Individualized induction chemotherapy by pre-treatment plasma Epstein-Barr viral DNA in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Liquid Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspective on Squamous Cell, Salivary Gland, Paranasal Sinus and Nasopharyngeal Cancers

Simple Summary

Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common type of solid tumor and harbors a poor prognosis since most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. The study of different tumor components in the blood, saliva or other body fluids is called liquid biopsy. The introduction of novel diagnostic tools such as liquid biopsy could aid in achieving earlier diagnoses and more accurate disease monitoring during treatment. In this manuscript, the reader will find an in-depth review of the current evidence and a future perspective on the role of liquid biopsy in head and neck cancer.

Abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is currently the sixth most common solid malignancy, accounting for a 50% five-year mortality rate. In the past decade, substantial improvements in understanding its molecular biology have allowed for a growing development of new biomarkers. Among these, the field of liquid biopsy has seen a sustained growth in HNC, demonstrating the feasibility to detect different liquid biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTC), extracellular vesicles and microRNAs. Liquid biopsy has been studied in HPV-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) but also in other subentities such as HPV-related SCCHN, EBV-positive nasopharyngeal cancer and oncogene-driven salivary gland cancers. However, future studies should be internally and externally validated, and ideally, clinical trials should incorporate the use of liquid biomarkers as endpoints in order to prospectively demonstrate their role in HNC. A thorough review of the current evidence on liquid biopsy in HNC as well as its prospects will be conducted.

Prognostic value of hepatitis B viral infection in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era

Background

Whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses risk to patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era remains unclear.

Methods

953 patients with non-metastatic, newly diagnosed NPC who received detection of serologic hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and treated with IMRT were retrospectively reviewed. 171 patients had HBV infection (HBsAg seropositive). Propensity score matching method (PSM) and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to address confounding. The survival rates were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the survival curves were compared by Log-rank test. Prognostic factors were explored by multivariate analysis.

Results

No significant survival differences were observed between HBsAg-negative group and HBsAg-positive group [5-year overall survival (OS), 87.7% vs. 83.9%, P=0.181; locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), 83.5% vs. 78.3%, P=0.109; distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), 80.2% vs. 77.9%, P=0.446; progression-free survival (PFS), 77.4% vs. 71.4%, P=0.153], consistent with the results of PSM and IPTW analysis. Further analyses revealed that HBV infection was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS [multivariate analysis; hazard ratio (HR), 3.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45–9.68; P=0.006], LRFS (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.37–5.95); P=0.005] in patients with stage N1, DMFS (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.15–6.09; P=0.022) and PFS (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.34–5.14; P=0.005). Among HBsAg-positive patients, liver protection improved OS (90.3% vs. 77.2%; P=0.022).

Conclusions

HBV infection is an independent risk factor for patients with stage N1 NPC in the IMRT era. Hepatic protection may benefit the survival of HBsAg-positive patients.

Identifying optimal clinical trial candidates for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Analysis of 9,468 real-world cases and validation by two phase 3 multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aims to identify the optimal high-risk candidates for clinical trials in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Non-metastatic NPC patients (n = 9468) were included. Recursive partitioning analyses (RPA) were performed to generate risk stratification. Receiver operating characteristics curve was used to determine the cut-off value of pre-treatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA for progression-free survival (PFS). Individual-level data from two clinical trials were used for validation.

RESULTS

Anatomic stratification based on T and N category (eighth edition TNM, TNM-8) classified the N2-3 or T4 as an anatomic high-risk group with 5-year PFS of 69% (95% confidence interval: 68%-71%). Prognostic stratification identified patients with pre-treatment EBV DNA ≥4000 copies/mL as a prognostic high-risk group with 5-year PFS of 69% (67%-70%). The c-index was significantly higher for anatomic stratification (0.621, p < 0.001) and prognostic stratification (0.585, p < 0.001) compared with existing TNM-8 stage groups (0.562). The validation cohorts based on clinical trials data showed greater PFS benefit than the results of the original trials [Hazard ratio: NCT01245959, 0.64 vs. 0.67; NCT01872962, 0.42 vs. 0.52]. Moreover, detectable post-treatment EBV DNA indicated a high risk of progression with 5-year PFS of 38.7% and was the most adverse independent factor for all endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

N2-3 or T4 NPC patients were ideal candidates for multicenter clinical trials in locoregionally advanced NPC. Patients with detectable post-treatment EBV DNA are suitable candidates for adjuvant trials.

Prognostic Value of Regression Rate of Plasma EBV DNA After Induction Chemotherapy for Stage II-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Background/Objective

We aimed to explore the prognostic value of regression rate (RR) of plasma Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA after induction chemotherapy (IC) in patients with stages II–IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

Eligible patients receiving IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy were included. The cut-off value of pre-treatment EBV DNA (pre-IC DNA) and RR were identified by receiver operating curve (ROC). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was applied to create new staging. Harrell’s c-index and time-independent ROC were employed to compare different RPA staging.

Results

In total, 1,184 patients were included. The cut-off values of pre-IC DNA and RR were 16,200 copies/ml and 95.127% for patients receiving two cycles, and 5,520 copies/ml and 99.994% for those receiving three cycles. Notably, we only focused on patients receiving two cycles of IC. Patients with a RR >95.127% had significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) than those with a RR ≤95.127% (86.2% vs. 54.3%, P <0.001). Then, RPA1 (pre-IC DNA + TNM staging + RR) and RPA2 (pre-IC DNA + TNM staging + post-IC EBV DNA [post-IC DNA]) staging systems were created. RPA1 staging achieved stronger power in OS prediction than RPA2 staging and TNM staging (c-index: 0.763 [0.714–0.812] vs. 0.735 [0.684–0.786] vs. 0.677 [0.604–0.749]; AUC: 0.736 vs. 0.714 vs. 0.628), indicating that RR had stronger prognostic power than post-IC DNA. Moreover, patients with stages III–IV_RPA1 could benefit from high concurrent cumulative platinum dose (≥160 mg/m²).

Conclusion

RR in conjunction with current TNM staging could better conduct risk stratification, prognosis prediction and help to guide precise concurrent chemotherapy.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Circulating Inflammation Signature in Non-Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Potential Role for Individualized Induction Chemotherapy

Purpose

We sought to assess the prognostic and predictive value of a circulating inflammation signature (CISIG) and develop CISIG-based tools for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized induction chemotherapy (ICT) in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively collected a candidate inflammatory biomarker panel from patients with NPC treated with definitive radiotherapy between 2012 and 2017. We developed the CISIG using candidate biomarkers identified by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model. The Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the CISIG prognostic value. A CISIG-based prediction model was constructed, validated, and assessed. Potential stratified ICT treatment effects were examined.

Results

A total of 1149 patients were analyzed. Nine biomarkers selected by LASSO regression in the training cohort were used to construct the CISIG, including hyaluronidase, laminin, procollagen III, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, high-density lipoprotein, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio. CISIG was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio: 2.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.93–3.64; P < 0.001). High CISIG group (>−0.2) was associated with worse 3-year DFS than low CISIG group in both the training (67.5% vs 88.3%, P < 0.001) and validation cohorts (72.3% vs 85.1%, P < 0.001). We constructed and validated a CISIG-based nomogram, which showed better performance than the clinical stage and Epstein–Barr virus DNA classification methods. A significant interaction between CISIG and the ICT treatment effect was observed (P for interaction = 0.036). Patients with high CISIG values did not benefit from ICT, whereas patients with low CISIG values significantly benefited from ICT.

Conclusion

The developed CISIG, based on a circulating inflammatory biomarker panel, adds prognostic information for patients with NPC. The proposed CISIG-based tools offer individualized risk estimation to facilitate suitable ICT candidate identification.

Pretreatment Plasma EBV-DNA Load Guides Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The efficacy of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC) is controversial. In this paper, we conduct a meta-analysis based on relevant studies to provide strong evidence for clinical strategies.

Materials and Methods

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies that stratified patients based on a high or low plasma Epstein–Barr virus deoxyribonucleic acid (EBV-DNA) load before treatment and compared the clinical efficacy of IC+CCRT vs. CCRT alone in LA-NPC. We tested for heterogeneity of studies and conducted sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS).

Results

Seven studies with a total of 5289 cases were finally included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test revealed the homogeneity of OS (I² = 0.0%, p=0.794), PFS (I² = 0.0%, p=0.778), DMFS (I² = 0.0%, p=0.997), and LRFS (I² = 0.0%, p=0.697) in patients with EBV-DNA loads of ≥4000 copies/ml in both the IC+CCRT and CCRT groups. The results reveal that IC+CCRT significantly extended the OS (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.58-0.83], p=0.000), PFS (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.99], p=0.033), and DMFS (HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.69-0.9], p=0.000) of patients compared with the CCRT group, but there were no beneficial effects on LRFS (HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.80-1.42], p=0.647). The heterogeneity test found that there was no significant heterogeneity of PFS (I² = 0.0%, p=0.564), DMFS (I² = 0.0%, p=0.648), LRFS (I² = 22.3%, p=0.257), and OS (I² = 44.6%, p=0.164) in patients with EBV-DNA loads of <4000 copies/ml. The results show that IC+CCRT prolonged DMFS (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.39-0.85], p=0.006) of patients without significant improvements in OS (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.55-1.26], p=0.240), PFS (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.74-1.31], p=0.908), and LRFS (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.54-1.77], p=0.943).

Conclusions

Pretreatment plasma EBV-DNA can be considered a promising effective marker for the use of IC in LA-NPC patients. The addition of IC could improve the OS and PFS of patients with EBV-DNA load ≥4000 copies/ml, but we saw no efficacy in patients with EBV-DNA load <4000 copies/ml. Moreover, regardless of the EBV-DNA load, IC could improve DMFS, but there was no effect on LRFS.

Outcomes of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with Moderate-Risk in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of induction chemotherapy (IC) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with moderate-risk treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 506 patients with T1-2N1M0 or T3-4N0-1M0 NPC (according to the 2010 UICC/AJCC staging system) who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without IC at a single center in China between 2005 and 2010. Survival outcomes were compared between the IC + CCRT and CCRT groups using the Kaplan–Meier method, Log-rank test and a Cox regression model.

Results

Among the 506 patients, CCRT alone resulted in equivalent overall survival (86.8% vs 88.5%, p=0.661), progression-free survival (79.6% vs 79.6%, p=0.756), locoregional relapse-free survival (90.2% vs 87.0%, p=0.364) and distant metastasis-free survival (88.0% vs 89.8%, p=0.407) to IC plus CCRT. In multivariate analysis, IC did not lower the risk of death (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.46–1.25, p=0.278), progression (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51–1.19, p=0.244), locoregional relapse (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81–1.42, p=0.651) or distant metastasis (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.15, p=0.140) in the entire cohort; similar results were obtained in stratified analysis based on N category (N0 vs N1) and EBV DNA (< vs ≥4000 copies/mL).

Conclusion

Addition of IC to CCRT does not improve survival outcomes in moderate-risk NPC; the use of IC should be carefully considered in these patients, though additional prospective trials are warranted to confirm the conclusions of this study.