Multiparameter diagnostic model based on 18F-FDG PET and clinical characteristics can differentiate thymic epithelial tumors from thymic lymphomas

A diagnostic model based on 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in improving the differential diagnosis of invasive thymic epithelial tumors and anterior mediastinal lymphomas

BACKGROUND

Accurately distinguishing between invasive thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and anterior mediastinal lymphoma before surgery is crucial for subsequent treatment choices. But currently, the diagnosis of invasive TET is sometimes difficult to distinguish from anterior mediastinal lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the application of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) in the differential diagnosis of TETs and anterior mediastinal lymphomas.

METHODS

18F-FDG PET/CT images of 133 invasive TETs and anterior mediastinal lymphomas patients were retrospectively analyzed. In particular, the tumor's longest diameter and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were evaluated. The SUVmax and longest diameter values of the two groups were analyzed by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal threshold and diagnostic efficiency.

RESULTS

Age, myasthenia gravis, SUVmax and tumor longest diameter differed significantly between invasive TETs and anterior mediastinal lymphomas patients. The tumor location, calcification, relationship with adjacent vessels and distant metastasis differed significantly between the groups. The ROC analysis showed an AUC for SUVmax and tumor longest diameter of 0.841 and 0.737. Respectively, the cutoff values with the best diagnostic performance were 9.65 (sensitivity: 77.78%, specificity: 81.97%) and 6.65 (sensitivity: 80.56%, specificity: 62.30%) for SUVmax and tumor longest diameter. The diagnostic model of SUVmax, calcification, relationship with surrounding blood vessels, lymph node metastasis and lung metastasis in the highest AUC of 0.935 (sensitivity: 90.16%, specificity: 88.89%). In addition, we incorporated splenic involvement and metastatic sub-diaphragmatic lymph node into Model 2 as a new predictive model 3 for differential diagnosis and found a significant improvement in the diagnostic performance of Model 3.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic model composed of 18F-FDG PET parameters is improving the differential diagnosis of invasive TETs and anterior mediastinal lymphomas.

Differentiating thymic epithelial tumors from mediastinal lymphomas: preoperative nomograms based on PET/CT radiomic features to minimize unnecessary anterior mediastinal surgery

PURPOSE

Clinical feasibility nomograms were developed to facilitate the differentiation between thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and mediastinal lymphomas (MLs), aiming to minimize the occurrence of non-therapeutic thymectomy.

METHODS

A total of 255 patients diagnosed with TETs or MLs underwent pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. Comprehensive clinical and imaging data were collected, including age, gender, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, pathological results, presence of myasthenia gravis symptoms, B symptoms, mass size, location, morphology, margins, density, and metabolic parameters derived from PET/CT. Radiomic features were extracted from the region of interest (ROI) of the primary lesion. Feature selection techniques were employed to identify the most discriminative subset of features. Machine learning methods were utilized to build candidate models, which were subsequently evaluated based on their area under the curve (AUC). Finally, nomograms were constructed using the optimal model to provide a clinical tool for improved diagnostic accuracy. The performance of the radiomic models was evaluated by their calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility.

RESULTS

Several independent risk factors were identified for distinguishing TETs from MLs, including average standardized uptake value (SUVavg), LDH, age, mass size, and radiomic score (rad-score). Significance was observed in differentiating the two types of tumors based on these factors. The best clinical efficacy was demonstrated by the combined model, with an impressive AUC of 0.954. Decision curve analysis and calibration curves indicated that the combined model was clinically advantageous for discriminating TETs from MLs. Besides, the results of external validation showed a sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 0.78.

CONCLUSION

Preoperatively, the differentiation of TETs from MLs can be facilitated by the utilization of the combined clinical information and radiomics model. This approach holds promise in minimizing the occurrence of unnecessary anterior mediastinal surgeries.

18F-FDG-PET/CT-based deep learning model for fully automated prediction of pathological grading for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma before surgery

BACKGROUND

The determination of pathological grading has a guiding significance for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. However, there is a lack of an accurate and safe method to obtain pathological grading before surgery. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning (DL) model based on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) for a fully automatic prediction of preoperative pathological grading of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A total of 370 PDAC patients from January 2016 to September 2021 were collected retrospectively. All patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT examination before surgery and obtained pathological results after surgery. A DL model for pancreatic cancer lesion segmentation was first developed using 100 of these cases and applied to the remaining cases to obtain lesion regions. After that, all patients were divided into training set, validation set, and test set according to the ratio of 5:1:1. A predictive model of pancreatic cancer pathological grade was developed using the features computed from the lesion regions obtained by the lesion segmentation model and key clinical characteristics of the patients. Finally, the stability of the model was verified by sevenfold cross-validation.

RESULTS

The Dice score of the developed PET/CT-based tumor segmentation model for PDAC was 0.89. The area under curve (AUC) of the PET/CT-based DL model developed on the basis of the segmentation model was 0.74, with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.72, 0.73, and 0.72, respectively. After integrating key clinical data, the AUC of the model improved to 0.77, with its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity boosted to 0.75, 0.77, and 0.73, respectively.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first deep learning model to end-to-end predict the pathological grading of PDAC in a fully automatic manner, which is expected to improve clinical decision-making.

Extracellular volume fraction derived from equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT as a diagnostic parameter in anterior mediastinal tumors

PURPOSE

To assess the usefulness of extracellular volume (ECV) fraction derived from equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for diagnosing anterior mediastinal tumors.

METHOD

This study included 161 histologically confirmed anterior mediastinal tumors (55 low-risk thymomas, 57 high-risk thymomas, 32 thymic carcinomas, and 17 malignant lymphomas) that were assessed by pretreatment CECT. ECV fraction was calculated using measurements obtained within the lesion and the aorta on unenhanced and equilibrium phase CECT. ECV fraction was compared among anterior mediastinal tumors using one-way ANOVA or t-test. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of ECV fraction to differentiate thymic carcinomas/lymphomas from thymomas.

RESULTS

ECV fraction differed significantly among the anterior mediastinal tumors (p < 0.001). ECV fraction of thymic carcinomas was significantly higher than those of low-risk thymomas, high-risk thymomas, and lymphomas (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.006, respectively). ECV fraction of lymphomas was significantly higher than that of low-risk thymomas (p < 0.001). ECV fraction was significantly higher in thymic carcinomas/lymphomas than in thymomas (40.1 % vs. 27.7 %, p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value to differentiate thymic carcinomas/lymphomas from thymomas was 38.5 % (AUC, 0.805; 95 %CI, 0.736-0.863).

CONCLUSIONS

ECV fraction derived from equilibrium CECT is helpful in diagnosing anterior mediastinal tumors. High ECV fraction is indicative of thymic carcinomas/lymphomas, particularly thymic carcinomas.