Long-term outcomes and significance of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in patients with invasive pancreatic neoplasms after repeat pancreatectomy

The prognostic role of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) can serve as an indicator for predicting the prognosis of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Patients and Methods

This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42023461260. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases up to September 2023 to assess whether LMR can predict the prognosis of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The outcomes measured included subgroup analyses of overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals of geographical region, patient population, and LMR threshold. A sensitivity analysis was also performed for OS and HR and confidence intervals were calculated for recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

A total of 14 eligible articles, comprising 4,019 patients, were included in the comprehensive analysis. The results of this comprehensive analysis indicate that LMR is a robust predictor of OS, demonstrating strong prognostic significance (HR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.44-0.69], I2 = 79%, P < 0.00001). This predictive significance extended to various types of pancreatic cancer, such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.57-0.93], I2 = 46%, P = 0.01), pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (HR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.66-0.99], P = 0.04) and other subtypes (HR = 0.40, 95% CI [0.22-0.72], I2 = 89%, P < 0.00001), but not to pancreatic head cancer (HR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.16-1.13], I2 = 59%, P = 0.12). LMR retained its predictive value across different regions, including Asia (HR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.47-0.76], I2 = 68%, P < 0.0001), Europe (HR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.67-0.91], I2 = 0%, P = 0.002), and the Americas (HR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001). Notably, both LMR cut-off values greater than or equal to three (HR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.47-0.82], I2 = 67%, P = 0.0009) and less than three (HR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.32-0.69], I2 = 85%, P = 0.0001) exhibited prognostic significance. The sensitivity analysis for OS confirmed the strong predictive value of LMR, whereas LMR did not exhibit predictive significance for RFS (HR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.09-1.32], I2 = 95%, P = 0.12). In both subgroups categorized by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scores of ≥7 (HR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.54-0.80], I2 = 53%, P = 0.04) and <7 (HR = 0.41, CI [0.23-0.72], I2 = 89%, P < 0.00001), LMR was demonstrated to have predictive value.

Conclusion

Despite the observed heterogeneity and potential biases in the included studies, the findings of this study suggest that LMR may serve as a valuable predictor of OS in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

The clinical significance of perioperative inflammatory index as a prognostic factor for patients with retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic factors of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have been explored but not yet certain. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of various preoperative clinical parameters and inflammatory indices in primary STS, with a particular focus on the transition of inflammatory index before and after tumor resection in de-differentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS).

METHODS

The clinical data of 113 patients with primary retroperitoneal STS receiving tumor resection were reviewed. Six variables (neutrophils, platelets, C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocytes, albumin, and hemoglobin) in the blood samples were measured and nine inflammatory indices (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), CRP-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-albumin ratio (NAR), CRP-albumin ratio (CAR), platelet-albumin ratio (PAR), HALP (hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS)) were calculated. The prognostic value of the indices was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Elevated NLR, CLR, PLR, NAR, CAR, PAR, and mGPS were associated with a worse overall survival (p = 0.0124, 0.0011, 0.049, 0.0047, 0.0085, 0.0332, and 0.0086, respectively) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that elevated CLR and DD-LPS were associated with poor overall survival (p = 0.0267 and 0.0218, respectively) in all retroperitoneal STS. In DD-LPD, patients with preoperative high CLR, whose postoperative CLR was normalized, demonstrated a favorable survival rate similar to those with preoperative low CLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated CLR before surgery as well as DD-LPS were poor prognostic markers for overall survival in primary retroperitoneal STS. Perioperative CLR normalization may be related to a favorable prognosis in DD-LPS.

Prognostic significance of the systemic immune-inflammation index in pancreatic carcinoma patients: A meta-analysis

Background: Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a prognostic indicator for several malignancies, including pancreatic carcinoma; however, there is no consensus on its significance. In the current study, a systematic meta-analysis was used to explore the correlation between SII and prognosis in pancreatic carcinoma patients.

Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were screened from inception to May 2020. Studies describing the prognostic role of SII in pancreatic carcinoma were then retrieved. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models to determine the correlation between SII and prognosis.

Results: A total of four studies, comprising 1749 patients, met the inclusion criteria of the study and were therefore included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that high SII indicated was correlated with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.24–1.65, P<0.001). These findings were validated through subgroup analyses, stratified by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. In addition, patients with high SII showed poorer cancer-specific survival (HR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.55–3.48, P<0.001). However, analysis showed no significant correlations between SII and disease-free and relapse-free survival (RFS).

Conclusion: These findings indicate that SII is a potential non-invasive and a promising tool for predicting clinical outcomes of pancreatic carcinoma patients. However, the current research did not explore whether neoadjuvant therapy has an effect on the prognostic value of SII. Further studies using adequate designs and larger sample sizes are required to validate these findings.

Simultaneous brain and lung metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after curative pancreatectomy: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) rarely metastasizes to the brain; therefore, the features of brain metastasis of PDAC are still unknown. We encountered simultaneous metastases to the brain and lung in a PDAC patient after curative surgery. Case presentation A 68-year-old man with PDAC in the tail of the pancreas underwent distal pancreato-splenectomy. He received gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. Two months later, brain and lung metastases occurred simultaneously. Considering the systemic condition, the patient received gamma knife treatment and an Ommaya reservoir was inserted for drainage. The patient's condition gradually worsened and he received the best supportive care. To the best of our knowledge, only 28 cases in which brain metastases of PDAC were identified at the time of ante-mortem have been reported to date, including the present case. Notably, the percentage of simultaneous brain and lung metastases was higher (32%) in a series of reviewed cohorts. Thus, lung metastasis might be one of the risk factors for the development of brain metastasis in patients with PDAC. As a systemic disease, it can be inferred that neoplastic cells will develop brain metastasis via hematogenous dissemination beyond the blood-brain barrier, even if local recurrence is controlled. In our case, immunohistochemical staining showed that the neoplastic cells were positive for carbonic anhydrase 9 (CAIX), mucin core protein 1 (MUC1), and MUC5AC in the resected primary PDAC.

CONCLUSION

We describe a case of simultaneous brain and lung metastases of PDAC after curative pancreatectomy, review previous literature, and discuss the clinical features of brain metastasis of PDAC.