53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database

Significant Prognostic Factor at Age Cut-off of 73 Years for Advanced Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma Patients: Insights from Real-World Study

Objective

The objective of this research was to determine the age cut-off for worse prognosis and investigate age-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in patients with advanced ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (AOSC).

Methods

In this research, we included a cohort of 20,846 patients diagnosed with AOSC, along with RNA-seq data from 374 patients in publicly available databases. Then we used the X-tile software to determine the age cut-off and stratified the patients into young and old groups. We utilized propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline between the young and old groups. Furthermore, we conducted an enrichment analysis of DEGs between the two age groups using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and gene ontology (GO) to identify dysregulated pathways. To evaluate the potential prognostic value of the DEGs, we performed survival analysis, such as Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log rank test.

Results

We stratified the patients into young group (n=16,336) and old group (n=4510) based on the cut-off age of 73 years by X-tile software. Age over 73 years was identified as an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Next, we identified 436 DEGs and found that the neurotrophin signaling pathway and translation factor activity were associated with prognosis outcomes. Among the top 10 hub genes (RELA, NFKBIA, TRAF6, IRAK2, TAB3, AKT1, TBP, EIF2S2, MAPK10, and SUPT3H), RELA, TAB3, AKT1, TBP, and SUPT3H were found to be significantly associated with poor prognosis in old patients with AOSC.

Conclusion

Our study determined 73 years as the cutoff value for age in patients with AOSC. RELA, TAB3, AKT1, TBP, and SUPT3H were identified as age-related DEGs that could contribute to the poor prognosis of older patients with AOSC.

Development and validation of prognostic nomogram for elderly patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on the SEER database

This study sought to establish nomogram models of overall survival (OS) in patients with elderly clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ECCRCC). The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database provided data of the ECCRCC-afflicted patients diagnosed during the period from 2010 to 2015. This data was subsequently segregated into the training and validation sets randomly in a 7:3 ratio. The calibration curves, the receiver operating characteristic curves, the decision curve analysis and the Concordance index (C-index) were applied for the model evaluation. 9201 eligible cases from 2010 to 2015 were extracted; 6441 were included in the training cohort and 2760 in the validation cohort. The C-index for the training and validation sets were 0.710 and 0.709, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic and decision curve analysis curves demonstrated that nomograms outperformed the AJCC stage in predictive performance. Moreover, the nomogram was found to match closely with the actual observation, as indicated by the calibration plots. To make predictions with regard to the survival of the ECCRCC-afflicted individuals, and as a guide for treatment, the new nomogram could be used.

ANO4 Expression Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Non-Metastasized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Over the past decade, transcriptome profiling has elucidated many pivotal pathways involved in oncogenesis. However, a detailed comprehensive map of tumorigenesis remains an enigma to solve. Propelled research has been devoted to investigating the molecular drivers of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). To add another piece to the puzzle, we evaluated the role of anoctamin 4 (ANO4) expression as a potential prognostic biomarker in non-metastasized ccRCC. Methods: A total of 422 ccRCC patients with the corresponding ANO4 expression and clinicopathological data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA). Differential expression across several clinicopathological variables was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the impact of ANO4 expression on the overall survival (OS), progression-free interval (PFI), disease-free interval (DFI), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Univariate and multivariate Cox logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors modulating the aforementioned outcomes. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to discern a set of molecular mechanisms involved in the prognostic signature. Tumor immune microenvironment was estimated using xCell. Results: ANO4 expression was upregulated in tumor samples compared to normal kidney tissue. Albeit the latter finding, low ANO4 expression is associated with advanced clinicopathological variables such as tumor grade, stage, and pT. In addition, low ANO4 expression is linked to shorter OS, PFI, and DSS. Multivariate Cox logistic regression analysis identified ANO4 expression as an independent prognostic variable in OS (HR: 1.686, 95% CI: 1.120-2.540, p = 0.012), PFI (HR: 1.727, 95% CI: 1.103-2.704, p = 0.017), and DSS (HR: 2.688, 95% CI: 1.465-4.934, p = 0.001). GSEA identified the following pathways to be enriched within the low ANO4 expression group: epithelial-mesenchymal transition, G2-M checkpoint, E2F targets, estrogen response, apical junction, glycolysis, hypoxia, coagulation, KRAS, complement, p53, myogenesis, and TNF-α signaling via NF-κB pathways. ANO4 expression correlates significantly with monocyte (ρ = -0.1429, p = 0.0033) and mast cell (ρ = 0.1598, p = 0.001) infiltration. Conclusions: In the presented work, low ANO4 expression is portrayed as a potential poor prognostic factor in non-metastasized ccRCC. Further experimental studies should be directed to shed new light on the exact molecular mechanisms involved.

Prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients stratified by age: A research relied on SEER database

Objective

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma may affect patients of any age. To date, there are only a limited number of large data studies on renal clear cell carcinoma in different age groups. This study assessed CCRCC risk factors in different age groups using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

We selected 58372 cases from the SEER database. These patients were divided into seven different age groups. Cox regression models were used to find independent risk factors for the survival of CCRCC patients. Based on independent risk factors, a nomogram was drawn with R software. Kaplan-Meier method for survival analysis and X-tile software were used to find the optimal age group for diagnosis.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed that patients’ age, sex, race, marital status, grade, TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) stage, surgery, WHO/ISUP grade were correlated with survival (P<0.01). Age was an independent risk factor for survival in patients with CCRCC according to multivariate Cox regression analysis (p<0.01). All-cause mortality and tumor-specific mortality increased according to the increasing age of the patients. The optimal cut-off values for age were defined as 58 and 76 years and 51 and 76 years, respectively, according to overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS).

Conclusion

There is a negative correlation between age and survival of CCRCC patients. The difference in prognosis of patients in different age groups has important implications for clinical treatment. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment plan should be based on more detailed age grouping, which is more beneficial to improving the prognosis and survival of patients.

Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Purpose

The study aimed to compare operative, functional, and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for entophytic renal tumors (ERTs) by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Methods

A total of 228 patients with ERTs who underwent PN or RN between August 2014 and December 2021 were assessed. A PSM in a 1:1 ratio was conducted to balance the differences between groups. Perioperative characteristics, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of functional and survival outcomes.

Results

After PSM, 136 cases were matched to the PN group (n = 68) and the RN group (n = 68). Patients who underwent RN had shorter OT, less EBL, and lower high-grade complications (all p <0.05) relative to those who underwent PN. However, better perseveration of renal function was observed in the PN group, which was reflected in 48-h postoperative AKI (44.1% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.002), 1-year postoperative 90% eGFR preservation (45.6% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.004), and new-onset CKD Stage ≥III at last follow-up (2.9% vs. 29.4%, p <0.001). RN was the independent factor of short-term (OR, 2.812; 95% CI, 1.369–5.778; p = 0.005) and long-term renal function decline (OR, 10.242; 95% CI, 2.175–48.240; p = 0.003). Furthermore, PN resulted in a better OS and similar PFS and CSS as compared to RN (p = 0.042, 0.15, and 0.21, respectively). RN (OR, 7.361; 95% CI, 1.143–47.423; p = 0.036) and pT3 stage (OR, 4.241; 95% CI, 1.079–16.664; p = 0.039) were independent predictors of overall mortality.

Conclusion

Among patients with ERTs, although the PN group showed a higher incidence of high-grade complications than RN, when technically feasible and with experienced surgeons, PN is recommended for better preservation of renal function, longer OS, and similar oncological outcomes.