Longer-term recurrence rate after low versus high dose radioiodine ablation for differentiated thyroid Cancer in low and intermediate risk patients: a meta-analysis

Long-Term Outcome of Low- and High-Dose Radioiodine for Thyroid Remnant Ablation

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of low- and high-dose radioiodine for remnant ablation in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in China. The first-stage results showed equivalence was observed between the two groups. Here, we report recurrence and survival at 3-5 and 6-10 years and biochemical parameters.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2014, adult patients with DTC were enroled. Patients had undergone total or near-total thyroidectomy, with or without cervical lymph node dissection, with tumour stages T1-T3 with or without lymph node metastasis, but without distant metastasis. Patients were randomly assigned to the low-dose (1850 MBq) or high-dose (3700 MBq) radioiodine group. They were then followed up for 3-5 and 6-10 years. Data on biochemical abnormalities, recurrence and survival were analysed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and χ2 tests.

RESULTS

The data of 228 patients (mean age = 42 years; 70.6% women) were analysed, with 117 patients in the low-dose group and 111 in the high-dose group. There were no significant differences in biochemical abnormalities, recurrence, or survival rates at the 6-10-year follow-up (all p > .05). Nine patients experienced recurrence in the low-dose group (8.7%), while eight patients experienced recurrence in the high-dose group (8.2%). The survival rates were 100% and 98.2% in the low- and high-dose groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term effectiveness and safety of low-dose (1850 MBq) radioiodine are the same as those of high-dose (3700 MBq) radioiodine for thyroid remnant ablation in Chinese patients with low-risk DTC.

RAI therapy in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: recurrence reduction and long-term outcomes in the Turkish population

PURPOSE

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most common thyroid malignancy, characterized by its slow progression and favorable prognosis. This study re-evaluates the efficacy of radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy versus no RAI in low-risk PTC patients following total thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 588 patients treated between 2010 and 2016 at a major tertiary center in Turkey. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those receiving total thyroidectomy (TT) with high-dose RAI (100 mCi) and those receiving TT alone. A matched cohort of 138 patients per group was analyzed to minimize bias.

RESULTS

Follow-up data indicated that at 24 months, the RAI group demonstrated a higher percentage of excellent treatment responses (86%) compared to the non-RAI group (74%). Long-term follow-up showed that 99.3% of the RAI group achieved no evidence of disease (NED), versus 90.6% in the non-RAI group. Recurrence rates were significantly lower in the RAI group (1%) compared to the non-RAI group (5.8% with a > 2.0 ng/ml cut-off for biological events).

CONCLUSION

In summary, the findings from this study underscore the efficacy of RAI therapy in reducing recurrence rates and enhancing long-term disease control in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients. While total thyroidectomy alone is effective, the addition of RAI therapy provides a marked improvement in treatment responses and reduces the risk of disease recurrence. This indicates that personalized treatment plans incorporating RAI may offer significant advantages in managing low-risk PTC.

Early Dynamic Risk Stratification Decreases Rate of Ablative and Adjuvant Radioiodine Use in ATA Low and Intermediate Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients

Objectives

In differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), radioiodine (RAI) therapy is most frequently employed for remnant ablation or as adjuvant therapy for the remaining disease. The application of RAI to patients classified as intermediate risk (InR) is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of early postoperative risk assessment on RAI use on papillary thyroid cancer patients who are classified as low risk (LoR) or InR.

Methods

This is a single-center, prospective registry study. One-hundred-eighty-six patients operated between January 2012 and August 2021 and categorized as LoR or InR were included in this study. All patients had total thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection by the same endocrine surgeon. An early dynamic risk assessment (EDRA) consisting of neck ultrasonography, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and anti-Tg levels was performed 6 weeks after surgery. Most of the patients were either followed up without RAI or received ablative low activity (30-50 mCi) RAI based on predetermined criteria.

Results

Median follow-up was 63 months. Sixty-six (61%) patients in the LoR group and 43 (56%) patients in the InR group did not receive RAI treatment. Thirty-eight (35%) and 22 (29%) patients in LoR and InR groups received ablative (30-50 mCi) RAI therapy, respectively. In LoR group 5 (4.6%) patients and in InR group 12 (16%) patients received 100 mCi or more RAI activity. Only one patient in the InR group recurred during follow-up. No statistically significant difference regarding local recurrence was found between patients who didn't receive RAI or were treated with RAI within both LoR (p=0.152) and InR (p=0.272) groups.

Conclusion

There is consensus for LoR patients about omitting RAI therapy after surgery. Indications for RAI treatment in InR DTC are still under debate. RAI use based on EDRA seems to be a better option than decisions solely made on histopathological risk factors and decreases adjuvant high-activity RAI use without increasing recurrence risk.

Radioiodine (131I) treatment decision-making for low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect and influencing factors of postsurgical radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for patients with low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Subjects and methods

A retrospective analysis of 423 low- and intermediaterisk DTC patients admitted to the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2005 to December 2020 was performed. All patients were treated with surgery, had a postoperative pathological diagnosis, and were treated with RAI, including 89 males and 334 females. Recurrence risk stratification: 143 cases were low-risk, and 280 cases were intermediaterisk.

Results

The excellent response (ER) rate for low- and intermediate-risk were 93.7% and 78.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in age, cumulative dose of [131I], and pretreatment stimulated-Tg (pre-Tg) levels between the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the cumulative dose of 131I and pre-Tg levels between ER and the non-ER group (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.799 in the low-risk group, and 0.747 in the intermediate-risk group for the ROC curve by ER status of pre-Tg. The ER rate with RAI treatment decreased with an increase in pre-Tg levels.

Conclusion

Pre-Tg was an important factor for RAI treatment decision-making and prognostic evaluation and differed between low-risk and intermediate-risk DTC. Aggressive RAI therapy was recommended for low-risk DTC with pre-Tg ≥ 20.0 ng/mL and in intermediate-risk group with pre-Tg ≥ 10.0 ng/mL.

Strategies for Radioiodine Treatment: What’s New

Radioiodine treatment (RAI) represents the most widespread and effective therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). RAI goals encompass ablative (destruction of thyroid remnants, to enhance thyroglobulin predictive value), adjuvant (destruction of microscopic disease to reduce recurrences), and therapeutic (in case of macroscopic iodine avid lesions) purposes, but its use has evolved over time. Randomized trial results have enabled the refinement of RAI indications, moving from a standardized practice to a tailored approach. In most cases, low-risk patients may safely avoid RAI, but where necessary, a simplified protocol, based on lower iodine activities and human recombinant TSH preparation, proved to be just as effective, reducing overtreatment or useless impairment of quality of life. In pediatric DTC, RAI treatments may allow tumor healing even at the advanced stages. Finally, new challenges have arisen with the advancement in redifferentiation protocols, through which RAI still represents a leading therapy, even in former iodine refractory cases. RAI therapy is usually well-tolerated at low activities rates, but some concerns exist concerning higher cumulative doses and long-term outcomes. Despite these achievements, several issues still need to be addressed in terms of RAI indications and protocols, heading toward the RAI strategy of the future.

Comparing High and Low-Dose Radio-Iodine Therapy in Thyroid Remnant Ablation Among Intermediate and Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients-Single Centre Experience

The role of Iodine-131 therapy is well established as an adjuvant therapy and for thyroid remnant ablation in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC); however controversy still exists regarding its appropriate dose. Purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of low-dose and high-dose Iodine-131 ablation therapies in low- and intermediate-risk PTC patients. Eighty-four patients were divided equally into Group I: Ablated with high dose of Iodine-131 and Group II: Ablated with low dose of Iodine-131. Iodine-131 WBS, serum TG levels and USG neck of all patients were performed at first presentation, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years follow up. Results are as follows: Group I: 64%, 72%, and 76% intermediate-risk patients were disease free at the follow up intervals of 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Similarly 70%, 82%, and 82% low-risk patients were disease free at above mentioned intervals. Group II: 56%, 60%, and 64% were disease free among intermediate-risk patients while percentage of disease free low-risk patients was 70%, 76%, and 76% at follow up intervals. Low dose of radioactive Iodine-131 was found as effective as high dose in thyroid remnant ablation of PTC patients.

Myeloid Toxicity of Radionuclide Cancer Therapy

Emergent genomic analytic techniques in patients with cancer offer the potential to define the risk of myelo dysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute leukemia (AL) manifesting following targeted radionuclide therapy of metastatic lymphoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and prostate cancer. Characterization of the genetic profile will allow risk stratification of patients before theranostic radionuclide management of advanced cancers and offers the opportunity to minimize toxicity while preserving optimal individualized efficacy in the practice of personalized precision nuclear oncology. Our review of a single-center experience of prospective radionuclide theranostic management of metastatic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), NETs, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer [mCRPC]) over the past decade, and comparison with published studies, shows that while the risk of significant myelotoxicity is generally low, at <3%, the consequences in the small minority of patients who develop MDS or AL are substantial, and survival is poor. Timely identification of patients at heightened risk of hematologic toxic complication, using novel genomic technology before institution of radionuclide therapy, will facilitate amelioration of myelotoxicity. In current clinical practice, the minimal hematological toxicity of chemo-free theranostic management of advanced cancer is significantly less compared with newly adopted chemotherapy -immunotherapy regimens, and the financial toxicity associated with these novel agents is avoided.

Outcomes after radioiodine ablation in patients with thyroid cancer: Long-term follow-up of a Chinese randomized clinicaltrial

OBJECTIVE

Two large randomized trials of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) reported recently (HiLo and ESTIMABL1) found that the recurrence rate among patients who underwent 1.1 GBq radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation was not higher than that of patients who underwent 3.7 GBq radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation. However, no similar studies have been conducted in China. We aimed to report clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with low/intermediate risk of recurrence DTC after long-term follow-up, and evaluate the risk factors that influence the presence or absence of incomplete response at the final follow-up.

DESIGN

A long-term follow-up of a Chinese randomized clinical trial (October 2014 and February 2021) was conducted.

PATIENTS

A total of 506 DTC patients at low/intermediate risk of recurrence who were randomized into two groups to receive 1.1 (n = 251) or 3.7 GBq (n = 255) RAI ablation following thyroid hormone withdrawal were followed on levothyroxine treatment for a median of 4.5 years (range: 1.6-6.3).

MEASUREMENTS

Suppressed serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) levels were determined, and neck ultrasonography was performed.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, 499 (98.6%) patients showed an excellent response. The other seven patients (two patients underwent 1.1 GBq and five patients underwent 3.7 GBq RAI ablation, respectively) showed either structural incomplete response (lymph node metastasis, n = 1), biochemical incomplete response (increased serum Tg ≥ 1 ng/ml, or increased positive TgAb levels, n = 5), or indeterminate response (stable positive TgAb levels, n = 1). The risk of incomplete response at the final follow-up was significantly increased in patients with stimulated serum Tg ≥ 10 ng/ml at ablation (p = .003) and in patients with unsuccessful ablation (p = .008).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that there was no difference in the long-term outcomes with RAI ablation using either 1.1 or 3.7 GBq in patients with low/intermediate risk of recurrence DTC, and 1.1 GBq RAI might be suitable for patients who are recommended for ablation.

Change in Practice of Radioactive Iodine Administration in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Single-Centre Experience

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to analyse temporal trends in radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment for thyroid cancer over the past decade; to analyse key factors associated with clinical decisions in RAI dosing; and to confirm lower activities of RAI for low-risk patients were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 1,323 patients who received RAI at a quaternary centre in Australia between 2008 and 2018 was performed. Prospectively collected data included age, gender, histology, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (7th ed). American Thyroid Association risk was calculated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median activities of RAI administered to low-risk patients decreased from 3.85 GBq (104 mCi) in 2008-2016 to 2.0 GBq (54 mCi) in 2017-2018. The principal driver of this change was an increased use of 1 GBq (27 mCi) from 1.3% of prescriptions in 2008-2011 to 18.5% in 2017-2018. In patients assigned as low risk per ATA stratification, lower activities of 1 GBq or 2 GBq (27 mCi or 54 mCi) were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. In patients assigned to intermediate- or high-risk categories who received RAI as adjuvant therapy, there was no difference in risk of recurrence between 4 GBq (108 mCi) and 6 GBq (162 mCi).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate an evolution of RAI activities consistent with translation of ATA guidelines into clinical practice. Use of lower RAI activities was not associated with an increase in recurrence in low-risk thyroid cancer patients. Our data also suggest lower RAI activities may be as efficacious for adjuvant therapy in intermediate- and high-risk patients.

Radioiodine in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Do We Need Diagnostic Pre-Ablation Iodine-123 Scintigraphy to Optimize Treatment?

Changing insights regarding radioiodine (I-131) administration in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) stir up discussions on the utility of pre-ablation diagnostic scintigraphy (DxWBS). Our retrospective study qualitatively and semi-quantitatively assessed posttherapy I-131 whole-body scintigraphy (TxWBS) data for thyroid remnant size and metastasis. Findings were associated with initial treatment success after nine months, as well as clinical, histopathological, and surgical parameters. Possible management changes were addressed. A thyroid remnant was reported in 89 of 97 (92%) patients, suspicion of lymph node metastasis in 26 (27%) and distant metastasis in 6 (6%). Surgery with oncological intent and surgery by two dedicated thyroid surgeons were independently associated with a smaller remnant. Surgery at a community hospital, aggressive tumor histopathology, histopathological lymph node metastasis (pN1) and suspicion of new lymph node metastasis on TxWBS were independently associated with an unsuccessful treatment. Thyroid remnant size was unrelated to treatment success. All 13 pN1 patients with suspected in situ lymph node metastases on TxWBS had an unsuccessful treatment, opposite 19/31 (61%) pN1 patients without (p = 0.009). Pre-ablative knowledge of these TxWBS findings had likely influenced management in 48 (50%) patients. Additional pre-ablative diagnostics could optimize patient-tailored I-131 administration. DxWBS should be considered, especially in patients with pN1 stage or suspected in situ lymph node metastasis. Dependent on local surgical expertise, DxWBS is not recommended to evaluate thyroid remnant size.

The Optimal Activity of Radioactive Iodine for Remnant Ablation in Low/Intermediate Risk Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Continuous Controversy and Meta-Analysis

Radioactive iodine (RAI) is widely used for remnant ablation in low/intermediate differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). However, the optimal effective dose that overweighs the benefits over unwanted side effects is a matter of controversy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess low versus high doses of RAI activity for DTC remnant ablation. Two authors independently searched PubMed and Cochrane Library using the keywords low dose radioactive iodine, high dose radioactive iodine, low-risk/intermediate risk, differentiated thyroid carcinoma, and remnant ablation. Two hundred and twenty references were identified when limiting the engine to controlled trials in English and during the period from January 2010 to December 2020. Nine trials (five from Europe and four from Asia) including 3137 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were then entered in an extraction sheet detailing the trial information including the author's name, year of publication, country, and type of surgery, preparation for RAI, the patients and control number in the low and high-dose groups, follow-up period, and the results. Out of 220 articles retrieved, nine controlled trials were included (follow-up period range, six months to 12 years, 3137 patients, and low risk of bias). The analysis favored the high dose for remnants ablation, odd ratio, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.50-1.07; P-value for the overall effect was 0.10. However, the results were limited due to the significant heterogeneity observed (56%, P-value 0.03). High-dose RAI was better for DTC remnants ablation. Further studies focusing on intermediate-risk DTC and adjusting for preoperative and postoperative factors are recommended.

Can we safely reduce the administration of 131-iodine in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer? - experience of the Brugmann hospital in Brussels

Background

131-iodine (¹³¹I) administration after surgery remains a standard practice in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). In 2014, the American Thyroid Association presented new guidelines for the staging and management of DTC, including no systematic ¹³¹I in patients at low-risk of recurrence and a reduced ¹³¹I activity in intermediate risk.The present study aims at evaluating the rate of response to treatment following this new therapeutic management compared to our previous treatment strategy in patients with DTC of different risks of recurrence.

Methods

Patients treated and followed up for DTC according to the 2014-ATA guidelines (Group 2) were compared to those treated between 2007 and 2014 (Group 1) in terms of general characteristics, risk of recurrence (based on the 2015-ATA recommendations), preparation to ¹³¹I administration, cumulative administered ¹³¹I activity and response to treatment.

Results

In total, 136 patients were included: 78 in Group 1 and 58 in Group 2. The two groups were not statistically different in terms of clinical characteristics nor risk stratification: 42.3% in Group 1 and 31% in Group 2 were classified as low risk, 38.5 and 48.3% as intermediate risk and 19.2 and 20.7% as high risk (P = 0.38). Two patients (one in each group) with distant metastases were excluded from the analysis.Preparation to ¹³¹I administration consisted in rhTSH stimulation in 23.4% of the patients in Group 1 and 100% in Group 2 (p < 0.001).¹³¹I was administered to 46/77 patients (59.7%) in Group 1 (5 at low risk of recurrence) and 38/57 patients (66.7%) in Group 2 (0 with a low risk). Among the patients treated by ¹³¹I, median cumulative activity was significantly higher in Group 1 (3.70GBq [100 mCi] range 1.11-11.1 GBq [30-300 mCi]) than in Group 2 (1.11 GBq [30 mCi], range 1.11-7.4 GBq [30-200 mCi], P < 0.001). Complete response was found in 90.9% in Group 1 vs. 96.5% in Group 2 (P = 0.20).

Conclusions

Using the 2015-ATA evidence-based guidelines for the management of DTC, meaning no ¹³¹I administration in low-risk patients, a low activity in intermediate and even high risk patients, and a systematic use of rhTSH stimulation before ¹³¹I therapy allowed us to reduce significantly the median administered ¹³¹I activity, with a similar rate of complete therapeutic response.