Pancreatic tumor in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a diagnostic challenge

Understanding autoimmune pancreatitis: Clinical features, management challenges, and association with malignancies

In this editorial we comment on the article by Jaber et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) represents a distinct form of pancreatitis, categorized into AIP-1 and AIP-2, characterized by obstructive jaundice, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and fibrosis. AIP-1, associated with elevated immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels, exhibits higher relapse rates, affecting older males, while AIP-2 is less common and linked to inflammatory bowel disease. AIP is considered a manifestation of IgG4-related systemic disease, sharing characteristic histological findings. Steroids are the primary treatment, with emerging biomarkers like interferon alpha and interleukin-33. AIP poses an increased risk of various malignancies, and the association with pancreatic cancer is debated. Surgery is reserved for severe cases, necessitating careful evaluation due to diagnostic challenges. AIP patients may have concurrent PanINs but display favorable long-term outcomes compared to pancreatic cancer patients. Thorough diagnostic assessment, including biopsy and steroid response, is crucial for informed surgical decisions in AIP.

Challenges for clinicians treating autoimmune pancreatitis: Current perspectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease clinically characterized by obstructive jaundice, unintentional weight loss, acute pancreatitis, focal pancreatic mass, and diabetes. AIP is classified into two subtypes - type 1 and type 2 - according to pathological findings, clinical features, and serology test results, but some cases may be defined as type not otherwise in the absence of pathological findings and inflammatory bowel disease. To address the differences in diagnostic criteria by country, standard diagnostic criteria for AIP were proposed in 2011 by an international consensus of expert opinions. Differential diagnosis of AIP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is important but remains challenging for clinicians. Fortunately, all subtypes of AIP show dramatic response to steroid treatment. This review discusses the current perspectives on the diagnosis and management of AIP in clinical practice.

Correlation of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Malignancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence regarding autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) association with pancreatic and non-pancreatic cancers. Literature lacks data on overall prevalence of malignancies in autoimmune pancreatitis.

AIM

Given the lack of definite evidence, we aimed to pool and summarize data from available literature regarding prevalence of different malignancies in AIP.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science through February 16, 2021, to include observational studies assessing the incidence of cancer in AIP. We used the DerSimonian-Laird method with random effects for meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence, 95% confidence interval (CI), and I² statistic are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with 2746 patients were included assessing the prevalence of cancer in AIP. The overall prevalence of cancer in AIP was 9.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7-13.5%]. The cancers with the highest prevalence in AIP population were gastric and colorectal cancer, with prevalence of 1.3% (95% CI, 0.5-2.1%) and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.6-1.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the prevalence of different cancers in AIP. Inflammatory surge in AIP and subsequent carcinogenesis is one explanation for this association. Moreover, AIP can be a paraneoplastic syndrome manifestation of malignancies.

The Clinical Utility of Soluble Serum Biomarkers in Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare etiological type of chronic pancreatitis. The clinical and radiological presentation of AIP often resembles that of pancreatic cancer. Identifying non-invasive markers for their early distinction is of utmost importance to avoid unnecessary surgery or a delay in steroid therapy. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to revisit all current evidence on the clinical utility of different serum biomarkers in diagnosing AIP, distinguishing AIP from pancreatic cancer, and predicting disease course, steroid therapy response, and relapse. A systematic review was performed for articles published up to August 2021 by searching electronic databases such as MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Among 5123 identified records, 92 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Apart from immunoglobulin (Ig) G4, which was by far the most studied biomarker, we identified autoantibodies against the following: lactoferrin, carboanhydrase II, plasminogen-binding protein, amylase-α2A, cationic (PRSS1) and anionic (PRSS2) trypsinogens, pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (PSTI/SPINK1), and type IV collagen. The identified novel autoantigens were laminin 511, annexin A11, HSP-10, and prohibitin. Other biomarkers included cytokines, decreased complement levels, circulating immune complexes, N-glycan profile changes, aberrant miRNAs expression, decreased IgA and IgM levels, increased IgE levels and/or peripheral eosinophil count, and changes in apolipoprotein isoforms levels. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that addresses biomarkers in AIP. Evolving research has recognized numerous biomarkers that could help elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of AIP, bringing us closer to AIP diagnosis and its preoperative distinction from pancreatic cancer.

IgG4-related diseases of the digestive tract

IgG4-related conditions affecting the digestive tract are part of a multi-organ fibro-inflammatory disorder termed IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), with autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related cholangitis being the most prominent manifestations. Gastrointestinal symptoms include jaundice, weight loss, abdominal pain, biliary strictures, and pancreatic and hepatic masses that mimic malignant diseases. IgG4-RD manifestations occur less frequently elsewhere in the digestive tract, namely in the oesophagus, retroperitoneum or intestine. Evidence-based European guidelines frame the current state-of-the-art in the diagnosis and management of IgG4-related digestive tract disease. Diagnosis is based on histology (if available), imaging, serology, other organ involvement and response to therapy (HISORt criteria). Few biomarkers beyond serum IgG4 concentrations are reliable. The first-line therapy (glucocorticoids) is swiftly effective but disease flares are common at low doses or after tapering. Second-line therapy might consist of other immunosuppressive drugs such as thiopurines or rituximab. Further trials, for example, of anti-CD19 drugs, are ongoing. Although an association between IgG4-RD and the development of malignancies has been postulated, the true nature of this relationship remains uncertain at this time.

Clinical characteristics of autoimmune pancreatitis: Analysis of 19 cases and a literature review

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an immune-mediated disease characterized by pancreatic enlargement, lymphoplasmic cell infiltration, and storiform fibrosis. The pathogenesis is not clear, the epidemiological data in China is still limited, the clinical manifestations are mostly non-specific, and the onset is insidious. Therefore, summarizing the clinical characteristics and prognosis of the disease can guide its diagnosis and treatment in the future.

AIM

To analyze the clinical manifestation, serology, imaging features, diagnostic methods, and therapy of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 19 patients with AIP, who visited the Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 2011 to May 2020. AIP was diagnosed according to the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) established at the 2010 Congress of the International Association of Pancreatology.

RESULTS

The sex ratio (male-to-female) was 16:3. The mean age was 71.0 ± 10.7 years. All of the cases met the diagnostic criteria for AIP type 1. The common symptoms in patients with AIP were obstructive jaundice, hyperglycemia, weight loss, anorexia, fatigue, and abdominal distension. Complications mostly involved the bile duct, lymph nodes, and thyroid gland. IgG4 was increased in 16 patients, all higher than twice normal upper limit; bilirubin was increased in 11 patients; CA199 was increased significantly in 11 patients, but decreased significantly after treatment (P < 0.05). Ultrasound can be used as a screening examination for AIP. CT and MRI were the most importantly used imaging modalities in AIP, and the typical signs were diffuse or local enlargement of the pancreas. EUS also had clinical diagnostic value. The majority of the patients (16/19) received glucocorticoid therapy, six of which were treated with immunosuppressive agents. Two cases were untreated. One case was misdiagnosed and underwent surgery. Most of the patients (14/16) who were treated with steroid had alleviated clinical symptoms and radiological signs, of whom one relapsed, and one died from unknown cause. There was no significant change in the two untreated patients during the follow-up period. One case died after surgery.

CONCLUSION

AIP is a rare clinical disease, and its clinical manifestations and serological indicators are not specific.

Autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: Epidemiological aspects and immunological considerations

Ordinary chronic pancreatitis is a well-known risk factor for pancreatic cancer, whereas such an association with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is widely debated. Due to the rarity of the latter disorder, there are few specific clinical and epidemiological studies investigating the relation between AIP and pancreatic cancer, which do not seem to support it. However, these studies are affected by several limitations and, therefore, a link between AIP (and, specifically, type 1 AIP) and pancreatic cancer cannot be ruled out definitively on this basis. Moreover, several immunopathological aspects of type 1 AIP and, in general, immunoglobulin G4-related disease can create an immunological context that may impair the tumoral immunosurveillance and promote the pancreatic carcinogenesis and its progression. In detail, Th2 immunological dominance, type 2 macrophage polarization and basophil infiltration observed in type 1 AIP, may play a permissive role in creating a favorable immunological environment for pancreatic carcinogenesis, in addition to the immunosuppressive therapies that can be used in these patients.

Prevalence of histological features resembling autoimmune pancreatitis in neoplastic pancreas resections

AIMS

Types 1 and 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) can mimic pancreatic neoplasia. Due to the small quantity of tissue in mass-targeted pancreas biopsies, inflammatory features may raise the differential of AIP. However, the frequency of AIP-like histology in neoplastic pancreas is not well characterised. Therefore, the specificity of inflammatory lesions on biopsy with respect to the diagnosis of AIP is uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Neoplastic pancreas resections performed at our institution between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Features of AIP types 1 and 2 were assessed in the non-neoplastic areas. If features of immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-associated AIP were seen, IgG4 immunohistochemistry was performed. We identified 163 neoplastic pancreas resections. Of these, 34 had one or more types of inflammatory lesions in non-neoplastic pancreatic tissue. Dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammation mimicking type 1 AIP was found in six cases with mild to moderately increased IgG4-positive plasma cells. Neutrophilic infiltrates in small intralobular ducts were found in 20 cases. Mild extralobular ductitis or duct microabscess was found in 10 specimens. Marked neutrophilic duct destruction that resembled granulocytic epithelial lesions was found in 12 cases. Some cases showed multiple features.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 20% of neoplastic pancreas resections showed focal areas that could raise the differential of AIP. More cases showed neutrophilic predominant inflammation as seen in type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis, compared to dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates seen in type 1 AIP. Pathologists must be cautious when making a diagnosis of AIP on biopsy tissue based on histological findings alone.

European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations

The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4-related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work-up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra-pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4-related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6-0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30-40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2-4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi-organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.