Refractive errors and risk factors for myopia in infants aged 1-18 months in Tianjin, China

The Performance of Spot Photoscreener in 6 to 10 Weeks Infants in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

To compare the refractive errors measured by the Spot photoscreener (with or without cycloplegia) to cycloplegic retinoscopy in 6- to 10-week-old infants.

Materials and Methods

101 right eyes from 101 healthy infants aged 6 to 10 weeks were recruited for this cross-sectional observational study. Refractive errors were measured using Spot photoscreener before and after cycloplegia, as well as cycloplegic retinoscopy. Comparisons between the refractive measurements were performed using one-way ANOVA with the post hoc Tukey HSD test or Kruskal-Wallis test with the Steel-Dwass test according to the data normality. Pearson's correlation test and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The agreement was evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement of the differences.

Results

Spot photoscreener was found to underestimate the spherical equivalent by 2.33 Diopters (D) in these infants. Following the induction of cycloplegia, the spherical equivalent measured by Spot photoscreener was in excellent agreement with cycloplegic retinoscopy with the mean difference of 0.01 D. Spot photoscreener overestimated cylindrical parameter by 0.2 D with poor agreement with cycloplegic retinoscopy no matter whether cycloplegia was induced. It had good agreement with cycloplegic retinoscopy in the J0 vector than the J45 vector measurement.

Conclusions

With the induction of cycloplegia, Spot photoscreener can accurately evaluate spherical equivalent in hyperopic infants with mild-to-moderate astigmatism. While it may provide valuable measurements of astigmatism, discrepancies in cylinder and axis should be taken into account.

Health-related quality of life measurements in children and adolescents with refractive errors: A scoping review

Background

Refractive errors, particularly myopia, are the leading visual disorders worldwide, significantly affecting the quality of life (QOL) even after correction. This scoping review focuses on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements for children and adolescents with refractive errors.

Main text

We explored generic and disease-specific HRQOL tools, examining their content, psychometric properties, and the impact of various interventions on QOL. Two English databases-PubMed, Embase, and one Chinese database, CNKI, were searched for relevant studies published from January 2001 to October 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies using standardized instruments to assess the QOL of children aged 0-18 with refractive errors. The review compares prevalent HRQOL measurements, analyzes children's refractive error assessments, and discusses intervention effects on patient QOL.

Conclusions

The study underlines the necessity of developing disease-specific QOL instruments for very young children and serves as a practical guide for researchers in this field. The findings advocate for a targeted approach in HRQOL assessment among the pediatric population, identifying critical gaps in current methodologies.

The Magnitude of Refractive Error and Its Associated Factors Among Patients Visiting Ophthalmology Clinics in Southern Ethiopia, 2022

Introduction

Refractive error is a vision-impairing condition due to light rays not being able to focus on the retina, resulting in the visual outcome of a cloudy image. It is one of the main causes of central vision impairment globally and in Africa, including Ethiopia. This study was conducted to assess the magnitude of refractive error and its associated factors among patients attending ophthalmic clinics.

Methods

An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was utilized. A systematic random sampling technique was applied to select 356 participants. The data were gathered using an interview-structured questionnaire and check list. Then, the data were entered into Epi-data version 4.6 and transferred to SPSS version 25 for further clean up and analysis. Descriptive and analytical statistics were conducted. A binary logistic regression analysis was done, and variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 in univariate analysis were taken for bivariate analysis. Statistically significant was declared at a p-value of less than 0.05 with an adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Among 356 participants, 96 (27.5%), with 95% CI (22.8, 32.1) had a refractive error, of which nearsighted is the most common type (15.8%). Regular use of electronic devices, near working distance (<33cm), less or lack of outdoor activities, history of diabetes mellitus and family history of refractive error were factors significantly associated with refractive error.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The magnitude of refractive error was 27.5%, which is relatively elevated than the previous studies. Clients need to get screened regularly so that refractive defects can be detected and corrected early. Eye care professionals shall make a big concern for patients with a history of diabetes and other medical illnesses since they are related to ocular refractive defects.

Measuring Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Eyes with Different Types of Astigmatism in a Cohort of Hong Kong Chinese Adults

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured retinal thickness (RT) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in eyes with different types of astigmatism.

Methods

This is a case-control study of 101 participants stratified into With-The-Rule (WTR; n = 41), Against-The-Rule (ATR; n = 25), and control (n = 35) groups by noncycloplegic subjective refraction. Inclusion criteria were ages between 18 and 45 years, spherical-equivalent (SE) refraction ≥-10.00 diopters (D), negative cylindrical power (CYL) ≤-0.75 D with axes of 0 to 30 degrees/150 to 180 degrees for WTR and 60 to 120 degrees for ATR, or CYL ≥-0.25 D for controls. Participants suffering from ocular diseases related to retinal defects, having a history of ocular surgery, with BCDVA >0.10 LogMAR, or poor OCT imaging quality were excluded. Fovea-centered scans were performed using spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), and RT automatically measured by the inbuilt software. Only right eyes were analyzed. Groups were matched for age, gender, SE, axial length, and corneal curvature.

Results

One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in both BCDVA (P = 0.039) and macular RT (P = 0.028) among the three groups. Bonferroni's post hoc test revealed statistically significant between-group differences in BCDVA (WTR vs. controls, P = 0.041), as well as in RT at inner-nasal (WTR vs. ATR, P = 0.034) and outer-temporal subfields (WTR vs. controls, P = 0.042). BCDVA was positively associated with macular RT (r = 0.206, P = 0.041) after adjusting for age, gender, and axial length.

Conclusions

Greater RT and poorer BCDVA were found in eyes with WTR astigmatism. Our findings suggest that the effect of astigmatism on retinal thickness and BCDVA may vary depending on not only magnitude, but also axis of astigmatism.

Development of myopia in laser-treated ROP infants: prematurity or laser photocoagulation?

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between the development of corrected 1-year-old refraction values and risk factors in preterm infants who underwent laser photocoagulation (LPC) therapy for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

METHODS

The ophthalmic examination findings of preterm neonates who had developed Type I ROP and received LPC therapy were evaluated retrospectively. The association between spherical equivalent (SE) values and clinical findings were analyzed by using multivariable linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 157 eyes of 80 neonates with a mean birth week of 27.1 ± 2.2 weeks (23 to 32 weeks) and a mean birth weight of 995 ± 273 g (565 to 1760 g). The treatments were administered on an average of 36.8 ± 2.7 (32 to 45 weeks) postmenstrual age. LPC treatment was applied bilaterally to 77 of the 80 neonates included in the study, and unilaterally to 3 of them. The mean ± standard deviation of the SE value was 0.31 ± 1.89 diopters (D) (- 8.00 to 4.63 D) according to the results of the 1-year corrected age refraction examination. In univariate analysis, no significant association between GA, BW, and ROP zone and SE value, while the number of laser spots (ß =  - 0.27 ± 0.00 D, p = 0.00) and stage 3 ROP (ß =  - 0.29 ± 0.37 D, p = 0.00) were significantly associated with the SE value. In multivariable linear regression analysis, a significant association between number of laser spot, stage 3 ROP and SE value (ß =  - 0.25 ± 0.00 D, p = 0.01 for number of laser spot, ß =  - 0.28 ± 0.36 D, p = 0.00 for stage 3 ROP).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study supports that stage of ROP and the number of laser spots count applied in photocoagulation treatment for ROP is significantly correlated with degree of myopia (p < 0.05).