Intravitreal conbercept for branch retinal vein occlusion induced macular edema: one initial injection versus three monthly injections

Effect of Conbercept Treatment on Macular Edema and Microvascular Structure in Eyes with Retinal Vein Occlusions

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema in Eyes with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with vs Without Glaucoma – Does Glaucoma Affect Visual Outcome in Eyes with BRVO-ME After antiVEGF Injections?

Purpose

To compare the therapeutic effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in eyes with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO-ME) with glaucoma to those without glaucoma.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of Mie University Hospital from 2013 to 2017. Patients were recruited if they had received anti-VEGF agents for BRVO-ME treatment and included 30 patients (30 eyes) without glaucoma (G[-] group) and 27 patients (27 eyes) with glaucoma (G[+] group). The central retinal thickness (CRT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months after a single injection of anti-VEGF agents were compared between the two groups.

Results

Before treatment, the mean±standard deviation of the CRT was 514.2±117.3 μm for the G[-] group, which was not significantly different from that for the G[+] group (533.4±171.4 μm). The CRT in the G[-] and G[+] groups significantly reduced to 321.1±114.6 μm and 347.8±134.7 μm, respectively, at 1 month after the injection and to 360.4±159.5 μm and 352.4±151.9 μm, respectively, at 3 months after the injection (P<0.01 for each group). The difference in the degree of CRT reduction between the two groups was not significant. Before treatment, the BCVA was 0.42±0.32 logMAR units in the G[-] group and 0.57±0.33 logMAR units in the G[+] group, showing no significant difference. The BCVA in the G[-] and G[+] groups improved significantly to 0.27±0.26 logMAR units and 0.34±0.42 logMAR units, respectively, at 1 month, and to 0.18±0.20 logMAR units and 0.39±0.34 logMAR units, respectively, at 3 months (P<0.01). The BCVA in the G[-] group was significantly better than that in the G[+] group at 3 months (P=0.02).

Conclusion

The therapeutic response of anti-VEGF agents for BRVO-ME is affected by the presence of glaucoma.

Analysis on short-term change of macular function and the correlates after intravitreal conbercept for CRVO-ME

Aim

To study the short-term change of macular function and the correlates after intravitreal conbercept for CRVO-ME.

Study design

Prospective, clinical study.

Methods

Twenty Three patients(23 eyes) were recruited, who were non-ischemia central retinal vein occlusion diagnosed by FFA (fundus fluorescein angiography) and treated with intravitreal conbercept for macular edema, best – corrected visual acuity ( BCVA), central macular thickness(CMT), amplitude density of P1 wave and implicit time of P1,N1 wave from ring 1 and ring 2 of mf-ERG were measured before and 1 week、2 month after treatment.

Results

Compared to the baseline, BCVA、CMT、amplitude density of P1 wave and implicit time of P1,N1 wave from ring 1 and ring 2 were greatly improved at 1 W、2 M after treatment; better results were gained at 2 M compared to 1 W; Pearson correlation analysis shows no significantly correlation between the improvement of mf-ERG with the change of BCVA、CMT.

Conclusion

The BCVA、the structure and the function of macular were greatly improved after intravitreal conbercept for central retinal vein occlusion induced macular edema; however no significantly correlation between the improvement of the function of macular with the strcture of macular and BCVA.