Curative resection by splenectomy for solitary splenic metastasis from early gastric cancer: a case report and literature review

Minimally Invasive Conversion Surgery for Unresectable Gastric Cancer with Splenic Metastasis and Splenic Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Case Report

While the importance of conversion surgery has increased with the development of systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC), reports of conversion surgery for patients with GC with distant metastasis and tumor thrombus are extremely scarce, and a definitive surgical strategy has yet to be established. Herein, we report a 67-year-old man with left abdominal pain referred to our hospital following a diagnosis of unresectable GC. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed advanced GC with splenic metastasis. A splenic vein tumor thrombus (SVTT) and a continuous thrombus to the main trunk of the portal vein were detected. The patient was treated with anticoagulation therapy and systemic chemotherapy comprising S-1 and oxaliplatin. One year following chemotherapy initiation, a CT scan revealed progressive disease (PD); therefore, the chemotherapy regimen was switched to ramucirumab with paclitaxel. After 10 courses of chemotherapy resulting in primary tumor and SVTT shrinkage, the patient underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and distal pancreaticosplenectomy (DPS). He was discharged without complications and remained alive 6 months postoperatively without recurrence. In summary, the wait-and-see approach was effective in a patient with GC with splenic metastasis and SVTT, ultimately leading to an R0 resection performed via LTG and DPS.

[Spleen biopsy: "pros and cons" or better "when and when not?"]

Due to the relatively high complication rate, the necessity of a spleen biopsy is controversially discussed. In establishing its indication, the clinical background and performed diagnostics must be considered. Based on the medical history, imaging procedures and sonographic course, different clinical scenarios are conceivable. The aim of this review is to describe the indications of splenic biopsy considering various clinical scenarios.

A Case of Peritoneal Dissemination and Splenic Metastasis after Gastric Cancer Surgery That Could Be Controlled with Multidisciplinary Treatment

Splenic metastasis is known to occur at the terminal stage of cancer. While peritoneal dissemination is the most frequent recurrence of gastric cancer, metastasis to the spleen from gastric cancer is very rare. Splenectomy is currently the most effective probable treatment for solitary splenic metastasis of gastric cancer; it provides a good patient prognosis. However, careful consideration of surgical indications is required, as splenic metastasis is typically accompanied by multi-organ metastasis and dissemination. One of the main cancer treatment methods is the “wait-and-see” approach using chemotherapy. In general, patients with gastric cancer are treated with systemic chemotherapy for distant metastases including peritoneal dissemination. Radiotherapy is not commonly used to prolong life in patients with gastric cancer as gastric cancer is predominantly adenocarcinoma. However, a recent report indicated that chemo-radiotherapy was performed successfully for unresectable gastric cancer, including peritoneal dissemination. Here, we present the case of a 67-year-old patient who was observed to have peritoneal dissemination and splenic metastasis after gastric cancer surgery. Once the peritoneal dissemination was localized, surgical excision and chemo-radiotherapy were performed. We treated the splenic metastasis with the “wait-and-see” strategy with chemotherapy. A complete response on imaging in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was achieved using multidisciplinary treatment. Our strategy of intensive multidisciplinary therapy could be a treatment option for cases with peritoneal dissemination or splenic metastasis of gastric cancer.

A case of long-term survival after splenectomy for solitary splenic metastasis from gastric cancer

Background

Very rarely does a splenic solitary metastasis arise from a gastric carcinoma because splenic metastasis is usually seen in association with widespread visceral metastasis. Splenectomy is considered to be a curative treatment; however, long-term prognosis after splenectomy has scarcely been reported. We report a case of a metachronous and solitary metastasis to the spleen from gastric cancer in which the patient achieved 5-year recurrence-free survival after splenectomy.

Case presentation

An 84-year-old man underwent an open total gastrectomy involving D1+ lymph nodes dissection for gastric cancer located in the cardia (pT3N1M0, pStage IIB). Eighteen months later, a 2-cm solitary hypodense lesion was detected in the spleen by computed tomography (CT). Twenty-three months later, the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) value elevated to 19.9 ng/ml, and abdominal CT revealed an increase in tumor size to 5 cm. Positron-emission tomography (PET)-CT revealed intense ¹⁸F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-glucose (FDG) uptake in the spleen without the involvement of other organs and lymph nodes. We diagnosed him with solitary splenic metastasis from gastric cancer and performed a splenectomy 26 months after the first surgery. Histological examination revealed that the splenic tumor was a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, which was very similar to the primary gastric tumor; the lesion was diagnosed as a metastatic tumor from the previous gastric carcinoma. The patient remains healthy to date without recurrence, 5 years after the splenectomy.

Conclusion

We experienced a case of a solitary splenic metastasis from gastric cancer in which 5-year recurrence-free survival was achieved after splenectomy. To determine the surgical indication in patients with splenic metastasis, it is important to differentiate between a solitary lesion or multiple metastasis. Especially, occult metastasis should be excluded by means of several months of follow-up with imaging tests and systemic FDG-PET surveys before splenectomy.

Splenic sarcoid reaction mimicking metachronous metastasis in patients after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a case report and literature review

Background

The occurrence of sarcoid reactions has been recognized in various cancers. The common location for observing these granulomas is mainly the lymph nodes, but a rare occurrence in the spleen has been reported.

Almost all splenic sarcoid reactions associated with gastric cancer have been resected synchronously and diagnosed accidentally, and a rare metachronous occurrence of a sarcoid reaction in the spleen after distal gastrectomy can mimic cancer metastasis. We describe a rare case of a splenic sarcoid reaction recognized in a patient with gastric cancer 6 months after distal gastrectomy.

Case presentation

An 82-year-old man underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (T3N0M0, stage IIA). Six months after gastrectomy, CT and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT showed the appearance of a splenic mass. We diagnosed solitary splenic metastasis from gastric cancer and performed laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy. His splenic tumor was diagnosed as a sarcoid reaction by histopathological examination.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a splenic sarcoid reaction recognized 6 months after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer without any chemotherapy. The splenic sarcoid reaction and cancer metastasis to the spleen were undistinguishable from the CT and FDG-PET/CT findings. The present case and literature review showed that cases of splenic sarcoid reactions associated with gastric cancer can also be accompanied by the occurrence of these granulomas in lymph nodes. When the appearance of a solitary mass is observed in the spleen after resection of primary cancer, it is necessary to consider not only cancer metastasis but also sarcoid reactions. Retrospective histopathological confirmation of the existence of sarcoid reactions in lymph nodes from resected specimens might possibly avoid incorrect diagnosis and intervention.

Do we CARE about the quality of case reports? A systematic assessment

BACKGROUND

Clinical case reports are important sources of information on the identification and treatment of new or rare diseases. The CAse REport (CARE) Statement and Checklist represents consensus-based guidelines for clinical case reports. How well case reports adhere to these guidelines is unknown.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic PubMed and OVID search was used to identify case reports on isolated splenic metastasis from 2007 to 2017 in English language journals. MeSH search terms included "(isolated splenic metastasis OR solitary splenic metastasis) AND case report." We retrieved 79 articles and 55 directly addressed the topic of interest. Each was scored dichotomously using the 13 categories with 36 item descriptors on the CARE checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 55 case reports, none fully followed the CARE guidelines; only 56.4% met 23 descriptors and none had more than 29 of 36 descriptors. Patient symptoms were not described in 40.0%, and in 47.3%, the abstract did not identify the main outcomes. All reports included patient's age and diagnostic methods. Most case reports reported the type of intervention (96.4%) and effect of the intervention (96.4%). None included patient-assessed outcomes or the patient's perspective. Only 49.1% included strengths and limitations of patient management, stating that the most effective treatment is unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the case reports on isolated splenic metastasis completely followed the CARE guidelines. Most reports did cover diagnostic workup and therapeutic interventions and gave a summary of the literature. Higher quality case reports would be useful in facilitating recognition of rare disease processes and informing clinical practice.