PreserFlo MicroShunt® exposure: a case series

Scleral bridging technique for preventing PreserFlo microshunt exposure: A case report

INTRODUCTION

The use of the PreserFlo microshunt is gaining popularity owing to its ease of implantation and reduced need for postoperative intervention compared to conventional trabeculectomy.

PATIENT CONCERNS

However, microshunt exposure remains a severe complication of PreserFlo surgery, particularly in patients with a thin Tenon capsule and conjunctiva. However, the actual thickness and intensity of the Tenon capsule or conjunctiva can be confirmed only during surgery.

DIAGNOSIS

Exfoliation glaucoma with previous several glaucoma surgeries with thinner Tenon capsule or conjunctiva.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed PreserFlo implantation with a surgical technique to recover a thin Tenon capsule and conjunctiva by creating a half-thickness rectangular scleral flap under the shunt and covering it over the microshunt until the distal part, similar to the bridge.

OUTCOMES

The patient had better intraocular pressure control with positive cosmetic appearance using this technique.

CONCLUSION

This technique will be beneficial for both preventing exposure and holding down the top, in addition to improving cosmetic appearance.

[Glaucoma Filtration Surgery - Bleb-forming Procedures]

Glaucoma filtration surgery has been a standard surgical therapy for decades. An increasing knowledge about wound healing processes in the eye, the introduction of antimetabolite treatment and continuous improvements of the surgical technique helped making trabeculectomy - the prototype filtration surgery - a very effective therapeutic tool. However, best results will only be regularly achieved with a high level of experience and time dedicated to postoperative follow-up. Furthermore, the potential for severe early and late complications still remains high. Thus, novel stent-based filtration surgery approaches, such as the Preserflo and the XEN shunt have been introduced. This review presents these three bleb-forming filtration procedures, covering the basic principles of surgical technique, data on effectivity as well as complications.

[Review by the French Glaucoma Society on the roles of new surgical techniques in glaucoma]

The surgical management of glaucoma has been enriched in recent years by the arrival of new surgical techniques as a group known as MIGS (minimally invasive glaucoma surgery). The objective of these new techniques is to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) while limiting the risk of complications of conventional filtering surgery and allowing faster visual recovery. MIGS can be classified into three main categories depending on the route used to promote the outflow of aqueous humor: the trabecular route, the suprachoroidal route and the subconjunctival route. MIGS using the subconjunctival route are also called minimally invasive bleb surgery (MIBS). These new techniques do not replace conventional filtering surgery, which remains the gold standard technique, but now offer new alternatives for the surgical management of glaucoma patients in combination with cataract surgery or as stand-alone procedures.

Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of PreserFlo versus Trabeculectomy for Glaucoma Management in the United Kingdom

PURPOSE

Clinical evaluation and cost analysis of mitomycin-C-augmented PreserFlo MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study across 3 teaching hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 134 consecutive eyes of 129 patients (70 undergoing MicroShunt, 64 trabeculectomy).

METHODS

Primary and secondary glaucoma cases with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) were included. Neovascular glaucoma and surgery combined with cataract extraction were excluded. The cost analysis used results from the clinical study to estimate operative costs (equipment and staff costs) and postoperative costs (follow-up visits, nonglaucoma medications, and postoperative procedures) per eye for PreserFlo and trabeculectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary clinical outcome measure was surgical failure (defined as IOP > 21 mmHg or < 20% reduction from baseline, IOP ≤ 5 mmHg, reoperation, or loss of light perception) or qualified and complete success (with or without medication) at 18 months. Secondary measures were IOP, glaucoma medications, visual acuity, mean deviation, time to cessation of steroid drops, complications, surgical time, follow-up visits, postoperative interventions, and reoperations. The cost analysis evaluated costs of PreserFlo compared with trabeculectomy.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar, except for more non-White patients in the trabeculectomy group (51% Black and Asian vs. 32% MicroShunt, P = 0.02) and more cases with prior ab externo glaucoma surgery in the MicroShunt group (19% vs. 3% in the trabeculectomy group, P = 0.004). Overall, 59% of eyes had primary open-angle glaucoma. Mean follow-up was 19.9 months for both groups. At 18 months, surgical failure was 25% for MicroShunt compared with 35% for trabeculectomy (P = 0.18). Failure in MicroShunt cases was due to inadequate IOP reduction (84%) or reoperation for glaucoma (16%). Failure in trabeculectomy cases was due to inadequate IOP reduction (58%), persistent hypotony (29%), or reoperation for glaucoma (13%). Combined blebitis and endophthalmitis rate was 1.4% for MicroShunt and 3.1% for trabeculectomy. Cost analysis showed a savings of £245 to £566 per eye in the MicroShunt group, driven mostly by reduced postoperative procedures and follow-up visits. This is in contrast to prior randomized controlled trial data reporting the incremental cost of $2058 of PreserFlo over trabeculectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience of introducing PreserFlo MicroShunt surgery showed it was safer than trabeculectomy and is a cost-saving and effective option that offers potential to free up highly limited National Health Service resources.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

[Comparison of new and old procedures in glaucoma surgery : Trabeculectomy, Preserflo and XEN]

Glaucoma is one of the most frequent causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. The main risk factor of the disease is an individually too high intraocular pressure and pressure reduction is still the only established treatment. If conservative pressure reduction and adherence are insufficient, and if the patient is unable to tolerate conservative treatment, surgical procedures become necessary. There are nowadays more than a dozen different surgical procedures for lowering the pressure. This article presents and discusses the procedures that have a subconjunctival pre-equatorial drainage in common. These include trabeculectomy, the XEN-gel implant and the Preserflo microshunt.

Safety and Efficacy of the Preserflo® Microshunt in Refractory Glaucoma: A One-Year Study

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Preserflo^® microshunt implantation in eyes with refractory glaucoma. Methods: In this retrospective study, a cohort of patients who underwent Preserflo^® microshunt implantation between April 2019 and August 2020 for refractory glaucoma were evaluated. At the time of surgery, all eyes had uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximally tolerated medical therapy and at least one previous failed glaucoma filtering surgery. The primary outcome was a complete success, defined as postoperative IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg with an IOP reduction ≥ 20% and no repeat filtering surgery. The secondary outcome was qualified success, defined as a complete success with the use of antiglaucoma medications. The rates of needling, bleb repair, and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: Forty-seven eyes with a mean preoperative IOP of 30.1 ± 7.1 mm Hg and a mean of 3.4 ± 1 glaucoma medications were included. The mean number of previous surgeries prior to microshunt implantation was 2.3 ± 1.3. After 1 year, the mean IOP was significantly reduced to 18.8 ± 4.6 mm Hg, with the mean number of medications significantly reduced to 1.4 ± 1.2. Complete success was achieved in 35% of eyes, and a qualified success in 60% of eyes. A decrease in IOP of at least 30% was found in 55% of eyes. Needling or bleb repair was performed in 49% of eyes. Complications were minimal and transient, except for one eye which presented with tube extrusion, and another eye with a transected tube. A repeat glaucoma surgery had to be performed in 17% of eyes. Conclusions: The Preserflo^® Microshunt provided moderate success but a significant reduction in IOP, with a good safety profile after one year of follow-up in eyes at high risk for failure of filtering surgery.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Safety of Individual Devices

Primary open-angle glaucoma progression in those already on maximal medical therapy has traditionally been treated with trabeculectomy, a surgical procedure that carries a high degree of morbidity. In the last few decades, significant advances have been made in the field of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices, which aim to defer or prevent trabeculectomy via less arduous surgical techniques in certain types of glaucoma. Although reviews have been published examining the efficacy of various MIGS techniques, no article synthesises the comparative safety of all available devices. We performed a literature review examining the safety of MIGS devices. Fifteen devices were included, variously attempting to increase aqueous outflow through the trabecular meshwork or the suprachoroidal space, shunting into the subconjunctival space, or reducing aqueous production through ciliary body ablation. Notably, the earliest product attempting to increase outflow to the suprachoroidal space, Alcon's CyPass Micro-Stent, was withdrawn from the market due to concerns regarding increased corneal endothelial cell loss at five years post-implantation. All other devices were described as well-tolerated, with the most common adverse effects including hyphaema, intraocular pressure spikes, and device migration or obstruction. MIGS devices are purported to be uniformly safe, and many studies report no statistically significant increased complications beyond those associated with cataract surgery alone. It is important to note, however, the generally poor quality of current studies, with a dearth of randomised, or even prospective, data, and a large proportion of studies funded by device producers.

Early Complications and Results of Preserflo MicroShunt in the Management of Uncontrolled Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Case Series

We analyze the surgical outcomes and early complications with their management of the Preserflo MicroShunt (Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) at six-month follow-up. The study is conducted between March 2021 and May 2022. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR, intraocular pressure (IOP), and changes in glaucoma medications are assessed. Thirty eyes of 30 patients (22 women [73.3%] and 8 men [26.7%]) are included. They are augmented with mitomycin C (MMC) 0.5 mg/mL (8 subjects) or MMC 0.2 mg/mL (22 subjects) intraoperatively. BCVA is significantly higher one day after the treatment than before the treatment (MD with 95% CI = 0.05 (<0.01; 0.30); p = 0.045) when analyzing all patients. Such dependency is not observed when analyzing only patients treated with MMC 0.2 or 0.5 mg/mL (p > 0.050 for both analyses). No other statistically significant differences are detected in the level of BCVA before and after treatment. Among the patients, overall IOP is significantly lower at each time point after treatment than before surgery (p < 0.001 for all analyses). Among patients augmented with MMC 0.2 mg/mL, the IOP level is also significantly lower at each time point after treatment than before treatment (p ≤ 0.001 for all analyses). The same differences are observed among patients with MMC = 0.5—the IOP level is significantly lower at each time point after treatment than before treatment (p < 0.050 for all analyses). Five subjects (16.7%) require anti-glaucoma medications three months after the procedure. Early complications (hypotony, choroidal effusion, keratitis, hyphema, and bleb fibrosis) are observed in 46.7% of cases. Our early results show that Preserflo MicroShunt is safe and effective for lowering IOP; however, it is not free from transient complications.

Evaluation of a Novel Αb Εxterno MicroShunt for the Treatment of Glaucoma

The surgical management of glaucoma has been revolutionized by the introduction of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). The various MIGS options aim to meaningfully lower intraocular pressure with a better safety profile than traditional glaucoma surgery. The key clinical attributes and the emerging potential of an ab externo MicroShunt (PreserFlo™) are reviewed in the context of published evidence and clinical experience. This novel MicroShunt consists of an 8.5-mm-long tube that is implanted in the eye via an ab externo approach enabling aqueous humor drainage into the sub-Tenon’s space through the formation of a bleb, similar in appearance to that created by trabeculectomy. The efficacy and safety of this procedure, the concomitant use of antimetabolites, the impact of tube positioning, and its future value in clinical practice are critically reviewed. Recent evidence has demonstrated the MicroShunt to be less effective than traditional filtration surgery, but with a significant improvement in safety. Cumulative data suggest that the new implant provides tangible clinical benefits to selected patients with glaucoma in need of further intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering. Future research should delineate the precise role of this and other MIGS options in the rapidly evolving glaucoma treatment algorithm.

Conjunctival erosion following a PRESERFLO® MicroShunt procedure

Purpose

We describe a case of conjunctival erosion following a PRESERFLO® MicroShunt procedure, and the subsequent revision surgery.

Observations

Conjunctival erosion was noted overlying the MicroShunt implant at postoperative week 11, 8 weeks following a bleb needling procedure for bleb encapsulation. A brisk leak was observed at the site of erosion. The patient underwent a subsequent revision procedure with repositioning of the MicroShunt implant and mitomycin C (MMC) application.

Conclusion and importance

Conjunctival erosion may be a relatively rare but important complication following MicroShunt surgery and may arise from a variety of risk factors. Extra care should be taken during bleb needling in the context of MicroShunt, and needling should be directed posteriorly, beyond the distal tip of the MicroShunt.

PreserFlo® MicroShunt: An Overview of This Minimally Invasive Device for Open-Angle Glaucoma

For moderate-to-severe glaucoma, trabeculectomy remains the “gold standard” intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment; nonetheless, this method requires extensive post-operative maintenance. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) treatments are designed to lessen intra- and post-operative care burden while offering an acceptable IOP decrease for individuals with mild to moderate glaucoma. The PreserFlo® MicroShunt (previously InnFocus MicroShunt) is an 8.5 mm glaucoma drainage device manufactured from poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (SIBS), an extremely biocompatible and bioinert material. The lumen is narrow enough to prevent hypotony, but big enough to avoid being obstructed by sloughed cells or pigment. The device is implanted ab externo, as a stand-alone procedure or in conjunction with cataract surgery, with intraoperative mitomycin C, and a bleb is produced under the conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule. The MicroShunt was CE-marked in 2012 and designed for primary open-angle glaucoma, the IOP of which remains uncontrolled after maximally tolerated topical treatment. Several clinical trials evaluating the MicroShunt’s long-term safety and effectiveness have been conducted, highlighting the effectiveness of the device over time, along with a tolerable safety profile. The present review aims to gather evidence of PreserFlo’s effectiveness and safety results almost 10 years after its introduction, and furthermore, to compare it with other MIGS and with the gold-standard trabeculectomy for glaucoma management.