Analysis of total corneal astigmatism with a rotating Scheimpflug camera in keratoconus

High-Fluence Epithelium-off Accelerated Pulsed Corneal Cross-linking (15 mW/cm2; 7.2 J/cm2) for Pediatric Keratoconus: A 3-Year Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment and secondarily determine the topographic changes, visual outcomes, and demarcation line depth after high-fluence pulsed light accelerated cross-linking (ACXL) in pediatric patients (younger than 18 years) with progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 32 eyes (25 children, aged 11 to 18 years), with progressive keratoconus treated with high-energy epithelium-off pulsed light ACXL (7.2 J/cm2, 15 mW/cm2, 12 minutes, 2 seconds on/1 second off). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), Scheimpflug tomography, and anterior optical coherence tomography measurements were recorded preoperatively and 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 32 eyes were included. Significant CDVA improvement, pachymetry, and maximum keratometry reduction were found at all follow-up visits. Mean keratometric values remained stable, and astigmatism showed a mild worsening (< 0.25 D) with statistical significance at 1 and 3 years. Total aberration showed discordant results and coma aberration had a slight improvement without statistical significance. The demarcation line depth was 265 ± 26 μm. Three patients developed mild haze without visual acuity loss. None of the patients underwent a second CXL procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients, high-fluence epithelium-off pulsed light ACXL appears to be a safe and effective procedure to halt the progression of keratoconus, slightly improving the CDVA and keratometric values. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(3):e148-e155.].

Cataract surgery considerations in patients with prior history of keratoconus and ectasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Preoperative workup for cataract surgery in patients with keratoconus poses certain challenges, particularly in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. This review aims to outline the appropriate preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations and provides an algorithm to help guide the workup prior to surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

A new system for keratoconus progression and staging has been proposed and additional studies comparing intraocular lens (IOL) formulas calculations and biometry devices have been conducted.

SUMMARY

Patients with severe keratoconus have unpredictable results and have an increased risk of a hyperopic refraction postoperatively. Although studies have compared IOL calculation formulas, there is no consensus on management. Clinical considerations and an approach to the workup are presented; however, additional studies are required to determine the most appropriate management of cataracts in severe keratoconus.

Cataract surgery in patients with underlying keratoconus: focused review

An underlying diagnosis of keratoconus (KC) can complicate cataract surgery. In this study, the results of a focused review of the literature pertaining to cataract surgery in patients with KC are detailed. Topics essential for the appropriate management of this patient population are discussed. First, the individual and shared epidemiology and pathophysiology of cataract and KC are reviewed. Then, the theory and approach to intraocular lens power calculation are discussed, highlighting particularities and pitfalls of this exercise when performed in patients with KC. Finally, several special-although not uncommon-management scenarios and questions are addressed, such as surgical planning in cases where corneal stabilization or tissue replacement interventions are also necessitated.

Measuring corneal astigmatism using OCT in keratoconus

PURPOSE

To measure net corneal astigmatism using optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Avanti) in individuals with keratoconus and compare the repeatability and accuracy with those obtained using Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR).

SETTING

Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional observational study.

METHODS

Net corneal astigmatism was calculated in keratoconic and normal eyes using OCT and Scheimpflug imaging with 4 settings-pupil or vertex centration settings with a 3 or 4 mm circular analytical zone. Corneal elevation maps were obtained from OCT images and fitted with the Zernike polynomials to obtain net corneal astigmatism. Manifest refraction astigmatism was used to evaluate the accuracy of net corneal astigmatism measurements. The coefficient of repeatability from 2 repeated measures was calculated.

RESULTS

46 eyes with manifest or subclinical keratoconus and 52 normal control eyes were analyzed. For OCT measurements in keratoconus, better accuracy was achieved with pupil centration and 3 mm analytical zone; however, better repeatability was achieved with vertex centration and 4 mm analytical zone (coefficient of repeatability = 0.53 diopters, the Fligner-Killeen test with Bonferroni adjustment P &lt; .0017). Agreement with manifest refraction was significantly better with OCT compared with that using Pentacam HR (generalized mixed-effect model with Bonferroni adjustment P &lt; .00625). No statistically significant difference was found between instruments or settings in control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT was able to measure net corneal astigmatism with better accuracy and precision in keratoconic eyes than the Pentacam HR. Measurements may be more accurate using pupil centration and a smaller analytical zone in patients with keratoconus.

Refractive Outcomes of Non-Toric and Toric Intraocular Lenses in Mild, Moderate and Advanced Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the refractive outcomes of non-toric and toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in keratoconus (KC) using different IOL power calculation formulas. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that report on refractive outcomes of different IOL power calculation formulas in KC patients undergoing cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were primary posterior chamber non-toric and toric monofocal intraocular lens implantation, data on the degree of KC, explicit mention of the formula used for each stage of KC, and the number of eyes in each category. We calculated and compared the absolute and mean prediction errors, percentage of eyes within 0.5 D and 1 D from target, and the weighted absolute prediction errors of IOL formulas, all were given for KC degrees I–III. Results: The bibliographic search yielded 582 studies published between 1996 and 2020, 14 of which (in total 456 eyes) met the criteria: three studies on non-toric IOL (98 eyes), eight studies on toric IOLs (98 eyes) and three studies of unknown separation between non-toric and toric IOLs (260 eyes). The lowest absolute prediction error (APE) for mild, moderate, and advanced KC was seen with Kane’s IOL power formula with keratoconus adjustment. The APE for the top five IOL power formulas ranged 0.49–0.73 diopters (D) for mild (83–94%) of eyes within 1 D from the target), 1.08–1.21 D for moderate (51–57% within 1 D), and 1.44–2.86 D for advanced KC (12–48% within 1 D). Conclusions: Cataract surgery in eyes with mild-to-moderate KC generally achieves satisfactory postoperative refractive results. In patients with advanced KC, a minority of the eyes achieved spherical equivalent refraction within 1 D from the target. The Kane’s formula with keratoconus adjustment showed the best results in all KC stages.