1
|
Noonan B, Bredin P, Cahill AM, Corkery S, Johnston KE, Medved K, Cusack AM, Hegarty J, Saab MM, Cushen SJ, Connolly R, Palmer B, Dahly D, Murphy M, Bambury RM, Gleeson JP. Study protocol: LIAM Mc trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer). PLoS One 2025; 20:e0313454. [PMID: 40179061 PMCID: PMC11967965 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2025] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The significant increase in cancer survivorship rates necessitates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to supportive care services. This study seeks to assess the feasibility of introducing a Men's Health Initiative supportive care intervention program in Ireland. METHODS This is a single-arm feasibility study involving a 12-week men's cancer survivorship programme alongside routine follow-up care in patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies. Men with advanced/metastatic genitourinary cancer (including prostate, kidney, urothelial tract, testicular or penile cancer), are eligible to enrol, with a target of 72 participants over a 2-year period. The intervention programme entails a twice-weekly physiotherapy-led exercise programme, along with dietetics, nursing, and psychosocial components, and regular signposting to additional available services. A Pilot Phase involving analysis of data from the first group of 6 participants to complete the programme is planned, before an Expansion Phase. Assessments will occur at baseline, on completion of the 12-week intervention, and 3 months post-intervention, and will include analyses of exercise/activity levels, body composition, muscle strength, psychological wellbeing, quality of life and resources utilised. The primary endpoints are to determine the feasibility and acceptability of introducing a men's cancer survivorship intervention programme into routine follow-up care in patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies. Secondary endpoints include impact of the intervention programme on quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, maintenance of weight, changes in body composition and changes in dietary intake and diet quality over the study period, as well as self-care agency and its relationship to quality of life and symptoms experienced. A qualitative process evaluation will be undertaken to explore participants' experiences, while an economic analysis will examine the healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with the intervention. The trial was peer-reviewed by the Irish Cancer Society. DISCUSSION The programme described in this protocol provides a supportive and safe environment for the introduction of self-care interventions using a small group-based format supported by individualised counselling according to the participant's identified needs. The development and implementation of future supportive care programmes for men's cancer survivorship will be guided by the findings of this study. TRIAL REGISTRARTION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05946993.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Noonan
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery University College Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Katie E. Johnston
- School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | - Josephine Hegarty
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Mohamad M. Saab
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Samantha J. Cushen
- School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Roisin Connolly
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Ireland
- Cancer Trials Cork, Cork University Hospital/University College Cork Cancer Centre. Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Brendan Palmer
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland
- Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Darren Dahly
- Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Mike Murphy
- School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Jack P. Gleeson
- Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Ireland
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miyazaki K, Suzukamo Y, Ikenaga M, Ohsumi S, Saito M, Satomi E, Shimozuma K, Nakayama T. Interpretation of clinically meaningful change in cancer palliative care patients' quality of life: minimally important difference for EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2025; 9:33. [PMID: 40106082 PMCID: PMC11923346 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-025-00858-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care for cancer helps improve and maintain patients' quality of life (QOL). Clinically meaningful changes in QOL measures are helpful when considering how a patient would want to spend the final days of their life. This study aimed to estimate the minimally important differences (MIDs) for within-person change for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) domains in advanced cancer patients in palliative care. METHOD Participants in this multicenter observational study comprised patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care in the last year before death. The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL was administered at two-week intervals. During the second assessment, patients also completed the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale to collect their subjective assessments of changes in their condition since the first assessment. MID for QOL score with a correlation of 0.3 or more with GRC score changes were estimated using anchor- and distribution-based methods. RESULTS Among the 257 screened patients at 13 facilities, we analyzed 181 (92 male; mean age: 67). The mean survival time was 131 days. Notably, the number of patients who responded "no change" for the GRC items was large (63-128). Anchor-based MIDs differed depending on the change direction (improvement vs. deterioration). The MIDs for meaningful within-person change may be used in clinical practice. CONCLUSION We estimated the MIDs in EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL in patients with advanced cancer with a life expectancy of less than one year, both anchor- and distribution-based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kikuko Miyazaki
- Department of Health Informative, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
| | - Yoshimi Suzukamo
- Comprehensive Unit for Health Economic Evidence Review and Decision Support, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Shozo Ohsumi
- Department of Brest Surgery, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Mari Saito
- Department of Palliative Care, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Eriko Satomi
- Department of Palliative Care, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kojiro Shimozuma
- Department of Biomedical Science, Ritsumeikan University, College of Life Sciences, Shiga, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informative, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Remmers S, Beyer K, Lalmahomed TA, Prinsen P, Horevoorts NJ, Sibert NT, Kowalski C, Barletta F, Brunckhorst O, Gandaglia G, van der Voort van Zyp JR, Smith EJ, Deschamps A, Collette L, Cornford P, Evans-Axelsson S, N’Dow J, Hemelrijck MV, Roobol MJ, Venderbos LD. An Overview of Patient-reported Outcomes for Men with Prostate Cancer: Results from the PIONEER Consortium. EUR UROL SUPPL 2025; 71:106-113. [PMID: 39801658 PMCID: PMC11722584 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used to capture the patients' perspective of their functional status and quality of life (QoL). Big data can help us better understand patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Using prospectively collected data from the Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Enhancement Through the Power of Big Data in Europe (PIONEER) consortium, we aimed to describe the functional status and QoL in men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), and radiotherapy (RT), and to demonstrate the applicability of PROM data on a large scale and at a European level. Methods We identified data sources that collected QoL data using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-PR25, or Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26/50 questionnaires. Aggregated summary scores for urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunction, global health status, and QoL were shared for each data source. Key findings and limitations We identified eight data sources originating from various settings: routine hospital data, embedded research PRO collection, survey data collected by a patient organization, multi-institutional prospective cohort study, and registry data. PRO data were available for 709 men on AS, 20 508 on RP, and 3417 on RT, with a median time between diagnosis and PROM assessment ranging from 1 to 8.7 yr. Most men were diagnosed with Gleason ≤7 disease, and T1 or T2 PCa. We observed that sexual dysfunction was the most affected PRO and found large differences between data sources. Conclusions and clinical implications Our results support the feasibility of PRO assessment using big data in Europe. Implementation of PROMs in clinical practice and the use of standardized methods could improve value-based health care provision. Patient summary In this study, we combined several data sources that reported urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunction, global health status, and quality of life. We identified eight data sources and show that sexual function is the most affected domain after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita‐Salute SanRaffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Katharina Beyer
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tariq A. Lalmahomed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Prinsen
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole J.E. Horevoorts
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita‐Salute SanRaffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Oliver Brunckhorst
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital Campus, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita‐Salute SanRaffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Emma J. Smith
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Laurence Collette
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Cornford
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - James N’Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Transforming Cancer Outcomes Through Research, Faculty of Life Science of Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Monique J. Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lionne D.F. Venderbos
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - the PIONEER Consortium
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita‐Salute SanRaffaele University, Milan, Italy
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital Campus, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, UK
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Europa Uomo, Antwerp, Belgium
- Medical Affairs Oncology, Bayer AB, Stockholm, Sweden
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
- Transforming Cancer Outcomes Through Research, Faculty of Life Science of Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Houqiong J, Yuli Y, Fujia G, Gengmei G, Yaxiong L, Yahang L, Tao L, Yang L, Dongning L, Taiyuan L. Body image and quality of life undergoing totally robotic versus robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study. BMC Surg 2024; 24:295. [PMID: 39385219 PMCID: PMC11463158 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02597-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the improvement of anastomotic techniques and the iteration of anastomotic instruments, robotic intracorporeal suturing has become increasingly proficient. The era of fully intracorporeal anastomosis in robotic gastric cancer resection is emerging. This study aims to explore the impact of totally robotic distal gastrectomy (TRDG) and robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) on patients' quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study is a comparative retrospective study of propensity score matching. This study included 306 patients who underwent robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between June 2016 and December 2023 at our center. Covariates used in the propensity score included sex, age, BMI, ASA score, maximum tumour diameter, degree of histological differentiation, Pathological TNM stage, Pathological T stage, Pathological N stage, and Lauren classification. Outcome measures included operative time, intraoperative bleeding, time to first venting, time to first fluid intake, postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, total length of abdominal incision, postoperative complications, inflammatory response, body image, and quality of life. RESULTS According to the results of the study, compared with the RADG group, the TRDG group had a faster recovery time for gastrointestinal function (P = 0.025), shorter length of abdominal incision (P < 0.001), fewer days in the hospital (P = 0.006) less pain (P < 0.001), less need for additional analgesia (P = 0.013), and a postoperative white blood cell count (P < 0.001) and C-reactive protein content indexes were lower (P<0.001). In addition, the TRDG group had significantly better body imagery and cosmetic scores (P = 0.015), physical function (P = 0.039), role function (P = 0.046), and global function (P = 0.021) than the RARS group. Meanwhile, the TRDG group had milder symptoms of fatigue (P = 0.037) and pain (P < 0.001). The PASQ Total Subscale Score (P < 0.001) and Global Subscale Score (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the TRDG group than in the RADG group at postoperative 3 months. CONCLUSION Totally robotic distal gastrectomy has a smaller incision, faster gastrointestinal recovery time, fewer days of postoperative hospitalization, and lower inflammatory markers than robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy. At the same time, postoperative cosmetic and quality of life outcomes were satisfactory. Clinically, these benefits translate to enhanced patient recovery, reduced surgical trauma, and better postoperative outcomes. These findings could guide surgeons in selecting more effective surgical approaches for patients undergoing gastrectomy, leading to better overall patient satisfaction and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Houqiong
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Yuan Yuli
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Guo Fujia
- Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Gao Gengmei
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Liu Yaxiong
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Liang Yahang
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Li Tao
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
| | - Liu Dongning
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
| | - Li Taiyuan
- Department of General surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
- Gastrointestinal Surgical Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Westhofen T, Feyerabend E, Buchner A, Schlenker B, Becker A, Eismann L, Rodler S, Jokisch F, Stief CG, Kretschmer A. Impact of Preoperative LUTS on Health-related Quality of Life Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Longitudinal Study. Urology 2024; 192:52-58. [PMID: 38679296 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) up to 10 years after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC). METHODS Within our prospective institutional database of 6487 patients treated with RP for PC (2008-2020), 2727 patients with preoperative LUTS (IPSS score of ≥8) were identified. A 1:1 propensity-score matched analysis of 3056 men (n = 1528 LUTS, n = 1528 no LUTS) was conducted. Primary endpoint was HRQOL (based on EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR25). Linear regression models tested the effect of preoperative LUTS on the net change in general HRQOL (P <.05). RESULTS Median follow-up was 48 months. Preoperative mean global health status (GHS) score (67.4 vs 75.7) was significantly lower in the LUTS cohort (P <.001). Post-RP the difference in general HRQOL between the LUTS cohort and the no-LUTS cohort became smaller (65.7 vs 67.8), however, remaining statistically significant (P = .037). In long-term follow-up, general HRQOL was comparable between both subcohorts (P-range 0.716-0.876). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed increased preoperative IPSS as an independent predictor for increased perioperative improvement of IPSS (P <.001) CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing RP, preoperative LUTS were associated with a postoperative improvement of HRQOL outcomes. In long-term follow-up, HRQOL was comparable to patients without preoperative LUTS. Hence, RP is an efficient option to treat PC as well as LUTS in those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thilo Westhofen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Enya Feyerabend
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris Schlenker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Armin Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lennert Eismann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friedrich Jokisch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany; Janssen Global Research and Development, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ross A, Brewer K, Hudgens S, Brown B, Fallick M, de Paauw-Holt S, Arondekar B, Clegg J, Hunsche E. Development of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Symptoms and Impacts of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer. Adv Ther 2024; 41:3076-3088. [PMID: 38861216 PMCID: PMC11263404 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02888-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This qualitative research study was conducted to develop a novel, comprehensive, patient-reported outcome measure (PRO), the "Symptoms and Impacts of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) for Prostate Cancer" (SIADT-PC), assessing hormonal therapy-related symptoms and their impacts on men with advanced prostate cancer. METHODS Concept elicitation (CE) interviews were conducted among adult men with prostate cancer to evaluate their experiences with ADT. Based on key symptom and impact concepts mentioned, an initial PRO measure was developed. The draft measure was further assessed in cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews with men with prostate cancer, in which participants reviewed items, response options, and recall periods. Initial item-based psychometric analyses were conducted using interview data. The draft questionnaire was revised on the basis of participant feedback, quantitative psychometric results, and consultation with clinical experts. RESULTS A total of 21 participants were interviewed (CE concept elicitation, n = 12; CD cognitive debriefing, n = 17; n = 8 completed both). Mean participant age (SD) was 59.7 (8.7) years and 76.2% were white. The de novo SIADT-PC measure consists of 27 items: 11 symptoms (e.g., fatigue, hot flashes, and erectile dysfunction), 2 long-term symptoms (e.g., weight gain), 10 impacts (e.g., impacts on physical activities and relationships), and 4 related to mode of administration (i.e., injection-site reactions). Items were assessed with a 5-point verbal rating scale, with answer choices that capture frequency or severity. CONCLUSIONS Once fully validated, this de novo measure may be used in clinical studies and clinical practice to assess hormone therapy-related symptoms and impacts, enabling physicians to identify timely and appropriate interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Ross
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Simon de Paauw-Holt
- Sumitomo Pharma Switzerland GmbH, Aeschengraben 27, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Elke Hunsche
- Sumitomo Pharma Switzerland GmbH, Aeschengraben 27, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kay H, Silver SN, Smith AB, Basak R, Shoenbill K, Usinger D, Goldstein AO, Matulewicz RS, Chen R, Bjurlin MA. Bladder Cancer Survivors Who Do Not Smoke Have Better Longitudinal Health-Related Quality of Life Measures: An Assessment of the Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Health in Bladder Cancer (CEASE-BC) Study. J Urol 2024; 212:87-94. [PMID: 38603576 PMCID: PMC11193885 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cigarette smoking is the most common risk factor for the development of bladder cancer (BC), yet there is a paucity of data characterizing the relationship between smoking status and longitudinal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in patients with BC. We examined the association between smoking status and HRQoL among patients with BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were sourced from a prospective, longitudinal study open between 2014 and 2017, which examined HRQoL in patients aged ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with BC across North Carolina. The QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core instrument) was administered at 3, 12, and 24 months after BC diagnosis. Our primary exposure of interest was current smoking status. Linear regression using generalized estimating equations was used to analyze the relationship between smoking status and various domains of the QLQ-C30. RESULTS A total of 154 patients enrolled in the study. Eighteen percent were classified as smoking at 3 months from diagnosis, and packs per day ranged from < 0.5 to 2. When controlling for time from diagnosis, demographic covariates, cancer stage, and treatment type, mean differences for physical function (7.4), emotional function (5.6), and fatigue measures (-8.2) were significantly better for patients with BC who did not smoke. CONCLUSIONS Patients with BC who do not smoke have significantly better HRQoL scores in the domains of physical function, emotional function, and fatigue. These results underscore the need to treat smoking as an essential component of BC care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Kay
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sarah N. Silver
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Angela B. Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ramsankar Basak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kimberly Shoenbill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Deborah Usinger
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Adam O. Goldstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Richard S. Matulewicz
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronald Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KC
| | - Marc A. Bjurlin
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sritharan K, Daamen L, Pathmanathan A, Schytte T, Pos F, Choudhury A, van der Voort van Zyp JR, Kerkmeijer LG, Hall W, Hall E, Verkooijen HM, Herbert T, Hafeez S, Mitchell A, Tree AC. MRI-guided radiotherapy in twenty fractions for localised prostate cancer; results from the MOMENTUM study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100742. [PMID: 38440792 PMCID: PMC10909700 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) offers multiple potential advantages over CT-guidance. This study examines the potential clinical benefits of MRIgRT for men with localised prostate cancer, in the setting of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy. We evaluate two-year toxicity outcomes, early biochemical response and patient-reported outcomes (PRO), using data obtained from a multicentre international registry study, for the first group of patients with prostate cancer who underwent treatment on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Materials and methods Patients who were enrolled within the MOMENTUM study and received radical treatment with 60 Gy in 20 fractions were identified. PSA levels and CTCAE version 5.0 toxicity data were measured at follow-up visits. Those patients who consented to PRO data collection also completed EQ-5D-5L, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaires. Results Between November 2018 and June 2022, 146 patients who had MRIgRT for localised prostate cancer on the 1.5 T MR-Linac were eligible for this study. Grade 2 and worse gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity was reported in 3 % of patients at three months whilst grade 2 and worse genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 7 % at three months. There was a significant decrease in the median PSA at 12 months. The results from both the EQ-5D-5L data and EORTC global health status scale indicate a decline in the quality of life (QoL) during the first six months. The mean change in score for the EORTC scale showed a decrease of 11.4 points, which is considered clinically important. QoL improved back to baseline by 24 months. Worsening of hormonal symptoms in the first six months was reported with a return to baseline by 24 months and sexual activity in all men worsened in the first three months and returned to baseline at 12 months. Conclusion This study establishes the feasibility of online-MRIgRT for localised prostate on a 1.5 T MR-Linac with low rates of toxicity, similar to that published in the literature. However, the clinical benefits of MRIgRT over conventional radiotherapy in the setting of moderate hypofractionation is not evident. Further research will focus on the delivery of ultrahypofractionated regimens, where the potential advantages of MRIgRT for prostate cancer may become more discernible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kobika Sritharan
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | - Lois Daamen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Floris Pos
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Adam Mitchell
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | - Alison C. Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Caeiro L, Jaramillo Quiroz S, Hegarty JS, Grewe E, Garcia JM, Anderson LJ. Clinical Relevance of Physical Function Outcomes in Cancer Cachexia. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1395. [PMID: 38611073 PMCID: PMC11010860 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Managing clinical manifestations of cancer/treatment burden on functional status and quality of life remains paramount across the cancer trajectory, particularly for patients with cachexia who display reduced functional capacity. However, clinically relevant criteria for classifying functional impairment at a single point in time or for classifying meaningful functional changes subsequent to disease and/or treatment progression are lacking. This unmet clinical need remains a major obstacle to the development of therapies for cancer cachexia. This review aims to describe current literature-based evidence for clinically meaningful criteria for (1) functional impairment at a single timepoint between cancer patients with or without cachexia and (2) changes in physical function over time across interventional studies conducted in patients with cancer cachexia. The most common functional assessment in cross-sectional and interventional studies was hand grip strength (HGS). We observed suggestive evidence that an HGS deficit between 3 and 6 kg in cancer cachexia may display clinical relevance. In interventional studies, we observed that long-duration multimodal therapies with a focus on skeletal muscle may benefit HGS in patients with considerable weight loss. Future studies should derive cohort-specific clinically relevant criteria to confirm these observations in addition to other functional outcomes and investigate appropriate patient-reported anchors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Caeiro
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; (L.C.); (S.J.Q.); (J.S.H.); (E.G.); (J.M.G.)
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Sofia Jaramillo Quiroz
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; (L.C.); (S.J.Q.); (J.S.H.); (E.G.); (J.M.G.)
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jenna S. Hegarty
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; (L.C.); (S.J.Q.); (J.S.H.); (E.G.); (J.M.G.)
| | - Ellen Grewe
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; (L.C.); (S.J.Q.); (J.S.H.); (E.G.); (J.M.G.)
| | - Jose M. Garcia
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; (L.C.); (S.J.Q.); (J.S.H.); (E.G.); (J.M.G.)
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Lindsey J. Anderson
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA; (L.C.); (S.J.Q.); (J.S.H.); (E.G.); (J.M.G.)
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clarke NA, Braverman J, Worthy G, Shaw JW, Bennett B, Dhanda D, Cocks K. A Review of Meaningful Change Thresholds for EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G Within Oncology. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:458-468. [PMID: 38191023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This literature review provides an overview of meaningful change thresholds for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) used across hematological cancers and solid tumors (melanoma, lung, bladder, and prostate). METHODS Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched to identify relevant oncology publications from 2016 to 2021. Label claims from the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for 7 recently approved drugs (pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, glasdegib, gilteritinib, tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, and daratumumab plus hyaluronidase-fihj) were reviewed. RESULTS Publications providing guidance on meaningful change thresholds for the QLQ-C30 displayed a growing trend away from broad "legacy" thresholds of 10 points for all QLQ-C30 scales), toward deriving "contemporary" thresholds (eg, subscale specific, population specific). Contemporary publications generally provide guidance on selecting thresholds for specific scales that account for improved or worsening thresholds (eg, QLQ-C30 subscales). This trend was not clear for FACT-G, with less new guidance available. Most clinical trials used in regulatory label submissions have used thresholds of 10 points for the QLQ-C30 subscales and 3 to 7 points for the FACT-G total score. Despite the availability of more recent guidelines, contemporary meaningful change thresholds seem slow to emerge in the published literature and regulatory labels. CONCLUSIONS Trialists should consider using contemporary thresholds, rather than legacy thresholds, for QLQ-C30 endpoints. Thresholds derived for a similar patient-population should be used where available. Further work is required to provide these across a broader range of cancer sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Clarke
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK.
| | - Julia Braverman
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Gill Worthy
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK
| | - James W Shaw
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Bryan Bennett
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Devender Dhanda
- Worldwide Health and Economic Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squib, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kim Cocks
- Statistics and Programming, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rencsok EM, Slopen N, McManus HD, Autio KA, Morgans AK, McSwain L, Barata P, Cheng HH, Dreicer R, Gerke T, Green R, Heath EI, Howard LE, McKay RR, Nowak J, Pileggi S, Pomerantz MM, Rathkopf DE, Tagawa ST, Whang YE, Ragin C, Odedina FT, Kantoff PW, Vinson J, Villanti P, Haneuse S, Mucci LA, George DJ. Pain and Its Association with Survival for Black and White Individuals with Advanced Prostate Cancer in the United States. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2024; 4:55-64. [PMID: 38108490 PMCID: PMC10773321 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Bone pain is a well-known quality-of-life detriment for individuals with prostate cancer and is associated with survival. This study expands previous work into racial differences in multiple patient-reported dimensions of pain and the association between baseline and longitudinal pain and mortality. This is a prospective cohort study of individuals with newly diagnosed advanced prostate cancer enrolled in the International Registry for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN) from 2017 to 2023 at U.S. sites. Differences in four pain scores at study enrollment by race were investigated. Cox proportional hazards models and joint longitudinal survival models were fit for each of the scale scores to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association with all-cause mortality. The cohort included 879 individuals (20% self-identifying as Black) enrolled at 38 U.S. sites. Black participants had worse pain at baseline compared with White participants, most notably a higher average pain rating (mean 3.1 vs. 2.2 on a 10-point scale). For each pain scale, higher pain was associated with higher mortality after adjusting for measures of disease burden, particularly for severe bone pain compared with no pain (HR, 2.47; 95% CI: 1.44-4.22). The association between pain and all-cause mortality was stronger for participants with castration-resistant prostate cancer compared with those with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and was similar among Black and White participants. Overall, Black participants reported worse pain than White participants, and more severe pain was associated with higher mortality independent of clinical covariates for all pain scales. SIGNIFICANCE Black participants with advanced prostate cancer reported worse pain than White participants, and more pain was associated with worse survival. More holistic clinical assessments of pain in this population are needed to determine the factors upon which to intervene to improve quality of life and survivorship, particularly for Black individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M. Rencsok
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natalie Slopen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Karen A. Autio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Pedro Barata
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert Dreicer
- University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Travis Gerke
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC), New York, New York
| | - Rebecca Green
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC), New York, New York
| | | | | | - Rana R. McKay
- Department of Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Joel Nowak
- Patient author, Durham, North Carolina
- Cancer ABCs, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Shannon Pileggi
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC), New York, New York
| | | | | | - Scott T. Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Young E. Whang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Camille Ragin
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- African-Caribbean Cancer Consortium, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Folakemi T. Odedina
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida
- Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium (CaPTC), Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Philip W. Kantoff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Convergent Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Jake Vinson
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC), New York, New York
| | | | - Sebastien Haneuse
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lorelei A. Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tombal B, Collins S, Morgans AK, Hunsche E, Brown B, Zhu E, Bossi A, Shore N. Impact of Relugolix Versus Leuprolide on the Quality of Life of Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results from the Phase 3 HERO Study. Eur Urol 2023; 84:579-587. [PMID: 37833178 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, demonstrated testosterone suppression to castrate levels in men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in the HERO study. Since advanced PCa and its treatments can impact patients' daily life, it is imperative to understand the impact of systemic therapy on patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). OBJECTIVE To report the HRQOL for patients on relugolix compared with those on leuprolide in on-treatment and testosterone recovery periods of the HERO study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A phase 3 randomized controlled study was conducted in 934 patients with advanced PCa. INTERVENTION Patients underwent 2:1 randomization and received relugolix 120 mg orally once daily or leuprolide 3-mo injections for 48 wk. Testosterone recovery was evaluated in a patient subset. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS HRQOL evaluations were based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Prostate Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PR25) during treatment and testosterone recovery phases. In a post hoc analysis, predictors of HRQOL deterioration were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found in changes from baseline to the end of treatment in either the EORTC QLQ-C30 or the EORTC QLQ-PR25 instrument. During the testosterone recovery phase, hormonal treatment-related symptoms scores were lower for relugolix than for leuprolide, suggesting a lower burden of hormone-related symptoms associated with a treatment that has more rapid testosterone recovery after treatment cessation. Limitations include low patient numbers in the testosterone recovery group. CONCLUSIONS Oral relugolix is a therapeutic option with similar patient-reported HRQOL to leuprolide, providing an oral option for androgen deprivation therapy associated with a more rapid testosterone reduction. PATIENT SUMMARY In men with advanced prostate cancer, relugolix had similar health-related quality of life to leuprolide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Tombal
- Institut de Recherche clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Sean Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Emily Zhu
- Myovant Sciences, Inc., Brisbane, CA, USA
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rencsok EM, Slopen N, Autio K, Morgans A, McSwain L, Barata P, Cheng HH, Dreicer R, Heath E, McKay RR, Pomerantz M, Rathkopf D, Tagawa S, Whang YE, Ragin C, Odedina FT, George DJ, Kantoff PW, Vinson J, Villanti P, Haneuse S, Mucci LA. Quality of life in the year after new diagnosis with advanced prostate cancer for Black and White individuals living in the US. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:3209-3221. [PMID: 37410340 PMCID: PMC10711502 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03468-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess differences in baseline and longitudinal quality of life among Black and White individuals in the US with advanced prostate cancer. METHODS Secondary analysis of data from the International Registry for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN) including US participants newly diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer and identifying their race as Black or White from 2017 to 2023. Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life (QoL) Survey at study enrollment and every 3 months thereafter for up to 1 year of follow-up reporting 15 scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher functioning and lower symptom scores represent better quality of life). Linear mixed effects models with race and month of questionnaire completion were fit for each scale, and model coefficients were used to assess differences in baseline and longitudinal QoL by race. RESULTS Eight hundred and seventy-nine participants were included (20% identifying as Black) at 38 US sites. Compared to White participants at baseline, Black participants had worse constipation (mean 6.3 percentage points higher; 95% CI 2.9-9.8), financial insecurity (5.7 (1.4-10.0)), and pain (5.1 (0.9-9.3)). QoL decreased over time similarly by race; most notably, role functioning decreased by 0.7 percentage points (95% CI -0.8, -0.5) per month. CONCLUSION There are notable differences in quality of life at new diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer for Black and White individuals, and quality of life declines similarly in the first year for both groups. Interventions that address specific aspects of quality of life in these patients could meaningfully improve the overall survivorship experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Rencsok
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Natalie Slopen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen Autio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Pedro Barata
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Dreicer
- University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Rana R McKay
- Department of Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Dana Rathkopf
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Young E Whang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Camille Ragin
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- African-Caribbean Cancer Consortium, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Folakemi T Odedina
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium (CaPTC), Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Philip W Kantoff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Convergent Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jacob Vinson
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC), New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sebastien Haneuse
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lorelei A Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Musoro JZ, Coens C, Sprangers MAG, Brandberg Y, Groenvold M, Flechtner HH, Cocks K, Velikova G, Dirven L, Greimel E, Singer S, Pogoda K, Gamper EM, Sodergren SC, Eggermont A, Koller M, Reijneveld JC, Taphoorn MJB, King MT, Bottomley A. Minimally important differences for interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 change scores over time: A synthesis across 21 clinical trials involving nine different cancer types. Eur J Cancer 2023; 188:171-182. [PMID: 37257278 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early guidelines for minimally important differences (MIDs) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 proposed ≥10 points change as clinically meaningful for all scales. Increasing evidence that MIDs can vary by scale, direction of change, cancer type and estimation method has raised doubt about a single global standard. This paper identifies MID patterns for interpreting group-level change in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores across nine cancer types. METHODS Data were obtained from 21 published EORTC Phase III trials that enroled 13,015 patients across nine cancer types (brain, colorectal, advanced breast, head/neck, lung, mesothelioma, melanoma, ovarian, and prostate). Anchor-based MIDs for within-group change and between-group differences in change over time were obtained via mean change method and linear regression, respectively. Separate MIDs were estimated for improvements and deteriorations. Distribution-based estimates were derived and compared with anchor-based MIDs. RESULTS Anchor-based MIDs mostly ranged from 5 to 10 points. Differences in MIDs for improvement vs deterioration, for both within-group and between-group, were mostly within a 2-points range. Larger differences between within-group and between-group MIDs were observed for several scales in ovarian, lung and head/neck cancer. Most anchor-based MIDs ranged between 0.3 SD and 0.5 SD distribution-based estimates. CONCLUSIONS Our results reinforce recent claims that no single MID can be applied to all EORTC QLQ-C30 scales and disease settings. MIDs varied by scale, improvement/deterioration, within/between comparisons and by cancer type. Researchers applying commonly used rules of thumb must be aware of the risk of dismissing changes that are clinically meaningful or underpowering analyses when smaller MIDs apply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jammbe Z Musoro
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Corneel Coens
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mirjam A G Sprangers
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, and Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans-Henning Flechtner
- Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Kim Cocks
- Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany; University Cancer Centre Mainz, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Departmenf of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eva M Gamper
- Innsbruck Institute of Patient-centered Outcome Research (IIPCOR), Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Alexander Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht and University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Koller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VU University Medical Center, Department of Neurology Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Madeleine T King
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Bottomley
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Houqiong J, Ziwen W, Chonghan Z, Penghui H, Hongxin Y, Weijie L, Dongning L, Taiyuan L. Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment. Front Surg 2023; 10:1092128. [PMID: 36874472 PMCID: PMC9978825 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1092128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES), as a new star of minimally invasive techniques, has been increasingly favored and promoted in the field of surgery around the world. Most previous studies were comparative studies of laparoscopic NOSES and conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, there is little research on comparing robotic colorectal cancer NOSES with conventional robotic-assisted colorectal cancer resection surgery. Participant and methods This study is a retrospective study of propensity score matching (PSM). This study included Ninety-one propensity score-matched pairs of the participant who had undergone robotic colorectal cancer resection surgery at our center between January 2017 and December 2020. The covariates used in the propensity score included gender, age, BMI, ASA score, maximum tumor diameter, the tumor's height from the anal verge, histological differentiation, AJCC stage, T stage, N stage, and history of previous abdominal surgery. The outcome measurement criteria included postoperative complications, inflammatory response, pelvic floor function, anal function, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results The robotic NOSES group had faster recovery time from gastrointestinal function (P = 0.014), shorter abdominal incision length (P < 0.001), less pain (P < 0.001), less additional analgesia required (P < 0.001), and lower postoperative indicators of white blood cell count (P < 0.001) and C-reactive protein content compared to the robotic-assisted resection surgery (RARS) group (P = 0.035). Additionally, the robotic NOSES group had significantly better body imagery (P < 0.001), cosmetic scores (P < 0.001), somatic function (P = 0.003), role function (P = 0.039), emotional function (P = 0.001), social function (P = 0.004), and overall function (P < 0.001) than the RARS group. The two groups demonstrated no significant difference between DFS and OS. Conclusion Robotic colorectal cancer NOSES is a safe and feasible minimally invasive procedure and offers shorter abdominal incisions, less pain, less surgical stress response, and better postoperative quality of life. Therefore, this technique can be further promoted for colorectal cancer patients eligible for NOSES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Houqiong
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Wan Ziwen
- Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhong Chonghan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - He Penghui
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yu Hongxin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Lu Weijie
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Liu Dongning
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Li Taiyuan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F, Ambler G, Williams NR, Al-Hammouri T, Khan MS, Thurairaja R, Nair R, Feber A, Dixon S, Nathan S, Briggs T, Sridhar A, Ahmad I, Bhatt J, Charlesworth P, Blick C, Cumberbatch MG, Hussain SA, Kotwal S, Koupparis A, McGrath J, Noon AP, Rowe E, Vasdev N, Hanchanale V, Hagan D, Brew-Graves C, Kelly JD. Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 327:2092-2103. [PMID: 35569079 PMCID: PMC9109000 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Importance Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is being performed with increasing frequency, but it is unclear whether total intracorporeal surgery improves recovery compared with open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Objectives To compare recovery and morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction vs open radical cystectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized clinical trial of patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer recruited at 9 sites in the UK, from March 2017-March 2020. Follow-up was conducted at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months, with final follow-up on September 23, 2021. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction (n = 169) or open radical cystectomy (n = 169). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery. There were 20 secondary outcomes, including complications, quality of life, disability, stamina, activity levels, and survival. Analyses were adjusted for the type of diversion and center. Results Among 338 randomized participants, 317 underwent radical cystectomy (mean age, 69 years; 67 women [21%]; 107 [34%] received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 282 [89%] underwent ileal conduit reconstruction); the primary outcome was analyzed in 305 (96%). The median number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery was 82 (IQR, 76-84) for patients undergoing robotic surgery vs 80 (IQR, 72-83) for open surgery (adjusted difference, 2.2 days [95% CI, 0.50-3.85]; P = .01). Thromboembolic complications (1.9% vs 8.3%; difference, -6.5% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.4%]) and wound complications (5.6% vs 16.0%; difference, -11.7% [95% CI, -18.6% to -4.6%]) were less common with robotic surgery than open surgery. Participants undergoing open surgery reported worse quality of life vs robotic surgery at 5 weeks (difference in mean European Quality of Life 5-Dimension, 5-Level instrument scores, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03]; P = .003) and greater disability at 5 weeks (difference in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 scores, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.15-0.73]; P = .003) and at 12 weeks (difference in WHODAS 2.0 scores, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.09-0.68]; P = .01); the differences were not significant after 12 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer recurrence (29/161 [18%] vs 25/156 [16%] after robotic and open surgery, respectively) and overall mortality (23/161 [14.3%] vs 23/156 [14.7%]), respectively) at median follow-up of 18.4 months (IQR, 12.8-21.1). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, treatment with robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy resulted in a statistically significant increase in days alive and out of the hospital over 90 days. However, the clinical importance of these findings remains uncertain. Trial Registration ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN13680280; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049410.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W. F. Catto
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Pramit Khetrapal
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | | | - Gareth Ambler
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Norman R. Williams
- Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Tarek Al-Hammouri
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Muhammad Shamim Khan
- Department of Urology, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Ramesh Thurairaja
- Department of Urology, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Rajesh Nair
- Department of Urology, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Andrew Feber
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Simon Dixon
- Health Economics and Decision Science, NIHR Research Design Service Yorkshire and the Humber, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Senthil Nathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Tim Briggs
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Imran Ahmad
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Jaimin Bhatt
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Philip Charlesworth
- The Harold Hopkins Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, England
| | - Christopher Blick
- The Harold Hopkins Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, England
| | - Marcus G. Cumberbatch
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England
| | - Syed A. Hussain
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England
| | - Sanjeev Kotwal
- Pyrah Department of Urology, St James University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England
| | | | - John McGrath
- Department of Urology, Royal Devon University Hospitals Foundation Trust and University of Exeter, Exeter, England
| | - Aidan P. Noon
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, England
| | | | - Daryl Hagan
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Chris Brew-Graves
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England
| | - John D. Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Koller M, Musoro JZ, Tomaszewski K, Coens C, King MT, Sprangers MA, Groenvold M, Cocks K, Velikova G, Flechtner HH, Bottomley A. Minimally important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma – Interpretation guidance derived from two randomized EORTC trials. Lung Cancer 2022; 167:65-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
|
18
|
Irusen H, Fernandez P, Van der Merwe A, Suliman S, Esterhuizen T, Lazarus J, Parkes J, Seedat S. Depression, Anxiety, and Their Association to Health-Related Quality of Life in Men Commencing Prostate Cancer Treatment at Tertiary Hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221125561. [PMID: 36112984 PMCID: PMC9478688 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221125561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comorbid depression and anxiety in men with localised prostate cancer (CaP) largely go undiagnosed and untreated and their effects on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in men with CaP should not be underestimated. We examined the prevalence of depression and anxiety and its association with HRQOL in men about to commence treatment for CaP and the differences between treatment groups, radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT). METHOD One hundred and seven participants from a longitudinal prospective observational study assessing depression, anxiety and HRQOL in men with localised CaP (DAHCaP), were used in this cross-sectional analysis. Data were collected shortly before participants were scheduled to receive their treatment. The Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and (EORTC QLQ-PR25) were used in this analysis. RESULTS Symptoms of depression pre-treatment were noted in 39.3%, state anxiety 28%, trait anxiety 31.4% and prostate cancer anxiety in 12.1% of participants. Statistically significant correlations (P ≤ .05) with the CES-D and a cluster of symptoms on the EORTC QLQ-C30 domains for Global Health (rs = -.35), fatigue (rs = .38), pain (rs = .32), dyspnoea (rs = .28), insomnia (rs = .30) and finance (rs = .26) and EORTC QLQ-PR25 domains for urinary symptoms (rs = .43), bowel (rs = .43) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (rs = .41) were observed.Statistically significant correlations were also noted between the STAI-S and EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25. No statistically significant difference was noted between treatments. CONCLUSION More men were depressed than anxious with significant associations with HRQOL prior to commencement of treatment. CaP treatments should focus not only on the prevailing indisposition but include a psychooncological and HRQOL assessment at pre-treatment in high-risk individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Irusen
- Department of Urology, Faculty of
Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Pedro Fernandez
- Department of Urology, Faculty of
Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Andre Van der Merwe
- Department of Urology, Faculty of
Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sharain Suliman
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University and SA MRC
Genomics of Brain Disorders Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tonya Esterhuizen
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of
Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - John Lazarus
- Department of Urology, Groote
Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jeannette Parkes
- Department of Radiation Oncology,
Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Soraya Seedat
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty
of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van Parijs H, Vinh-Hung V, Fontaine C, Storme G, Verschraegen C, Nguyen DM, Adriaenssens N, Nguyen NP, Gorobets O, De Ridder M. Cardiopulmonary-related patient-reported outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of radiation therapy for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1177. [PMID: 34736429 PMCID: PMC8569957 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08916-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term prospective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy is scarce. TomoBreast compared conventional radiotherapy (CR) with tomotherapy (TT), on the hypothesis that TT might reduce lung-heart toxicity. Methods Among 123 women consenting to participate, 64 were randomized to CR, 59 to TT. CR delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, with a sequential boost (16 Gy/8 fractions/1.6 weeks) after lumpectomy. TT delivered 42 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, 51 Gy simultaneous-integrated-boost in patients with lumpectomy. PRO were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ-C30. PRO scores were converted into a symptom-free scale, 100 indicating a fully symptom-free score, 0 indicating total loss of freedom from symptom. Changes of PRO over time were analyzed using the linear mixed-effect model. Survival analysis computed time to > 10% PRO-deterioration. A post-hoc cardiorespiratory outcome was defined as deterioration in any of dyspnea, fatigue, physical functioning, or pain. Results At 10.4 years median follow-up, patients returned on average 9 questionnaires/patient, providing a total of 1139 PRO records. Item completeness was 96.6%. Missingness did not differ between the randomization arms. The PRO at baseline were below the nominal 100% symptom-free score, notably the mean fatigue-free score was 64.8% vs. 69.6%, pain-free was 75.4% vs. 75.3%, and dyspnea-free was 84.8% vs. 88.5%, in the TT vs. CR arm, respectively, although the differences were not significant. By mixed-effect modeling on early ≤2 years assessment, all three scores deteriorated, significantly for fatigue, P ≤ 0.01, without effect of randomization arm. By modeling on late assessment beyond 2 years, TT versus CR was not significantly associated with changes of fatigue-free or pain-free scores but was associated with a significant 8.9% improvement of freedom from dyspnea, P = 0.035. By survival analysis of the time to PRO deterioration, TT improved 10-year survival free of cardiorespiratory deterioration from 66.9% with CR to 84.5% with TT, P = 0.029. Conclusion Modern radiation therapy can significantly improve long-term PRO. Trial registration Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.govNCT00459628, April 12, 2007 prospectively. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08916-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Van Parijs
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.
| | - Christel Fontaine
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guy Storme
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dung M Nguyen
- School of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nele Adriaenssens
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Olena Gorobets
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.,Ukrainian Military Medical Academy, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|