Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism between anterior and total cornea in 2.2 mm steep meridian incision cataract surgery

The Influence of Corneal Thickness on Surgically Induced Corneal Astigmatism Derived from Total Keratometry Measured by Anterior Segment Swept-Source OCT

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study was to explore the possible correlations between the anterior segment parameters derived from anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (AS-SS-OCT) with the surgically induced corneal astigmatism (CSIA) calculated from total keratometry (TK) measured by AS-SS-OCT.

METHODS

Seventy-one eyes of 67 patients with age-related cataract who underwent phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation with 2.2-mm incision were included. The CSIA values were calculated from anterior keratometry (CSIAKant) and TK (CSIATK) measured by AS-SS-OCT, respectively. Hotelling's T2 test was used to evaluate the difference. The correlation of CSIA with various parameters derived from AS-SS-OCT was tested with the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The centroid of CSIAKant and of CSIATK were 0.31 ± 0.55 D @ 54° and 0.41 ± 0.59 D @ 51°, with no significant difference (F = 1.283, p = 0.281, Hotelling's T2). The mean absolute CSIAKant and CSIATK were 0.58 ± 0.24 D and 0.65 ± 0.28 D. Spearman test showed that the magnitude of CSIAKant was negatively correlated with preoperative peripheral corneal thickness (PCT, p = 0.045) and the magnitude of anterior keratometry (p = 0.044). The magnitude of CSIATK was negatively correlated with preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT, p = 0.003) and preoperative PCT (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased thickness of the peripheral cornea is correlated with the decrease in the magnitude of the CSIA. The correlation we identified between the corneal thickness and the CSIA indicated that certain preoperative parameters should be considered for the prediction of CSIA for a more precise refractive outcome.

Evaluation of statistical correction strategies for corneal back surface astigmatism with toric lenses: a vector analysis

PURPOSE

To compare actual and formula-predicted postoperative refractive astigmatism using measured posterior corneal power measurements and 4 different empiric posterior corneal astigmatism correction models.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective consecutive case series.

METHODS

Using a dataset of 211 eyes before and after tIOL implantation (Hoya Vivinex), IOLMaster 700 (IOLM) or Casia2 (CASIA) keratometric and front/back surface corneal power measurements were converted to power vector components C0 (0/90 degrees) and C45 (45/135 degrees). Differences between postoperative and Castrop formula predicted refraction at the corneal plane using the labeled parameters of the tIOL and the keratometric or front/back surface corneal powers were recorded as the effect of corneal back surface astigmatism (BSA).

RESULTS

Generally, the centroid of the difference shifted toward negative C0 values indicating that BSA adds some against the rule corneal astigmatism (ATR). From IOLM/CASIA keratometry, the average difference in C0 was 0.39/0.32 diopter (D). After correction with the Abulafia-Koch, Goggin, La Hood, and Castrop nomograms, it was -0.18/-0.24 D, 0.27/0.18 D, 0.13/0.08 D, and 0.17/0.10 D. Using corneal front/back surface data from IOLM/CASIA, the difference was 0.18/0.12 D.

CONCLUSIONS

The Abulafia-Koch method overcorrected the ATR, while the Goggin, La Hood, and Castrop models slightly undercorrected ATR, and using measurements from the CASIA tomographer seemed to produce slightly less prediction error than IOLM.

Prediction of corneal power vectors after cataract surgery with toric lens implantation-A vector analysis

BACKGROUND

Intraocular lenses are typically calculated based on a pseudophakic eye model, and for toric lenses (tIOL) a good estimate of corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery is required in addition to the equivalent corneal power. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the preoperative IOLMaster (IOLM) and the preoperative and postoperative Casia2 (CASIA) tomographic measurements of corneal power in a cataractous population with tIOL implantation, and to predict total power (TP) from the IOLM and CASIA keratometric measurements.

METHODS

The analysis was based on a dataset of 88 eyes of 88 patients from 1 clinical centre before and after tIOL implantation. All IOLM and CASIA keratometric and total corneal power measurements were converted to power vector components, and the differences between preoperative IOLM or CASIA and postoperative CASIA measurements were assessed. Feedforward neural network and multivariate linear regression prediction algorithms were implemented to predict the postoperative total corneal power (as a reference for tIOL calculation) from the preoperative IOLM and CASIA keratometric measurements.

RESULTS

On average, the preoperative IOLM keratometric / total corneal power under- / overestimates the postoperative CASIA keratometric / real corneal power by 0.12 dpt / 0.21 dpt. The prediction of postoperative CASIA real power from preoperative IOLM or CASIA keratometry shows that postoperative total corneal power is systematically (0.18 dpt / 0.27 dpt) shifted towards astigmatism against the rule, which is not reflected by keratometry. The correlation of postoperative CASIA real power to the corresponding preoperative CASIA values is better than those as compared to the preoperative IOLM keratometry. However, there is a large variation from preoperative IOLM or CASIA keratometry to the postoperative CASIA real power of up to 1.1 dpt (95% confidence interval).

CONCLUSION

One of the challenges of tIOL calculation is the prediction of postoperative total corneal power from preoperative keratometry. Keratometric power restricted to a front surface measurement does not fully reflect the situation of corneal back surface astigmatism, which typically adds some extra against the rule astigmatism.

Efficacy Comparison Between Steep-Meridian Incision and Non-Steep-Meridian Incision in Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery with Low-to-Moderate Astigmatism

INTRODUCTION

To compare the visual outcomes of astigmatism correction with implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery with low-to-moderate astigmatism through a steep-meridian corneal relaxing incision (SM-CRI) and non-steep-meridian corneal relaxing incision (NSM-CRI).

METHODS

Seventy eyes of 70 patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent ICL V4c implantation were classified into two groups: SM-CRI and NSM-CRI. Refractive outcomes and vector analysis were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At the postoperative 6 month visit, all participants in both groups achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better. The difference vector (DV) showed that the residual astigmatism in the SM-CRI group was much smaller than that in the NSM-CRI group (P = 0.021), and the correction index (CI) was 0.84 ± 0.30 and 0.67 ± 0.35 for the SM-CRI and NSM-CRI groups, respectively, with a significant statistical difference (P = 0.013). Approximately 71% of eyes in the SM-CRI group had an angle of error (AE) within ± 15°, whereas 55% of eyes in the NSM-CRI group were within that range. The absolute mean AE was 10.13 ± 14.57° in the SM-CRI group, compared with 23.88 ± 28.22° in the NSM-CRI group (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

SM-CRI can alleviate corneal astigmatism and decrease the cylindrical diopter of the ICL, thus improving postoperative visual quality compared with NSM-CRI.

Correlations of Immediate Corneal Tomography Changes with Preoperative and the Elapsed Phaco Parameters

Purpose

The ability to predict corneal edema and understand its relationship with imaging parameters enables optimization of decision-making in terms of cataract surgery. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the immediate tomographic alterations after phacoemulsification.

Patients and Methods

In this prospective study, we evaluated clinical and corneal tomographic data of 30 patients with cataracts, obtained using a rotating Scheimpflug tomographic system before and after cataract surgery with a phacoemulsification system. Corneal thickness and volume were measured, and Pentacam Nucleus Staging, keratometry, and specular microscopy were performed preoperatively and immediately postoperatively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pre-and postoperative values. We calculated the correlations between the changes in these values and multiple parameters related to phacodynamics, including “ultrasound (US) elapsed” (phaco time), “US average” (average power used), and “US absolute” (energy effectively dissipated, a product of the other two parameters).

Results

There were increases in corneal volume (p<0.0001) and pachymetry (p<0.0001), and a decrease in endothelial cell count (p<0.0001) after surgery. The mean differences in pre- and postoperative specular microscopy, corneal volume, and pachymetry were −335.13±236.21 cells/mm³, 1.33±0.56 mm³, and 61.33±23.73 microns, respectively. The difference in pre-and postoperative corneal volume in patients with US elapsed ≥40 s was 0.75 mm³ greater than that in patients with US elapsed <40 s (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24–1.25; p=0.005); that of pachymetry in patients with US elapsed ≥40 s was 31.76 microns greater than that in patients with US elapsed <40 s (95% CI: 9.55–53.97; p=0.007). Spearman correlation revealed that, for every 1% increase in cataract density, the US average value increased by 0.31% (coef.: 0.3110; 95% CI: 0.0741–0.5490; p=0.012).

Conclusion

Knowledge of Pentacam Nucleus Staging and the effect of US elapsed on differences in corneal volume and pachymetry before and after cataract surgery should be of particular value for surgeons who routinely encounter patients with hard cataracts.

Surgically induced astigmatism after cataract surgery - a vector analysis

Background: Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) has been widely discussed in the literature as the change in corneal astigmatism resulting from corneal incision. The purpose of this study was to investigate the change in corneal refractive power preoperative to postoperative using a vector analysis of keratometry, total keratometry, and corneal back surface data from a modern optical biometerMethods: The analysis was based on a dataset of 122 eyes of 122 patients with preoperative and 1 month postoperative measurements performed with the IOLMaster 700 biometer from 1 clinical centre and a standardised surgical technique involving a corneal 2.5 mm 45°-incision made from the superior direction. Keratometry, total keratometry and corneal back surface data were processed in 3 vector components (spherical equivalent power SEQ and astigmatism considered in 0°/90° (C_0°) and in 45°/135° (C_45°) meridian), and the changes in corneal power vectors were analysed, comparing preoperative to postoperative values.Results: The mean corneal power of total keratometry reduced slightly after cataract surgery (-0.05 dpt), resulting mostly from a decrease in back surface power (-0.04 dpt). The astigmatism vector component C_0° of total keratometry reduced by -0.28 dpt, mostly due to a decrease at the corneal front surface (-0.26 dpt). With the corneal incision at 12 o'clock position this flattening in the 90° meridian refers to a SIA of around ¼ dpt. The change in C_0° and the C_45° astigmatic vector components for both keratometry and total keratometry show a large variation ranging between 0.24 and 0.33 dpt (standard deviations), indicating a poor predictability of the change in astigmatism due to cataract surgery.Conclusion: Cataract surgery locally flattens the cornea in the incision meridian. This flattening shows a large individual variation and therefore a poor predictability. Our study indicates that SIA in modern cataract surgery with standardised corneal incision is in a range of 1/4 dpt.