Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery in a cataract patient with a "0 vaulted" ICL: a case report

Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery in a cataract patient with low vaulted ICL following LASIK: a case report

BACKGROUND

Apart from the conventional utilization of ICL implantation for the correction of refractive errors, its recent applications extend to correcting refractive errors post laser refractive surgery. Notably, the development of cataracts stands out as a prevalent postoperative complication, often associated with low vault. Previous cases have demonstrated successful management of cataracts with ICL through the combination of FLACS and ICL removal coupled with IOL implantation, resulting in favorable postoperative visual outcomes. Herein, we present a case of cataract with low vault ICL following LASIK and its subsequent management.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 46-year-old male presented with vision loss in the right eye for 9 months, and he had undergone LASIK 22 years prior and had ICL implantation in both eyes 2 years ago to correct refractive error. One day after ICL implantation, both eyes exhibited the UDVA of 1.2 and 1.0, well-positioned ICLs, and approximate vault of 150 μm and 200 μm. Six months ago, the patient became aware of blurred vision in the right eye for a duration of 3 months. Examination revealed cloudy lens cortex in the right eye. During the current review, the UDVA of the right eye was 0.6, where nasal wedge-shaped clouding was evident and worsened, while the left eye lens remained transparent. AS-OCT demonstrated the vault of 54 μm in the right eye and 83 μm in the left eye. Considering the patient's history of LASIK and the presence of right eye cataract, a monovision approach was adopted. The patient underwent FLACS combined with ICL extraction and monofocal IOL lens implantation in the right eye. At 10 days postoperatively, the patient exhibited the UDVA of 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report confirms the feasibility of FLACS in managing cataracts in patients with low vault ICL following LASIK. This procedure does not pose significantly greater challenges than in typical cataract cases, although meticulous care remains essential throughout every step of the surgery, particularly during laser scanning and positioning. With adequate preoperative preparation and precise calculation of the IOL power, surgical outcomes can meet expectations fully.

Comparative evaluation of multiple nomograms for predicting postoperative vault after implantable collamer lens surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the vault predictability of most available implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing nomograms and identify which preoperative measurements are predictive of vault.

SETTING

Private practice in Draper, Utah.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of 209 eyes of 106 patients who underwent STAAR Surgical ICL implantation. Analyses were performed based on the availability of preoperative parameters, varying the number of eyes for each test. Mean absolute error (MAE) of predicted vs actual postoperative vault was calculated for each nomogram. The frequency of Kim, Rocamora (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-optical coherence tomography), Russo, and Reinstein recommending the correct ICL size in instances when Parkhurst, optimized white-to-white (WTW), and STAAR could not recommend a definitive ICL size was determined. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was performed between preoperative measurements and vault.

RESULTS

The Kim, Rocamora, Russo, and Reinstein nomograms had significantly lower MAE of predicted vs actual postoperative vault than the KSV2 and Nakamura V3 nomograms. The Russo formula most frequently recommended the correct ICL size when the Parkhurst, Optimized WTW, and STAAR nomograms could not provide ICL size recommendations. At the 0.05 significance level, anterior chamber depth (ACD), ciliary body inner diameter (CBID), and pupil diameter were the parameters found to have significant correlation with postoperative vault.

CONCLUSIONS

The Kim, Rocamora, Russo, and Reinstein nomograms were the most predictive of vault. Additionally, ACD, CBID, and pupil diameter were found to be significantly correlated with vault and should be considered for use in future ICL sizing nomograms.

Postoperative vault prediction for phakic implantable collamer lens surgery: LASSO formulas

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate reliable formulas for predicting postoperative vault more accurately after implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery in a White patient population with varying degrees of ametropia.

SETTING

Private clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis on dataset split into a separate training and test set.

METHODS

115 eyes of 59 patients were used to train regression models predicting postoperative vault based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator [LASSO]-OCT formula), ocular biometry data (LASSO-Biometry formula), or data from both devices (LASSO-Full formula). The performance of these models was evaluated against the manufacturer's nomogram (Online Calculation and Ordering System [OCOS]) and Nakamura 1 (NK1) and 2 (NK2) formulas on a matched separate test set of 37 eyes of 19 patients.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -5.32 ± 3.37 (range: +3.75 to -17.375 diopters). The mean absolute errors of the estimated vs achieved postoperative vault for the LASSO-Biometry, LASSO-OCT, and LASSO-Full formulas were 144.1 ± 107.9 μm, 145.6 ± 100.6 μm, and 132.0 ± 86.6 μm, respectively. These results were significantly lower compared with the OCOS, NK1, and NK2 formulas ( P < .006). Postoperative vault could be estimated within 500 μm in 97.3% (LASSO-Biometry) to 100% of cases (LASSO-OCT and LASSO-Full).

CONCLUSIONS

The LASSO suite provided a set of powerful, reproducible yet convenient ICL sizing formulas with state-of-the-art performance in White patients, including those with low to moderate degrees of myopia. The calculator can be accessed at http://icl.emmetropia.be .

Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation

PURPOSE

To introduce a modified procedure of ICL implantation, to summarize the perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment after myopia correction with Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), and to compare the difference of complications between the no-hole ICL and hole ICL.

METHODS

We searched all articles on ICL-related perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment in Scopus, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases for the last 22 years.

RESULTS

ICL implantation is safe, effective, stable and predictable in the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism, but can also cause a series of perioperative problems, including intraoperative and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

There are many kinds of complications related to ICL, but the common intraoperative and postoperative complications mainly include abnormality of arch height, abnormal position of ICL, loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma, cataract and night vision symptoms. Compared with ICL without central pore, the incidence of complications such as loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma and cataract was relatively lower in central hole ICL, while postoperative complications such as night vision symptoms were obvious.

Visual Outcomes, Footplate Position and Vault Achieved with the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens for Myopic Astigmatism

Purpose

Report the outcomes of the implantable collamer lens (ICL) in myopic astigmatism using very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound sizing.

Methods

Analysis of 42 consecutive ICL procedures using EVO and EVO+ (Visian V4c) lenses (STAAR Surgical) was done. ICL size was chosen using the ultrasound-based Kojima Formula with Insight 100 VHF digital ultrasound (VHFDU). Standard visual outcomes analysis was performed using 3-month data, also including contrast sensitivity, refractive and corneal vector analysis, and ECC. Postoperative lens position was evaluated using VHF digital ultrasound.

Results

Attempted SEQ was −10.83±3.39D (−4.40 to −16.98D). Cylinder was −1.46±1.15D (0.00 to −4.25D). One-year follow-up was available in 86% of the eyes and 3 months in 96%. Postoperative UDVA was 20/20 or better in 89% of the eyes, relative to 71% preoperatively. Postoperative SEQ refraction was ±0.50 D in 74% and ±1.00 D in 98% of the eyes. There was a gain of one line of CDVA in 43% of the eyes, 2 or more lines in 10% of the eyes, while there was a one line loss in 7% and no eyes lost 2 or more lines. The vector mean for the corneal SIA was 0.24 D Ax 100. Contrast sensitivity showed a statistically significant increase with a mean of 0.14 log units at 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (P<0.01). The mean change in ECC was −153±353 cells/mm². Lens vault was 506±233 µm (114–924 µm). Footplate insertion was in zonular position in 48.3%, ciliary body in 49.2%, and sulcus in 2.5% of locations.

Conclusion

ICL implantation resulted in high safety and efficacy but with an implantation vault range that ideally would be improved upon. VHF digital ultrasound of the lens footplate and posterior anatomical relations may provide essential information for evaluating postoperative vault outliers.