Incidence and risk of hypertension associated with PARP inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Incidence and Risk of Thromboembolic and Cardiovascular Adverse Events with PARP Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Safety Meta-analysis

Background and objective

PARP inhibitor (PARPi) treatment is an effective option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). There are few data on the cardiovascular and thromboembolic safety of these agents in mCRPC, as cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events (AEs) are uncommon. Our aim was to analyze the incidence and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), thromboembolic events, and hypertension with PARPi therapy in mCRPC.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology meeting abstracts for clinical trials on PARPi use in mCRPC up to March 31, 2024. We analyzed the pooled incidence of all-grade and high-grade MACEs, thromboembolic events, and hypertension, and calculated risk ratios (RRs) for PARPi versus non-PARPi treatment.

Key findings and limitations

We included 11 phase 2 or 3 trials in our meta-analysis. Hypertension was the most common AE for both any-grade (17.2%) and high-grade (9.3%) events. In comparison to other treatments, PARPi was associated with significantly higher risk of high-grade MACEs (RR 2.03; p = 0.03) and thromboembolic events (RR 2.15; p = 0.002), especially venous thromboembolism (VTE; RR 2.13; p = 0.004) and pulmonary embolism (RR 3.60; p = 0.001). The risk of hypertension, any-grade MACEs, and thromboembolic AEs was not significantly higher, apart from VTE (RR 2.17; p = 0.01).

Conclusions and clinical implications

There is higher risk of high-grade cardiovascular and thromboembolic toxicity with PARPi use in comparison to other treatments in mCRPC, although these toxicities are rare. Clinicians should be aware of this risk, especially in a population that often has comorbidities and concomitant treatments, for correct monitoring and management of these AEs.

Patient summary

Drugs called PARP inhibitors are very effective in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer that does not respond to hormone treatment. However, their use is associated with some cardiovascular adverse events, although these are rare. Our study shows that these events seem to be more frequent with PARP inhibitors than with other treatments, especially for severe grades. Doctors and patients should be aware of this risk to help in preventing, recognizing, and managing the occurrence of these rare complications.

Incidence and risk of endocrine and metabolic abnormalities linked to PARP inhibitors in solid tumors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) serve as crucial therapeutic agents in solid tumor treatment. Preclinical investigations suggest a potential protective function of PARPi against endocrine and metabolic impairments. Nevertheless, the existing body of evidence remains inconclusive on this aspect.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the potential impact of PARPi on endocrine and metabolic disruptions in clinical trials.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a comprehensive search across the Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, along with the ClinicalTrials.gov registry.

STUDY SELECTION

Phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of PARPi in metabolic and endocrine processes were selected for inclusion in patients with solid tumors.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary outcomes of interest encompassed metabolic and endocrine dysfunctions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 26 trials (n = 9,590 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. Niraparib demonstrated an increased risk of any-grade hyperglycemia (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.28-3.62), with patients receiving PARPi for metastatic pancreatic cancer showing a higher susceptibility to any-grade hyperglycemia (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.04). Conversely, rucaparib exhibited a potential ameliorative effect on hyperglycemia (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.97). No statistically significant disparities were observed for other outcomes associated with PARPi utilization.

LIMITATIONS

Among these RCTs included, 50% were assessed as low qualities due to high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that PARPi may exert adverse effects on endocrine and metabolic pathways. Close monitoring of hyperglycemia is recommended for patients undergoing niraparib therapy, especially those with pancreatic cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This meta-Analysis was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database with ID CRD42023457959.

Hypertension associated with niraparib in cancer patients: A pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Niraparib plays a crucial role in the treatment of ovarian cancer. A comprehensive understanding of the incidence and risk of hypertension associated with niraparib would be of vital importance to healthcare practitioners.

METHODS

In this study, an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study was conducted based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Cases of hypertension related to niraparib were extracted for disproportionality analysis from the first quarter (Q1) of 2017 to Q1 of 2023. Moreover, a separate meta-analysis was performed using the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on niraparib for cancer treatment published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to May 31st, 2023. The primary outcomes were the incidence and risk of hypertension associated with niraparib.

RESULTS

In the FAERS, 1196 hypertension cases were found to be related to niraparib treatment. Notably, niraparib exhibited the highest level of disproportionality, as indicated by a reporting odds ratio (ROR) of 2.85 (95% CI, 2.69-3.01), suggesting a greater likelihood of causing hypertension compared to other poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (P < 0.01). Our safety meta-analysis included five pivotal RCTs of niraparib that reported hypertension. In comparison to placebo treatment, the meta-analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the risk of hypertension with niraparib (OR 2.84 [95% CI, 2.17-3.72], P < 0.01), with no heterogeneity observed among the studies (I2 = 0%, χ2 = 2.02, P = 0.73). The incidence of niraparib-induced hypertension was determined to be 16.9% (95% CI, 14.9-18.9; I2 = 34%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that hypertension is a distinctive adverse event associated with niraparib compared to other PARP inhibitors. Niraparib significantly increases the risk of hypertension that needs early recognition and management in clinical medication.

Management of hypertension in patients with cancer: challenges and considerations

The survival rates of many cancers have significantly improved due to recent advancements in cancer screening and therapeutics. Although better cancer outcomes are encouraging, additional health challenges have surfaced, the utmost of which is the burden imposed by various cardiovascular and renal toxicities of anticancer therapies. To improve the overall outcome of patients with cancer, it is essential to understand and manage these treatment-related adverse effects. The cardiovascular side effects of antineoplastic therapies are well-known and include left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, myocardial ischaemia, QT prolongation, arrhythmia and hypertension. Among these, hypertension is the most common complication, prevalent in about 40% of all cancer patients, yet frequently overlooked and undertreated. This review explores the intricate connection between cancer and hypertension and provides distinct approaches to diagnosing, monitoring and managing hypertension in patients with cancer. We also outline the challenges and considerations that are relevant to the care of patients receiving anticancer drugs with prohypertensive potential.