Clinical efficacy of implantation of toric intraocular lenses with different incision positions: a comparative study of steep-axis incision and non-steep-axis incision

Efficacy Comparison Between Steep-Meridian Incision and Non-Steep-Meridian Incision in Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery with Low-to-Moderate Astigmatism

INTRODUCTION

To compare the visual outcomes of astigmatism correction with implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery with low-to-moderate astigmatism through a steep-meridian corneal relaxing incision (SM-CRI) and non-steep-meridian corneal relaxing incision (NSM-CRI).

METHODS

Seventy eyes of 70 patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent ICL V4c implantation were classified into two groups: SM-CRI and NSM-CRI. Refractive outcomes and vector analysis were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At the postoperative 6 month visit, all participants in both groups achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better. The difference vector (DV) showed that the residual astigmatism in the SM-CRI group was much smaller than that in the NSM-CRI group (P = 0.021), and the correction index (CI) was 0.84 ± 0.30 and 0.67 ± 0.35 for the SM-CRI and NSM-CRI groups, respectively, with a significant statistical difference (P = 0.013). Approximately 71% of eyes in the SM-CRI group had an angle of error (AE) within ± 15°, whereas 55% of eyes in the NSM-CRI group were within that range. The absolute mean AE was 10.13 ± 14.57° in the SM-CRI group, compared with 23.88 ± 28.22° in the NSM-CRI group (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

SM-CRI can alleviate corneal astigmatism and decrease the cylindrical diopter of the ICL, thus improving postoperative visual quality compared with NSM-CRI.

Effect of two different preoperative calculation schemes on visual outcomes of patients after toric intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative visual outcomes of two different preoperative corneal incision schemes in TECNIS toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled study, patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) were included. These patients were grouped according to the different preoperative schemes: steep-axis group and minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group. The outcome measurements were the residual refractive astigmatism, visual acuity, changes of corneal astigmatism, and high-order aberration at 1 month postoperatively.

RESULTS

This study consisted of 90 eyes (45 eyes steep-axis group, 45 eyes minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group). 1 month after surgery, the refractive astigmatism was statistically lower in the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group compared with the steep-axis group (0.58 ± 0.40D vs 0.38 ± 0.37D, P = 0.021). The minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group had a smaller difference vector (0.56 ± 0.38D vs 0.36 ± 0.35D; P = 0.047) and a smaller prediction error (0.60 ± 0.44D vs 0.37 ± 0.35D; P = 0.004). In the steep-axis group, corneal astigmatism significantly decreased compared with preoperative value (1.65 ± 0.57D vs 1.17 ± 0.64D; P < 0.001). In the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group, the changes of corneal astigmatism before and after surgery were not significant. Moreover, total aberration and second astigmatism in ocular aberration were lower in the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group compared with the steep-axis group (1.86 ± 1.09 vs 1.37 ± 0.95; P = 0.035 and 0.47 ± 0.28 vs 0.31 ± 0.19; P = 0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Minimum-residual refractive astigmatism incision had better astigmatism correction and more accurate prediction. The corneal astigmatism was stable 1 month after surgery. It might lead to better visual quality in the early postoperative stage. Trial registration number for prospectively registered trials: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04006912, 07/02/2019.

Rotational stability of Toric intraocular lenses

BACKGROUND

A prospective study to evaluate the rotational stability of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

A prospective study of 30 eyes in 29 patients. All patients with regular astigmatism of range 0.75-4 D were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included irregular corneal astigmatism, post-refractive surgery and corneal dystrophies. All patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery by the same surgeon. Three eyes with corneal astigmatism of 0.75-1.5 D were implanted with the AcrySof SA60T3 IOL, eight eyes with astigmatism between 1.5 and 2.0 D received the SA60T4 IOL and eight eyes with astigmatism between 2.0 and 2.50 D received the SA60T5 and rest with astigmatism of 2.5 D and higher received SA60T6 and above models. Main outcome measure was the post-operative position of the lens, assessed at day 1, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months, using toric marker and the slit lamp.

RESULTS

There was no significant rotation of IOL observed during a follow-up period of 6 months. Overall, the post-operative rotation was within 5° in 95% of cases. There was no trend for either clockwise or anti-clockwise rotation. However, IOL rotation happens mostly within the first month of surgery, and if it is significant, it requires early repositioning.

CONCLUSION

Toric IOLs are very effective and consistent in correcting astigmatism during the cataract surgery. Once placed to its position, toric IOLs demonstrate rotational stability in the capsular bag.

Site of clear corneal incision in cataract surgery and its effects on surgically induced astigmatism

Clear corneal incision (CCI) is a commonly used surgical approach in cataract surgery. In this prospective study, we evaluated the effect of CCI site on surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and other postoperative astigmatic changes. CCIs were constructed based on the steep meridian of the total corneal refractive power in the 4.0-mm-zone (TCRP_4.0), and patients were divided into four groups: temporal, superotemporal, superonasal, and superior according to the site of the incision. TCRP_4.0 analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of astigmatism with superior incisions (P < 0.001), and the combined mean polar values for SIA changed significantly in the temporal (Hotelling T² = 1.977), superotemporal (Hotelling T² = 0.544), superonsal (Hotelling T² = 1.066), and superior incision groups (Hotelling T² = 1.134) (all P < 0.001). The posterior axis alignment should be considered in cataract surgery with CCI, and the SIA is affected by axis rotation, and incision orientation.

Astigmatismus

Der Astigmatismus ist der weltweit häufigste Refraktionsfehler vor Hypermetropie und Myopie. Man unterscheidet den äußeren vom inneren Astigmatismus. Der äußere Astigmatismus kann weiter in „mit der Regel“, „gegen die Regel“ und „schräg“ unterteilt werden. Die Summierung des äußeren und inneren Astigmatismus ergibt den refraktiven Zylinder. Astigmatismus wurde lange als zweidimensionales Phänomen gesehen, doch erst die dreidimensionale Betrachtung hat den Blick auf bestehende Analyseverfahren (Topo- und Tomographie) erweitert. Die Vektoranalyse nach Alpins ist hierbei eine bekannte Methode zur Therapieplanung. Zur Therapie des Astigmatismus stehen konservative Optionen wie Brille oder torische Kontaktlinse sowie unterschiedlichste chirurgische Verfahren wie photorefraktive Keratektomie, Femtosekundenlaser-assistierte Keratotomie, Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis, „small-incision lenticule extraction“ und die Implantation torischer Intraokularlinsen zur Verfügung.

Comparison of Outcomes after Phacoemulsification with Two Different Corneal Incision Distances Anterior to the Limbus

Purpose

To compare visual performance and visual quality outcomes after phacoemulsification with two different clear corneal incision (CCI) distances anterior to the limbus in senile cataract patients.

Methods

Retrospective case series. Patients who had undergone phacoemulsification were divided into two groups according to the CCI distances anterior to the limbus. The CCI distances in group A range from 1 mm to 1.5 mm, while those in group B range from 0.5 mm to 1 mm. The visual acuity, refraction, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), corneal aberrations, anterior segment parameters, and subjective vision quality were evaluated.

Results

This study enrolled 54 eyes, with 27 eyes per group. Both groups had significant improvement in postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in postoperative UDVA, CDVA, SIA, corneal aberrations, anterior segment parameters, or VF-QOL questionnaire performance (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The phacoemulsification with CCI distances ranging from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm is an effective and safe therapy to senile cataract. The CCI distance anterior to the limbus that ranges from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm is recommended for routine phacoemulsification.

[Astigmatism]

Astigmatism is the most frequent refractive error worldwide followed by hyperopia and myopia. Internal astigmatism has to be differentiated from external astigmatism. Furthermore, external astigmatism can be divided into "with the rule", "against the rule" and "oblique". The summation of internal and external astigmatism results in the refractive cylinder. Astigmatism has for a long time been regarded as a two-dimensional phenomenon; however, only a three-dimensional consideration expanded the view on existing analytical methods (topography and tomography). Alpins' vector analysis is a commonly used method for treatment planning. Multiple options exist for treatment of astigmatism with conservative approaches, such as eyeglasses or toric contact lenses as well as various surgical procedures, such as photorefractive keratectomy, femtosecond laser-assisted keratotomy, laser in-situ keratomileusis, small incision lenticule extraction and toric intraocular lens implantation.

Effect of incision on visual outcomes after implantation of a trifocal diffractive IOL

Background

To evaluate visual acuity, corneal astigmatism and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after implantation of trifocal diffractive IOLs operated with either a corneal steep-axis incision or 135° incision.

Method

This prospective study enrolled patients randomly assigned to different groups. According to preoperative corneal astigmatism, 101 eyes of 77 patients were assigned into group A₁ (0 ~ 0.50 D) or A₂ (0.51 ~ 1.00 D) with a corneal steep-axis incision or group B₁ (0 ~ 0.50 D) or B₂ (0.51 ~ 1.00 D) with a 135° incision. Visual acuity, corneal astigmatism and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were followed-up for 3 months.

Results

Corneal astigmatism in group A₂ significantly decreased 3 months after surgery (P < 0.01) and was significantly lower than that in group B₂ 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively (all values of P < 0.01). The following parameters were better in group A₂ than in group B₂: uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months (P = 0.00, 0.00, 0.01, 0.01, respectively);uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 1 day and 2 weeks (P = 0.00, 0.01); and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 1 month postoperatively (P = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02, respectively).

Conclusions

After a corneal steep-axis incision, patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of 0.51 D to 1.00 D exhibited reduced corneal astigmatism and achieved better UIVA and early postoperative UDVA/UNVA.

Trial registration

Retrospectively Registered Trials ISRCTN10086721, 23/06/2018.