Comparative analysis of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating the histological grade of cervical squamous carcinoma

The value of amide proton transfer imaging in predicting parametrial invasion and lymph-vascular space invasion of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing parametrial invasion (PMI) and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) of cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of cervical cancer patients diagnosed pathologically at our hospital from January 2021 to June 2024. All patients underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and APT imaging before treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and APT values were measured. Based on the pathological results, patients were categorized into LVSI (+) and LVSI (-) groups, and PMI (+) and PMI (-) groups. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the ADC and APT values between these groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI and LVSI. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance among these measures.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included, with 56 in the LVSI (-) group, 27 in the LVSI (+) group, 35 in the PMI (-) group, and 16 in the PMI (+) group. The ADC values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly lower than those for the LVSI (-) and PMI (-) groups (P < 0.01). The APT values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly higher than those for the LVSI (-) and PMI (-) groups (P < 0.01). The AUC values for ADC, APT, and the combination of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI were 0.839, 0.788, and 0.880, respectively, and in predicting PMI were 0.770, 0.764, and 0.796, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the diagnostic performance of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI. However, the diagnostic performance of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI was significantly better than that of ADC and APT alone (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

APT imaging can predict LVSI and PMI status in cervical cancer before surgery. When combined with ADC, its diagnostic accuracy for predicting LVSI is higher than that of APT or ADC alone. This suggests a novel approach for assessing LVSI in cervical cancer.

Whole-tumor histogram analysis of multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models at high b values for assessing cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic potential of whole-tumor histogram analysis of multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models for differentiating cervical cancer (CC) aggressive status regarding of pathological types, differentiation degree, stage, and p16 expression.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center study from March 2022 to July 2023. Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) were obtained including 15 b-values (0 ~ 4000 s/mm2). Diffusion parameters derived from four non-Gaussian diffusion models including continuous-time random-walk (CTRW), diffusion-kurtosis imaging (DKI), fractional order calculus (FROC), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) were calculated, and their histogram features were analyzed. To select the most significant features and establish predictive models, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Finally, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of our models by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS

89 women (mean age, 55 ± 11 years) with CC were enrolled in our study. The combined model, which incorporated the CTRW, DKI, FROC, and IVIM diffusion models, offered a significantly higher AUC than that from any individual models (0.836 vs. 0.664, 0.642, 0.651, 0.649, respectively; p < 0.05) in distinguishing cervical squamous cell cancer from cervical adenocarcinoma. To distinguish tumor differentiation degree, except the combined model showed a better predictive performance compared to the DKI model (AUC, 0.839 vs. 0.697, respectively; p < 0.05), no significant differences in AUCs were found among other individual models and combined model. To predict the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, only DKI and FROC model were established and there was no significant difference in predictive performance among different models. In terms of predicting p16 expression, the predictive ability of DKI model is significantly lower than that of FROC and combined model (AUC, 0.693 vs. 0.850, 0.859, respectively; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models with whole-tumor histogram analysis show great promise to assess the aggressive status of CC.

Integrated pretreatment diffusion kurtosis imaging and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels: a biomarker strategy for early assessment of radiotherapy outcomes in cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the utility of pretreatment DKI parameters and serum SCC-Ag in evaluating the early therapeutic response of cervical cancer to radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 33 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer, including 31 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and two cases of adenosquamous carcinoma, participated in the study. All patients underwent conventional MRI and DKI scans on a 3T magnetic resonance scanner before radiotherapy and after ten sessions of radiotherapy. The therapeutic response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients were categorized into a response group (RG), comprising Complete Remission (CR) and Partial Remission (PR), and a non-response group (NRG), comprising Stable Disease (SD) and Progressive Disease (PD). LASSO was employed to select pretreatment DKI parameters, and ROC curves were generated for the selected parameters and serum SCC-Ag.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in pretreatment MD, Da, Dr, MK, Ka, Kr, and SCC-Ag between the RG and NRG groups (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were noted for FA and FAK (P = 0.441&0.928). The two selected parameters (MD and MK) demonstrated area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.810, 0.769, 0.850 and 0.827, 0.846, 0.750, respectively. The combination of MD and MK exhibited an improved AUC of 0.901, sensitivity of 0.692, and specificity of 1.000, with a higher Youden index compared to the individual parameters. Conversely, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the combination of MD, MK, and SCC-Ag were 0.852, 0.615, and 1.000, with a Youden index of 0.615.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment MD, MK, and SCC-Ag demonstrate potential clinical utility, with the combined application of MD and MK showing enhanced efficacy in assessing the early therapeutic response of cervical cancer to radiotherapy. The addition of SCC-Ag did not contribute further to the assessment efficacy.

Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging of the abdomen: Current progress and future directions

The chemical exchange saturation transfer technique serves as a valuable tool for generating in vivo image contrast based on the content of various proton groups, including amide protons, amine protons, and aliphatic protons. Among these, amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging has seen extensive development as a means to assess the biochemical status of lesions. The exchange from saturated amide protons to bulk water protons during and following the saturation ratio frequency pulse contributes to detectable APT signals. While APTw imaging has garnered significant attention in the central nervous system, demonstrating noteworthy findings in cerebral neoplasia, stroke, and Alzheimer's disease over the past decade, its application in the abdomen has been a relatively recent progression. Notably, studies have explored its utility in hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, and cervical carcinoma within the abdominal context. Despite these advancements, there is a paucity of reviews on APTw imaging in abdominal applications. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a concise overview of the fundamental theories underpinning APTw imaging. Additionally, we systematically summarize its diverse clinical applications in the abdomen, with a particular focus on the digestive and urogenital systems. Finally, the manuscript concludes by discussing technical limitations and factors influencing APTw imaging in abdominal applications, along with prospects for future research.

Amide proton transfer weighted combined with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) combined with diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in quantitative prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in cervical carcinoma (CC).

METHODS

Data of 19 LNM(+) and 50 LNM(-) patients with CC were retrospectively analyzed. 3.0 T MRI scan was performed before the operation, including APTw and DKI. After post-processing, quantitative magnetization transfer ratio asymmetric at 3.5 ppm [MTRasym (3.5 ppm)], mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were obtained. The MTRasym(3.5 ppm), MK, and MD values were respectively measured by two observers, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to test the consistency of the results. The independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences in the values of each parameter. The ROC curve was used to analyze the predictive performance of parameters with significant differences and their combination parameter.

RESULTS

The two observers had good agreement in the measurement of each data (ICC > 0.75). The MTRasym(3.5 ppm) and MK values of the LNM(+) group(3.260 ± 0.538% and 0.531 ± 0.202) were higher than those of the LNM(-) group(2.698 ± 0.597% and 0.401 ± 0.148) (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in MD values between the two groups(P > 0.05). The area under the curves (AUCs) of MTRasym(3.5 ppm), MK value, and MTRasym(3.5 ppm) + MK value were 0.763, 0.716, and 0.813, respectively, when predicting LNM status of CC.

CONCLUSION

APTw and DKI can quantitatively predict LNM status of CC, which is of importance in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

T1 mapping as a quantitative imaging biomarker for diagnosing cervical cancer: a comparison with diffusion kurtosis imaging

BACKGROUND

T1 mapping can potentially quantitatively assess the intrinsic properties of tumors. This study was conducted to explore the ability of T1 mapping in distinguishing cervical cancer type, grade, and stage and compare the diagnostic performance of T1 mapping with diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI).

METHODS

One hundred fifty-seven patients with pathologically confirmed cervical cancer were enrolled in this prospectively study. T1 mapping and DKI were performed. The native T1, difference between native and postcontrast T1 (T1diff), mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and adenocarcinoma (CAC), low- and high-grade carcinomas, and early- and advanced-stage groups were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

RESULTS

The native T1 and MK were higher, and the MD and ADC were lower for CSCC than for CAC (all p < 0.05). Compared with low-grade CSCC, high-grade CSCC had decreased T1diff, MD, ADC, and increased MK (p < 0.05). Compared with low-grade CAC, high-grade CAC had decreased T1diff and increased MK (p < 0.05). Native T1 was significantly higher in the advanced-stage group than in the early-stage group (p < 0.05). The AUROC curves of native T1, MK, ADC and MD were 0,772, 0.731, 0.715, and 0.627, respectively, for distinguishing CSCC from CAC. The AUROC values were 0.762 between high- and low-grade CSCC and 0.835 between high- and low-grade CAC, with T1diff and MK showing the best discriminative values, respectively. For distinguishing between advanced-stage and early-stage cervical cancer, only the AUROC of native T1 was statistically significant (AUROC = 0.651, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with DKI-derived parameters, native T1 exhibits better efficacy for identifying cervical cancer subtype and stage, and T1diff exhibits comparable discriminative value for cervical cancer grade.

Added-value of 3D amide proton transfer MRI in assessing prognostic factors of cervical cancer: a comparative study with multiple model diffusion-weighted imaging

Background

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging has been gradually applied to cervical cancer, yet the relationships between APT and multiple model diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have yet to be investigated. This study attempted to evaluate the added value of 3-dimensional (3D) APT imaging to multiple model DWI for assessing prognostic factors of cervical cancer.

Methods

This prospective diagnostic study was conducted in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. A total of 88 consecutive patients with cervical cancer underwent APT imaging and DWI with 11 b-values (0-2,000 s/mm2). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure molecular diffusion (D), perfusion fraction (f), pseudo-diffusion (D*), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated based on mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and kurtosis models. The mean, minimum, and maximum values of APT signal intensity (APT SI) and DWI-derived metrics were compared based on tumor stages, subtypes, grades, and lymphovascular space invasion status by Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters.

Results

APT SImax, APT SImin, MKmean, and MKmax showed significant differences between adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (all P<0.05). APT SImean, APT SImax, and MKmax were higher and ADCmin, Dmean, Dmin, and MDmin were lower in the high-grade tumor than in low-grade tumor (all P<0.05). For distinguishing lymphovascular space invasion, only MKmean showed significant difference (P=0.010). APT SImax [odds ratio (OR) =2.347, P=0.029], APT SImin (OR =0.352; P=0.024), and MKmean (OR =6.523; P=0.001) were the independent predictors for tumor subtype, and APT SImax (OR =2.885; P=0.044), MDmin (OR =0.155, P=0.012) were the independent predictors for histological grade of cervical cancer. When APT SImin and APT SImax was combined with MKmean and MKmax, the diagnostic performance was significantly improved for differentiating AC and AC [area under the curve (AUC): 0.908, sensitivity: 87.5%; specificity: 83.3%; P<0.001]. The combination of APT SImean, APT SImax, ADCmin, MKmax, and MDmin demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for predicting tumor grade (AUC: 0.903, sensitivity: 78.6%; specificity: 88.9%; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Addition of APT to DWI may improve the ability to noninvasively predict poor prognostic factors of cervical cancer.

Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging Combined with ZOOMit Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis of Cervical Cancer

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging combined with ZOOMit diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in cervical cancer (CC). Materials and Methods: Sixty-one participants with pathologically confirmed CC were included in this retrospective study. The APTw MRI and ZOOMit diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were acquired. The mean values of APTw and DKI parameters including mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusivity (MD) of the primary tumors were calculated. The parameters were compared between the LNM and non-LNM groups using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between the LNM status and the risk factors. The diagnostic performance of these quantitative parameters and their combinations for predicting the LNM was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Patients were divided into the LNM group (n = 17) and the non-LNM group (n = 44). The LNM group presented significantly higher APTw (3.7 ± 1.1% vs. 2.4 ± 1.0%, p < 0.001), MK (1.065 ± 0.185 vs. 0.909 ± 0.189, p = 0.005) and lower MD (0.989 ± 0.195 × 10−3 mm2/s vs. 1.193 ± 0.337 ×10−3 mm2/s, p = 0.035) than the non-LNM group. APTw was an independent predictor (OR = 3.115, p = 0.039) for evaluating the lymph node status through multivariate analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of APTw (0.807) was higher than those of MK (AUC, 0.715) and MD (AUC, 0.675) for discriminating LNM from non-LNM, but the differences were not significant (all p > 0.05). Moreover, the combination of APTw, MK, and MD yielded the highest AUC (0.864), with the corresponding sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 88.6%. Conclusion: APTw and ZOOMit DKI parameters may serve as potential noninvasive biomarkers in predicting LNM of CC.

APTw combined with mDixon-Quant imaging to distinguish the differentiation degree of cervical squamous carcinoma

Background

To investigate the value of amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging combined with modified Dixon fat quantification (mDixon-Quant) imaging in determining the degree of differentiation of cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC) against histopathologic.

Methods

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected from 52 CSC patients. According to histopathologic results, patients were divided into the poorly differentiated group (37 cases) and the well/moderately differentiated group (15 cases). The APTw value by APTw imaging and the fat fraction (FF) and transverse relaxation rate R 2 * values by mDixon-Quant were independently measured by two radiologists. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to test the consistency of APTw, FF, and R 2 * values measured by the two observers. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the difference in each parameter between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between the degree of differentiation on histopathology and imaging parameters by APTw and mDixon Quant. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of various parameters and their combination in distinguishing the degree of CSC differentiation on histopathology. The DeLong test was used to access the differences among the area under the ROC curves (AUCs). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between APTw and mDixon-Quant imaging parameters.

Results

The APTw means were 2.95 ± 0.78% and 2.05 (1.85, 2.65)% in the poorly and well/moderately differentiated groups, respectively. The R 2 * values were 26.62 (21.99, 33.31)/s and 22.93 ± 6.09/s in the poorly and well/moderately differentiated groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The AUCs of APTw, R 2 * , and their combination were 0.762, 0.686, and 0.843, respectively. The Delong test suggested statistical significance between R 2 * and the combination of APTw and R 2 * . R 2 * values showed a significant correlation with APTw values in the poorly differentiated group.

Conclusions

APTw combined with mDixon-Quant can be used to efficiently distinguish the differention degrees of CSC diagnosed on histopathology.

Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in abdominal oncological setting: why and when

This article provides an overview of diffusion kurtosis (DKI) imaging in abdominal oncology. DKI allows for more data on tissue structures than the conventional diffusion model (DWI). However, DKI requires high quality images at b-values greater than 1000 s/mm² and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that traditionally MRI systems are not able to acquire and therefore there are generally amplified anatomical distortions on the images due to less homogeneity of the field. Advances in both hardware and software on modern MRI scanners have currently enabled ultra-high b-value imaging and offered the ability to apply DKI to multiple extracranial sites. Previous studies have evaluated the ability of DKI to characterize and discriminate tumor grade compared to conventional DWI. Additionally, in several studies the DKI sequences used were based on planar echo (EPI) acquisition, which is susceptible to motion, metal and air artefacts and prone to low SNRs and distortions, leading to low quality images for some small lesions, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Another problem is the optimal b-value of DKI, which remains to be explored and not yet standardized, as well as the manual selection of the ROI, which could affect the accuracy of some parameters.