Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume

Novel simulation for dosimetry impact of diaphragm respiratory motion in four-dimensional volumetric modulated arc therapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The diaphragm respiratory motion (RM) could impact the target dose robustness in the lower esophageal cancer (EC). We aimed to develop a framework evaluating the impact of different RM patterns quantitatively in one patient, by creating virtual four-dimensional computed-tomography (v4DCT) images, which could lead to tailored treatment for the breathing pattern. We validated virtual 4D radiotherapy (v4DRT) along with exploring the acceptability of free-breathing volumetric modulated arc therapy (FB-VMAT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We assessed 10 patients with superficial EC through their real 4DCT (r4DCT) scans. v4DCT images were derived from the end-inhalation computed tomography (CT) image (reference CT) and the v4DRT dose was accumulated dose over all phases. r4DRT diaphragm shifts were applied with magnitudes derived from r4DCT scans; clinical target volume (CTV) dose of v4DRT was compared with that of r4DRT to validate v4DRT. CTV dosage modifications and planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins of the spinal cord were examined with the diaphragm movement. The percentage dose differences (ΔDx) were determined between the v4DRT and the dose calculated on the reference CT image.

RESULTS

The CTV ΔDx between the r4DRT and v4DRT were within 1% in cases with RM ≦ 15 mm. The average ΔD100% and ΔDmean of the CTV ranging from 5 to 15 mm of diaphragm motion was 0.3% to 1.7% and 0.1% to 0.4%, respectively. All CTV index changes were within 3% and ΔD1cc and ΔD2cc of Cord PRV were within 1%.

CONCLUSION

We postulate a novel method for evaluating the CTV robustness, comparable to the conventional r4DCT method under the diaphragm RM ≦ 15 mm permitting an impact of within 3% in FB-VMAT for EC on the CTV dose distribution.

18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Gastrointestinal malignancies encompass a variety of primary tumor sites, each with different staging criteria and treatment approaches. In this review we discuss technical aspects of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning to optimize information from both the PET and computed tomography components. Specific applications for 18F-FDG-PET/CT are summarized for initial staging and follow-up of the major disease sites, including esophagus, stomach, hepatobiliary system, pancreas, colon, rectum, and anus.

Motion-compensated FDG PET/CT for oesophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Respiratory-induced motion of oesophageal tumours and lymph nodes can influence positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The aim was to compare standard three-dimensional (3D) and motion-compensated PET/CT regarding standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and detection of lymph node metastases.

METHODS

This prospective observational study (NCT02424864) included 37 newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer patients. Diagnostic PET/CT was reconstructed in 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. MTVs of the primary tumour were calculated using an automated region-growing algorithm with SUV thresholds of 2.5 (MTV2.5) and ≥ 50% of SUVmax (MTV50%). Blinded for reconstruction method, a nuclear medicine physician assessed all lymph nodes showing ¹⁸F‑fluorodeoxyglucose uptake for their degree of suspicion.

RESULTS

The mean (95% CI) SUVmax of the primary tumour was 13.1 (10.6-15.5) versus 13.0 (10.4-15.6) for 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT, respectively. MTVs were also similar between the two techniques. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences between both measurements (95% limits of agreement) of 0.08 (-3.60-3.75), -0.26 (-2.34-1.82), 4.66 (-29.61-38.92) cm³ and -0.95 (-19.9-18.0) cm³ for tumour SUVmax, lymph node SUVmax, MTV2.5 and MTV50%, respectively. Lymph nodes were classified as highly suspicious (30/34 nodes), suspicious (20/22) and dubious (66/59) for metastases on 3D/motion-compensated PET/CT. No additional lymph node metastases were found on motion-compensated PET/CT. SUVmax of the most intense lymph nodes was similar for both scans: mean (95% CI) 6.6 (4.3-8.8) and 6.8 (4.5-9.1) for 3D and motion-compensated, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SUVmax of the primary oesophageal tumour and lymph nodes was comparable on 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. The use of motion-compensated PET/CT did not improve lymph node detection.

PET and MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy: Rational, feasibility and benefit

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) corresponds to various replanning strategies aiming to correct for anatomical variations occurring during the course of radiotherapy. The goal of the article was to report the rational, feasibility and benefit of using PET and/or MRI to guide this ART strategy in various tumor localizations. The anatomical modifications defined by scanner taking into account tumour mobility and volume variation are not always sufficient to optimise treatment. The contribution of functional imaging by PET or the precision of soft tissue by MRI makes it possible to consider optimized ART. Today, the most important data for both PET and MRI are for lung, head and neck, cervical and prostate cancers. PET and MRI guided ART appears feasible and safe, however in a very limited clinical experience. Phase I/II studies should be therefore performed, before proposing cost-effectiveness comparisons in randomized trials and before using the approach in routine practice.

Positron emission tomography with computed tomography imaging (PET/CT) for the radiotherapy planning definition of the biological target volume: PART 1

AIM

Functional and molecular imaging, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography imaging (PET/CT) is increasing for radiotherapy (RT) definition of the target volume. This expert review summarizes existing data of functional imaging modalities and RT management, in terms of target volume delineation, for the following anatomical districts: brain (for primary and secondary tumors), head/neck and lung.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A collection of available published data was made, by PubMed a search. Only original articles were carefully and critically revised.

RESULTS

For primary and secondary brain tumors, amino acid PET radiotracers could be useful to identify microscopic residual areas and to differ between recurrence and treatment-related alterations in case of re-irradiation. As for head and neck neoplasms may benefit from precise PET/CT-based target delineation, due to the major capability to identify high-risk RT areas. In primary and secondary lung cancer, PET/CT could be useful both to delimit a tumor and collapsed lungs and as a predictive parameter of treatment response.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, molecular and functional imaging approaches offer a major step to individualize radiotherapeutic care going forward. Nevertheless, several uncertainties remain on the standard method to properly assess the target volume definition including PET information for primary and secondary brain tumors.

PET imaging in adaptive radiotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the multimodality treatment of several gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Positron-emission tomography (PET) has an established role in the diagnosis, response assessment and (re-)staging of these tumors. Nevertheless, the value of PET in adaptive radiotherapy remains unclear. This review focuses on the role of PET in adaptive radiotherapy, i.e. during the treatment course and in the delineation process.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The MEDLINE database was searched for the terms ("Radiotherapy"[Mesh] AND "Positron-Emission Tomography"[Mesh] AND one of the site-specific keywords, yielding a total of 1710 articles. After abstract selection, 27 papers were identified for esophageal neoplasms, 1 for gastric neoplasms, 9 for pancreatic neoplasms, 6 for liver neoplasms, 1 for biliary tract neoplasms, none for colonic neoplasms, 15 for rectal neoplasms and 12 for anus neoplasms.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The use of PET for truly adaptive radiotherapy during treatment for GI tumors has barely been investigated, in contrast to the potential of the PET-defined metabolic tumor volume for optimization of the target volume. The optimized target definition seems useful for treatment individualization such as focal boosting strategies in esophageal, pancreatic and anorectal cancer. Nevertheless, for all GI tumors, further investigation is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, too little data are available to conclude on the role of PET imaging during radiotherapy for ART strategies in GI cancer. On the other hand, based on the available evidence, the use of biological imaging for target volume adaptation seems promising and could pave the road towards individualized treatment strategies.