Searching for novel multimodal treatments in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer

Defining oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and critical synthesis of consensus

BACKGROUND

Small retrospective series suggest that local consolidative treatment (LCT) may improve survival in oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, no uniform definition of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in PDAC exists; this impedes meaningful conclusions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL registries for studies and protocols reporting on definitions and/or LCT of OMD in PDAC was performed. The primary endpoint was the definition of OMD. Levels of agreement were categorized as consensus (≥75% agreement between studies), fair agreement (50%-74%), and absent/poor agreement (<50%).

RESULTS

After screening of 5374 abstracts, the full text of 218 studies was assessed, of which 76 were included in the qualitative synthesis. The majority of studies were retrospective (n = 66, 87%), two were prospective studies and eight were study protocols. Studies investigated mostly liver (n = 38, 51%) and lung metastases (n = 15, 20%). Across studies, less than one-half (n = 32, 42%) reported a definition of OMD, while 44 (58%) did not. Involvement was limited to a single organ (consensus). Additional criteria for defining OMD were the number of lesions (consensus), metastatic site (poor agreement), metastatic size (poor agreement), treatment possibilities (poor agreement), and biomarker response (poor agreement). Liver OMD could involve three or fewer lesions (consensus) and synchronous disease (fair agreement), while lung metastases could involve two or fewer lesions and metachronous disease (consensus). The large majority of studies were at a high risk of bias or did not include any control groups.

CONCLUSION

Definitions of OMD were not used or varied widely between studies hampering across-study comparability and highlighting an unmet need for a consensus. The present study is part of a multistep process that aims to develop an interdisciplinary consensus on OMD in pancreatic cancer.

Highly Selective Targeting of Pancreatic Cancer in the Liver with a Near-Infrared Anti-MUC5AC Probe in a PDOX Mouse Model: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Accurately identifying metastatic disease is critical to directing the appropriate treatment in pancreatic cancer. Mucin 5AC is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer but absent in normal pancreas tissue. The present proof-of-concept study demonstrates the efficacy of an anti-mucin 5AC antibody conjugated to an IR800 dye (MUC5AC-IR800) to preferentially label a liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer (Panc Met) in a unique patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. In orthotopic models, the mean tumor to background ratio was 1.787 (SD ± 0.336), and immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of MUC5AC within tumor cells. MUC5AC-IR800 provides distinct visualization of pancreatic cancer liver metastasis in a PDOX mouse model, demonstrating its potential utility in staging laparoscopy and fluorescence-guided surgery.

Feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy with synchronous liver metastasectomy for oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - A case-control study

Background

Resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with synchronous liver metastasectomy is still a matter of debate. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of synchronous resection of PDAC and liver metastases for curative intent at a high-volume surgical center.

Methods

Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with synchronous liver metastasectomy (M1 resection group, n = 50) were matched 1 : 1 based on tumor and nodular stage, age, gender, body mass index and concomitant disease with two control groups (M0 resection and M1 no resection). The M0 resection group included patients who underwent PD without metastases. The M1 no resection group included patients with liver metastases who underwent palliative bypass or exploratory laparotomy without resection followed by palliative and adjuvant therapies.

Results

M1 resection group had a longer operation time, larger intraoperative blood loss, and longer postoperative hospital stay than other two groups. R0 resection rate of M1 resection group was similar to that of M0 resection group (92% vs. 94%, p = 1.000). Postoperative complications were comparable between the groups. The overall median survival in M1 resection, M0 resection, and M1 no resection group was 16, 30, and 6 months, respectively. Cumulative survival rates for 1-, 2-, and 3-year of the M1 resection, M0 resection, and M1 no resection group were 63.8%, 29.0%, and 6.7%; 94.0%, 74.4%, and 25.1%; 24.0%, 2.0%, and 0%, respectively. The survival of M1 resection group was worse than that of M0 resection group (p = 0.009), however significantly much better than that of M1 no resection group (p = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed carcinoembryonic antigen >8 ng/ml and non-R0 resection were associated with death. Multivariate analysis revealed that M1 resection group had improved survival compared with M1 no resection group.

Conclusions

PD with synchronous liver metastasectomy for oligometastatic PDAC is safe and feasible, it might provide survival benefits for selected patients.

•

A retrospective, case–control study was conducted at a high-volume surgical center.

•

50 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with synchronous liver metastasectomy.

•

Complications were similar in M1 resection, M0 resection and M1 no resection groups.

•

Carcinoembryonic antigen >8 ng/ml and non-R0 resection were associated with death.

•

The survival of M1 resection group was much better than that of M1 no resection.