Extraperitoneal pediatric kidney transplantation of adult renal allograft using an en-bloc native liver and kidney mobilization technique

Venous vascular reconstruction of a robotically procured right kidney with two renal veins transplanted into a pediatric recipient

BACKGROUND

Right versus left kidney donor nephrectomy remains a controversial topic in renal transplantation given the increased incidence of right kidney vascular anomalies and associated venous thrombosis. We present the case of a 3-year-old pediatric recipient with urethral atresia and end-stage kidney disease who received a robotically procured living donor right pelvic kidney with two short same-size renal veins and a short ureter.

METHODS

We utilized a completely deceased iliac vein system (common iliac vein with both external and internal veins) to extend the two renal veins. Due to the distance between both renal veins, the external iliac vein was anastomosed to the upper hilum renal vein, and the internal iliac vein was anastomosed to the lower hilum renal vein. The donor's short ureter was anastomosed to the recipient's ureter end-to-side.

RESULTS

The patient had immediate graft function and there were no post-operative complications. Renal ultrasound was unremarkable at 48 hours post-transplant. Serum creatinine was 0.5 mg/dL at 3 months post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the successful transplantation of a robotically procured right pelvic donor kidney with two short renal veins using a deceased donor iliac vein system for venous reconstruction without increasing technical complications. This technique of venous reconstruction can be used in right kidneys with similar anatomical variations without affecting graft function.

Retroperitoneal kidney transplantation with liver and native kidney mobilization: a safe technique for pediatric recipients

BACKGROUND

Pediatric kidney transplant (KT) using larger, deceased or living donor adult kidneys can be challenging in the pediatric population due to limited space in the retroperitoneum. Liver and native kidney (L/NK) mobilization techniques can be used in smaller and younger transplant recipients to aid in retroperitoneal placement of the renal allograft. Here, we compare the clinical outcomes of pediatric retroperitoneal KT with and without L/NK mobilization.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pediatric renal transplant recipients treated between January 2015 and May 2021. Donor and recipient demographics, intraoperative data, and recipient outcomes were included. Recipients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique utilized: with L/NK mobilization (Group 1) and without L/NK mobilization (Group 2). Baseline variables were described using frequency distributions for categorical variables and means and standard errors for continuous variables. Tests of association with the likelihood of using L/NK mobilization were performed using standard χ2 tests, t tests, and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Forty-six pediatric recipients were evaluated and categorized into Group 1 (n = 26) and Group 2 (n = 20). Recipients in Group 1 were younger (6.7 ± 0.8 years vs. 15. 3 ± 0.7, P < 0.001), shorter (109.5 ± 3.7 vs. 154.2 ± 3.8 cm, P < 0.001) and weighed less (21.4 ± 2.0 vs. 48.6 ± 3.4 kg, P < 0.001) than those in Group 2. Other baseline characteristics did not differ between Groups 1 and 2. One urologic complication was encountered in Group 2; no vascular or surgical complications were observed in either group. Additionally, no stents or drains were used in any of the patients. There were no cases of delayed graft function or graft primary nonfunction. The median follow-up of the study was 24.6 months post-transplant. Two patients developed death-censored graft failure (both in Group 2, P = 0.22), and there was one death with a functioning graft (in Group 2, P = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal liver/kidney mobilization is a feasible and safe technique that facilitates implantation of adult kidney allografts into pediatric transplant recipients with no increased risk of developing post-operative complications, graft loss, or mortality.

Pediatric kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries show no increased risk of complications compared to single renal artery grafts

Background

Kidney allografts with multiple renal arteries (MRA) are not infrequent and have been historically associated with a higher risk of developing vascular and urologic complications. Reports of kidney transplantation using MRA allografts in the pediatric population remain scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate if transplantation of allografts with MRA with a surgical intent of creating a single arterial inflow using vascular reconstruction techniques when required, and without the routine use of surgical drains or ureteral stents, is associated with an increased risk of complications when compared to single renal artery (SRA) grafts.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all pediatric renal transplant recipients performed by a single surgeon at our center between January 2015 and June 2022. Donor and recipient demographics, intraoperative data, and recipient outcomes were included. Recipients were divided into two groups based on SRA vs. MRA. Baseline variables were described using frequency distributions for categorical variables and means and standard errors for continuous variables. Comparisons of those distributions between the two groups were performed using standard chi-squared and t-tests. Time-to-event distributions were compared using the log-rank test.

Results

Forty-nine pediatric transplant recipients were analyzed. Of these, 9 had donors with MRA (Group 1) and 40 had donors with SRA (Group 2). Native kidney and liver mobilization was performed in 44.4% (4/9) of Group 1 vs. 60.0% (24/40) of Group 2 cases (p = 0.39). There were no cases of delayed graft function or graft primary nonfunction. No surgical drainage or ureteral stents were used in any of the cases. One patient in Group 2 developed a distal ureter stricture. The geometric mean serum creatinine at 6- and 12-months posttransplant was 0.7 */ 1.2 and 0.9 */ 1.2 mg/dl in Group 1 and 0.7 */ 1.1 and 0.7 */ 1.1 mg/dl in Group 2. Two death-censored graft failures were observed in Group 2, with no significant difference observed between the two groups (p = 0.48).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that pediatric renal transplantation with MRA grafts, using a surgical approach to achieve a single renal artery ostium, can be safely performed while achieving similar outcomes as SRA grafts and with a low complication rate.