1
|
Gottschalk Z, Cohen SA. Use of Circulating Tumor DNA to Guide Decision-making in Adjuvant Colon Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01565-y. [PMID: 38842605 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01565-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays to guide clinical decision-making in early-stage colon cancer is an area of rapidly advancing active research. With assays clinically available, clinicians must be informed how to best use this novel tool to treat patients. RECENT FINDINGS Recent observational and prospective studies have suggested that ctDNA has potential to guide clinical decision-making in early-stage colon cancer by detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence risks. MRD-negative patients may be able to de-escalate or forgo adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) without compromising disease-free survival or overall survival, while MRD-positive patients may benefit significantly from ACT. Recent and ongoing studies have given reason for optimism about the future of ctDNA as a useful biomarker for clinicians treating early-stage colon cancer. Data thus far are mostly limited to observational studies; inconsistent results highlight the need for caution. As more evidence emerges, ctDNA may become standard of care for colon cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Gottschalk
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 825 Eastlake Ave E, LG-465, Seattle, WA, 98177, USA
| | - Stacey A Cohen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 825 Eastlake Ave E, LG-465, Seattle, WA, 98177, USA.
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shur JD, Qiu S, Johnston E, Tait D, Fotiadis N, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Riddell A, Koh DM. Multimodality Imaging to Direct Management of Primary and Recurrent Rectal Adenocarcinoma Beyond the Total Mesorectal Excision Plane. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230077. [PMID: 38363197 PMCID: PMC10988347 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Rectal tumors extending beyond the total mesorectal excision (TME) plane (beyond-TME) require particular multidisciplinary expertise and oncologic considerations when planning treatment. Imaging is used at all stages of the pathway, such as local tumor staging/restaging, creating an imaging-based "roadmap" to plan surgery for optimal tumor clearance, identifying treatment-related complications, which may be suitable for radiology-guided intervention, and to detect recurrent or metastatic disease, which may be suitable for radiology-guided ablative therapies. Beyond-TME and exenterative surgery have gained acceptance as potentially curative procedures for advanced tumors. Understanding the role, techniques, and pitfalls of current imaging techniques is important for both radiologists involved in the treatment of these patients and general radiologists who may encounter patients undergoing surveillance or patients presenting with surgical complications or intercurrent abdominal pathology. This review aims to outline the current and emerging roles of imaging in patients with beyond-TME and recurrent rectal malignancy, focusing on practical tips for image interpretation and surgical planning in the beyond-TME setting. Keywords: Abdomen/GI, Rectum, Oncology © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D. Shur
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Sheng Qiu
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Edward Johnston
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Diana Tait
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Nicos Fotiadis
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Shahnawaz Rasheed
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Paris Tekkis
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Angela Riddell
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- From the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road,
Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.D.S., S.Q., E.J., D.T., N.F., C.K., S.R.,
P.T., A.R., D.M.K.); and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England (E.J.,
N.F., D.M.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Leest P, Schuuring E. Critical Factors in the Analytical Work Flow of Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Molecular Profiling. Clin Chem 2024; 70:220-233. [PMID: 38175597 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy testing, especially molecular tumor profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in cell-free plasma, has received increasing interest in recent years as it serves as a reliable alternative for the detection of tumor-specific aberrations to guide treatment decision-making in oncology. Many (commercially available) applications have been developed, however, broad divergences in (pre)analytical work flows and lack of universally applied guidelines impede routine clinical implementation. In this review, critical factors in the blood-based ctDNA liquid biopsy work flow are evaluated. CONTENT In the preanalytical phase, several aspects (e.g., blood collection tubes [BCTs], plasma processing, and extraction method) affect the quantity and quality of the circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) applicable for subsequent molecular analyses and should meet certain standards to be applied in diagnostic work flows. Analytical considerations, such as analytical input and choice of assay, might vary based on the clinical application (i.e., screening, primary diagnosis, minimal residual disease [MRD], response monitoring, and resistance identification). In addition to practical procedures, variant interpretation and reporting ctDNA results should be harmonized. Collaborative efforts in (inter)national consortia and societies are essential for the establishment of standard operating procedures (SOPs) in attempts to standardize the plasma-based ctDNA analysis work flow. SUMMARY Development of universally applicable guidelines regarding the critical factors in liquid biopsy testing are necessary to pave the way to clinical implementation for routine diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul van der Leest
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wullaert L, van Rees JM, Martens JWM, Verheul HMW, Grünhagen DJ, Wilting SM, Verhoef C. Circulating Tumour DNA as Biomarker for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cells 2023; 12:2520. [PMID: 37947598 PMCID: PMC10647834 DOI: 10.3390/cells12212520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a potential biomarker that could contribute to more judicious patient selection for personalised treatment. This review and meta-analysis gives an overview of the current knowledge in the literature investigating the value of ctDNA in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases for studies published prior to the 26th of May 2023. Studies investigating the association between ctDNA and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing curative-intent local therapy for CRLM were included. Meta-analyses were performed to pool hazard ratios (HR) for the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of eleven studies were included and nine were eligible for meta-analyses. Patients with detectable ctDNA after surgery experienced a significantly higher chance of recurrence (HR 3.12, 95% CI 2.27-4.28, p < 0.000010) and shorter OS (HR 5.04, 95% CI 2.53-10.04, p < 0.00001) compared to patients without detectable ctDNA. A similar association for recurrence was found in patients with detectable ctDNA after the completion of adjuvant therapy (HR 6.39, 95% CI 2.13-19.17, p < 0.0009). The meta-analyses revealed no association between detectable ctDNA before surgery and the RFS and OS. These meta-analyses demonstrate the strong association between detectable ctDNA after treatment and oncological outcomes in CRLM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lissa Wullaert
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.W.)
| | - Jan M. van Rees
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.W.)
| | - John W. M. Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M. W. Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.W.)
| | - Saskia M. Wilting
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.W.)
| |
Collapse
|