1
|
Methasate A, Parakonthun T, Intralawan T, Nampoolsuksan C, Swangsri J. Impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on gastric cancer survival: Peritoneal metastasis and cytology perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:840-847. [PMID: 39071459 PMCID: PMC11271738 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer presenting with peritoneal metastasis is notably associated with diminished survival prospects. The use of cytoreductive surgery in conjunction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to increase survival rates in these patients. Despite these advancements, debates persist regarding the magnitude of survival improvement attributed to this treatment modality. The present investigation examined survival outcomes following HIPEC in individuals diagnosed with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis, and it took a comparative analysis of patients exhibiting positive and negative cytological findings. AIM To compare the impact of HIPEC on survival in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and positive or negative cytology. METHODS Between April 2013 and March 2020, 84 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated at our institution were categorized into three cohorts: HIPEC (20 patients with peritoneal metastasis), cytology-positive (23 patients without peritoneal nodules but with positive wash cytology), and cytology-negative (41 patients with advanced gastric cancer, no peritoneal nodules, and negative wash cytology). The HIPEC cohort underwent gastrectomy with HIPEC, while the cytology-positive and cytology-negative groups received gastrectomy alone. The demographic, pathological, and survival data of the groups were compared. RESULTS The HIPEC cohort-predominantly younger females-exhibited relatively extended surgical durations and high blood loss. Nevertheless, the complication rates were consistent across all three groups. Median survival in the HIPEC group was 20.00 ± 4.89 months, with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates of 73.90%, 28.70%, and 9.60%, respectively. These figures paralleled the survival rates of the cytology-positive group (52.20% at 1 year, 28.50% at 2 years, and 19.00% at 3 years). Notably, 47% of patients experienced peritoneal recurrence. CONCLUSION HIPEC may offer a modest improvement in short-term survival for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis, mirroring the outcomes in cytology-positive patients. However, peritoneal recurrence remained high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asada Methasate
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
- Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Thammawat Parakonthun
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
- Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Thita Intralawan
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Chawisa Nampoolsuksan
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
- Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Jirawat Swangsri
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
- Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Langellotti L, Fiorillo C, D’Annibale G, Panza E, Pacelli F, Alfieri S, Di Giorgio A, Santullo F. Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) + HIPEC in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1929. [PMID: 38792007 PMCID: PMC11119026 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of deadliest metastatic patterns of gastric cancer, being associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Up to now, palliative systemic chemotherapy (pSC) has been the only recommended treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate a potential survival benefit after CRS + HIPEC compared to pSC. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in March 2024. Manuscripts reporting patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with CRS + HIPEC were included. A meta-analysis was performed, comparing the survival results between the CRS + HIPEC and pSC groups, and the primary outcome was the comparison in terms of OS. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs). We assessed heterogeneity using the Q2 statistic. RESULTS Out of the 24 papers included, 1369 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC, with a median OS range of 9.8-28.2 months; and 103 patients underwent pSC, with a median OS range of 4.9-8 months. CRS + HIPEC was associated with significantly increased survival compared to palliative systemic chemotherapy (-1.8954 (95% CI: -2.5761 to -1.2146; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CRS + HIPEC could provide survival advantages in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis compared to pSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lodovica Langellotti
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio D’Annibale
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Edoardo Panza
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
- Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.S.)
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.S.)
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harada K, Yamashita K, Iwatsuki M, Baba H, Ajani JA. Intraperitoneal therapy for gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:43-49. [PMID: 35184625 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2044790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Multidisciplinary therapies are used in its treatment, but the prognosis for GAC patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) remains poor and there is no effective established approach. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the results of recent clinical studies and recent advances in the management, including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. In this review, keywords were searched in combination with 'peritoneal carcinomatosis' and 'gastric cancer' in PubMed, and then studies that evaluated peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with gastric cancer were identified through reading them. Several studies were quoted at second hand. Despite recent advances in therapeutic approaches such as systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, debulking surgery, thermal hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and best supportive therapy, further studies are necessary. This review also summarizes molecular biology of GAC patients with PM. EXPERT OPINION Each modality is advancing and some have shown therapeutic effects, but none have become standard treatments that exhibit remarkable effects. To improve the prognosis of GAC patients with PM, large-scale clinical trials and further basic research are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Harada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kohei Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Masaaki Iwatsuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazurek M, Szlendak M, Forma A, Baj J, Maciejewski R, Roviello G, Marano L, Roviello F, Polom K, Sitarz R. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19020681. [PMID: 35055500 PMCID: PMC8776178 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis tend to achieve poor clinical outcomes. Until recently, the treatment options were limited mainly to either palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy in exceptional cases. Currently, these patients benefit from multimodal treatment, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite good overall results, this treatment modality is still widely debated. The following study is designed to assess the papers about the possible application and utility of HIPEC in GC. A search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed to assess the papers devoted to the role of HIPEC in GC treatment; a literature search was performed until March 21st; and, finally, 50 studies with a total number of 3946 patients were analyzed. According to the most recent data, it seems to be reasonable to limit the duration of HIPEC to the shortest effective time. Moreover, the drugs used in HIPEC need to have equal concentrations and the same solvent. Perioperative chemotherapy needs to be reported in detail and, furthermore, the term “morbidity” should be defined more clearly by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Mazurek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Voivodship Hospital in Siedlce, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Szlendak
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Alicja Forma
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Jacek Baj
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | - Ryszard Maciejewski
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | | | - Luigi Marano
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Karol Polom
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-070 Gdansk, Poland;
| | - Robert Sitarz
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gronau F, Jara M, Feldbrügge L, Wolf V, Oeff A, Rau B. [Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer]. Chirurg 2021; 92:522-527. [PMID: 33620502 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01371-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Developed multimodal treatment concepts, which include a combination of perioperative systemic treatment and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), show promising results with respect to improvement of the long-term survival. METHODS This article contains a review of the literature of published studies on the topic of gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis. RESULTS The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis shows an extremely limited median survival of 7 months under palliative second-line systemic treatment. The median survival time increased to 12 months with cytoreductive surgery and in combination with HIPEC showed a positive effect on survival in individual studies. EXPERT OPINION Treatment recommendations for patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer should be carried out by experts in surgical reference centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Gronau
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Jara
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Linda Feldbrügge
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Vincent Wolf
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Alan Oeff
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Beate Rau
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland. .,Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Feldbrügge L, Wolf V, Gronau F, Oeff A, Alevizopoulos AE, Jara M, Rau B. Behandlung des peritoneal metastasierten Magenkarzinoms. DER ONKOLOGE 2020; 26:945-950. [DOI: 10.1007/s00761-020-00804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
7
|
Guner A, Yildirim R. Surgical management of metastatic gastric cancer: moving beyond the guidelines. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:58. [PMID: 31559339 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.08.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite decreasing incidence, gastric cancer remains a major health problem worldwide and is associated with poor survival. The poor survival is mainly attributed to delayed presentation which may cause local or systemic metastases. The standard of care for patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) is palliative chemotherapy with best supportive care. Although the survival has improved owing to advances in chemotherapeutic agents, it is still unsatisfactory, and some perspective changes are needed in the management of MGC to improve the outcomes. Therefore, various alternative treatment strategies for MGC have formed the most important research topics. Liver-directed treatment (LDT) options such as liver resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have been studied in the management of liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC). Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) in addition to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) aiming to remove all macroscopic tumor focus resulting from peritoneal dissemination is the treatment option for peritoneal metastasis, while para-aortic lymph node dissection is the treatment option for para-aortic lymph node metastasis which is considered to be M1 disease. Conversion surgery is a novel concept aiming at R0 resection for originally unresectable or marginally resectable tumors after a remarkably good response to the chemotherapy. Large amounts of data in the literature have demonstrated the benefits of individualized approaches such as the combination of systemic and local treatment options in selected patient groups. In this review, we aimed to explore the current and future treatment options by reviewing the literature on this controversial topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Guner
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.,Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Institute of Medical Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Reyyan Yildirim
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|