advanced NSCLC with ALK positivity, patients should be evaluated for baseline characteristics and pre-existing medication, informed of the potential toxicities, and periodically monitored to balance benefits and risks. Moreover, a multidisciplinary group of experts is essential to establish a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.
.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors associated gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation, and ulceration: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database (FAERS)

BACKGROUND : There have been cases reporting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and associated serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse drug reactions (gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation, and ulceration). These adverse drug reactions are not in the drug package inserts, and the drug relationships are not proven in the literature.  AIM: We aimed to examine the potential association between GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration, and ALK-TKIs by data mining of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHOD  : We conducted a disproportionality analysis of GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration by estimating the reporting odds ratios (ROR) and the information component (IC) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS : A total of 279 cases of ALK-TKI-associated GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, were identified. GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration cause 16% of cases of death. A significantly increased reporting rate for GI obstruction [ROR 1.77 (1.45-2.15); IC 0.82 (0.53-2.03)] and perforation [ROR 1.61 (1.28-2.02); IC 0.68 (0.35-1.92)] was observed for ALK-TKIs as a drug class. The signal of GI ulceration was detected only in crizotinib [ROR 1.23 (1.01-1.50); IC 0.29 (0.01-1.51)]. A statistically significant ROR and IC emerged for the site of the esophagus.  CONCLUSION : Overall, the pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS indicates slightly increased reporting of GI obstruction and perforation, which may cause severe or even fatal outcomes among ALK-TKIs users.

Clinical characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations and ALK&ROS1 fusions

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between clinical characteristics and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions, c-ros oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) gene fusions, and epidermic growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients to distinguish these different types.

METHODS

Both ALK, ROS1 gene rearrangements and EGFR mutations testing were performed. The clinical characteristics and associated pulmonary abnormalities were investigated.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-three NSCLC patients were included for analysis. One hundred seventy (37.5%), 32 (7.1%), and 9 cases (2.0%) with EGFR mutations, ALK gene fusions, and ROS1 gene fusions were identified, respectively. The EGFR-positive and ALK&ROS1-positive were more common in female (χ2  = 61.934, P < 0.001 and χ2  = 28.152, P < 0.001), non-smoking (χ2  = 59.315, P < 0.001 and χ2  = 11.080, P = 0.001), and adenocarcinoma (χ2  = 44.864, P < 0.001 and χ2  = 12.318, P = 0.002) patients; proportion of patients with emphysema was lower (χ2  = 35.494, P < 0.001 and χ2  = 15.770, P < 0.001) than the wild-type patients. The results of logistic regression analysis indicated that female (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.834, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.069-3.144, P = 0.028), non-smoking (adjusted OR 2.504, 95% CI 1.456-4.306, P = 0.001), lung adenocarcinoma (adjusted OR 4.512, 95% CI 2.465-8.260, P < 0.001), stage III-IV (adjusted OR 2.232, 95% CI 1.066-4.676, P = 0.033), and no symptoms of emphysema (adjusted OR 2.139, 95% CI 1.221-3.747, P = 0.008) were independent variables associated with EGFR mutations. Young (adjusted OR 3.947, 95% CI 1.873-8.314, P < 0.001) and lung adenocarcinoma (adjusted OR 2.950, 95% CI 0.998-8.719, P = 0.050) were associated with ALK/ROS1 fusions.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR mutations were more likely to occur in non-smoking, stage III-IV, and female patients with lung adenocarcinoma, whereas ALK&ROS1 gene fusions were more likely to occur in young patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Emphysema was less common in patients with EGFR mutations.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analyses From ALTA-1L: Model-Based Analyses Supporting the Brigatinib Dose in ALK-Positive NSCLC

The ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib in 1st Line (ALTA-1L) compared brigatinib versus crizotinib in ALK inhibitor-naive patients with ALK+ NSCLC. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was used to estimate brigatinib exposures for exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses in ALTA-1L. A previously developed population PK model for brigatinib was applied to estimate brigatinib PK parameters. Relationships between static (time-independent) and dynamic (time-varying) exposure metrics and efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS], objective response rate [ORR], and intracranial ORR) and safety outcomes (selected grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 adverse events) were evaluated using logistic regression and time-to-event analyses. There were no meaningful differences in brigatinib PK in the first-line and second-line settings, supporting use of the previous population PK model for the first-line population. Exposure-response analyses showed no significant effect of time-varying brigatinib exposure on PFS. Brigatinib exposure was not significantly related to ORR, but higher exposure was associated with higher intracranial ORR (odds ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.28; P = 0.049). Across the observed median exposure (5th-95th percentile) at steady state for 180 mg once daily, the predicted probability of intracranial ORR was 0.83 (0.58-0.99). Adverse events significantly associated with higher exposure were elevated lipase (grade ≥ 3) and amylase (grade ≥ 2). Time to first brigatinib dose reduction was not related to exposure. These results support the benefit-risk profile of first-line brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-day lead-in dose at 90 mg once daily) in patients with ALK+ NSCLC.

Clinical Impact of Switching to Ceritinib After Severe AEs Related to Crizotinib/Alectinib in a Novel PTH2R-ALK Fusion Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report

Lung cancer is still the leading cause of morbidity and mortality by cancer among men, according to the latest epidemiological data in China. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements act as key oncogenic drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have been identified in 5–6% of NSCLC. Although ALK inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) were proven to be more effective than chemotherapy in ALK-positive NSCLC patients and the safety profile of these drugs was favorable, novel ALK fusions NSCLC might discontinue or switch treatment because of adverse events (AEs) have rarely previously been reported. Here, we describe a male patient with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who carried a novel PTH2R-ALK fusion identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The patient first took crizotinib but switched to alectinib due to gastrointestinal AEs. Although alectinib remained effective on tumors, ceritinib (450 mg) was replaced after the AEs of hyperbilirubinemia occurred. After reducing the dose to 300mg, the diarrhea AEs caused by ceritinib were effectively relieved, and the patient obtained sustained clinical benefit with progression-free survival nearly 12 months. Our findings offer valuable information for the safety management of NSCLC patients with a novel PTH2R-ALK fusion treated by ALK-TKIs.

Safety of Surgery after Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

New drugs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy, have changed the prognosis in a subset of patients with advanced lung cancer, and are now actively investigated in a number of trials with neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens. However, no phase III randomized studies were published yet. The current narrative review proves that targeted therapies are safe in neoadjuvant approach. Unsurprisingly, administration of therapy is related to an acceptable toxicity profile. Severe adverse events’ rate that rarely compromises outcomes of patients with advanced lung cancer is not that commonly accepted in early lung cancer as it may lead to missing the chance of curative surgery. Among those complications, the most important factors that may limit the use of targeted therapies are severe respiratory adverse events precluding the resection occurring after treatment with some anaplastic lymphoma kinase and rarely after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. At this point, in the presented literature assessing the feasibility of neoadjuvant therapies with anaplastic lymphoma kinase and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, we did not find any unexpected intraoperative events that would be of special interest to a thoracic surgeon. Moreover, the postoperative course was associated with typical rate of complications.

Brigatinib Dose Rationale in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Exposure-Response Analyses of Pivotal ALTA Study

Brigatinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive non‐small cell lung cancer who progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. Approval was based on results from a randomized, dose‐ranging phase II study (ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113 (ALTA)). Despite an apparent dose–response relationship for efficacy in ALTA, an exposure–response relationship was not discernable using static models driven by time‐averaged exposure. However, exposure–response modeling using daily time‐varying area under the concentration curve as the predictor in time‐to‐event models predicted that increasing the dose of brigatinib (range, 30 mg once daily (q.d.) to 240 mg q.d.) would result in clinically meaningful improvements in progression‐free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS, and overall survival. Grade ≥ 2 rash and amylase elevation were predicted to significantly increase with brigatinib exposure. These results provided support for a favorable benefit‐risk profile with the approved dosing regimen (180 mg q.d. with 7‐day lead‐in at 90 mg) versus 90 mg q.d.

Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Therapies Including Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Molecular targeted therapy has greatly advanced the field of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for the majority of lung cancers. Indeed, gefitinib, which was the first molecular targeted therapeutic agent, has actually doubled the survival time of NSCLC patients. Vigorous efforts of clinicians and researchers have revealed that lung cancer develops through the activating mutations of many driver genes including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), and rearranged during transfection (RET) genes. Although ALK, ROS1, and RET are rare genetic abnormalities, corresponding tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can exert dramatic therapeutic effects. In addition to anticancer drugs targeting driver genes, bevacizumab specifically binds to human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and blocks the VEGF signaling pathway. The VEGF signal blockade suppresses angiogenesis in tumor tissues and inhibits tumor growth. In this review, we also explore immunotherapy, which is a promising new NSCLC treatment approach. In general, antitumor immune responses are suppressed in cancer patients, and cancer cells escape from the immune surveillance mechanism. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that target the primary escape mechanisms, immune checkpoints. Patients who respond to ICIs are reported to experience longlasting therapeutic effects. A wide range of clinical approaches, including combination therapy involving chemotherapy or radiation plus adjuvant therapy, are being developed.

Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Ceritinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatments for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China

INTRODUCTION

A trial-based assessment was completed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase.

METHODS

Based on the disease situation of advanced NSCLC, a Markov model was constructed to estimate the costs and benefits of ceritinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. The cost information and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. The stability of the model was verified by sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The base case analysis results indicated that compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, ceritinib therapy would increase benefits in a 5-, 10- and 15-year time horizon, with extra costs of $230,661.61, $149,321.52 and $136,414.43 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. The most sensitive parameter in the model analysis was the cost of ceritinib. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that at the current price of ceritinib, the chance of ceritinib being cost-effective was 0 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $27,142.85 per quality-adjusted life-year (three times the per capita gross domestic product of China).

CONCLUSION

As a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ceritinib is unlikely to be cost-effective at the current price from the Chinese healthcare perspective. To meet the treatment demands of patients, it may be a better option to reduce the price or provide appropriate drug assistance policies.

A Radiologist's Guide to the Changing Treatment Paradigm of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The ASCO 2018 Molecular Testing Guidelines and Targeted Therapies

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to provide an imaging-based guide of the modern genomic classifications and targeted therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an emphasis on the relevance of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology molecular testing guidelines for radiologists. CONCLUSION. Knowledge of the radiologic relevance of lung cancer driver mutations and modern targeted agents is essential for imaging interpretation of advanced NSCLC in the modern age of precision medicine.

Meta-analysis comparing incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia with ALK inhibitors and chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: This meta-analysis compared incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia with ALK inhibitors versus chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials & methods: PubMed/MEDLINE was searched to identify Phase II and III randomized clinical trials published up to 25 October 2018. Summary incidence, relative risk and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated for grade 3-4 neutropenia. Results: Five randomized clinical trials were included. Relative risk (95% CI) of developing grade 3-4 neutropenia with ALK inhibitor versus chemotherapy was 0.27 (0.07-1.06). Probabilities of developing grade 3-4 neutropenia were 6.56 and 14.19%, respectively; no significant difference was found. Conclusion: In patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia with ALK-targeted therapy is not significantly different compared with chemotherapy.

First-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement: state of the art and future development

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 5% of all diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbor a genetic rearrangement between the ALK and EML4 genes, representing a specific molecular, histological and clinical subgroup (ALK+ NSCLC). To date, upfront treatment with ALK-tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) has replaced chemotherapy in the first line setting for this subset of patients with excellent results. However, all treated patients eventually develop acquired resistance mechanisms to these agents (mainly resistance mutations) and experience progression of the disease. Areas covered: This paper provides a comprehensive state-of-the-art review about first-line approved ALK-TKIs, furthermore, it discusses the most promising ALK-TKIs under development designed to overcome resistance mutations and their implications. Expert opinion: Alectinib should currently be regarded as the standard of care for the first-line treatment of ALK+ NSCLC, considering its superior efficacy and safety profile. Regarding developing agents, lorlatinib and ensartinib appear to be the most promising ones, even though the data from their trials are still immature.

Ceritinib Alone for Crizotinib-naive Versus Crizotinib-pretreated for Management of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-rearrangement Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Ceritinib shows a promising efficacy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangement non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present systematic review determined the whole body and intracranial effectiveness and safety of ceritinib in crizotinib-naive versus crizotinib-pretreated regimens in ALK-rearrangement NSCLC. A comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and COCHRANE, was performed to identify clinical trials in English-language journals. We estimated the pooled progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) for ceritinib in whole body and intracranial responses to find differences between crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated regimens. The intracranial disease control rate in both crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated regimens was also estimated. The pooled efficacy parameters were as follows: ORR, 56.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.6%-60.1%); PFS, 8.26 months (95% CI, 6.18-11.07 months); intracranial ORR, 41.3% (95% CI, 35.3%-47.6%); and intracranial disease control rate, 79.8% (95% CI, 73.8%-84.7%). The pooled ceritinib for crizotinib-naive showed a trend toward greater ORR and longer PFS compared with ceritinib for crizotinib-pretreated (68.9% and 14.62 months vs. 48.2% and 6.32 months, respectively). The intracranial ORR for ceritinib as the initial regimen was 50.6% compared with 33.6% for crizotinib-pretreated. The discontinuation and dose reduction rates were 3.1% and 38.4%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse effects were increased alanine aminotransferase (25.5%), increased γ-glutamyltransferase (12.6%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (11.1%). Ceritinib is an effective agent for both crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Ceritinib has significant activity in crizotinib-naive patients with brain metastases.

Treating ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Targeting genomic alterations, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements, have radically changed the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the case of ALK-rearranged gene, subsequent rapid development of effective genotype-directed therapies with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) triggered major advances in the personalized molecularly based approach of NSCLC. Crizotinib was the first-in-class ALK TKI with proven superiority over standard platinum-based chemotherapy for the 1st-line therapy of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients. However, the acquired resistance to crizotinib and its diminished efficacy to the central nervous system (CNS) relapse led to the development of several novel ALK inhibitors, more potent and with different selectivity compared to crizotinib. To date, four ALK TKIs, crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib and brigatinib have received approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and even more agents are currently under investigation for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. However, the optimal frontline approach and the exact sequence of ALK inhibitors are still under consideration. Recently announced results of phase III trials recognized higher efficacy of alectinib compared to crizotinib in first-line setting, even in patients with CNS involvement. In this review, we will discuss the current knowledge regarding the biology of the ALK-positive NSCLC, the available therapeutic inhibitors and we will focus on the raised issues from their use in clinical practise.

Expression and copy number gains of the RET gene in 631 early and mid stage non-small cell lung cancer cases

Background

To identify whether RET is a potential target for NSCLC treatment, we examined the status of the RET gene in 631 early and mid stage NSCLC cases from south central China.

Methods

RET expression was identified by Western blot. RET‐positive expression samples were verified by immunohistochemistry. RET gene mutation, copy number variation, and rearrangement were analyzed by DNA Sanger sequencing, TaqMan copy number assays, and reverse transcription‐PCR. ALK and ROS1 expression levels were tested by Western blot and EGFR mutation using Sanger sequencing.

Results

The RET‐positive rate was 2.5% (16/631). RET‐positive expression was related to poorer tumor differentiation (P < 0.05). In the 16 RET‐positive samples, only two samples of moderately and poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinomas displayed RET rearrangement, both in RET‐KIF5B fusion partners. Neither ALK nor ROS1 translocation was found. The EGFR mutation rate in RET‐positive samples was significantly lower than in RET‐negative samples (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

RET‐positive expression in early and mid stage NSCLC cases from south central China is relatively low and is related to poorer tumor differentiation. RET gene alterations (copy number gain and rearrangement) exist in all RET‐positive samples. RET‐positive expression is a relatively independent factor in NSCLC patients, which indicates that the RET gene may be a novel target site for personalized treatment of NSCLC.

The function and therapeutic targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death by cancer in North America. A decade ago, genomic rearrangements in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) receptor tyrosine kinase were identified in a subset of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. Soon after, crizotinib, a small molecule ATP-competitive ALK inhibitor was proven to be more effective than chemotherapy in ALK-positive NSCLC patients. Crizotinib and two other ATP-competitive ALK inhibitors, ceritinib and alectinib, are approved for use as a first-line therapy in these patients, where ALK rearrangement is currently diagnosed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. The clinical success of these three ALK inhibitors has led to the development of next-generation ALK inhibitors with even greater potency and selectivity. However, patients inevitably develop resistance to ALK inhibitors leading to tumor relapse that commonly manifests in the form of brain metastasis. Several new approaches aim to overcome the various mechanisms of resistance that develop in ALK-positive NSCLC including the knowledge-based alternate and successive use of different ALK inhibitors, as well as combined therapies targeting ALK plus alternative signaling pathways. Key issues to resolve for the optimal implementation of established and emerging treatment modalities for ALK-rearranged NSCLC therapy include the high cost of the targeted inhibitors and the potential of exacerbated toxicities with combination therapies.

Ceritinib compassionate use for patients with crizotinib-refractory, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: Ceritinib was evaluated within a compassionate use program of Italian patients. Patients & methods: 70 patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive crizotinib-refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received ceritinib. Results: Overall response was 40.6%, median progression-free survival was 8.2 months and median survival was 15.5 months. Dose reduction due to treatment-related adverse events occurred in 50.8% of patients starting at 750 mg/day. No significantly different progression-free survival was observed between patients who underwent any time dose reduction (n = 38) versus those who remained on the recommended dose of 750 mg/day (n = 32; p = 0.07). Conclusion: The efficacy of ceritinib compassionate use program resembled that of clinical trials. Dose reductions and adjustments did not appear to negatively affect clinical outcome.