Second-line chemotherapy after early disease progression during first-line chemotherapy containing bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib monotherapy as second-line treatment of patients with RAS-mutant advanced colorectal cancer (STREAM): an academic, multicenter, single-arm, two-stage, phase II study

BACKGROUND

Maintaining angiogenesis inhibition and switching the chemotherapy backbone represent the current second-line therapy in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, prolonged overall survival (OS) in the chemorefractory setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

STREAM was an academic, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, evaluating the activity of regorafenib in RAS-mutant mCRC, in terms of the rate of patients who were progression-free after 6 months from study entry (6mo-PF). Patients were pretreated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. According to Simon's two-stage design, ≥18 patients 6mo-PF were needed in the overall population (N = 46). Secondary endpoints were safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. Early metabolic response by [¹⁸F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT) scan was an exploratory endpoint. EudraCT Number: 2015-001105-13.

RESULTS

The number of patients 6mo-PF was 8/22 at the first stage and 14/46 in the overall population. The ORR was 10.9%, disease control rate was 54.6%, median (m)PFS was 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-6.7 months], mOS was 18.9 months (95% CI 10.3-35.3 months), and mPFS2 (from study entry to subsequent-line progression) was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-19.7 months). Long benefiter patients (>6mo-PF) significantly more often had a single metastatic site and lung-limited disease. No unexpected toxicity was reported. Grade ≥3 events occurred in 39.1% of patients, with hand-foot syndrome (13%), fatigue, and hyperbilirubinemia (6.5%) occurring mostly. Baseline metabolic assessment was associated with OS in the multivariate analysis, while early metabolic response was not associated with clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not meet its primary endpoint. However, regorafenib was well tolerated and did not preclude subsequent treatments. Patients with good prognostic features (single metastatic site and lung-limited disease) reported clinical benefit with regorafenib. The exploratory metabolic analysis suggests that baseline [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT might be useful to select patients with a favorable outcome. A chemotherapy-free interval with regorafenib was associated with durable disease control in a selected group of patients with favorable clinical characteristics.

Bevacizumab with Chemotherapy as a First-Line Treatment for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in a Serbian Cohort

Background and Objectives: For stage IIIb-IV ovarian cancer, bevacizumab-containing treatment is considered the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients had stage IIIc-IV ovarian cancer according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics with no clinical signs or symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction or a history of abdominal fistulae, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess or evidence of rectosigmoid involvement by pelvic examination, bowel involvement on computed tomography, or clinical symptoms of bowel obstruction in the previous 6 months. After debulking surgery, the patients received 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel and carboplatin (AUC 6) for the first six cycles and 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab every three weeks up to 17 cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoint was overall survival. Results: Between April 2017 and March 2020, 35 patients began study treatment. Bevacizumab was administered at 7.5 mg/kg in all the patients and for more than 7.5 months in 70% of them. The median progression-free survival was 20 months (95% CI: 16-23). The median overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: This was, to our knowledge, the first trial in Serbia to show progression-free survival and overall survival of combination regimens in advanced ovarian cancer. Based on the observed progression-free survival, bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy should be considered as a standard option in advanced ovarian cancer.

RAS Mutation Conversion in Bevacizumab-Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Liquid Biopsy Based Study

Simple Summary

Recent evidence has been provided that the clonal evolution of mutant RAS colorectal tumors may lead to the negative selection of mutant RAS clones, with the appearance of a time window characterized by the disappearance of RAS mutant clones in plasma. We demonstrate here for the first time that the use of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment is the most significant factor for RAS conversion from mutant to wild type in plasma. The frequent appearance of this “RAS wild-type * window” in patients treated with a first line treatment containing bevacizumab could possibly present them as candidates for second line treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, which are otherwise precluded.

Abstract

Liquid biopsies have shown that, in RAS mutant colorectal cancer, the conversion to RAS wild-type * status during the course of the disease is a frequent event, supporting the concept that the evolutionary landscape of colorectal cancer can lead to an unexpected negative selection of RAS mutant clones. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether the negative selection of RAS mutation in plasma might be drug-dependent. For this purpose, we used liquid biopsy to compare the rate of conversion from RAS mutant to RAS wild-type * in two groups of originally RAS mutant mCRC patients: the first treated with chemotherapy alone, while the second was treated with chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Serial liquid biopsies were performed at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) after starting first line treatments. We found that the only independent variable significantly associated to RAS status conversion was the use of bevacizumab. RAS conversion was not found associated to tumor burden reduction, although bevacizumab-treated patients who converted to RAS wild-type * had a significantly longer PFS compared to patients who remained RAS mutant. The appearance of a “RAS wild-type * window”, mainly in bevacizumab-treated patients, might present them as candidates for second line treatment with anti-EGFR, which was otherwise precluded.