Rationale and design of the German-speaking myeloma multicenter group (GMMG) trial HD6: a randomized phase III trial on the effect of elotuzumab in VRD induction/consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma

Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in First-Line Treatment and at Relapse in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Although recent data suggest that melphalan high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is safe and effective in eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients up to the age of 75 years, its value in elderly MM patients is still controversially discussed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 607 MM patients ≥60 years old, who were admitted to our institution for first-line or salvage HDT/ASCT between January 2007 and October 2018. We assigned them to three groups according to age at HDT/ASCT: 60-64 years (S1), 65-69 years (S2) and ≥70 years (S3). We compared progression-free and overall survival, duration of hospitalization, complications, transfers to intermediate or intensive care unit, readmissions after discharge and deaths within 100 days after HDT/ASCT between these groups.

RESULTS

Age did not impact progression-free and overall survival after first-line and salvage HDT/ASCT. Patients ≥70 years old at first HDT/ASCT had a longer hospitalization compared to patients 60-64 years old; however, the difference in the length of hospitalization was only marginal. Rates of febrile neutropenia, mucositis, transfers to intermediate or intensive care unit, readmissions after discharge, and deaths within 100 days after HDT/ASCT were similar in the 3 age groups of patients receiving first or salvage HDT/ASCT. Patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 receiving first HDT/ASCT had a higher risk for a transfer to intermediate or intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that HDT/ASCT is safe and effective in eligible elderly MM patients in first-line treatment and at relapse. A careful patient selection according to biological rather than chronological age is of crucial importance.

Sequence diversity of kappa light chains from patients with AL amyloidosis and multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

AL amyloidosis (AL) results from the misfolding of immunoglobulin light chains (IG LCs). Aim of this study was to comprehensively analyse kappa LC sequences from AL patients in comparison with multiple myeloma (MM).

OBJECTIVE

We analysed IGKV/IGKJ usage and associated organ tropism and IGKV1/D-33 in terms of mutational analysis and theoretical biochemical properties.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

cDNA and bulk RNA sequencing of the LCs of AL and MM patients.

RESULTS

We studied 41 AL and 83 MM patients showing that IGKV1 was most expressed among kappa AL and MM, with higher frequency in AL (80% vs. 53%, p = .002). IGKV3 was underrepresented in AL (10% vs. 30%, p = .014). IGKJ2 was more commonly used in AL than in MM (39% vs. 29%). Patients with IGKV1/D-33 were associated with heart involvement (75%, p = .024). IGKV1/D-33-segments of AL had a higher mutation count (AL = 12.0 vs. MM = 10.0). FR3 and CDR3 were most frequently mutated in both, with a median mutation count in FR3 being the highest (AL = 4.0; MM = 3.5) and one mutation hotspot (FR3 (83I)) for IGKV1/D-33/IGKJ2 was associated with cardiac involvement.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that germline usage has an influence on AL amyloidosis risk and organ involvement.

Predictors of early morbidity and mortality in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: data from five randomized, controlled, phase III trials in 3700 patients

Early morbidity and mortality affect patient outcomes in multiple myeloma. Thus, we dissected the incidence and causes of morbidity/mortality during induction therapy (IT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and developed/validated a predictive risk score. We evaluated 3700 transplant-eligible NDMM patients treated in 2005-2020 with novel agent-based triplet/quadruplet IT. Primary endpoints were severe infections, death, or a combination of both. Patients were divided in a training (n = 1333) and three validation cohorts (n = 2367). During IT, 11.8%, 1.8%, and 12.5% of patients in the training cohort experienced severe infections, death, or both, respectively. Four major, baseline risk factors for severe infection/death were identified: low platelet count (<150/nL), ISS III, higher WHO performance status (>1), and age (>60 years). A risk score (1 risk factor=1 point) stratified patients in low (39.5%; 0 points), intermediate (41.9%; 1 point), and high (18.6%; ≥2 points) risk. The risk for severe infection/death increased from 7.7% vs. 11.5% vs. 23.3% in the low- vs. intermediate- vs. high-risk groups (p < 0.001). The risk score was independently validated in three trials incorporating quadruplet IT with an anti-CD38 antibody. Our analyses established a robust and easy-to-use score to identify NDMM patients at risk of severe infection/death, covering the latest quadruplet induction therapies. Trial registrations: HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4: EudraCT No. 2004-000944-26. GMMG-MM5: EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16. GMMG-HD6: NCT02495922. EMN02/HOVON-95: NCT01208766. GMMG-HD7: NCT03617731.

Impact of Clinical Parameters and Induction Regimens on Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Introduction

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ABSCT) remains the standard consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As a prerequisite, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) must be mobilized and collected by leukapheresis (LP). Many factors can hamper PBSC mobilization/collection. Here, we provide a comprehensive multiparametric assessment of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters in a large cohort.

Methods

In total, 790 MM patients (471 [60%] male, 319 [40%] female) who underwent PBSC mobilization/collection during first-line treatment were included. Evaluated PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters included the prolongation of PBSC mobilization, plerixafor administration, number of LP sessions, and overall PBSC collection goal/result.

Results

741 (94%) patients received cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/dexamethasone (CAD) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization. Plerixafor was administered in 80 (10%) patients. 489 (62%) patients started LP without delay. 530 (67%) patients reached the PBSC collection goal at the first LP session. The mean overall PBSC collection result was 10.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.4) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. In a multiparametric analysis, variables negatively associated with PBSC mobilization/collection outcomes were female gender, age >60 years, an advanced ISS stage, and local radiation pre-/during induction, but not remission status postinduction. Notably, the identified risk factors contributed differently to each PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameter. In this context, compared to all other induction regimens, lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies negatively affected only the number of LP sessions required to reach the collection goal, but no other PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters. In contrast, the probability of reaching a high collection goal of ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight was higher after lenalidomide-based induction compared to VCD/PAD or VAD - taking into account - that a higher G-SCF dosage was given in approximately one-third of patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies.

Conclusion

Considering the identified risk factors in the clinical setting can contribute to optimized PBSC mobilization/collection. Moreover, our study demonstrates the necessity for a differentiated evaluation of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters.

Comparison of IGLV2-14 light chain sequences of patients with AL amyloidosis or multiple myeloma

Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is one of the most common forms of systemic amyloidosis and is caused by the deposition of insoluble fibrils derived from misfolded and aggregated immunoglobulin light chains (LC). To uncover the causes leading to this aggregation, we compared AL LC sequences with those of patients with the related disease multiple myeloma (MM), which do not aggregate in insoluble fibrils in vivo. IGLV2-14 is one of the most common AL-associated IGLV subfamilies. Here, we analysed IGLV2-14 LC sequences of 13 AL and eight MM patients in detail. We found that AL-associated LCs presented a lower median mutation count (7.0 vs. 11.5 in MM; P = 0.045), as well as an overall composition of less charged amino acids than MM LCs. However, we did not find a mutation that was present in ≥ 50% of the AL and not in the MM sequences. Furthermore, we did not find a significant difference in the isoelectric point (pI) in general, suggesting similar stability of the LCs in AL and MM. However, the subgroup of patients without a detectable heavy chain stood out. Surprisingly, they are characterized by an increase in mutation count (median 7.0 vs. 5.5) and pI (median 7.82 vs. 6.44, P = 0.043). In conclusion, our data suggest that the amount of mutations and the introduction of charges play a crucial role in AL fibril formation, as well as the absence or presence of a potential heavy chain binding partner.

Myeloma Spine and Bone Damage Score (MSBDS) on Whole-Body Computed Tomography (WBCT): Multiple Reader Agreement in a Multicenter Reliability Study

Objective: To assess the reliability of the myeloma spine and bone damage score (MSBDS) across multiple readers with different levels of expertise and from different institutions. Methods: A reliability exercise, including 104 data sets of static images and complete CT examinations of patients affected by multiple myeloma (MM), was performed. A complementary imaging atlas provided detailed examples of the MSBDS scores, including low-risk and high-risk lesions. A total of 15 readers testing the MSBDS were evaluated. ICC estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated based on mean rating (k = 15), absolute agreement, a two-way random-effects model and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: Overall, the ICC correlation coefficient was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.79–0.92), and the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.94–0.97). Global inter- and intra-observer agreement among the 15 readers with scores below or equal to 6 points and scores above 6 points were 0.81 (95% C.I.: 0.72–0.86) and 0.94 (95% C.I.:0.91–0.98), respectively. Conclusion: We present a consensus-based semiquantitative scoring systems for CT in MM with a complementary CT imaging atlas including detailed examples of relevant scoring techniques. We found substantial agreement among readers with different levels of experience, thereby supporting the role of the MSBDS for possible large-scale applications. Significance and Innovations • Based on previous work and definitions of the MSBDS, we present real-life reliability data for quantitative bone damage assessment in multiple myeloma (MM) patients on CT. • In this study, reliability for the MSBDS, which was tested on 15 readers with different levels of expertise and from different institutions, was shown to be moderate to excellent. • The complementary CT imaging atlas is expected to enhance unified interpretations of the MSBDS between different professionals dealing with MM patients in their routine clinical practice.

Elotuzumab and Weekly Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Without Transplant Intent: A Phase 2 Measurable Residual Disease-Adapted Study

Importance

Treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with a quadruplet regimen consisting of a monoclonal antibody, proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory imide, and corticosteroid has been associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with triplet regimens. The optimal quadruplet combination, and whether this obviates the need for frontline autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), remains unknown. We evaluated elotuzumab and weekly carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Elo-KRd) without ASCT in NDMM.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of Elo-KRd using a measurable residual disease (MRD)-adapted design in NDMM regardless of ASCT eligibility.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study enrolled patients between July 2017 and February 2021. Median follow-up was 29 months.

Interventions

Twelve to 24 cycles of Elo-KRd; consecutive MRD-negative results at 10-6 by next-generation sequencing (NGS) after cycles 8 (C8) and 12 determined the duration of Elo-KRd. This was followed by Elo-Rd (no carfilzomib) maintenance therapy until disease progression.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the rate of stringent complete response (sCR) and/or MRD-negativity (10-5) after C8 Elo-KRd. Secondary end points included safety, rate of response, MRD status, PFS, and overall survival (OS). As an exploratory analysis, MRD was assessed using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (MS) on peripheral blood samples.

Results

Forty-six patients were enrolled (median age 62 years, 11 [24%] aged >70 years). Overall, 32 (70%) were White, 6 (13%) were Black, 3 (6%) were more than 1 race, and 5 (11%) were of unknown race. Thirty-three (72%) were men and 13 (28%) were women. High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 22 (48%) patients. The rate of sCR and/or MRD-negativity after C8 was 26 of 45 (58%), meeting the predefined statistical threshold for efficacy. Responses deepened over time, with the MRD-negativity (10-5) rate increasing to 70% and MS-negativity rate increasing to 65%; concordance between MRD by NGS and MS increased over time. The most common (>10%) grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lung and nonpulmonary infections (13% and 11%, respectively). There was 1 grade 5 myocardial infarction. The estimated 3-year PFS was 72% overall and 92% for patients with MRD-negativity (10-5) at C8.

Conclusions and Relevance

An MRD-adapted design using elotuzumab and weekly KRd without ASCT showed a high rate of sCR and/or MRD-negativity and durable responses. This approach provides support for further evaluation of MRD-guided deescalation of therapy to decrease treatment exposure while sustaining deep responses.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02969837.

Treatment Strategy for Multiple Myeloma to Improve Immunological Environment and Maintain MRD Negativity

Improving the immunological environment and eradicating minimal residual disease (MRD) are the two main treatment goals for long-term survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), monoclonal antibody drugs (MoAbs), and autologous grafts for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can improve the immunological microenvironment. ASCT, MoAbs, and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) may be important for the achievement of MRD negativity. An improved immunological environment may be useful for maintaining MRD negativity, although the specific treatment for persistent MRD negativity is unknown. However, whether the ongoing treatment should be continued or changed if the MRD status remains positive is controversial. In this case, genetic, immunophenotypic, and clinical analysis of residual myeloma cells may be necessary to select the effective treatment for the residual myeloma cells. The purpose of this review is to discuss the MM treatment strategy to "cure MM" based on currently available therapies, including IMiDs, PIs, MoAbs, and ASCT, and expected immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, via improvement of the immunological environment and maintenance of MRD negativity.

Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma: Promise and Challenges

Whereas the treatment of MM was dependent solely on alkylating agents and corticosteroids during the prior three decades, the landscape of therapeutic measures to treat the disease began to expand enormously early in the current century. The introduction of new classes of small-molecule drugs, such as proteasome blockers (bortezomib and carfilzomib), immunomodulators (lenalidomide and pomalidomide), nuclear export inhibitors (selinexor), and histone deacetylase blockers (panobinostat), as well as the application of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), resulted in a seismic shift in how the disease is treated. The picture changed dramatically once again starting with the 2015 FDA approval of two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) - the anti-CD38 daratumumab and the anti-SLAMF7 elotuzumab. Daratumumab, in particular, has had a great impact on MM therapy and today is often included in various regimens to treat the disease, both in newly diagnosed cases and in the relapse/refractory setting. Recently, other immunotherapies have been added to the arsenal of drugs available to fight this malignancy. These include isatuximab (also anti-CD38) and, in the past year, the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) belantamab mafodotin and the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel). While the accumulated benefits of these newer agents have resulted in a doubling of the disease's five-year survival rate to more than 5 years and improved quality of life, the disease remains incurable. Almost without exception patients experience relapse and/or become refractory to the drugs used, making the search for innovative therapies all the more essential. This review covers the current scope of anti-myeloma immunotherapeutic agents, both those in clinical use and on the horizon, including naked mAbs, ADCs, bi- and multi-targeted mAbs, and CAR T-cells. Emphasis is placed on the benefits of each along with the challenges that need to be overcome if MM is to be considered curable in the future.

Safety of lenalidomide for maintenance treatment of patients with multiple myeloma following autologous stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Myeloma is the second most common hematological cancer, with 5800 cases per year diagnosed in the UK. Despite improved treatment it is still considered non-curable, although the median survival has increased from 3 to 8 years over the past 20 years. Treatment involves the use of induction therapy and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients deemed fit enough. Further attempts to improve outcomes include the use of maintenance therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review details all trials in which lenalidomide has been used as maintenance following ASCT. PubMed searches included randomized control trials, observational cohort, reviews, and meta-analysis.

EXPERT OPINION

Lenalidomide is a well-tolerated, oral agent that is associated with increased overall and progression free survival when used as maintenance following ASCT. Its use in this setting is FDA and EMA approved and is standard of care in Europe and North America. The early link between lenalidomide and second hematological cancers appears to be associated with use in combination with melphalan. There is an increase in non-melanoma skin cancers and solid tumors in the elderly but this has minimal impact on mortality. Lenalidomide use as part of combination maintenance is underway and may further improve outcomes.

Treatment Induced Cytotoxic T-Cell Modulation in Multiple Myeloma Patients

The biology of plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD) involves both genetic and immune-related factors. Since genetic lesions are necessary but not sufficient for Multiple Myeloma (MM) evolution, several authors hypothesized that immune dysfunction involving both B and T cell counterparts plays a key role in the pathogenesis of the disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of cornerstone treatments for Multiple Myeloma into immune system shaping. A large series of 976 bone marrow samples from 735 patients affected by PCD was studied by flow analysis to identify discrete immune subsets. Treated MM samples displayed a reduction of CD4+ cells (p<0.0001) and an increase of CD8+ (p<0.0001), CD8+/DR+ (p<0.0001) and CD3+/CD57+ (p<0.0001) cells. Although these findings were to some extent demonstrated also following bortezomib treatment, a more pronounced cytotoxic polarization was shown after exposure to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and Lenalidomide (Len) treatment. As a matter of fact, samples of patients who received ASCT (n=110) and Len (n=118) were characterized, towards untreated patients (n=138 and n=130, respectively), by higher levels of CD8+ (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively), CD8+/DR+ (p=0.0252 and p=0.0001, respectively) and CD3+/CD57+ cells (p<0.0001 and p=0.0006, respectively) and lower levels of CD4+ lymphocytes (p<0.0001 and p=0.0005, respectively). We demonstrated that active MM patients are characterized by a relevant T cell modulation and that most of these changes are therapy-related. Current Myeloma treatments, notably ASCT and Len treatments, polarize immune system towards a dominant cytotoxic response, likely contributing to the anti-Myeloma effect of these regimens.

Monoclonal Antibodies and Antibody Drug Conjugates in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy. Current treatment strategies are mainly based on immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors or combination of both. Novel agents added to these backbone treatments represent a promising strategy in treatment of newly diagnosed as well as relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients. In this respect, the incorporation of monoclonal antibodies into standard-of-care regimens markedly improved prognosis of myeloma patients during the last years. More specifically, monoclonal anti-CD38 antibodies, daratumumab and isatuximab, have been implemented into treatment strategies from first-line treatment to refractory disease. In addition, the monoclonal anti-SLAM-F7 antibody elotuzumab in combination with immunomodulatory drugs has improved the clinical outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Belantamab mafodotin is the first approved antibody drug conjugate directed against B cell maturation antigen and is currently used as a monotherapy for patients with advanced disease. This review focuses on clinical efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies as well as antibody drug conjugates in multiple myeloma.

Estimands in hematologic oncology trials

The estimand framework included in the addendum to the ICH E9 guideline facilitates discussions to ensure alignment between the key question of interest, the analysis, and interpretation. Therapeutic knowledge and drug mechanism play a crucial role in determining the strategy and defining the estimand for clinical trial designs. Clinical trials in patients with hematological malignancies often present unique challenges for trial design due to complexity of treatment options and existence of potential curative but highly risky procedures, for example, stem cell transplant or treatment sequence across different phases (induction, consolidation, maintenance). Here, we illustrate how to apply the estimand framework in hematological clinical trials and how the estimand framework can address potential difficulties in trial result interpretation. This paper is a result of a cross-industry collaboration to connect the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E9 addendum concepts to applications. Three randomized phase 3 trials will be used to consider common challenges including intercurrent events in hematologic oncology trials to illustrate different scientific questions and the consequences of the estimand choice for trial design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Template language for describing estimand in both study protocols and statistical analysis plans is suggested for statisticians' reference.

Selective elimination of immunosuppressive T cells in patients with multiple myeloma

Elimination of suppressive T cells may enable and enhance cancer immunotherapy. Here, we demonstrate that the cell membrane protein SLAMF7 was highly expressed on immunosuppressive CD8⁺CD28^-CD57⁺ Tregs in multiple myeloma (MM). SLAMF7 expression associated with T cell exhaustion surface markers and exhaustion-related transcription factor signatures. T cells from patients with a high frequency of SLAMF7⁺CD8⁺ T cells exhibited decreased immunoreactivity towards the MART-1_aa26-35*A27L antigen. A monoclonal anti-SLAMF7 antibody (elotuzumab) specifically depleted SLAMF7⁺CD8⁺ T cells in vitro and in vivo via macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP). Anti-SLAMF7 treatment of MM patients depleted suppressive T cells in peripheral blood. These data highlight SLAMF7 as a marker for suppressive CD8⁺ Treg and suggest that anti-SLAMF7 antibodies can be used to boost anti-tumoral immune responses in cancer patients.

The Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in Smoldering and Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma

The recent introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), with several cellular targets, such as CD-38 (daratumumab and isatuximab) and SLAM F7 (elotuzumab), differently combined with other classes of agents, has significantly extended the outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in different phases of the disease. Initially used in advanced/refractory patients, different MoAbs combination have been introduced in the treatment of newly diagnosed transplant eligible patients (NDTEMM), showing a significant improvement in the depth of the response and in survival outcomes, without a significant price in terms of toxicity. In smoldering MM, MoAbs have been applied, either alone or in combination with other drugs, with the goal of delaying the progression to active MM and restoring the immune system. In this review, we will focus on the main results achieved so far and on the main on-going trials using MoAbs in SMM and NDTEMM.

Post-transplant consolidation based on combination of lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy due to uncontrolled proliferation of neoplastic plasma cells in the bone marrow, associated to chromosomal instability and cytogenetic abnormalities, which could have an impact on prognosis. Response to treatment and survival of newly diagnosed myeloma patients is heterogeneous, with median overall survival ranging from two to more than ten years, due to clinical and biological factors. To warrant long-term control of disease, several strategies have been proposed in the last years, including short-term high-dose of treatment, named as consolidation, before maintenance. This review will discuss the role of consolidation in the current myeloma treatment landscape, and further improvements required to optimize tailored front-line therapy.

Emerging immunotherapies in multiple myeloma

Despite considerable advances in treatment approaches in the past two decades, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease. Treatments for myeloma continue to evolve with many emerging immunotherapies. The first immunotherapy used to treat hematologic cancers, including multiple myeloma, was an allogeneic stem cell transplant. In the mid-2000s, immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide, lenalidomide, and subsequently pomalidomide were proven to be effective in multiple myeloma and substantially improved survival. The next wave of immunotherapies for multiple myeloma included the monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and elotuzumab, which were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015. Subsequently, a variety of immunotherapies have been developed for multiple myeloma, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific antibodies, antibody drug conjugates, and checkpoint inhibitors. Many of these emerging treatments target the B cell maturation antigen, which is expressed on plasma cells, although several other novel receptors are also being studied. This review summarizes the evidence of these various immunotherapies, their mechanism of action, and data from clinical trials regarding the treatments' safety and efficacy.

Comparison of NGS and MFC Methods: Key Metrics in Multiple Myeloma MRD Assessment

In order to meet the challenges in data evaluation and comparability between studies in multiple myeloma (MM) minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, the goal of the current study was to provide a step-by-step evaluation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) data. Bone marrow (BM) sample pairs from 125 MM patients were analyzed by NGS and MFC MM MRD methods. Tumor load (TL) and limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were calculated. The best-fit MRD cut-off was chosen as 1 × 10⁻⁵, resulting in an overall 9.6% (n overall = 12 (NGS n = 2, MFC n = 10)) nonassessable cases. The overall concordance rate between NGS and MFC was 68.0% (n = 85); discordant results were found in 22.4% (11.2% (n = 14) of cases in each direction. Overall, 55.1% (n = 60/109) and 49.5% (n = 54/109) of patients with a serological response ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) showed BM MRD negativity by NGS and MFC, respectively. A good correlation in the TL assessed by both techniques was found (correlation coefficient = 0.8, n = 40, p < 0.001). Overall, our study shows good concordance between MM BM MRD status and TL when comparing NGS and MFC at a threshold of 10^–5. However, a sufficient number of analyzed events and calculation of MRD key metrics are essential for the comparison of methods and evaluability of data at a specific MRD cut-off.

The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have improved dramatically in the last two decades with the advent of novel therapies including immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. In recent years, immunotherapy for the treatment of MM has advanced rapidly, with the approval of new targeted agents and monoclonal antibodies directed against myeloma cell-surface antigens, as well as maturing data from late stage trials of chimeric antigen receptor CAR T cells. Therapies that engage the immune system to treat myeloma offer significant clinical benefits with durable responses and manageable toxicity profiles, however, the appropriate use of these immunotherapy agents can present unique challenges for practicing physicians. Therefore, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer convened an expert panel, which met to consider the current role of approved and emerging immunotherapy agents in MM and provide guidance to the oncology community by developing consensus recommendations. As immunotherapy evolves as a therapeutic option for the treatment of MM, these guidelines will be updated.

Monoclonal antibodies in newly diagnosed and smoldering multiple myeloma: an updated review of current clinical evidence

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) are rapidly changing the therapeutic scenario of multiple myeloma. Most of the available data, however, come from studies performed in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.Area covered: Here, the most recent results from clinical trials that have investigated (or are investigating) efficacy and safety of MoAbs as front-line treatments in both transplant-eligible and not-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, as well as in smoldering myeloma, are reviewed. PubMed reported articles before 28 March 2020, and abstracts presented at the last ASCO, ASH, EHA, and IMW meetings were considered. Among others, pertinent data regarding daratumumab, isatuximab, elotuzumab, and pembrolizumab will be analyzed.Expert opinion: Introduction of MoAbs as first-line therapy will likely provide a significant improvement in the clinical outcome of patients with multiple myeloma. This will also require an appropriate re-positioning of salvage therapies. The role of MoAbs in smoldering myeloma appears to be promising, but adequate follow-up is needed.

Roundtable: How I treat a newly diagnosed patient with high-risk myeloma

Initial management of high-risk myeloma remains a treatment challenge. Risk is defined by a combination of clinical and biological features, with fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of specific cytogenetic abnormalities driving categorization. High-risk abnormalities include t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(17p), and +1q. Clinical features such as plasma cell leukemia, presence of 5% to 20% circulating plasma cells, and extramedullary disease all are factors in high-risk presentations. The driving principle of treatment of the high-risk patient is the use of a regimen with the greatest likelihood of a deep and prolonged remission, as defined by minimal residual disease negativity. I will describe prior and current treatment approaches, including induction, the role of autologous transplantation, and posttransplantation consolidation and maintenance therapy selection using the best available data to provide a rationale for these decisions. This case-based roundtable walks through treatment of a patient with newly diagnosed high-risk myeloma.

The efficacy and safety of modified bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVES

Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is a standard induction regimen for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, some patients discontinue VRd because of severe adverse events, despite its high efficacy. We aimed to study the efficacy of modified dose of VRd (VRd lite) in transplant-eligible patients with NDMM.

METHODS

Forty-eight transplant-eligible patients with NDMM were included. VRd lite was administered every 4 weeks. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, and dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally on the day of and the day after bortezomib administration. Lenalidomide was omitted on days 1, 8 and 15, which are the days of bortezomib administration.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles of VRd lite was 83%, including a complete response of 25%. Thirty-eight among the 45 patients who completed at least four cycles of VRd lite received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The ORR and very good partial response or better were upgraded to 100% and 74%, respectively, following ASCT.

CONCLUSION

Our strategy consisting of VRd lite followed by ASCT is, thus, a highly effective and well-tolerated regimen resulting in durable responses in patients with NDMM.

Meeting report of the 7th Heidelberg Myeloma Workshop: today and tomorrow

PURPOSE

The 7th Heidelberg Myeloma Workshop was held on April 5th and 6th, 2019 at the University Hospital Heidelberg.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Main topics of the meeting were (1) diagnostics and prognostic factors, (2) role of immunotherapy in multiple myeloma (MM), (3) current therapy of MM, (4) biology and genomics of MM as well as (5) novel treatment concepts. A debate on the status of minimal residual disease (MRD) driven therapy was held.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostics and treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed MM are continuously evolving. While advances in the field of (single cell) genetic analysis now allow for characterization of the disease at an unprecedented resolution, immunotherapeutic approaches and MRD testing are at the forefront of the current clinical trial landscape.