Prognostic value and clinicopathological characteristics of PD-L1 overexpression in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis

The prognostic significance of programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand on lymphoma cells and tumor-immune cells in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) is the most common type non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, where the treatment of relapsed/refractory cases is the major challenge. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 play a crucial role in the negative regulation of the immune response against the disease. The aim of the study was to analyze the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 on lymphoma cells (LCs) and tumor-immune cells (TICs) and to investigate their correlation with outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Samples from 283 patients diagnosed with DLBCL, NOS (both germinal center B cell like [GCB] and non-GCB subtypes) were included in the study. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was determined using double immunohistochemical staining (D-IHC) for PD-1/PAX5 and PD-L1/PAX5 on tissue microarrays. LCs were highlighted by D-IHC to obtain more accurate results. Clinical data and histologic diagnoses were obtained from electronic data records. We correlated clinical characteristics, and PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on LCs and TICs with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Expression of PD-1 on TICs was observed in 38.4% and on LCs in 8.8% of cases, while PD-L1 was expressed on TICs in 46.8% and on LCs in 6.5% of cases. PD-L1 expression on LCs was more frequent in non-GCB subtype (p = 0.047). In addition, patients with PD-L1 expression on LCs had significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.015), and the expression retained significant in the multivariate model (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 was more frequently expressed in LCs of the non-GCB subtype. Additionally, PD-L1 in LCs may predict shorter PFS time. D-IHC staining for PD-L1/PAX5 is a feasible method to assess PD-L1 expression on LCs of DLBCL, NOS patients and can be used to identify patients who may benefit from targeted immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors.

The predictive implication of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in extranodal natural killer/T-Cell lymphoma and its correlation with clinicopathological features: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and function in hematologic malignancies have aroused extensive attention, its prognostic value for extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is still unknown. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the predictive value of neoplastic PD-L1 expression for ENKTL.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI databases were searched to identify eligible observational studies reporting PD-L1 expression and survival outcomes of ENKTL patients. The search was conducted in accordance with the Meta-analyses Of Observative Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were adopted to analyze survival outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were adopted for clinicopathological parameters. Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 17.0 were used for statistical analysis. Potential publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot and Egger's test.

Results

A total of 433 patients with ENKTL were included across seven studies. The pooled results showed no significant relationship between neoplastic PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) (HR =1.35, 95% CI: 0.49-3.75, P=0.559). We also performed subgroup analyses. However, increased PD-L1 expression was associated with a low international prognostic index (IPI) score of 0-1 (OR =2.46; 95% CI: 1.11-5.45, P=0.03), good performance status (OR =1.97; 95% CI: 1.11-3.51, P=0.02), and a good treatment effect (OR =2.61; 95% CI: 1.01-6.70, P=0.05).

Conclusions

PD-L1-positive expression in patients with ENKTL was correlated with favorable clinical features. Thus, PD-L1-positive expression appears to be a potential predictor of treatment benefits. Additional large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to further explore its predictive value.

Programmed death ligand 1 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: correlation with clinicopathological prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of the level of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is still debatable. This study examined the effect of the level of PD-L1 expression on the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of one hundred de novo DLBCL patients diagnosed from 2013 to 2016. PD-L1 expression was defined by a modified Combined-Positive Score (CPS) and their medical records were reviewed to collect their clinical, laboratory and radiological data, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

The included patients were aged from 23 to 85 years and treated by rituximab- cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, oncovin, prednisone (R-CHOP); 49% were males; 85% of the cases were presented at Ann Arbor stages III, IV; 33% of patients were seropositive for HCV and 87% of cases were presented with intermediate and high IPI. All included cases expressed PD-L1 using modified CPS. 27% of patients showed low PD-L1 expression (≥ 5% to < 50% of total tumor cellularity) while 73% of patients showed high PD-L1expression (≥ 50% of total tumor cellularity). High PD-L1 expression is statistically correlated with advanced stage (p 0.01), high IPI score (p 0.017), high incidence of stationary and progressive disease (p 0.002) and high incidence of relapse (p value 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 29% for patients with high PD-L1 expression compared with 84.8% for patients with low PD-L1 expression (p 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that high PD-L1 expression in DLBCL is associated with aggressive clinicopathological features and a decreased response to R-CHOP. The level of PD-L1 expression could be an independent predictor of DFS of DLBCL. More research is mandatory to standardize the cutoff value and scoring methods.

Coexpression of PD-L1/PD-1 with CXCR3/CD36 and IL-19 Increase in Extranodal Lymphoma

Many studies have demonstrated that PD-L1/PD-1 signaling is an immune evasion mechanism in tumors. PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3/CD36 in peripheral lymphocytes in lymphoma still needs to be clarified. The current study investigated PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3/CD36 in circulating lymphocytes, serum IL-19 levels, and their correlation with clinical outcome and extranodal involvement in lymphoma. Subjects and Methods. The coexpression of PD-L1/PD-1 with CXCR3/CD36 on circulating lymphocytes was analyzed by flow cytometry in 78 lymphoma patients before and after therapy and in 50 healthy controls. The concentration levels of IL-19 in serum were assessed by an ELISA. Results. PD-L1 and PD-1 were expressed on circulating CXCR3+ and CD36+ lymphocytes in lymphoma and were significantly higher in patients with extranodal involvement than in lymphoma patients without extranodal involvement (P < 0.001). Elevated IL-19 levels were observed in lymphoma patients and increased significantly in extranodal involvement (P < 0.001). High percentages of PD-L1+CXCR3+ and PD-1+CXCR3+ lymphocytes were associated with high LDH levels, hepatomegaly, lymphedema, advanced tumor stage, and recurrence. Furthermore, patients with splenomegaly and generalized lymphadenopathy had high percentages of PD-L1+CXCR3+ lymphocytes. In addition, levels of PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3 and IL-19 were significantly associated with bone marrow, lung, and lymph vessel involvement. Further analysis revealed that high percentages of PD-L1+CD36+ and PD-1+CD36+ lymphocytes were associated with lung and bone marrow involvement. Patients with high levels of PD-L1/PD-1 coexpression with CXCR3 and IL-19 had inferior event-free survival (EFS) compared with that in lymphoma patients with low levels. EFS was decreased in patients with high percentages of PD-L1+CD36+ and PD-1+CD36+ lymphocytes. When using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the superiority of IL-19 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.993) and PD-L1+CXCR3+% (AUC: 0.961) to PD-1+CXCR3+% (AUC: 0.805), PD-L1+CD36+% (AUC: 0.694), and PD-1+CD36+% (AUC 0.769) was evident in the diagnosis of extranodal involvement, identifying lymphoma patients with extranodal involvement from patients without extranodal involvement. Conclusions. Coexpression of PD-L1/PD-1 with CXCR3/CD36 in circulating lymphocytes and serum IL-19 levels contributes to poor prognosis and might be potential markers for extranodal involvement in lymphoma.

Effects of programmed death ligand 1 on the prognosis of neuroblastoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have investigated the prognostic role of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with neuroblastoma, while the results are still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between the expression of PD-L1 and the prognosis of neuroblastoma.

METHODS

Search electronic databases include PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science, and the search time is set to build the database until January 2021. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to analyze the included results. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.

RESULTS

This review will be disseminated in print by peer-review.

CONCLUSION

The study will provide updated evidence for the evaluation of whether the expression of PD-L1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with neuroblastoma.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The private information from individuals will not be published. This systematic review also should not damage participants' rights. Ethical approval is not available. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated in relevant conferences.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/FBCY6.

Predicting Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lymphoma: Are We Up to the Standards of Solid Tumors?

Treatment of cancer has transformed with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. However, the majority of solid tumor patients do not respond to checkpoint blockade. In contrast, the response rate to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is 65% to 84% which is the highest among all cancers. Currently, checkpoint inhibitors are only approved for cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma as the responses to single-agent checkpoint blockade in other hematologic malignancies is disappointingly low. Various established biomarkers such as programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein surface expression, mismatch repair (MMR) status, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are routinely used in clinical decision-making in solid tumors. In this review, we will explore these biomarkers in the context of hematologic malignancies. We review characteristic 9p24.1 structural alteration in cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) as a basis for response to PD-1 inhibition, as well as the role of antigen presentation pathways. We also explore the reported frequencies of MMR deficiency in various hematologic malignancies and investigate TMB as a predictive marker.

The clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of 3133 patients

Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is considered an adverse factor predicting poor prognosis in various cancers, but the significance of PD-L1 expression for the prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in PCa.

Methods: Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase before March 23, 2020. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained to assess the results. Begg’s test was applied to evaluate publication bias.

Results: Fourteen studies involving 3133 cases were analyzed. The pooled data showed that both PD-L1 protein expression and PD-L1 DNA methylation (mPD-L1) were negatively associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival, with HRs of 1.67 (95% CI = 1.38-2.06, p < 0.001) and 2.23 (95% CI = 1.51-3.29, p < 0.001), respectively. In addition, PD-L1 overexpression was significantly related to advanced tumor stage (OR = 1.40, 95% CI= 1.13-1.75, p = 0.003), positive surgical margin (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.03-1.78, p = 0.028), higher Gleason score (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.35-2.42, p < 0.001) and androgen receptor positivity (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.61-3.01, p < 0.001), while no significant correlation with age (p = 0.122), preoperative PSA (p = 0.796) or nodal status (p = 0.113) was observed.

Conclusions: The study revealed that high expression of PD-L1 was related to unfavorable prognosis and advanced clinicopathological factors in PCa patients.

PD-L1 and prognosis in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a meta-analysis and bioinformatics study

Background

The prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been controversial according to previous investigations. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the potential prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in MPM.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched for relevant original articles published before 9 April 2020. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. The results of the meta-analysis were verified using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset.

Results

In total 16 studies were included in our meta-analysis. A high PD-L1 expression was associated with a poor OS (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.28-1.83, p < 0.001), but not a grave PFS (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.82-1.39, p = 0.643) in MPM. Furthermore, the PD-L1 expression correlated with the sarcomatoid + biphasic type of MPM (odds ratio = 4.32, 95% CI = 2.16-8.64, p < 0.001). TCGA data indicated that PD-L1 was a significant prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.069, 95% CI = 1.136-3.769, p = 0.0175), but not for PFS (HR = 1.205, 95% CI = 0.572-2.539, p = 0.624), which was in accordance with the results of the meta-analysis.

Conclusion

A high PD-L1 expression is a significant prognostic factor for poor OS of patients with MPM. We therefore suggest that PD-L1 expression levels can be used to predict the clinical outcomes of patients with MPM in the future.