Risk factors, physical and mental health burden of male and female pathological gamblers in the German general population aged 40-80

Electronic-Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (e-SBIRT) for Addictive Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Addictive disorders are significant global public health burdens. Treatment uptake with these disorders is low and outcomes can be mixed. Electronic screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (e-SBIRT) programs have potential to improve uptake and treatment outcomes. To date, however, no prior review of the literature has been conducted to gauge the effectiveness of e-SBIRT for addictive disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature concerning e-SBIRT for addictive disorders by surveying the MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PsycInfo databases on January 17, 2023.

RESULTS

Ten articles were included at analysis reporting evaluation of e-SBIRT interventions for substance use disorders including alcohol use in a variety of settings. No articles were identified regarding treatment for behavioral addictions such as disordered/harmful gambling. Meta-analysis found e-SBIRT to be effective at reducing drinking frequency in the short term only. e-SBIRT was not found to be advantageous over control conditions for abstinence or other treatment outcomes. We identified and described common components of e-SBIRT programs and assessed the quality of available evidence, which was generally poor.

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggest that research regarding e-SBIRT is concentrated exclusively on higher-risk substance use. There is a lack of consensus regarding the effectiveness of e-SBIRT for addictive disorders. Although common features exist, e-SBIRT designs are variable, which complicates identification of the most effective components. Overall, the quality of outcome evidence is low, and furthermore, high-quality experimental treatment evaluation research is needed.

What is known about population level programs designed to address gambling-related harm: rapid review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Gambling and gambling-related harm attract significant researcher and policy attention. The liberalisation of gambling in most western countries is strongly associated with a marked rise in gambling activity and increases in gambling-related harm experienced at the population level. Programs to address gambling-related harm have traditionally focused on individuals who demonstrate problematic gambling behaviour, despite clear evidence of the effectiveness of a public health approach to high-risk activities like gambling. Little is known about the availability or efficacy of programs to address gambling-related harm at a population level.

METHODS

The Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation commissioned a rapid evidence review of the available evidence on programs designed to reduce gambling-related harm at a population level. The review was conducted using a public health and harm reduction lens. MEDLINE, ProQuest Central and PsychInfo databases were searched systematically. Included studies were published in English between 2017 - 2023 from all countries with gambling policy contexts and public health systems comparable to Australia's; included primary data; and focused on primary and/or secondary prevention of gambling-related harm or problems.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-seven articles were eligible for inclusion. Themes identified in the literature included: risk and protective factors; primary prevention; secondary prevention; tertiary prevention; target population group; and public health approach. The evidence review revealed a gap in empirical evidence around effective interventions to reduce gambling-related harm at the population level, particularly from a public health perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing gambling-related harm requires a nuanced, multi-layered approach that acknowledges the complex social, environmental, and commercial nature of gambling and associated harms. Moreover, evidence demonstrates community programs to reduce gambling-related harm are more successful in reducing harm when based on sound theory of co-design and address the social aspects that contribute to harm.

Inanspruchnehmende einer Spielsuchtambulanz mit „Doppeldiagnosen“

Zusammenfassung: Zielsetzung: Internetnutzungsstörungen werden als wichtiges gesundheitsrelevantes Phänomen akzeptiert und sind bekanntermaßen mit hohen Raten an komorbiden psychischen Erkrankungen assoziiert. Jedoch ist das Wissen über das gleichzeitige Auftreten mit einer weiteren Verhaltenssucht begrenzt. Die vorliegende Arbeit bietet eine erste klinische Charakterisierung bei gleichzeitig auftretender Internetnutzungs- und Glücksspielstörung (Doppeldiagnose). Methodik: Die Analyse beruhte auf einer konsekutiven klinischen Stichprobe von Betroffenen ( N=1813), die sich wegen einer Verhaltenssucht ambulant vorstellten. Daten wurden aus der klinischen Exploration sowie psychometrischen Verfahren zur Erfassung von Depressivität, Stress, Angstsymptomen und Funktionsniveau erhoben und mit Betroffenen, die entweder eine Computerspiel- oder Glücksspielstörung aufwiesen, verglichen. Ergebnisse: Bei n=46 Betroffenen wurde eine Doppeldiagnose gestellt. Diese Gruppe wies zudem eine höhere Anzahl weiterer psychischer Störungen auf. Die Auswertung der klinischen Inventare wies auf eine insgesamt hohe Symptombelastung hin, ohne dass sich die Gruppen signifikant voneinander unterschieden. Schlussfolgerungen: Eine kleine Gruppe Inanspruchnehmender erfüllt die Kriterien einer Internetnutzungs- und einer Glücksspielstörung. Es ergeben sich keine auffälligen Unterschiede in der Symptombelastung zu Betroffenen mit singulärer Abhängigkeit, jedoch ist zu vermuten, dass Doppeldiagnosen eine differenzierte therapeutische Herangehensweise erfordern.