The Antibiofilm efficacy of nitric oxide on soft contact lenses

Rational design of antibiotic-free antimicrobial contact lenses: Trade-offs between antimicrobial performance and biocompatibility

Microbial keratitis associated with contact lenses (CLs) wear remains a significant clinical concern. Antibiotic therapy is the current standard of care. However, the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens necessitates the investigation of alternative strategies. Antibiotic-free antimicrobial contact lenses (AFAMCLs) represent a promising approach in this regard. The effectiveness of CLs constructed with a variety of antibiotic-free antimicrobial strategies against microorganisms has been demonstrated. However, the impact of these antimicrobial strategies on CLs biocompatibility remains unclear. In the design and development of AFAMCLs, striking a balance between robust antimicrobial performance and optimal biocompatibility, including safety and wearing comfort, is a key issue. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in AFAMCLs technology. The focus is on the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of various strategies employed in AFAMCLs construction. Furthermore, this review investigates the potential impact of these strategies on CLs parameters related to wearer comfort. This review aims to contribute to the continuous improvement of AFAMCLs and provide a reference for the trade-off between resistance to microorganisms and wearing comfort. In addition, it is hoped that this review can also provide a reference for the antimicrobial design of other medical devices.

Nitric oxide: an old drug but with new horizons in ophthalmology-a narrative review

Background and Objective

Based on basic knowledge and prior research on nitric oxide (NO), the potential of NO for treating eye diseases is reviewed, and the possibility of NO-based eye drops in clinical practice and the future potential of NO in ophthalmology are discussed.

Methods

A PubMed search was performed for English-language original reports and reviews using the following key words: nitric oxide, eye, ocular, and drug.

Key Content and Findings

NO is synthesized in the human body by NO synthase (NOS) from L-arginine or through enzyme-dependent reduction of dietary nitrate. Three types of NOS (eNOS, nNOS, and iNOS) are abundantly expressed in the eye under normal physiologic or pathologic conditions. The biological effect of NO in the eye is dose dependent. Low intraocular NO concentrations, produced by eNOS or nNOS, have various cellular effects, including vasodilation, intraocular pressure (IOP) regulation, and neuroprotection. iNOS induced under pathologic ocular conditions produces high NO concentrations in the local environment and mediates tissue inflammation, ocular cell apoptosis, and neurodegeneration. In particular, increased iNOS has been reported in glaucoma and retinal ischemic or degenerative diseases. NO plays a vital role in ocular injury. NO can facilitate ocular surface wound healing while eradicating pathogens such as bacteria and Acanthamoeba in chemical burns or infectious keratitis. Furthermore, NO has antifibrotic activity via the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signaling pathway. NO causes smooth muscle relaxation, which can be used to inhibit myopia progression in children. NO can be a stem cell modulator and may help in treating ocular stem cell disorders.

Conclusions

Because of its diverse biologic effects, NO can be a key player in regulating ocular inflammation in various ocular diseases, aiding ocular surface wound healing, controlling IOP in glaucoma, alleviating retinal disease, and suppressing myopia progression. Although there remain limitations to the effective use of highly unstable state, gaseous NO, the role of NO in the field of ophthalmology can be greatly expanded through the development of novel NO donors and effective delivery platforms.

The nitric oxide synthase gene negatively regulates biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis

Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) is a clinically important conditioned pathogen that can cause a troublesome chronic implant-related infection once a biofilm is formed. The nitric oxide synthase (NOS) gene, which is responsible for endogenous nitric oxide synthesis, has already been found in the genome of S. epidermidis; however, the specific mechanisms associated with the effects of NOS on S. epidermidis pathogenicity are still unknown. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether the NOS gene has an impact on biofilm formation in S. epidermidis. Bioinformatics analysis of the NOS gene was performed, and homologous recombination was subsequently employed to delete this gene. The effects of the NOS gene on biofilm formation of S. epidermidis and its underlying mechanisms were analyzed by bacterial growth assays, biofilm semiquantitative determination, Triton X-100-induced autolysis assays, and bacterial biofilm dispersal assays. Additionally, the transcription levels of fbe, aap, icaA, icaR and sigB, which are related to biofilm formation, were further investigated by qRT-PCR following NOS deletion. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the NOS gene was conserved between bacterial species originating from different genera. The NOS deletion strain of S. epidermidis 1457 and its counterpart were successfully constructed. Disruption of the NOS gene resulted in significantly enhanced biofilm formation, slightly retarded bacterial growth, a markedly decreased autolysis rate, and drastically weakened bacterial biofilm dispersal. Our data showed that the fbe, aap and icaA genes were significantly upregulated, while the icaR and sigB genes were significantly downregulated, compared with the wild strain. Therefore, these data strongly suggested that the NOS gene can negatively regulate biofilm formation in S. epidermidis by affecting biofilm aggregation and dispersal.

Multi-purpose Disinfecting Solutions only Partially Inhibit the Development of Ocular Microbes Biofilms in Contact Lens Storage Cases

PURPOSE

Certain ocular resident or pathogenic microbes may remain viable in the presence of multi-purpose disinfectant solutions (MPDSs), subsequently developing biofilms inside contact lens storage cases (CLSCs) which pose a risk of infection to wearers. This study evaluated the formation of ocular microbiota biofilms exposed to three top selling MPDS.

METHODS

Crystal violet assay was carried out for the verification of biofilm formation. The in vitro assays evaluated Pseudomonas aeruginosa UFPEDA 416 and Staphylococcus aureus UFPEDA 02 exposure of 48 h to MPDS, as well as the use of 40 KHz ultrasound at the beginning and with 24 h immersion in the MPDS. Subsequently, in vivo assays evaluated the formation of microbial biofilms on the CLSC walls containing silicone-hydrogel contact lenses immersed in MPDS from 15 healthy volunteer patients, who had been wearing the lenses for 7 days.

RESULTS

Biofilms were inhibited by 26%-98% in the in vitro assays, with a statistically significant difference only for P. aeruginosa UFPEDA 416 exposed to diluted MPDS. Most inhibitions occurred moderately and weakly. In addition, adherent cells were detected in more than 90% of the tests. Biofilm was not inhibited in more than one third of the results, nor was it disturbed, especially with the ultrasound treatments. The average of obtained optical densities at 590 nm was between 0.6 and 0.8 in the in vivo assays. The results were similar between the CLSC right and left wells. There was a correlation between microbial biofilm formation and the type of MPDS tested, with statistical difference between the three treatments.

CONCLUSION

MPDS promoted a partial inhibition of microbial biofilm formation but only one MPDS proved to be more effective in vitro and in vivo. This study, however, could not distinguish the effect of possible errors in the good hygiene practices of the users.

Retention, Bacterial Adhesion, and Biofilm Formation between Anionic and Zwitterionic Bandage Contact Lenses in Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study

This study aimed to compare the in vitro and in vivo retention, bacterial adhesion, and biofilm formation between anionic and zwitterionic bandage contact lenses (BCLs) in healthy canines. BCL retention and tolerance were evaluated in 10 healthy canines via a single-masked, crossover study for 7 days. To compare in vitro bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, four Staphylococcus strains were incubated with the BCLs at 37 °C for 2 or 24 h, and the bacterial colony forming units (CFUs) adhering to the BCLs were counted. Next, to compare in vivo bacterial adhesion, the CFUs of bacteria adhering to the BCLs worn by canines for 24 h were counted. Anionic lenses significantly retained and reduced in vitro bacterial adhesion than in the zwitterionic lenses. However, the amount of in vitro biofilm formation was more likely to be higher on anionic lenses than on zwitterionic lenses. In vivo bacterial adhesion was not significantly different between the two types of BCLs. Nevertheless, both BCLs were well-tolerated by the canines; thus, their short-term use in dogs can be recommended as safe.