Switch to aflibercept or ranibizumab after initial treatment with bevacizumab in eyes with neovascular AMD

Clinical Outcomes of Faricimab in Patients with Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To assess the anatomic and functional outcomes in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy in response to intravitreal faricimab.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series.

SUBJECTS

Patients with previously treated nAMD who received ≥ 4 consecutive injections of faricimab were included. The study period was from March through November 2022.

METHODS

Clinical and imaging data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Central foveal thickness (CFT), maximum fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (fvPED) height, and Snellen visual acuity (VA) were obtained. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the change in CFT, maximum fvPED height, and logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in CFT, maximum fvPED height, and Snellen VA before faricimab and after ≥ 4 faricimab intravitreal injections.

RESULTS

During the study period, 218 eyes of 191 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 79.9 (range, 70.6-89.2) years. The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections received before faricimab was 34.2 (range, 6.4-62). The following results were found after ≥ 4 faricimab injections. Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA before switching to faricimab was 0.58 (Snellen VA ∼20/76; range, 20/22-20/264) and was 0.55 (Snellen VA ∼20/71; range, 20/21-20/235; P = 0.20) after switching. Mean maximum fvPED height was 195.0 (range, 50.2-339.8) μm before switching to faricimab and improved to 165.0 (range, 33.6-296.4; P < 0.001) μm after switching. Mean CFT was 354.8 (range, 184.7-524.9) μm before switching to faricimab and improved to 306.6 (range, 144.4-468.8; P < 0.001) after switching. The proportion of eyes with intraretinal fluid was 36.7% (80/218 eyes) before switching, and decreased to 24.8% (54/218 eyes, P < 0.001) after switching. The proportion of eyes with subretinal fluid was 53.2% (116/218 eyes) before switching and decreased to 26.6% (58/218 eyes, P < 0.001) after switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal faricimab may improve anatomic outcomes in patients with previously treated nAMD, while maintaining VA in the short-term.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Aflibercept monotherapy or bevacizumab first for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

Clinical outcome and switch patterns with bevacizumab first treatment strategy for patients with newly diagnosed neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of the number of intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and treatment switch in patients who started intravitreal bevacizumab injections between January 1, 2016 and December 30, 2018.

RESULTS

From January 1 2016 to December 31 2018, 608 eyes of 565 patients started intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for a new diagnosis of nAMD. Average visual acuity (VA) at presentation was 0.60 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), which improved to 0.47 after six injections (P < 0.001) and decreased to 0.63 at the last follow-up (P = 0.543). Switch of treatment was recommended for 190 eyes (31.3%), and of them, 91 patients (15%) were switched during the first 6 months and defined as primary failure of bevacizumab. The switch of treatment resulted in a statistically significant improvement in VA in the first 6 months after the switch. The gain in VA was not sustainable over time.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab first treatment strategy produced results that were comparable to previous real-world outcomes publications of ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment with low rates of failure of bevacizumab treatment. Treatment switch to second-line treatment yielded a significant VA improvement, mainly in patients with primary bevacizumab failure.

Aflibercept versus Ranibizumab as a Second Line Therapy After Bevacizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes of aflibercept versus ranibizumab as a second line treatment for persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after initial bevacizumab injections.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with center-involved DME of ≥ 300 μm thickness after bevacizumab intravitreal injections in 2015–2019 were included. Those treated with ranibizumab (R) and aflibercept (A) were grouped as group R and group A, respectively. The change in central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) before and after three-monthly anti-VEGF injections (anti-VEGF) in group R and group A were compared and reviewed.

Results

There were 80 eyes of 75 patients in group R and 80 eyes of 72 patients in group A. The initial bevacizumab injections in group R and group A varied significantly (p = 0.01). The median change of the CMT after the three injections was not significantly different in group R (80 μm) and group A (81.5μm) (p = 0.7). The improvement of BCVA in group R and group A was not significant (p = 0.5). Dry macula was noted in 1 vs 14 eyes in group R vs group A.

Conclusion

After treating refractory DME with initial bevacizumab injections, 3 injections of either aflibercept or ranibizumab had similar anatomic and functional outcomes. Aflibercept achieved dry macula in more eyes with refractory DME compared to ranibizumab.

THE EFFECT OF ENDOPHTHALMITIS ON RECURRENCE OF MACULAR EDEMA IN EYES RECEIVING INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR

PURPOSE

Visual outcomes after postinjection endophthalmitis have been well-studied, but the effect of endophthalmitis on the underlying exudative disease process remains unclear. We investigate the need for continued anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections after endophthalmitis.

METHODS

Eyes that developed endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor between January 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, at a single academic retina practice were identified. Retrospective chart review was performed to determine 1) the proportion of eyes without recurrence of macular edema or subretinal fluid after endophthalmitis and 2) the proportion achieving a 12-week or greater interval between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections or exudation after endophthalmitis compared with internal controls before endophthalmitis.

RESULTS

Of 50 eyes with endophthalmitis, seven (14.0%) had no fluid recurrence at a mean of 98.1 week. Of 43 eyes with recurrence, 48.0% achieved a >12-week recurrence-free interval after endophthalmitis (vs. 8.3% before endophthalmitis; P < 0.0001). Eyes with compared to those without choroidal neovascularization were more likely to achieve this interval (60.5% vs. 8.3%, respectively; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Endophthalmitis after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection is associated with relative stability of the underlying exudation. Further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanism, which may be useful in developing strategies and targets for the treatment of exudative macular diseases.

SUSPENDING TREATMENT OF NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION IN CASES OF FUTILITY

PURPOSE

To provide guidance on the management of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and its subtypes who respond poorly to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, and to identify cases where suspending anti-VEGF treatment may be warranted.

METHODS

Through a literature review and the combined knowledge and clinical experience of retinal experts, the Steering Committee of the Bayer-sponsored Vision Academy developed an algorithm for determining when to suspend anti-VEGF treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in cases of futility.

RESULTS

Consideration of factors that may cause suboptimal response to anti-VEGF therapy, such as undertreatment or misdiagnosis of the underlying condition, and factors that may preclude continued treatment, such as injection- or drug-induced complications, is necessary for adjusting treatment protocols in patients who respond poorly to anti-VEGF. If poor response to treatment persists after switching to an alternative anti-VEGF agent and no change in response is observed after withholding treatment for a predetermined period of time ("treatment pause"), anti-VEGF treatment may be considered futile and should be suspended.

CONCLUSION

This publication introduces an algorithm to guide the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in patients showing poor response to anti-VEGF treatment and provides expert guidance for suspending anti-VEGF treatment in cases of futility.

How Successful is Switching from Bevacizumab or Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Age-Related Macular Degeneration? A Systematic Overview

Emerging anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have revolutionised medical retina practice and the management and eventual outcome of nAMD. Recent research has focused on evaluating and comparing the efficacy of the two most widely employed anti-VEGF agents, bevacizumab and ranibizumab; however, a subgroup of patients with nAMD demonstrates a suboptimal response to standard therapy. We have therefore conducted a review of pertinent studies published until August 2018 which have documented the clinical efficacy when switching to a different anti-VEGF. Evidence on baseline disease characteristics, injection frequency and disease outcome has been obtained for patients treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg and/or bevacizumab 1.25 mg and were switched to aflibercept 2 mg. Our review identified 45 studies investigating switching to aflibercept. Our review showed a clear anatomical benefit after the switch in terms of central retinal thickness and pigment epithelium detachment characteristics, whereas the functional outcomes were variable. Remarkable heterogeneity was documented among the relevant studies with regard to several factors including the baseline characteristics of the cohorts, the non-response definition and previous treatment protocols. Larger prospective trials with appropriate control arms are therefore required to elucidate the potential benefit when switching between anti-VEGF agents in refractory nAMD.

Interplay between Autophagy and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Its Role in the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a complex eye disease with many pathogenesis factors, including defective cellular waste management in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Main cellular waste in AMD are: all-trans retinal, drusen and lipofuscin, containing unfolded, damaged and unneeded proteins, which are degraded and recycled in RPE cells by two main machineries—the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy. Recent findings show that these systems can act together with a significant role of the EI24 (etoposide-induced protein 2.4 homolog) ubiquitin ligase in their action. On the other hand, E3 ligases are essential in both systems, but E3 is degraded by autophagy. The interplay between UPS and autophagy was targeted in several diseases, including Alzheimer disease. Therefore, cellular waste clearing in AMD should be considered in the context of such interplay rather than either of these systems singly. Aging and oxidative stress, two major AMD risk factors, reduce both UPS and autophagy. In conclusion, molecular mechanisms of UPS and autophagy can be considered as a target in AMD prevention and therapeutic perspective. Further work is needed to identify molecules and effects important for the coordination of action of these two cellular waste management systems.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema in a Real-World Clinical Setting

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) in a real-world clinical setting and to assess the efficacy of subsequent alternative treatments in eyes with suboptimal response to anti-VEGF.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

The medical records of consecutive eyes with center-involving DME, treated between August 2008 and June 2015 with 3 monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections-with or without prompt or deferred laser-followed by pro re nata re-treatment, were reviewed. A subgroup of eyes that were unresponsive to the treatment received subsequent alternative therapeutic options, including switching to another anti-VEGF drug, intravitreal injection of dexamethasone, and vitrectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 170 eyes of 129 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up (FU) was 45.6 months (SD 18; minimum 12-maximum 81). The change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1-year FU was +5 ETDRS letters (P < .0001). Improvement in BCVA was statistically significant up to 5 years. Improvement in central macular thickness (CMT) was statistically significant up to the last FU visit. In eyes with suboptimal response, no significant visual improvement was found by switching to another anti-VEGF (P =.4347). Twenty-four eyes treated with intravitreal dexamethasone and 14 with vitrectomy exhibited a significant reduction in CMT with variable functional responses. In these eyes, better BCVA gain was found in cases with an early change of the treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

The results support treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF for DME in real-world clinical settings and suggest that an early change of the therapeutic strategy should be considered for eyes unresponsive to the treatment.