Clinical outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring distinct subtypes of EGFR mutations and receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors: brain metastasis and de novo T790M matters

Analysis of Modular Hub Genes and Therapeutic Targets across Stages of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Transcriptome

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), representing 85% of lung cancer cases, is characterized by its heterogeneity and progression through distinct stages. This study applied Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to explore the molecular mechanisms of NSCLC and identify potential therapeutic targets. Gene expression data from the GEO database were analyzed across four NSCLC stages (NSCLC1, NSCLC2, NSCLC3, and NSCLC4), with the NSCLC2 dataset selected as the reference for module preservation analysis. WGCNA identified eight highly preserved modules-Cyan, Yellow, Red, Dark Turquoise, Turquoise, White, Purple, and Royal Blue-across datasets, which were enriched in key pathways such as "Cell cycle" and "Pathways in cancer", involving processes like cell division and inflammatory responses. Hub genes, including PLK1, CDK1, and EGFR, emerged as critical regulators of tumor proliferation and immune responses. Estrogen receptor ESR1 was also highlighted, correlating with improved survival outcomes, suggesting its potential as a prognostic marker. Signature-based drug repurposing analysis identified promising therapeutic candidates, including GW-5074, which inhibits RAF and disrupts the EGFR-RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling cascade, and olomoucine, a CDK1 inhibitor. Additional candidates like pinocembrin, which reduces NSCLC cell invasion by modulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and citalopram, an SSRI with anti-carcinogenic properties, were also identified. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular underpinnings of NSCLC and suggest new directions for therapeutic strategies through drug repurposing.

Clinical Management of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Brain Metastases, and Actionable Genomic Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 60% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease, and approximately 20% have brain metastases (BrMs) at diagnosis. During the disease course, 25-50% of patients will develop BrMs. Despite available treatments, survival rates for patients with NSCLC and BrMs remain low, and their overall prognosis is poor. Even with newer agents for NSCLC, options for treating BrMs can be limited by their ineffective transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the unique brain tumor microenvironment. The presence of actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) is a key determinant of optimal treatment selection, which aims to maximize responses and minimize toxicities. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to understand the current landscape of the clinical management of patients with NSCLC and BrMs, particularly those with AGAs.

METHOD

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant SLR was conducted to identify studies in patients with BrMs in NSCLC. Searches used the EMBASE and MEDLINE® databases, and articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 26, 2022 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 179 studies were included in the SLR. This subset review focused on 80 studies that included patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs (19 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], two single-arm studies, and 59 observational studies). Sixty-four of the 80 studies reported on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 14 on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations, and two on both alterations. Ninety-five percent of studies evaluated targeted therapy. All RCTs allowed patients with previously treated, asymptomatic, or neurologically stable BrMs; the percentage of asymptomatic BrMs varied across observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although targeted therapies demonstrate systemic benefits for patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs, there remains a continued need for effective therapies to treat and prevent BrMs in this population. Increased BBB permeability of emerging therapies may improve outcomes for this population.

Uncommon de novo EGFRT790M-Mutant NSCLC characterized with unique genetic Features: Clinical response and acquired resistance to the third-generation EGFR-TKIs treatment

INTRODUCTION

The literature on de novo EGFRT790M-mutant patients diagnosed with lung cancer is limited, and there is currently no consensus concerning the most effective treatment protocols. This study aimed to investigate the genomic characteristics of de novoEGFRT790M-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and provide insights into its clinical response and resistance mechanism to third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

Next-generation sequencing was utilized to screen a substantial cohort of 4,228 treatment-naïve patients from the Mygene genomic database to identifythe de novo EGFR-T790M mutation. Meanwhile, we recruited 83 individuals diagnosed with lung cancer who harbored de novo EGFRT790M mutation in the real world. In addition, 166 patients who acquired EGFR-T790M mutation after becoming resistant to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs were included as a comparison cohort.

RESULTS

De novo EGFRT790M mutation identified by next-generation sequencing is rare (∼1.3 %) in Chinese lung cancer patients. The relative variant allele frequency (VAF) of de novo EGFRT790M mutation was either comparable to or significantly lower than those of EGFR-activating mutations. Patients with de novo-T790M mutations exhibited less favorable clinical outcomes when administered third-generation EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy thanthose with 19del mutationsdue to a high overlap rate in EGFR p.L858R mutation. In patients with a de novo EGFRT790M mutation, no correlation was observed between T790M clonality and treatment outcomes with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. In contrast, the sub-clonality of the T790M mutation detrimentally affected the third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment efficacy in patients with acquired T790M mutation. Potential resistance mechanisms of third-generation EGFR TKIs in NSCLC patients with de novo or acquired EGFRT790M mutations included EGFR p.C797S in cis or EGFR p.E709X mutation, as well as activation of bypass pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study characterized the uncommon but unique de novo EGFRT790M-mutant NSCLC and laid a foundation for designing future clinical trials in the setting of uncommon EGFR mutation.

Design, synthesis and antitumor activity of 4-arylamine substituted pyrimidine derivatives as noncovalent EGFR inhibitors overcoming C797S mutation

Clinical researches have shown that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a key target for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many EGFR inhibitors were successfully developed as ani-tumor drugs to treat NSCLC patients. Unfortunately, drug resistances were found in clinic. To overcome C797S mutation in EGFR, a novel series of 4-arylamine substituted pyrimidine derivatives were designed and synthesized under the principle of structure-based drug design. Interestingly, compounds 6e and 9i demonstrated the best anti-proliferative activity against A549, NCI-H1975, and HCC827 cells. In particular, the IC50 values against HCC827 cells reached to 24.6 nM and 31.6 nM, which were much lower than human normal cells 2BS and LO2. Furthermore, compounds 6e and 9i showed extraordinary activity against EGFR19del/T790M/C797S (IC50 = 16.06 nM and 37.95 nM) and EGFRL858R/T790M/C797S (IC50 = 11.81 nM and 26.68 nM), which were potent than Osimertinib (IC50 = 52.28 nM and 157.60 nM). Further studies have shown that compounds 6e and 9i could pertain inhibition of HCC827 colony formation, and arrest HCC827 cells at G2/M phase. Moreover, the most promising compound 6e could inhibit the migration of HCC827 cells, induce HCC827 cells apoptosis, and significantly inhibit the phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT and Erk1/2. In vivo xenograft mouse model with HCC827 cells, compound 6e resulted in remarkable tumor regression without obvious toxicity. In addition, molecular docking studies suggested that compound 6e could firmly combine with T790M-mutant, T790 M/C797S-mutant, and L858R/T790 M/C797S-mutant EGFR kinases as ATP-competitive inhibitor.

Overview on Therapeutic Options in Uncommon EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): New Lights for an Unmet Medical Need

The majority of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (85-90%) are exon 19 deletions and L858R point mutations of exon 21, characterized by high sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Less is known about uncommon mutations (10-15% of EGFR mutations). The predominant mutation types in this category include exon 18 point mutations, exon 21 L861X, exon 20 insertions, and exon 20 S768I. This group shows a heterogeneous prevalence, partly due to different testing methods and to the presence of compound mutations, which in some cases can lead to shorter overall survival and different sensitivity to different TKIs compared to simple mutations. Additionally, EGFR-TKI sensitivity may also vary depending on the specific mutation and the tertiary structure of the protein. The best strategy remains uncertain, and the data of EGFR-TKIs efficacy are based on few prospective and some retrospective series. Newer investigational agents are still under study, and there are no other approved specific treatments targeting uncommon EGFR mutations. Defining the best treatment option for this patient population remains an unmet medical need. The objective of this review is to evaluate existing data on the outcomes, epidemiology, and clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients with rare EGFR mutations, with a focus on intracranial activity and response to immunotherapy.

Incidence of Bone Metastases and Skeletal-Related Events in Patients With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Treated With Osimertinib

Introduction

Bone metastases are frequent in patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFR+) NSCLC. Skeletal-related events (SREs) are common in these patients; however, no data on SRE in osimertinib-treated patients are reported. We investigated the development of bone metastases and SREs in patients with EGFR+ NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Methods

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients with metastatic EGFR+ NSCLC who were treated with osimertinib between February 2016 and September 2021. Demographics, bone metastases-related outcomes, SREs, treatment efficacy, and overall survival (OS) were collected.

Results

In total, 250 patients treated with osimertinib (43% first line) were included. Of the patients, 51% had bone metastases at initiation of osimertinib. Furthermore, 16% of the patients with bone metastases used bone-targeted agents. Median follow-up from initiation of osimertinib was 23.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.9-26.9 mo). During osimertinib treatment, 10% developed new bone metastases or bone progression. Of the patients with bone metastases, 39% had more than or equal to one SREs: 28% developed first SRE before osimertinib treatment, 1% after, and 11% during. Median OS post-bone metastasis was 30.8 months (95% CI: 21.9-39.7). Median OS after first SRE was 31.1 months (95% CI: 15.8-46.5).

Conclusions

Bone metastases and SREs are frequent before and during treatment with osimertinib in EGFR+ NSCLC. Because of these findings and the long OS post-bone metastases, we advocate prescription of bone-targeted agents in these patients and recommend adding bone-specific end points in clinical trials.

[Initial Treatment of Aumolertinib in Combination with Bevacizumab for Advanced NSCLC with Primary EGFR T790M Mutation: A Report of Three Cases and Literature Review]

With the development of sequencing technology, the detection rate of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with primary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation is increasing. However, the first-line treatment for primary EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC still lacks standard recommendations. Here, we reported three advanced NSCLC cases with EGFR-activating mutation and primary T790M mutation. The patients were initially treated with Aumolertinib combination with Bevacizumab; among which, one case was discontinued Bevacizumab due to bleeding risk after treatment for three months. Treatment was switched to Osimertinib after ten months of treatment. Another case switched to Osimertinib and discontinued Bevacizumab after thirteen months of treatment. The best effect response in all three cases was partial response (PR) after initial treatment. Two cases progressed after first-line treatment and progression-free survival (PFS) was eleven months and seven months respectively. The other one patient had persistent response after treatment, and the treatment duration has reached nineteen months. Two cases had multiple brain metastases before administration and the best response to intracranial lesions was PR. The intracranial PFS was fourteen months and not reached (16+ months), respectively. There were no new adverse events (AEs), and no AEs of grade three or above were reported. In addition, we summarized the research progress of Osimertinib in the treatment of NSCLC with primary EGFR T790M mutation. In conclusion, Aumolertinib combined with Bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced NSCLC with primary EGFR T790M mutation has a high objective response rate (ORR) and control ability of intracranial lesions, which can be used as one of the initial options for first-line advanced NSCLC with primary EGFR T790M mutation.
.

Metformin: A Promising Antidiabetic Medication for Cancer Treatment

Metformin is a widely used drug in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis and increases glucose utilization in peripheral tissues. In recent years, several studies have shown that metformin is a potential therapeutic agent against cancer, alone or combined with other anticancer treatments. Metformin mainly activates the AMPK complex and regulates intracellular energy status, inhibiting the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I and reducing the production of reactive oxygen species. Other anticancer targets of metformin are specific transcription factors inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis and reducing drug resistance. In addition, metformin modulates tumor cells' response to anticancer treatments, favoring the activity of T cells. In diabetic patients, metformin reduces the occurrence of cancer and improves the prognosis and efficacy of anticancer treatments. In this review, we provided a comprehensive perspective of metformin as an anticancer drug.