1
|
Yariv O, Newman NB, Yarchoan M, Rabiee A, Wood BJ, Salem R, Hernandez JM, Bang CK, Yanagihara TK, Escorcia FE. Advances in radiation therapy for HCC: Integration with liver-directed treatments. Hepatol Commun 2025; 9:e0653. [PMID: 40163776 PMCID: PMC11927661 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2025] Open
Abstract
HCC is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality with increasing incidence worldwide. Historically, treatment for early disease includes liver transplantation, surgical resection, and/or other local therapies, such as thermal ablation. As a result of technical advances and high-quality prospective data, the use of definitive external beam radiotherapy with ablative doses has emerged. Intermediate-stage disease has been generally addressed with arterially directed therapies (eg, chemoembolization or radioembolization) and external beam radiotherapy, while advanced stages have been addressed by systemic therapy or best supportive care. The role of each local/locoregional therapy has rapidly evolved in the context of novel pharmacotherapies, including immunotherapies and antiangiogenic agents. The combinations, indications, and timing of treatments vary widely among specialties and geographies. Here, we aim to synthesize the best quality evidence available regarding the efficacy and safety of different liver-directed modalities, with a focus on recent prospective clinical data of external beam radiotherapy within the context of other available liver-directed therapies across Barcelona Liver Classification (BCLC) stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orly Yariv
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Neil B. Newman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Mark Yarchoan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Atoosa Rabiee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Bradford J. Wood
- Interventional Radiology, Center for Interventional Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Liver Cancer Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jonathan M. Hernandez
- Liver Cancer Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christine K. Bang
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Care Center, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ted K. Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Freddy E. Escorcia
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Liver Cancer Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang G, Ren Y, Liu J, Cao Y, Xiong F, Liang B, Zheng C, Kan X. Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation and Iodine-125 Seed Implantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Locations: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2025; 12:15-27. [PMID: 39810991 PMCID: PMC11731015 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s499763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2025] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims The effect of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (TACE-RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations is not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of TACE-RFA plus iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation (TACE-RFA-125I) therapy with those of TACE-RFA for unresectable HCC (≤5 cm) in high-risk locations. Methods From January 2010 to June 2023, the clinical data of 126 patients with unresectable HCC (≤5 cm) in high-risk locations who received TACE-RFA-125I or TACE-RFA treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results Forty-six pairs of patients were matched. The local progression-free survival rates at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-years were 100%, 82.4%, 74.8%, 63.5%, and 54% in the TACE-RFA-125I group, which were significantly higher than 91.3%, 69.4%, 50.7%, 29.4%, and 26.7% in the TACE-RFA group, respectively (p = 0.004). The median progression-free survival in the TACE-RFA-125I group was significantly longer than that in the TACE-RFA group (p = 0.002). The overall survival rates at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-years were 100%, 93.4%, 80.7%, 74.9%, and 64.7% in the TACE-RFA-125I group, which were significantly higher than 97.8%, 78%, 68.6%, 51.1%, and 45.3% in the TACE-RFA group, respectively (p = 0.011). There was no occurrence of major complications or procedure-related deaths in the two groups. Conclusion Compared with the TACE-RFA treatment, TACE-RFA-125I should be a more effective treatment strategy for patients with unresectable HCC (≤5 cm) in high-risk locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanqiao Ren
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiayun Liu
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanyan Cao
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fu Xiong
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin Liang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chuansheng Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xuefeng Kan
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xia WL, Zhao XH, Guo Y, Hu HT, Li HL. TACE Combined with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus 125I Seed Implantation in the Treatment of HCC with Hepatic Arterioportal Shunts. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:1689-1697. [PMID: 39247518 PMCID: PMC11378794 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s480082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and 125I seed implantation are methods used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), PVTT often associated with arterioportal shunts(APS), there are few reports on the combined use of TACE and 125I seed implantation for such patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with PVTT 125I seed implantation in the treatment of HCC patients with APS. Methods Forty-two patients diagnosed with HCC combined with PVTT and APS between January 2020 and December 2021 were included. Appropriate materials were selected to transarterial embolization of the APS, and 125I seeds were implanted into the PVTT. The occlusion effect was observed and recorded after 3 months, the efficacy of intrahepatic lesions and PVTT was evaluated, and the patient survival, prognostic factors affecting APS recanalization were analyzed. Results All 42 patients completed the follow-up three months after treatment. The immediate APS improvement rate was 100%, and the APS improvement rate at the three-month follow-up was 64.29%. The disease control rates of PVTT and intrahepatic lesions were 81.00% and 78.60%, respectively. The patients' 6-month and 12-month survival rates were 78.6% and 46.8%. The median OS for all patients was 11.90 months, and the median OS was 13.30 months in the APS effective treatment group and 8.30 months in the ineffective group. The PVTT type is the only independent factor affecting APS recanalization. (P=0.02). Conclusion For HCC patients with PVTT and APS, TACE combine with 125I seed implantation in PVTT is a potentially effective and safe method that contributes to prolonging patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Li Xia
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Hui Zhao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Guo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong-Tao Hu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, People's Republic of China
| | - Hai-Liang Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meng P, Ma JP, Huang XF, Zhang KL. Application of radioactive iodine-125 microparticles in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein embolus. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:2023-2030. [PMID: 39087134 PMCID: PMC11287696 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radioactive iodine-125 (125I) microparticle therapy is a new type of internal radiation therapy that has shown unique advantages in the treatment of malignant tumors, especially hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma frequently experience portal vein embolism, which exacerbates the difficulty and complexity of treatment. 125I particles, used in local radiotherapy, can directly act on tumor tissue and reduce damage to surrounding healthy tissue. Through retrospective analysis, this study discussed the efficacy and safety of radioactive 125I particles in portal vein embolization patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in order to provide more powerful evidence supporting clinical treatment. AIM To investigate the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with portal vein 125I particle implantation in the treatment of primary liver cancer patients with portal vein tumor thrombus and its influence on liver function. METHODS The clinical data of 96 patients with primary liver cancer combined with portal vein tumor thrombus admitted to our hospital between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two patients received treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and implantation of 125I particles in the portal vein (combination group), while 44 patients received treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone (control group). The therapeutic effects on tumor lesions, primary liver cancer, and portal vein tumor embolisms were compared between the two groups. Changes in relevant laboratory indexes before and after treatment were evaluated. The t test was used to compare the measurement data between the two groups, and the χ 2 test was used to compare the counting data between groups. RESULTS The tumor lesion response rate in the combination group (59.62% vs 38.64%) and the response rate of patients with primary liver cancer complicated with portal vein tumor thrombus (80.77% vs 59.09%) were significantly greater than those in the control group (χ 2 = 4.196, 5.421; P = 0.041, 0.020). At 8 wk after surgery, the serum alpha-fetoprotein, portal vein main diameter, and platelet of the combined group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were significantly greater than those of the control group (t = 3.891, 3.291, 2.330, 3.729, 3.582, 4.126; P < 0.05). The serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels of the two groups were significantly greater than those of the same group 8 wk after surgery (P < 0.05), and the peripheral blood platelet, alpha-fetoprotein, and main portal vein diameter were significantly less than those of the same group before surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION In patients with primary liver cancer and a thrombus in the portal vein, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus portal vein 125I implantation is more effective than transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone. However, during treatment it is crucial to pay attention to liver function injury caused by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Meng
- The Fourth Department of Oncology, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai 264001, Shandong Province, China
| | - Ji-Peng Ma
- Department of Medical Services, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai 264001, Shandong Province, China
| | - Xiao-Fei Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510062, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Kang-Le Zhang
- The Third Department of Oncology, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai 264001, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang H, Shi HB, Qiang WG, Wang C, Sun B, Yuan Y, Hu WW. CT-guided Radioactive 125I Seed Implantation for Abdominal Incision Metastases of Colorectal Cancer: Safety and Efficacy in 17 Patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:136-142. [PMID: 36463020 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation for patients with abdominal incision metastases from colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of patients with abdominal incision metastases of colorectal cancer from November 2010 to October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Each incisional metastasis was percutaneously treated with 125I seed implantation under CT guidance. Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT was reviewed, and the outcomes were evaluated in terms of objective response rate, complications, and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 17 patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 18 months (range, 2.7-22.1 months). At 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the treatment, objective response rate was 52.9%, 63.6%, 33.3%, and 0%, respectively. A small amount of local hematoma occurred in two patients and resolved spontaneously without any treatment. Two patients experienced a minor displacement of radioactive seeds with no related symptoms. Severe complications, such as massive bleeding and radiation injury, were not observed. No ≥ grade 3 adverse events were identified. By the end of follow-up, 14 patients died of multiple hematogenous metastases. The one-year overall survival rate was 41.6%, and the median overall survival was 8.6 months. CONCLUSION CT-guided 125I seed implantation brachytherapy is safe and feasible for patients with abdominal incision metastases from colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wang
- Center of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Hong-Bing Shi
- Center of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Wei-Guang Qiang
- Center of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Center of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Bai Sun
- Center of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Ye Yuan
- Center of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Wen-Wei Hu
- Center of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen Z, Fu X, Qiu Z, Mu M, Jiang W, Wang G, Zhong Z, Qi H, Gao F. CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations after transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation: a propensity score-matched study. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57:127-139. [PMID: 36942903 PMCID: PMC10039481 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 125I brachytherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations. PATIENTS AND METHODS After 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), this retrospectively study analyzed 49 patients who underwent TACE +MWA+125I brachytherapy (group A) and 98 patients who only received TACE +MWA (group B). The evaluated outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment complications. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis survival was used to compare the two groups. RESULTS The patients in group A showed a longer PFS than group B (7.9 vs. 3.3 months, P = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in median OS between the two groups (P = 0.928). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate of tumors in high-risk locations, and the ORR of intrahepatic tumors were 67.3%, 93.9%, and 51.0%, respectively, in group A, and 38.8%, 79.6% and 29.6%, respectively, in group B (P < 0.001, P = 0.025 and P = 0.011, respectively). TACE-MWA-125I (HR = 0.479, P < 0.001) was a significant favorable prognostic factor that affected PFS. The present of portal vein tumor thrombosis was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 1.625, P = 0.040). The Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage (BCLC C vs. B) was an independent factor affecting OS (HR = 1.941, P = 0.038). The incidence of complications was similar between the two groups, except that the incidence of abdominal pain was reduced in the group A (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS TACE-MWA-125I resulted in longer PFS and better tumor control than did TACE-MWA in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zixiong Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaobo Fu
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenkang Qiu
- Interventional Medical Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Maoyuan Mu
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Weiwei Jiang
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Guisong Wang
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhihui Zhong
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Han Qi
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Fei Gao
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|