Comparison of weekly and triweekly cisplatin regimens during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Weekly versus triweekly cisplatin treatment in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer during concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

For patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standardized treatment. However, whether a weekly or triweekly cisplatin regimen should be used during CCRT is controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore differences in the effects and toxicities of the two regimens.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (until June 10, 2022). We evaluated overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and grade ≥ 3 adverse events. The effect indices were hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs), and Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4) was used for computations.

RESULTS

We identified 7 studies in our analysis. There was no significant difference in OS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.38, P = 0.99), DMFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.22, P = 0.36), LRFS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.32, P = 0.62) or DFS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.56-1.56; P = 0.78) between the weekly and triweekly cisplatin regimens. We found that the weekly cisplatin regimen was more likely to cause grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicity events than the triweekly cisplatin regimen. In addition, subgroup analyses revealed that patients undergoing CCRT and CCRT plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) had similar OS or DFS.

CONCLUSION

Weekly and triweekly cisplatin regimens had similar efficacy for LA-NPC. The triweekly regimen may replace the weekly regimen for LA-NPC because of lower toxicity. Larger data accumulation and more multicenter clinical trials may be needed to verify these results.

Advance in integrating platinum-based chemotherapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant tumor characterized by the malignant transformation of nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. It is highly sensitive to radiation therapy, making radiotherapy the primary treatment modality. However, 60-80% of patients are initially diagnosed with locally advanced NPC (LA-NPC), where radiotherapy alone often fails to achieve desirable outcomes. Therefore, combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy has emerged as an effective strategy to optimize treatment for LA-NPC patients. Among the various chemotherapy regimens, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using platinum-based drugs has been established as the most commonly utilized approach for LA-NPC patients. The extensive utilization of platinum drugs in clinical settings underscores their therapeutic potential and emphasizes ongoing efforts in the development of novel platinum-based complexes for anticancer therapy. The aim of this review is to elucidate the remarkable advances made in the field of platinum-based therapies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, emphasizing their transformative impact on patient prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of weekly versus triweekly cisplatin treatment concomitant with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Background: Most nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to their hidden anatomical structure and atypical clinical symptoms and often require chemoradiotherapy. Here, we present a systematic review and pooled analysis to synthesize existing research on the efficacy and adverse effects of weekly versus triweekly cisplatin chemotherapy concomitant with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 1 September 2021, for relevant original research articles published in English. The literature search and data extraction were done independently by two investigators. We used random-effects models to provide point estimates [95% confidence interval (CI)] of overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and the incidence rate of adverse effects (AEs) and with subgroup analysis according to each study type. The primary endpoints were ORR, OS, and PFS; LRFS, DMFS, and grade ≥3 acute AEs were secondary endpoints. Results: In total, 2,305 patients of eight studies were included in this review. We found that patients who were administered cisplatin weekly or triweekly had no differences in ORR, OS, PFS, DMFS, LRFS, severe mucositis, dermatitis, nausea/vomiting or nephrotoxicity. Patients who were administered weekly cisplatin were at a higher risk of hematological toxicity compared with patients who received the chemotherapy triweekly. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that both regimens could be recommended as the standard of care for the chemoradiotherapy treatment of LANPC, the perceived benefit of lower toxicity with weekly cisplatin could not be established.

Efficacy and safety of weekly versus triweekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and weekly and triweekly cisplatin are both alternative regimens based on the results of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, there is a lack of direct evidence on the efficacy and safety of weekly versus triweekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in NPC alone. This meta-analysis aimed to identify which regimen is more superior between weekly and triweekly cisplatin in patients with NPC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible literatures. Clinical outcome measures including 1-year overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 5-year loco-regional failure-free survival, 5-year distant metastasis-free survial and the most common 3 grade or higher acute toxicities (hematological toxicity, mucositis and nausea and vomiting) were analyzed by RevMan 5.4 software; significance level was 0.05.

RESULTS

Seven clinical controlled studies with 1795 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between weekly and triweekly cisplatin in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 5-year loco-regional failure-free survival, and 5-year distant metastasis-free survial) (all P > .05). Grade 3 or higher mucositis and nausea and vomiting showed similar between the 2 arms. However, grade 3 or higher hematological toxicity of weekly cisplatin was significantly higher than that of triweekly cisplatin (1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.98, P = .0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly cisplatin resulted in similar survival benifit as triweekly cisplatin, but with higher hematological toxicity.

Preclinical evaluation of the dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor sapanisertib in combination with cisplatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

A wide range of investigational drugs are being investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), including PI3K-mTOR inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effective combination of TORC1/2 inhibitor sapanisertib and chemotherapy drug cisplatin in preclinical models of NPC. In our work, sapanisertib at nanomolar concentrations decreases viability and proliferation in NPC cells regardless of varying genetic backgrounds. Sapanisertib acts synergistically with cisplatin via induces more G0/G1 arrest and apoptosis. At the same concentration, sapanisertib neither decreases viability nor proliferation in normal nasal epithelial cells. Sapanisertib also decreases NPC cell migration. It decreases phosphorylation of Akt, mTOR, p70S6K and 4EBP1 in NPC cells. The in vitro findings on the inhibitory effects of sapanisertib on NPC growth and mTOR signaling were also evident in the NPC xenograft mouse model. In addition, combination of sapanisertib with cisplatin resulted in better efficacy than monotherapy to inhibit NPC growth in mice without causing significant toxicity. These data clearly demonstrate efficacy and insignificant toxicity of sapanisertib alone and its combination with cisplatin in NPC preclinical models. Our findings will accelerate clinical trials evaluating combination of sapanisertib and chemotherapy for NPC treatment.

Adding Concurrent Chemotherapy Significantly Improves the Survival of Stage II-IVb Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Concurrent Anti-EGFR Agents

Objective

Anti-EGFR Targeted agents were found to be capable of modulating the antitumor immunity in head and neck cancer and become more and more frequently used in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC). We aimed to explore whether adding concurrent chemotherapy influences the survival outcome of patients with stage II-IVb NPC treated with concurrent anti-EGFR agents and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and explore other prognostic factors for the patients.

Materials and Methods

A total of 656 stage II-IVb NPC patients treated with concurrent anti-EGFR agents plus IMRT between January 2011 and November 2015 were enrolled. Firstly, from these patients, a well-balanced cohort of 302 patients who received concurrent chemotherapy was created by matching potential prognostic factors. Furthermore, for all 656 stage II-IVb NPC patients, univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were conducted to identify prognostic factors and to confirm the findings from the matching cohort.

Results

Compared with concurrent anti-EGFR agents alone, combining concurrent cisplatin and anti-EGFR agents significantly improved the OS (5-year 94.7% versus 84.3%, P=0.012) and PFS (5-year 82.0% versus 71.7%, P=0.039) of NPC patients with more severe hematologic toxicity and mucositis. The independent prognostic factors identified by multivariate analysis of OS and PFS included concurrent chemotherapy, epstein-barr virus(EBV) status and clinical stage. Patients treated without induction chemotherapy (IC) may achieve more benefits from the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to concurrent anti-EGFR agents.

Conclusions

For stage II-IVb NPC patients treated with concurrent anti-EGFR agents, the addition of concurrent chemotherapy can significantly improve the survival outcome.

Alisol A Inhibited the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells by Inhibiting the Hippo Signaling Pathway

PURPOSE

Alisol A is a bioactive triterpenoid isolated from the Rhizoma Alismatis. Previous studies have shown that alisol A has anticancer potential. In this study, we explored the effect of alisol A on the growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MTT assay, colony formation assay, flow cytometry, transwell assay, wound healing assay, and western blotting were used to assess cell viability, proliferation, cell cycle, migration, invasion, and protein expression, respectively, in vitro. AutoDock Vina and Discovery Studio software were used for molecular docking.

RESULTS

Alisol A inhibited the viability, proliferation, migration, and invasion of NPC cells. The molecular docking simulation assay confirmed that alisol A bound to YAP protein. In addition, alisol A promoted the phosphorylation of YAP and suppressed the expression of YAP in NPC cells.

CONCLUSION

Alisol A inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of NPC cells by inhibiting the Hippo signaling pathway. Alisol A may be a candidate drug for NPC.

Weekly versus triweekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis

Background: Weekly and triweekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have been used in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Objective: This study aimed to compare the benefits and risks between the two treatments.

Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases for prospective and retrospective clinical studies of NPC patients who received weekly compared with triweekly cisplatin-based CCRT. The primary endpoints comprised overall, failure-free, distant metastasis-free, and locoregional recurrence-free survivals (OS, FFS, DMFS, and LRFS). Secondary endpoints were toxicities.

Results: Six studies were included in the systematic review, of which four with 1515 NPC patients were eligible for further pooled analysis. There were no significant differences between weekly and triweekly groups in terms of 5-year OS (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-1.79), FFS (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.67-1.76), DMFS (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.54-2.92), and LRFS (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.25). For grade ≥ 3 toxicities, the weekly group had higher risks of anemia (risk ratio [RR] 2.96, 95% CI 1.12-7.81) and thrombocytopenia (RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.54-4.90), but a lower incidence of vomiting (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.63) versus the triweekly group.

Conclusion and Relevance: Both weekly and triweekly schedules could be recommended to NPC patients during CCRT. Additionally, hematologic adverse events in weekly strategy and non-hematologic adverse events in triweekly strategy are of higher concern.

Integrin α5 mediates intrinsic cisplatin resistance in three-dimensional nasopharyngeal carcinoma spheroids via the inhibition of phosphorylated ERK /caspase-3 induced apoptosis

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) originates in the nasopharynx epithelium. Although concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by chemotherapy is considered as an effective treatment, there is substantial drug resistance in locally advanced NPC patients. One major contributor to the chemoresistance includes aberrant expression of cell adhesion molecules, such as integrin α and β subunits, giving rise to cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of integrin α5 on the development of intrinsic cisplatin resistance in NPC and the associated underlying mechanisms using in vitro three-dimensional (3D) spheroid models, as well as induced cisplatin-resistant NPC (NPCcisR). We demonstrated that established 3D highly- (5-8F) and lowly- (6-10B) metastatic NPC spheroids overexpressed integrin α5 and aggravated their resistance to cisplatin. Besides, enhanced integrin α5 resulted in substantially reduced growth, corresponding to G₀/G₁ and G₂/M cell cycle arrest. In addition, 5-8FcisR and 6-10BcisR cells in 3D forms synergistically strengthened endurance of their spheroids to cisplatin treatment as observed by increased resistance index (RI) and decreased apoptosis. Mechanistically, the aberrantly expressed integrin α5 decreased drug susceptibility in NPC spheroids by inactivating ERK and inhibition of caspase-3 inducing apoptosis. Furthermore, the effect of integrin α5 inducing intrinsic resistance was verified via treatment with ATN-161, a peptide inhibitor for integrin α5β1. The results showed dramatic reduction in integrin α5 expression, reversal of ERK phosphorylation and caspase-3 cleavage, together with elevated cisplatin sensitivity, indicating regulation of innate drug resistance via integrin α5. Taken together, our findings suggest that integrin α5 could act as a promising target to enhance the chemotherapeutic sensitivity in NPC.

Patient reported outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation with weekly versus bolus cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) data comparing bolus (B-CP) with weekly (W-CP) cisplatin concurrent with radiation are lacking.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study comparing PRO among 99 patients with head and neck radiation, 26% who received concurrent B-CP and 73% treated with W-CP.

RESULTS

W-CP patients had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P = .004). There were no differences in median cisplatin dose, PROs, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) dependence or hospitalization between arms. Patients with a greater decline in their self-reported dysphagia score were more often PEG dependent at the end of radiation therapy (P = .03). There was also a trend toward PEG dependence with a higher maximum dysphagia score and greater change in aspiration score (P = .06). The maximum decline in white cell count and absolute neutrophil count were greater in the W-CP group (P = .04, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Both B-CP and W-CP are well tolerated. PROs do not suggest a benefit to W-CP.

Feasibility and efficiency of double-agent versus single-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the mainstay of treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. It remains unclear whether double-agent CCRT (d-CCRT) is more effective than single-agent CCRT (s-CCRT). In this study, we compared the treatment efficiency and toxicity of d-CCRT with s-CCRT in NPC patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with stage II-IV NPC treated with d-CCRT or s-CCRT were retrospectively reviewed. The d-CCRT group patients were compared with s-CCRT group patients for overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and toxicity. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted using the pair-matching method.

RESULTS

In this study, 933 patients who received CCRT for NPC between 2011 and 2014 were pair-matched at a 1:2 ratio (n = 311 for d-CCRT; n = 622 for s-CCRT). The d-CCRT treated patients showed no significant advantages in terms of 4-year OS (87.2% vs. 85.5%), DFS (84.1% vs. 79.5%), LRRFS (94.6% vs. 91.8%), DMFS (87.5% vs. 85.5%) compared with s-CCRT treated patients (P = 0.450, 0.106, 0.203, 0.366, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that CCRT regimen had no significant effects on survival. In the d-CCRT group, the incidence of grade 3-4 hematological toxicities was significantly higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The d-CCRT regimen did not confer significant survival benefits compared with the s-CCRT regimen in the treatment of stage II-IV NPC patients. Furthermore, patients treated with the d-CCRT regimen experienced greater hematological toxicity.