Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia

Short-term efficacy of additional laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate short-term efficacy of direct laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy (LAG) versus non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) plus additional LAG for early gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

286 patients were retrospectively assigned into two groups: direct LAG group (n = 255) and additional LAG (ESD plus LAG, n = 31) group. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to equalize relevant confounding factors between two groups for analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were successfully matched, including 62 in the direct LAG group and 31 in the additional LAG group. A significant (P = 0.013) difference existed in the drainage removal time between the additional LAG and direct LAG group (7 d vs. 6 d). Age, sex, tumor location and surgical approach were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications, with age ≥ 60 years (P = 0.002) and total gastrectomy (P = 0.011) as significant independent risk factors. A significant (P = 0.023) difference existed in the surgical time between the early and late groups (193.3 ± 37.6 min vs. 165.5 ± 25.1 min).

CONCLUSION

Additional LAG (D1 + lymphadenectomy) after ESD may be safe and effective even though non-curative ESD may prolong the drainage removal time and increase the difficulty of surgery.

Increasing utilization of endoscopic local excision for early-stage gastric cancers in the United States

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association provided updated criteria for endoscopic local excision of early-stage gastric cancer in 2018. The purpose of this study was to evaluate utilization patterns for endoscopic local excision in the United States for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2017. Patients were classified into strict appropriate criteria, expanded criteria, and inappropriate based on the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines. Factors associated with endoscopic local excision were identified using univariate and logistic multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Within the National Cancer Database, 46,334 patients were stratified into strict appropriate criteria (n = 1,405), expanded criteria (n = 727), and inappropriate (n = 43,675). Annual cases of local excision increased by 76.9% over the study period, from 273 in 2010 to 483 in 2017. Among patients who underwent local excision, 10.1% were classified as strict appropriate criteria, 1.6% were classified as expanded criteria, and 84.5% were classified as inappropriate. Among inappropriate patients, factors associated with endoscopic local excision were: more recent year of diagnosis, increasing age, female sex, tumor located in the cardia, smaller size, low-grade, absence of lymphovascular invasion, and treatment at an academic facility.

CONCLUSION

The use of endoscopic local excision for gastric cancer has nearly doubled since 2010. However, most patients do not satisfy consensus criteria for endoscopic therapy.