Survival impact of additional chemotherapy after adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy

Efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy after adjuvant therapy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients with risk factors: a retrospective single-center study

Objective

Accumulated evidence has suggested a relatively high recurrence rate in early-stage cervical cancer (CC) patients with risk factors. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy (concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone) in stage IB-IIA CC patients with risk factors.

Methods

A total of 237 stage IB-IIA CC patients who received radical surgery between January 2014 and December 2021 were included in the retrospective study. According to the types of adjuvant therapies, the patients were classified into the control group (CCRT or RT alone) and the study group (consolidation chemotherapy following CCRT or RT alone). The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary end points of the study were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

For the entire cohort, no significant difference was observed in the DFS or OS between the study and control group, which was also confirmed in the PSM cohort (n=124). The multivariate analysis identified the high-risk factor type was an independent adverse prognostic factor for the patients. In patients with high risk factors, consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy was significantly associated with better clinical outcomes and identified as an independent prognostic favorable factor. Moreover, this association remained statistically significant in high-risk patients with ≥2 metastatic lymph nodes. In patients with intermediate risk factors, consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy was unrelated to DFS or OS. The safe assessment demonstrated consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy was significantly correlated with higher rates of ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicities in both the global and subgroup analysis stratified by risk factor type.

Conclusion

Consolidation chemotherapy after adjuvant therapy provided survival benefits in stage IB-IIA CC patients with high risk factors, particularly those with ≥2 metastatic lymph nodes. However, related hematologic toxicities should be alerted in patient management. The actual efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy still need to be investigated in more well-designed clinical trials.

Impact of different post-operative treatment modalities on long-term outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer

Objective

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer patients receiving different adjuvant treatment modalities after radical hysterectomy.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2012, patients diagnosed with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy plus retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy with pathologically confirmed positive lymph nodes, and received either radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation, or sequential chemoradiation, were included in this study. Survival analysis was performed according to different adjuvant treatment modalities and after adjustment using propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 192 stage IIICp cervical cancer patients were eligible. In multivariate analysis, only sequential chemoradiation versus radiotherapy was associated with both overall survival (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.94, p=0.035) and disease-free survival (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57, p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival for radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation, and sequential chemoradiation was 71.6%, 81.7%, and 81.5%, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival was noted between the three groups (radiotherapy vs concurrent chemoradiation, p=0.15; radiotherapy vs sequential chemoradiation, p=0.09; concurrent chemoradiation vs sequential chemoradiation, p=0.95). However, sequential chemoradiation significantly increased disease-free survival compared with radiotherapy alone (79.2% vs 63.1%, p=0.028). After propensity score matching in the baseline characteristics, both overall survival (88.0% vs 71.6%, p=0.028) and disease-free survival (88.0% vs 63.1%, p=0.021) were improved in the sequential chemoradiation group compared with radiotherapy alone; no significant differences were noted between sequential chemoradiation and concurrent chemoradiation (overall survival 88.0% vs 83.8%, p=0.50; disease-free survival 88.0% vs 75.8%, p=0.28).

Conclusion

In this cohort of FIGO 2018 IIICp cervical cancer patients, post-operative sequential chemoradiation was associated with higher survival compared with radiotherapy alone after propensity matching. Future prospective studies are required to further elucidate the optimal modality in node-positive cervical cancer.

The effectiveness of consolidation chemotherapy in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following concurrent chemoradiation after radical surgery

OBJECTIVE

Studies determining which early-stage cervical cancer patients with high-risk factors benefit from consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are limited and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of consolidation chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2019, a retrospective review was conducted among high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients who were treated with postoperative CCRT or consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative CCRT. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 293 patients with early-stage cervical cancer were included in this study. A total of 188 patients were in the consolidation chemotherapy group, and 105 patients were in the postoperative CCRT alone group. The median follow-up was 48.3 months (range: 3-123 months). In the survival analyses, no significant differences in DFS (P = 0.21) or OS (P = 0.15) were observed between the groups. The grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia rates in the consolidation group were higher than those in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone group (54.8% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.02; 49.4% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.001, respectively). For patients with ≥2 positive lymph nodes or ≥2 high-risk factors, consolidation chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (P = 0.013 and P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) compared with CCRT alone.

CONCLUSION

For early-stage cervical cancer, consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative CCRT improved survival outcomes in patients with ≥2 positive lymph nodes or ≥2 high-risk factors.

Identification and validation of serum tumor-markers based nomogram to predict the prognostic value of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma

Unlike cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), no uniform standard has been implemented to identify serum biomarkers for adenocarcinoma of the cervix (ADC). In the present study, we aimed to determine whether pretreatment serum tumor markers were of prognostic value in patients with ADC and constructed and validated the novel accurate nomogram for stratifying the risk groups. Patients with ADC who underwent curative hysterectomy or definitive radiotherapy from January 2011 to December 2016 were included. Significant factors independently predicting prognosis were selected by univariate multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models and adopted for constructing the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) prediction nomograms. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and concordance index (C-index) with calibration curve was used to determine the accuracy of the nomogram in the prediction and determination of performance. We enrolled a total of 295 samples and randomized them as the training set (n = 207) or validation set (n = 88). Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging Guidelines (FIGO) stage, para-aortic lymph node (PALN), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and HCG-β were assessed as the common factors independently predicting OS and PFS. For our constructed nomograms, its C-index values in OS and PFS prediction were 0.896 (95% CI, 0.879-0.913) and 0.895 (95% CI, 0.878-0.912) in training set, whereas 0.845 (95% CI:0.796-0.894) and 0.846 (95% CI:0.797-0.895) in validation set. ROC and calibration curves for our constructed nomograms predicted the excellent consistency of nomogram-predicted values with real measurements of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS. We explored novel prognostic serum tumor markers of ADC and constructed effective nomograms comprising NSE, HCG-β, FIGO stage, PALN, and CEA, which could estimate OS and PFS for patients with ADC. These nomograms performed well in predicting patient prognosis, which was a potentially useful approach for stratifying ADC risk, thus contributing to clinical decision-making and individualized follow-up planning.

Analysis of the Role and Mechanism of ZEB1 in Regulating Cervical Carcinoma Progression via Modulating PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint

Background

Cervical carcinoma (CC) is a common and highly malignant tumor in women. The involvement of zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) in many kinds of tumors has been well-documented; however, its role and mechanism in CC remain to be clarified.

Objective

This study investigated the mechanism of ZEB1 in modulating the growth and metastasis of CC cells.

Methods

The expression of ZEB1 in CC tissues and adjacent normal counterparts was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The correlation between ZEB1 and patient clinicopathological indexes was analyzed. In vitro, gain and loss functions of ZEB1 were performed in C-33A and HeLa cell lines. The proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells were detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and transwell assay, respectively. The expression levels of apoptosis-related proteins such as BCL2-associated X (Bax), B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl2), and Caspase-3, as well as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated proteins including E-cadherin, Vimentin, and Snail, were measured by Western blotting. In addition, the targeting relationship between ZEB1 and programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was predicted by bioinformatics and further verified by dual-luciferase reporter assay.

Results

ZEB1 was significantly up-regulated in CC tissues compared with normal counterparts. ZEB1 overexpression promoted the migration, proliferation, and invasion of CC cells and inhibited apoptosis, while knocking down ZEB1 contributed to the opposite effects. In addition, experiments on related mechanisms confirmed that ZEB1 targeted the 3'EUTR terminal of PD-1/PD-L1 and negatively regulated its expression. And an interaction between ZEB1 and PD-1/PD-L1 was identified.

Conclusion

ZEB1 can promote the proliferation and metastasis of CC cells via modulating the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint.