Mothers' experiences of parenting and everyday life of children born at 23 weeks of gestation - a qualitative descriptive study

Reflections about being born extremely preterm in children and adolescents: A qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND

The survival of the smallest and most immature preterm infants, born at 23-24 weeks of gestation, has improved significantly. While there is a substantial amount of research on the neurocognitive and social outcomes of extremely premature birth, little is known about the survivors' subjective experience of being born preterm and its effect on later life.

AIMS

The purpose was to study the subjective experiences of school-aged children born at 23-24 weeks of gestation, in order to understand their perspectives on how being born extremely early had affected their life.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive study.

METHODS

18 school-aged children (12 girls and 6 boys, 7-15 years of age), born at 23 or 24 weeks of gestation, were interviewed. The semi-structured interview guide covered six topics about quality of life: somatic health, functioning, learning and memory, emotional health, social relations, experience of prematurity and its effect.

RESULTS

Most children reported memories, which were told to them by parents, about their premature birth and early life. Using qualitative thematic analysis, the narratives of the children were classified into three groups: 1) the go-with-the-flow children, who identified little or no effect of prematurity, 2) the ponderers, who reflected on some effects such as minor physical challenges, and 3) the hesitants, who either did not connect their challenges with prematurity, or did not produce much reflection overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Children had been told about their early life by the parents and repeated these memories indicating that prematurity had become a significant part of the family story. Differences were found how the children reflected on the impact of prematurity in their personal life. It is essential to include preterm survivors' own perspectives already during childhood and adolescence into the research of extreme prematurity.

Follow-up care and support to parents of premature children: Multidisciplinary versus regular follow-up care

BACKGROUND

Preterm care involves clinical measures almost exclusively aimed at keeping the preterm alive and ready for discharge from hospital. Children are then enrolled in clinical follow-up care after this stressful period, but mental or specialised care for parents and child is often not embedded in the routine of a neonatal hospital ward and the family is then dependent on institutions for mental health or child health clinics, that is, regular care that is regionally scattered. This study aimed to investigate experiences of parents with regular care and compare them with parents visiting a fixed, specialised, multidisciplinary institute, outside the hospital walls, for preterm follow-up care.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among 56 parents (regular follow-up care N = 26; multidisciplinary follow-up care N = 30) of children born prematurely. The survey consisted out of items like parents' experiences with follow-up care, like the organisation of care, supportive care, environmental support and experienced stress.

RESULTS

Parents receiving multidisciplinary follow-up care reported higher levels of satisfaction with organisation of care (F = 5.45; p = 0.023) and supportive care (F = 11.69; p = 0.001) than parents receiving regular follow-up care. Also, it was found that the extent of support from the social environment alleviated stress but only in parents receiving regular follow-up care (ß = -0.47; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study findings indicate that experience with follow-up care is valued higher when receiving multidisciplinary care than regular care, and the degree in environmental support alleviates stress in parents receiving regular care.

Parental Narratives of Bonding and Relational Experiences with Preterm Infants Born at 23 to 24 Weeks-A Qualitative Descriptive Study

(1) Background. The birth of an infant at 23 to 24 weeks poses a significant challenge to healthy parent-infant bonding because of the high risk of infant loss and the prolonged separation. The aim of this study was to retrospectively explore the narratives of parents with children born at 23-24 weeks about their bonding formation and relational experiences. (2) Methods. This was a qualitative descriptive study conducted with Finnish parents of children born at 23 or 24 weeks of gestation. Twenty-nine mothers and eight fathers were retrospectively interviewed using a semi-structured interview about the bonding process with their infant during the period in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and their later parent-child relationship. Parents' narratives were deductively analysed according to a framework previously developed for studying parental bonding. (3) Results. Our results showed that several parents described the bonding process as natural or even easy despite the traumatic start to parenthood. Support from NICU staff and providing opportunities for participation in infant care and parent-infant physical closeness were reported to enhance the bonding process. Our study identified earlier parenting experience as a new element supporting bonding. (4) Conclusions. According to our results, essential elements enhancing parent-infant bonding in NICU settings seem to be supporting parents psychologically, promoting parent-infant closeness, and encouraging parental participation in the infants' care, even with the most immature infants.