BiClamp® vessel-sealing device for open hepatic resection of malignant and benign liver tumours: a single-institution experience

A novel internal cold circulation radiofrequency-assisted device for liver transection

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new internal cold circulation bipolar radiofrequency compared with Habib-4X bipolar radiofrequency device in the resection of liver tumors.

METHODS

A total of 85 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received radiofrequency-assisted liver resection from February 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively enrolled in our study, in which 45 patients received the new internal cold circulation bipolar radiofrequency (New-RF) and 40 patients received Habib-4X bipolar radiofrequency (Habib-4X). Primary outcome measures were the speed of liver transection, the width of coagulation tissue, hemorrhage volume, blood transfusion rate, and operation time.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of patients in the New-RF and Habib-4X groups had no significant difference (p > 0.05). Compared to Habib-4X, the New-RF had a faster average speed of liver transection (4.81 ± 1.20 cm²/min vs 3.64 ± 1.08 cm²/min, p < 0.001), a narrower width of coagulation tissue (1.42 ± 0.23 cm² vs 1.81 ± 0.20 cm², p < 0.001), a less operation time (55.04 ± 16.12 min vs 64.02 ± 15.09 min, p = 0.010), a lower rate of needle path bleeding (13.3% vs 35.0%, p = 0.019), and a lower carbonization rate of electrode needle (22.2% vs 77.8%, p < 0.001). Hemorrhage during the transection (85.0 ml vs 105.0 ml, p = 0.438) and hemorrhage per square centimeter (3.28 ± 0.86 ml/cm² vs 3.60 ± 1.12 ml/cm², p = 0.141) in the New-RF group were smaller than those in Habib-4X group with no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

The new internal cold circulation bipolar radiofrequency was a safe and efficacious auxiliary device for liver resection with a faster speed of resection, lower carbonization rate of electrode needle, and more precise range of coagulation.

Snip-electrocoagulation technique versus clamp-crashing technique for parenchyma transection in liver resection: a pilot study

Background

Nowadays, much effort has been made to optimize the technique for liver parenchyma transection to reduce intrasurgical hemorrhage and complications. Here we intent to introduce a novel method for sharp liver parenchyma transection using scissors and bipolar electrocoagulator (named the snip-electrocoagulation technique, SET) and compare it with the classical clamp-crushing technique (CCT).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 98 patients were divided into either the SET group or the CCT group. The total inflow occlusion time, total surgery time, intrasurgical blood loss and transfusion, morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and the narrowest tumor-free margins were compared.

Results

Background characteristics in the two groups were comparable, and the differences of total inflow occlusion time (median 25 vs. 27 minutes), total surgery time (median 182.5 vs. 190 minutes), blood transfusion amount (median value 0 in both groups), postoperative hospital stay (median 7 vs. 8 days), and overall complication rate (16% vs. 31.2%, P>0.05) were not statistically significant. However, the SET group yielded less intrasurgical blood loss (median 200 vs. 300 mL), and better tumor-free margins (13.69±2.99 vs. 10.76±3.31 mm; mean ± SD; P<0.05).

Conclusions

SET is a safe method for sharp parenchyma transection in liver resection when compared with the classical CCT, considering the similar morbidity and mortality, along with the decreased intrasurgical blood loss. More importantly, SET can be adopted when the tumors are located close to the intrahepatic vessels and the tumor-free margins are expected to be limited.