Dynamic nomogram prediction model for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Drug Exposure As a Predictor in Diabetic Retinopathy Risk Prediction Models-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review to assess drug exposure handling in diabetic retinopathy (DR) risk prediction models, a network-meta-analysis to identify drugs associated with DR and a meta-analysis to determine which drugs contributed to enhanced model performance.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We included studies presenting DR models incorporating drug exposure as a predictor. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS from inception to December 2023. We evaluated the quality of studies using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and certainty using GRADE. We conducted network meta-analysis and meta-analysis to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and pooled C-statistic, respectively, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) (PROSPERO: CRD42022349764).

RESULTS

Of 5,653 records identified, we included 28 studies of 678,837 type 1 or 2 diabetes participants, of which 38,579 (5.7%) had DR. A total of 19, 3, and 7 studies were at high, unclear, and low risk of bias, respectively. Drugs included in models as predictors were: insulin (n = 24), antihypertensives (n = 5), oral antidiabetics (n = 12), lipid-lowering drugs (n = 7), antiplatelets (n = 2). Drug exposure was modelled primarily as a categorical variable (n = 23 studies). Two studies handled drug exposure as time-varying covariates, and one as a time-dependent covariate. Insulin was associated with an increased risk of DR (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.61-3.86). Models that included insulin (n = 9) had a higher pooled C-statistic (C-statistic = 0.84, CI: 0.80-0.88), compared to models (n = 9) that incorporated a combination of drugs alongside insulin (C-statistic = 0.79, CI: 0.74-0.84), as well as models (n = 3) not including insulin (C-statistic = 0.70, CI: 0.64-0.75). Limitations include the high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity in reviewed studies.

CONCLUSION

This is the first review assessing drug exposure handling in DR prediction models. Drug exposure was primarily modelled as a categorical variable, with insulin associated with improved model performance. However, due to suboptimal drug handling, associations between other drugs and model performance may have been overlooked. This review proposes the following for future DR prediction models: (1) evaluation of drug exposure as a variable, (2) use of time-varying methodologies, and (3) consideration of drug regimen details. Improving drug exposure handling could potentially unveil novel variables capable of significantly enhancing the predictive capability of prediction models.

Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Nomogram Construction for Diabetic Retinopathy Prediction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare various machine learning algorithms for constructing a diabetic retinopathy (DR) prediction model among type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients and to develop a nomogram based on the best model.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included DM patients receiving routine DR screening. Patients were randomly divided into training (244) and validation (105) sets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for the selection of clinical characteristics. Six machine learning algorithms were compared: decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), logistic regression model (LM), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost (XGB). Model performance was assessed via receiver-operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curve analyses (DCAs). A nomogram was then developed on the basis of the best model.

RESULTS

Compared with the five other machine learning algorithms (DT, KNN, RF, SVM, and XGB), the LM demonstrated the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC, 0.894) and recall (0.92) in the validation set. Additionally, the calibration curves and DCA results were relatively favourable. Disease duration, DPN, insulin dosage, urinary protein, and ALB were included in the LM. The nomogram exhibited robust discrimination (AUC: 0.856 in the training set and 0.868 in the validation set), calibration, and clinical applicability across the two datasets after 1,000 bootstraps.

CONCLUSION

Among the six different machine learning algorithms, the LM algorithm demonstrated the best performance. A logistic regression-based nomogram for predicting DR in type 2 DM patients was established. This nomogram may serve as a valuable tool for DR detection, facilitating timely treatment.

[Risk factors for ketoacidosis in children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and establishment of a predictive model]

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the risk factors for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and to establish a model for predicting the risk of DKA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 217 children/adolescents with T1DM who were admitted to General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from January 2018 to December 2021. Among the 217 children/adolescents,169 cases with DKA were included as the DKA group and 48 cases without DKA were included as the non-DKA group. The risk factors for DKA in the children/adolescents with T1DM were analyzed, and a nomogram model was established for predicting the risk of DKA in children/adolescents with T1DM.

RESULTS

For the 217 children/adolescents with T1DM, the incidence rate of DKA was 77.9% (169/217). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high levels of random blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood ketone body, and triglyceride on admission were closely associated with the development of DKA in the children/adolescents with T1DM (OR=1.156, 3.2031015, 20.131, and 9.519 respectively; P<0.05). The nomogram prediction model had a C-statistic of 0.95, with a mean absolute error of 0.004 between the risk of DKA predicted by the nomogram model and the actual risk of DKA, indicating that the model had a good overall prediction ability.

CONCLUSIONS

High levels of random blood glucose, HbA1c, blood ketone body, and triglyceride on admission are closely associated with the development of DKA in children/adolescents with T1DM, and targeted intervention measures should be developed to reduce the risk of DKA.