1
|
Shi Y, Han X, Zhao Q, Zheng Y, Chen J, Yu X, Fang J, Liu Y, Huang D, Liu T, Shen H, Luo S, Yu H, Cao Y, Zhang X, Hu P. Tunlametinib (HL-085) plus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors: an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase I study. Exp Hematol Oncol 2024; 13:60. [PMID: 38867257 PMCID: PMC11167782 DOI: 10.1186/s40164-024-00528-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tunlametinib (HL-085) is a novel, highly selective MEK inhibitor with substantial clinical activities in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. This phase I study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of tunlametinib plus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. METHODS Patients with confirmed advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors who had progressed on or shown intolerance or no available standard therapies were enrolled and received tunlametinib plus vemurafenib. This study consisted of a dose-escalation phase and a dose-expansion phase. Primary end points of this study were safety, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS From August 17, 2018 to April 19, 2022, 72 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The RP2D for BRAF V600-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was tunlametinib 9 mg plus vemurafenib 720 mg, twice daily (BID, bis in die). Until the data cut-off date of December 15, 2023, of 33 NSCLC patients with evaluable disease, the objective response rate (ORR) was 60.6% (20/33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42.1-77.1), the median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6-14.5) and median duration of response (DoR) was 11.3 months (95%CI, 6.8-NE). At the RP2D, ORR was 60.0% (9/15; 95% CI, 32.3-83.7), the median PFS was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6 -NE) and median DoR was 11.3 months (95%CI, 3.9-NE). Of 24 colorectal cancer patients with evaluable disease, the ORR was 25.0% (6/24; 95% CI, 5.6-NE). All 72 patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and the most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were anemia (n = 13, 18.1%) and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (n = 10, 13.9%). Tunlametinib was absorbed rapidly with Tmax of 0.5-1 h. Vemurafeinib did not influence the system exposure of tunlametinib and vice versa, indicating no drug-drug interaction for this combination. CONCLUSIONS Tunlametinib (HL-085) plus vemurafenib had a favorable safety profile and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. The RP2D for NSCLC was tunlametinib 9 mg BID plus vemurafeinib 720 mg BID. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03781219.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuankai Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xiaohong Han
- Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK and PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Zhao
- Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK and PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - YuLong Zheng
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310006, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Chen
- Thoracic Medicine Department I, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410006, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinmin Yu
- Department of Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Fang
- Thoracic Oncology Second Department, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Yutao Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Dingzhi Huang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Shen
- Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310009, People's Republic of China
| | - Suxia Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450008, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongsheng Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Cao
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xi Zhang
- Department of Clinical Research and Development, Shanghai Kechow Pharma, Inc, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China
| | - Pei Hu
- Clinical Pharmacology Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Drug, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical PK and PD Investigation for Innovative Drugs, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Han X, Ge P, Liu S, Yang D, Zhang J, Wang X, Liang W. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with malignant melanoma: a systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-comparative clinical studies. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1163805. [PMID: 37521468 PMCID: PMC10374288 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1163805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive cancer that spreads and metastasizes quickly. In recent years, the antiangiogenic drug bevacizumab has been trialed to treat malignant melanoma. We conducted the first meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with other drugs in malignant melanoma. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-comparative clinical studies of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy, targeted medicine, and interferon to treat malignant melanoma in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Meta-analysis of RCT was performed using Review Manager (version 5.4), and non-comparative meta-analysis was performed using R (version 4.0.3). The primary outcome was the objective response rate. Depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies, the pooled outcomes and 95% CI were calculated using either random-effects or fixed-effect models. Subgroup outcomes were calculated with possible relevant variables. Sensitivity analyses were carried out by excluding each study from the highly heterogeneous pooled results in turn. Funnel plot and Begg's test were used to test the included studies' potential publication bias. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: This meta-analysis included 20 trials: five RCTs and 15 non-comparative clinical studies with a total of 23 bevacizumab intervention arms. In 14 treatment arms, bevacizumab was combined with chemotherapy drugs such as fotemustine, dacarbazine, carboplatin/paclitaxel, and temozolomide. In six treatment arms, bevacizumab was combined with targeted medicines such as imatinib, everolimus, sorafenib, erlotinib, and temsirolimus. There were also six treatment arms that used bevacizumab in combination with interferon. The pooled objective response rate was 15.8% (95% CI, 11.4%-20.2%). Bevacizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel significantly increased the overall survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel (HR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.49-0.85, p < 0.01). Fatigue, nausea, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse events. The pooled incidence of hypertension of all bevacizumab arms in malignant melanoma was 32.4% (95% CI, 24.5%-40.3%). Conclusion: This study showed that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy might be effective and well-tolerated in patients with stage III or IV unresectable malignant melanoma. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=304625], identifier [CRD42022304625].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Han
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sat University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Pu Ge
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Siyu Liu
- School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Dandan Yang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinzi Zhang
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xinpei Wang
- Medical Equipment Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weiting Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garutti M, Bergnach M, Polesel J, Palmero L, Pizzichetta MA, Puglisi F. BRAF and MEK Inhibitors and Their Toxicities: A Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010141. [PMID: 36612138 PMCID: PMC9818023 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This meta-analysis summarizes the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) of BRAFi and MEKi. METHODS A systematic search of Medline/PubMed was conducted to identify suitable articles published in English up to 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes were profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, and the analysis of single side effects belonging to both categories. RESULTS The overall incidence of treatment-related all-grade Aes was 99% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) and 97% for Trametinib (95% CI: 0.92-0.99; I2 = 66%) and Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.94-0.99; I2 = 0%). In combined therapies, the rate was 98% for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-0.99; I2 = 77%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 69% of cases for Binimetinib (95% CI: 0.50-0.84; I2 = 71%), 68% for Encorafenib (95% CI: 0.61-0.74), and 72% for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (95% CI: 0.65-0.79; I2 = 84%). The most common grade 1-2 AEs were pyrexia (43%) and fatigue (28%) for Dabrafenib + Trametinib and diarrhea for both Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (52%) and Encorafenib + Binimetinib (34%). The most common AEs of grade 3 or higher were pyrexia, rash, and hypertension for Dabrafenib + Trametinib (6%), rash and hypertension for Encorafenib + Binimetinib (6%), and increased AST and ALT for Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib (10%). CONCLUSIONS Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of BRAFi and MEKi combination therapies, showing related toxicity profiles to offer a helpful tool for clinicians in the choice of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Garutti
- CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-04-3465-9092
| | | | - Jerry Polesel
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Lorenza Palmero
- CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Pizzichetta
- CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
- Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, 34123 Trieste, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu X, Li JJ, Ding Y, Li DD, Wen XZ, Weng DS, Wang JH, Jiang H, Zhang XS. Safety and Tolerability of BRAF Inhibitor and BRAF Inhibitor-Based Combination Therapy in Chinese Patients With Advanced Melanoma: A Real World Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:582676. [PMID: 33868987 PMCID: PMC8047100 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.582676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The toxicity spectrum between Chinese and Caucasian patients with melanoma who were treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) may differ. The purpose of the present study was to assess the safety and tolerability of BRAFi and BRAFi-based combination therapies [MEK inhibitors (MEKi) or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody] in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We also investigated whether treatment-related adverse events (AEs) correlated with the prognosis. This retrospective study collected data from 43 patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive metastatic melanoma from a single Chinese cancer center. Of the 43 patients, 12 patients received BRAFi monotherapy, 12 patients received BRAFi+MEKi, and 19 patients received BRAFi combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody. The median follow-up time was 19 months. In the BRAFi group, the most common AEs were rashes, palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, and arthralgia. Four out of 12 (30%) patients experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs. All grades of AEs in the BRAFi+MEKi group were similar to the BRAFi group, except for higher pyrexia (58.3%) and fewer cutaneous AEs. Three out of 12 (25%) patients experienced grade 3–4 AEs, especially pyrexia (16.7%). In the BRAFi+anti-PD-1 antibody group, AEs were similar to the BRAFi group, except for an increased aminotransferase level (36.8%), increased bilirubin (31.6%), and hypothyroidism (15.8%). Eleven out of 19 (57.9%) patients experienced grade 3–4 AEs and four out of 19 (21%) patients discontinued the therapy due to AEs. Treatment-related hepatotoxicity (trHE), defined as an increase in either alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), or bilirubin levels, was the only AE identified as a significant poor-prognosis indicator in this study. The median progression-free survival of patients with trHE (41.9%) was 8 months, whereas it was 18 months for those without trHE [p = 0.046, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.116]. Moreover, this association was independent of medication regimens (p = 0.014, HR = 2.971). The overall response rate of patients with trHE was significantly lower than those without trHE (44.4 vs. 60.0%, p = 0.024), and we observed a similar trend in patients treated with BRAFi, BRAFi+MEKi, and BRAFi+anti-PD-1 antibody. In conclusion, BRAFi and BRAFi-based combination therapies were tolerable with reversible AEs in Chinese patients with melanoma. The trHE in patients receiving BRAFi and BRAFi-based regimens might indicate a poor therapy-related prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Liu
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing-Jing Li
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ya Ding
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dan-Dan Li
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xi-Zhi Wen
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - De-Sheng Weng
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiu-Hong Wang
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hang Jiang
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Shi Zhang
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang D, Xu T, Zhu H, Dong J, Fu L. Primary malignant melanomas of the female lower genital tract: clinicopathological characteristics and management. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:4017-4037. [PMID: 33414983 PMCID: PMC7783736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The female lower genital tract melanomas mainly include vulvar, vaginal and cervical melanoma. There is little clinical data on the melanomas thus making them highly lethal with their prognosis being worse than for cutaneous melanoma and other gynecological malignancies. Surgery is still the primary treatment for gynecological melanomas with wide local resection (WLE) of tumors with adequate margins being preferred for early-stage vulvar melanoma while complete resection of the primary tumor is the standard treatment for early-stage cervical and vaginal melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy seems to avoid unnecessary complete regional lymphadenectomy. However, it should be chosen cautiously. Recently discovered molecular changes have provided new hopes for effective systemic treatment of female genital tract melanomas. In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis and clinicopathological characteristics of these rare melanomas with particular emphasis on new therapies and clinical management methods that may affect prognosis. The review aims to provide a viable direction for clinicians to diagnose and treat female lower genital tract melanomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Tianmin Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - He Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Junxue Dong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Infection BiologyBerlin, Germany
| | - Li Fu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arthralgia Induced by BRAF Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12103004. [PMID: 33081201 PMCID: PMC7602871 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) are standard of care for BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM). One of the most common side effects is arthralgia, for which a high incidence has been described, but whose clinical presentation and management have not yet been characterized. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the patterns and clinical course of this drug-induced joint pain and to discuss a potential pathogenesis based on our clinical findings. In our cohort of patients treated with BRAFi between 2010 and 2018, 48 of 154 (31%) patients suffered from new-onset joint pain, which primarily affected small joints with a symmetrical pattern, as can be observed in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, the most frequent rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease. Most cases were sufficiently treated by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; however, some patients required dose reduction or permanent discontinuation of the BRAFi. Interestingly, we found that the occurrence of arthralgia was associated with better tumor control. Abstract Introduction: BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi), commonly used in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM) treatment, frequently cause arthralgia. Although this is one of the most common side effects, it has not been characterized yet. Methods: We retrospectively included all patients treated with BRAFi +/− MEK inhibitors (MEKi) for MM at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (Heidelberg) between 2010 and 2018 and reviewed patient charts for the occurrence and management of arthralgia. The evaluation was supplemented by an analysis of frozen sera. Results: We included 154 patients (63% males); 31% (48/154) of them reported arthralgia with a median onset of 21 days after the start of the therapy. Arthralgia mostly affected small joints (27/36, 75%) and less frequently large joints (19/36, 53%). The most commonly affected joints were in fingers (19/36, 53%), wrists (16/36, 44%), and knees (12/36, 33%). In 67% (24/36) of the patients, arthralgia occurred with a symmetrical polyarthritis, mainly of small joints, resembling the pattern typically observed in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), for which a role of the MAPK signaling pathway was previously described. Patients were negative for antinuclear antibodies, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, and rheumatoid factor; arthritis was visible in 10 of 13 available PET–CT scans. The development of arthralgia was linked to better progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Arthralgia is a common side effect in patients receiving BRAFi +/− MEKi therapy and often presents a clinical pattern similar to that observed in RA patients. Its occurrence was associated with longer-lasting tumor control.
Collapse
|
7
|
Si L, Zhang X, Shu Y, Pan H, Wu D, Liu J, Lou F, Mao L, Wang X, Wen X, Gu Y, Zhu L, Lan S, Cai X, Diede SJ, Zhou Y, Ge J, Li J, Wu H, Guo J. A Phase Ib Study of Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Chinese Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (KEYNOTE-151). Transl Oncol 2019; 12:828-835. [PMID: 30981094 PMCID: PMC6458446 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab shows robust antitumor activity and favorable safety in metastatic melanoma. KEYNOTE-151 evaluated pembrolizumab in Chinese patients, who have more aggressive melanoma subtypes than other populations. METHODS Chinese patients aged ≥18years with advanced melanoma previously treated with one line of therapy received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 35 cycles or until confirmed disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or study withdrawal. Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and safety. Key secondary end points included duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Median age was 52 years (N=103); 37.9% had acral and 14.6% had mucosal melanoma. Median follow-up was 7.9months at data cutoff (December 27, 2017). ORR was 16.7% (95% CI, 10.0-25.3%) (1 complete, 16 partial responses). Disease control rate was 38.2%. ORR was 15.8% for acral, 13.3% for mucosal melanoma. Median DOR was 8.4months; 65.6% of patients had response duration ≥6months. Median PFS was 2.8months (95% CI, 2.7-3.5months); 6-month rate was 20.4%. Median OS was 12.1months (95% CI, 9.6months-not reached); 6-month rate, 75.7%; 12-month rate, 50.6%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 87 (84.5%) patients; 9 (8.7%) experienced grade 3/4 TRAE and 2 (1.9%) discontinued because of TRAE; none died. Two deaths occurred that were unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab was well tolerated and provided clinically meaningful antitumor activity as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Si
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Kidney Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China.
| | - Xiaoshi Zhang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, 651 Dongfeng E Rd, Yuexiu Qu, Guangzhou Shi, Guangdong Sheng, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Yongqian Shu
- Jiangsu Province Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Gulou Qu, Nanjing, Shi, 210029, Jiangsu Sheng, China.
| | - Hongming Pan
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3 Qingchun E Rd, XinCheng ShangQuan, Jianggan Qu, Hangzhou Shi, Zhejiang Sheng, 310016, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Di Wu
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, 3808 Jiefang Rd, HongQiJie, Chaoyang Qu, Changchun Shi, Jilin Sheng, 130021, Jilin, China.
| | - Jiwei Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Rd, Xigang Qu, Dalian, Shi, 116011, Liaoning Sheng, China.
| | - Fang Lou
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3 Qingchun E Rd, XinCheng ShangQuan, Jianggan Qu, Hangzhou Shi, Zhejiang Sheng, 310016, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Lili Mao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Kidney Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China.
| | - Xuan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Kidney Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China.
| | - Xizhi Wen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, 651 Dongfeng E Rd, Yuexiu Qu, Guangzhou Shi, Guangdong Sheng, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Yanhong Gu
- Jiangsu Province Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Gulou Qu, Nanjing, Shi, 210029, Jiangsu Sheng, China.
| | - Lingjun Zhu
- Jiangsu Province Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Gulou Qu, Nanjing, Shi, 210029, Jiangsu Sheng, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, 3808 Jiefang Rd, HongQiJie, Chaoyang Qu, Changchun Shi, Jilin Sheng, 130021, Jilin, China.
| | - Shijie Lan
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, 3808 Jiefang Rd, HongQiJie, Chaoyang Qu, Changchun Shi, Jilin Sheng, 130021, Jilin, China.
| | - Xin Cai
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Rd, Xigang Qu, Dalian, Shi, 116011, Liaoning Sheng, China.
| | - Scott J Diede
- Merck & Co. Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, 07033, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
| | - Yu Zhou
- MSD, Building A, Headquarters Park Phase 2, 1582 Gumei Road, Xuhui District, 200233, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jun Ge
- MSD, Building A, Headquarters Park Phase 2, 1582 Gumei Road, Xuhui District, 200233, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jianfeng Li
- MSD, One Merck Campus Beijing, 100012, Beijing, Beijing, China.
| | - Haiyan Wu
- MSD, One Merck Campus Beijing, 100012, Beijing, Beijing, China.
| | - Jun Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Kidney Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, 100142, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Importance of the Right Framework: Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway and the Scaffolding Protein PTPIP51. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19103282. [PMID: 30360441 PMCID: PMC6213971 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19103282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The protein tyrosine phosphatase interacting protein 51 (PTPIP51) regulates and interconnects signaling pathways, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and an abundance of different others, e.g., Akt signaling, NF-κB signaling, and the communication between different cell organelles. PTPIP51 acts as a scaffold protein for signaling proteins, e.g., Raf-1, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2), as well as for other scaffold proteins, e.g., 14-3-3 proteins. These interactions are governed by the phosphorylation of serine and tyrosine residues of PTPIP51. The phosphorylation status is finely tuned by receptor tyrosine kinases (EGFR, Her2), non-receptor tyrosine kinases (c-Src) and the phosphatase protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). This review addresses various diseases which display at least one alteration in these enzymes regulating PTPIP51-interactions. The objective of this review is to summarize the knowledge of the MAPK-related interactome of PTPIP51 for several tumor entities and metabolic disorders.
Collapse
|
9
|
Li HL, Su MM, Xu YJ, Xu C, Yang YS, Zhu HL. Design and biological evaluation of novel triaryl pyrazoline derivatives with dioxane moiety for selective BRAFV600E inhibition. Eur J Med Chem 2018; 155:725-735. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|