Pars plana vitrectomy under melphalan irrigation for recurrent retinal detachment in eyes treated for retinoblastoma: a case report

Long-Term Results after Intraocular Surgery in Treated Retinoblastoma Eyes

Introduction: The aim of the study was to analyze the results of intraocular surgery in treated retinoblastoma eyes and to assess the long-term results with a priority on local recurrences, secondary enucleation, and metastases. Methods: Retrospective noncomparative case series. Results: From March 1964 to January 2020, 42 eyes of 40 retinoblastoma patients underwent intraocular surgery. Time interval between the last therapy and surgery was 9.5 years (mean: 114 months; median: 54.5 months). 31 eyes were treated for radiogenic cataract formation with a gain in visual acuity of 61.3%. One child developed an upper eyelid metastasis, 3 showed second primary malignancies (SPM), one a late recurrence, and 2 eyes were enucleated. Retinal surgery was performed in 17 eyes; 6 eyes were done as a combined procedure. Indications were radiogenic complications in the sense of a vitreous hemorrhage in 11 eyes and a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in 6 eyes. 41.2% of the treated eyes had a postoperative gain in visual acuity, whereas 9.5% of the eyes could not be preserved in the long term. Regarding systemic involvement 2 patients developed late recurrences and one a SPM. Conclusion: Surgical therapy in treated retinoblastoma is necessary in isolated cases. In our series, cataract surgery was a safe procedure with a good option of a significant increase in visual acuity. As expected, vitreoretinal treated eyes showed a limited gain in visual acuity, a higher risk of late recurrences, and a lower globe retention rate. Therefore, a careful indication and individual risk-benefit analysis are mandatory.

Pediatric Cataract Surgery Following Treatment for Retinoblastoma: A Case Series and Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To determine the visual and refractive outcomes and the ocular and systemic complications of cataract surgery in eyes treated for retinoblastoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series and systematic review.

METHODS

Children <18 years of age with retinoblastoma who underwent surgery for secondary cataract between 2000 and 2020 were reviewed. Medline (OVID), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database were searched from inception to August 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 15 eyes of 15 children were included. The mean age at retinoblastoma diagnosis was 12 months (median, 14; interquartile range [IQR], 4-19). Cataract developed at a mean age of 39 months (median, 31; IQR, 20-52), secondary to multiple treatments (n = 7), pars-plana vitrectomy (n = 3), external-beam radiotherapy (n = 2), laser (n = 2), and retinal detachment (n = 1). The mean preoperative quiescent interval was 44 months (median, 28; IQR, 15-64). Primary intraocular lens implantation was performed in 93%, posterior capsulotomy in 40%, and anterior vitrectomy in 33% of participants. Postoperatively, 100% had improved fundus visibility and 73% had improved vision. Complications included visual axis opacification (11 of 15), capsular phimosis (5 of 15), and zonulopathy (3 of 15). No patient developed intraocular recurrence, extraocular extension, or metastasis at a mean of 76 months (median, 78; IQR, 29-128) follow-up. The systematic review identified 852 studies, with 18 meeting inclusion criteria. Across all studies (n = 220 children), intraocular recurrence occurred in 6%, globe salvage in 91%, and extraocular extension and metastasis in <1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern retinoblastoma therapies, including intravitreal chemotherapy and vitrectomy, cause secondary cataract. Following cataract surgery, intraocular recurrence risk is low and extraocular spread is rare. Although surgery improves tumor visualization, visual prognosis may be limited by several factors. Challenges include biometry limitations and a high incidence of zonulopathy.

Pars plana vitrectomy for vitreoretinal complications in only seeing eyes after treatment for retinoblastoma

Purpose

To report the outcomes of two only seeing eyes of two cases with retinoblastoma in which vitrectomy was performed to treat vitreous hemorrhage or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after treatment for retinoblastoma.

Observations

Case 1 was an 8-month-old girl whose bilateral retinoblastoma (group D, OU) was treated by chemotherapy and focal ablation therapy. As the tumor size increased, enucleation was required in the right eye. At 4 years of age, about 1 year after the last treatment for retinoblastoma, lens-sparing vitrectomy was performed for dense, nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage, which had occurred 6 months previously. No recurrence of the tumor was found, and the patient's visual acuity improved to 0.9 postoperatively. Case 2 was a 4-month-old boy who was diagnosed with bilateral retinoblastoma (group D, OD; group C, OS) and underwent treatment, including systemic and local chemotherapy and proton beam therapy. Because large, regressed tumor masses were present in the posterior pole of the right eye, the left eye was the only seeing eye. At the age of 1 year 7 months, retinal detachment developed in the left eye 1 month after cryotherapy was performed for tumor recurrence. Although a scleral buckling procedure without drainage was performed, the retina was not reattached. The retina was reattached after vitrectomy with melphalan irrigation and silicone oil tamponade. However, recurrence was noted 6 months after the operation, and enucleation was required.

Conclusion and importance

Vitrectomy appears to be beneficial for the treatment of vision-threatening complications after retinoblastoma treatment. However, vitrectomy may be associated with the potential spread of tumor cells and/or tumor recurrence and therefore should be reserved as the last treatment modality for only seeing eyes. Careful postoperative follow-up is mandatory.

•

Pars plana vitrectomy was performed in two only seeing eyes of two cases.

•

In a case with nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage and tumor regression over 1 year, visual acuity improved to 0.9 postoperatively without recurrence.

•

In the other case with retinal detachment and vitreous seeding required enucleation for tumor recurrence.

The Results of Pars Plana Vitrectomy in the Treatment of Intraocular Retinoblastoma: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) as a treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma (RB) patients. Methods: Twenty-eight RB patients who had PPV were recruited in this retrospective case study, using the digital wide-angle retinal imaging device to record and assess disease condition. Results: The mean value of follow-up time was 79.4 months from diagnosis and 73.1 months from PPV. Up to the end of the follow-up time after PPV, the 5-year survival rate was 96.4%. Ultimately, 35.7% patients underwent enucleation of the eyeball. Among patients with salvaged eyes, 50% had no light perception vision. During the postoperative follow-up time, 14.3% of patients required no further antitumor treatment, and the remaining patients still need to continue to receive systemic or local antitumor treatment, such as chemotherapy, arterial interventional therapy, laser treatment, cryotherapy, and so on. The complication after PPV include cataracts (46.4%), iris adhesion (7.1%), emulsification of the silicone oil (17.9%), band degeneration of the cornea (10.7%), glaucoma (3.6%), and retinal neovascularization (3.6%). Conclusion: According to our observations, we recommend that the utmost care should be taken when considering PPV for the treatment of activated RB. When weighing the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis, PPV is not suitable for routine treatment. It is necessary to fully grasp the operative indications and strictly observe operation specifications, which includes close postoperative follow-up.

Current Indications of Secondary Enucleation in Retinoblastoma Management: A Position Paper on Behalf of the European Retinoblastoma Group (EURbG)

Simple Summary

Although secondary enucleation (SE) is the treatment of choice for retinoblastoma eyes that did not respond favorably to conservative therapies, clear criteria for its indication are, however, currently missing. In this position paper on behalf of the European Retinoblastoma Group (EURbG), we discuss the available literature on SE, including its influence on metastases rate and survival, and propose guidelines to assist decision-making to interrupt eye-preserving therapies depending on the availabilities of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Absolute indications to SE may be restricted to eyes with refractory tumor activity resisting all salvage treatments or eyes under apparent tumor control but no visual potential and irreducible complications. In contrast, eyes with an obscured optic nerve head and/or ocular complications amenable to specific surgical or medical management can be considered relative indications, provided that appropriate follow-up can be implemented and that parents are fully aware of a residual risk.

Abstract

Secondary enucleation (SE) puts an irreversible end to eye-preserving therapies, whenever their prolongation is expected to violate the presumed state of metastatic grace. At present, it must be acknowledged that clear criteria for SE are missing, leading to empiric and subjective indications commonly related to disease progression or relapse, disease persistence masking the optic nerve head or treatment-related complications obscuring the fundus view. This absence of evidence-based consensus regarding SE is explained by the continuously moving frontiers of the conservative management as a result of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, as well as by the lack of studies sufficiently powered to accurately stratify the risk of metastasis in conservatively treated patients. In this position paper of the European Retinoblastoma Group (EURbG), we give an overview of the progressive shift in the indications for SE over the past decades and propose guidelines to assist decision-making with respect to when SE becomes imperative or recommended, with corresponding absolute and relative SE indications. Further studies and validation of biologic markers correlated with the risk of metastasis are expected to set more precisely the frontiers of conservative management and thus consensual criteria for SE in the future.

Management of cataracts secondary to intravitreal chemotherapy injections for retinoblastoma seeding

PURPOSE

To report our experience in the management of cataracts presumably due to intravitreal chemotherapy administration in eyes with vitreous disease associated with retinoblastoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of a cohort of five eyes of five retinoblastoma patients who developed cataracts secondary to intravitreal chemotherapy administration and who then underwent cataract surgery. All patients underwent lensectomy and anterior vitrectomy with/without intraocular lens implantation via clear corneal approach. All cases were administered intraoperative intravitreal melphalan (35-40 mcg) and topotecan (10-20 mcg) at the end of cataract surgery as a preventive measure against retinoblastoma spread. Injections were repeated as needed in monthly follow-ups. Main outcome measures were enucleation rate and disease-free survival time.

RESULTS

The age at surgery ranged between 5 and 10 years. Follow-up time varied from 12 to 16 months. Treatment-free period before surgery ranged between 3 and 20 months. Time from last injection to cataract detection was: 2, 2, 10, 6, and 7 months; and time from last injection to cataract surgery was: 8, 3, 20, 7, and 15 months in cases 1-5, respectively. None of the eyes required enucleation. Tumor control was achieved in all patients at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of melphalan and topotecan into anterior parts of the vitreous may lead to cataract formation. This can be safely managed with lensectomy and anterior vitrectomy and the use of intravitreal administration of melphalan and topotecan at the conclusion of the surgery as a precautionary measure against the potential risk of extraocular spread.

Segmental Scleral Buckle Surgical Technique for Repair of a Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Retinoblastoma: A Case and Review of the Literature

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe the surgical repair of a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with a posterior break in a child with retinoblastoma (RB).

Methods

Retrospective case report and review of the English language literature. Retrospective review of an 11-month-old male with bilateral retinoblastoma who developed a RRD with a posterior retinal break in his better-seeing eye after treatment with cryotherapy. A review of all published cases to date of RRD in patients with RB is presented.

Results

The patient underwent a posterior segmental scleral buckle without subretinal fluid drainage with successful reattachment of the retina and no extraocular extension of RB.

Conclusions

RRDs in RB patients may be successfully repaired with anatomic success and no extraocular tumor extension. Even for patients with a posterior break, a segmental scleral buckle without drainage of subretinal fluid is a viable option and long-term excellent vision is a possible outcome.