Effect of unaffordable medical need on distress level of family member: analyses of 1997-2013 United States National Health Interview Surveys

Affordability in individuals' healthcare decision making: A concept analysis

This concept analysis aims to define affordability within the context of healthcare decision making. Affordability is a complex concept that influences an individual's healthcare decision making. In the year's post-Affordable Care Act, the United States has seen an increase in insured individuals, but also an increase in underinsured healthcare consumers. Evidence for the concept attributes was found by searching the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EconLit, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, Humanities Full Text, and PsychINFO databases. Literature was synthesized using the Walker and Avant approach. A new definition was derived with four defining attributes, as well as antecedents and consequences. Three cases are forwarded: the model, borderline, and contrary. In healthcare decision making, affordability is a subjective measure that individuals use in determining the ability to engage in a healthcare service or a durable good transaction. Affordability varies based on circumstances. The context of healthcare decision making of individuals stands in contrast to the decision-making in health systems and to decisions unrelated to one's health. Affordability is a determinant of an individual's ability to engage in a transaction. As such, nurses and policymakers should attempt to understand affordability from the patient's perspective.

An Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that palliative care improves the quality of life of individuals with serious medical illness. Research also suggests that in patients with advanced cancer, palliative care's focus on symptom management, coping with illness, goals of care, and treatment decisions may be associated with improved patient quality of life in part by increasing patients' use of active (vs. passive) and approach-oriented (vs. avoidant) coping strategies. However, without a framework outlining the process that individuals with serious medical illness and their loved ones undergo, it is challenging to discern exactly where, how, and why palliative care may affect the serious medical illness experience. To address this gap, we propose a clinically applicable framework, derived from existing theory and research in the social and behavioral sciences. This framework, called the Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness, describes how patients and their loved ones cognitively and emotionally process the various events that may occur as they navigate serious medical illness and the end of life. The framework also describes how individuals and their loved ones use that event processing to determine next steps, while considering the impact of their surrounding external environment, their individual social roles, and their connections on this decision making. The framework presented in this article is intended to improve our ability to understand and care for individuals with serious medical illness and their loved ones, while stimulating further discussion and research to test and refine these ideas.

Assessment of Anxiety and Depression in Polish Primary Parental Caregivers of Children with Cerebral Palsy Compared to a Control Group, as well as Identification of Selected Predictors

Background: Taking care of a child with Cerebral Palsy (CP) may be linked with adverse effects in the parents’ physical and mental health. The causes of anxiety and depression symptoms associated with childcare are still not fully understood. Aim: To assess the intensity of anxiety and depression symptoms in parents of children with CP compared to a control group and to identify selected mental health predictors. Design and Methods: Data were collected from 301 respondents, including 190 parents of children with CP (study group) and 111 parents taking care of children developing normally (control group). Intensity of anxiety and depression was rated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scale. Gross Motor Function Classification System for Cerebral Palsy (GMFCS), Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-29), Berlin Support Social Scales (BSSS) scales and a specially designed questionnaire were used to assess the predictors. The investigated variables included the children’s and the parents’ characteristics, as well as environmental factors. The analyses applied Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, M(SD) as well as multiple regression. Results: The level of anxiety and depression was clearly higher in the parents of children with CP–the mean levels of anxiety and depression in the study group and the controls amounted to 8.1 vs. 4.7 and 6.8 vs. 3.7, respectively. The factors associated with intensity of anxiety and depression in the parents of children with CP included lack of social support, mainly perceived and received support, unsatisfying parental health status, poor economic status of the family, as well as difficult living conditions, sense of coherence, loneliness, the parent’s gender, and the child’s intellectual disability. Conclusions: Identification of significant anxiety and depression predictors, understood as modifiable factors, should be considered in determining and planning comprehensive support for a child with CP and his/her primary parental caregiver.