Longitudinal changes in personal recovery in individuals with psychotic disorders through hospitalisation in a psychiatric ward: preliminary findings

Long-term Changes in Personal Recovery and Quality of Life Among Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Different Durations of Illness: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

In schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) personal recovery and subjective quality of life (S-QOL) are crucial and show conceptual overlap. There is limited knowledge about how these outcomes change over time. Therefore, we investigated changes in personal recovery or S-QOL for patients with SSD. We specifically focused on the influence of the patients' durations of illness (DOI) on changes in personal recovery and S-QOL.

STUDY DESIGN

We included 46 studies investigating longitudinal changes in quantitative assessments of personal recovery or S-QOL for patients with SSD. Outcomes were categorized in overall personal recovery, overall S-QOL connectedness, hope and optimism, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment. We evaluated effect sizes of change between baseline and follow-up assessments. We also evaluated potential moderating effects, including DOI on these changes in outcomes.

STUDY RESULTS

We found small improvements of overall personal recovery and S-QOL, but marginal or no improvement over time in the other more specific outcome domains. Patients without a schizophrenia diagnosis, a younger age, and more recent publications positively influenced these changes. We found no significant influence of DOI on the changes in any outcome domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in personal recovery or S-QOL of people with SSD is modest at best. However, these studies did not fully capture the personal narratives or nonlinear process of recovery of an individual. Future research should focus on how to shift from a clinical to more person-oriented approach in clinical practice to support patients in improving their personal process of recovery.

REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

CRD42022377100.

Personal recovery in first-episode psychosis: Beyond clinical and functional recovery

BACKGROUND

The concept of personal recovery after psychotic illness focuses more on patients' social and existential needs compared to traditional outcome measures including clinical and functional recovery. This research aims to contribute to a broad framework on (personal) recovery and associated factors.

METHODS

Data from 203 persons with symptomatic remission of their first-episode psychosis from the ongoing HAMLETT study were analyzed. To determine the relative importance of several biological, clinical, psychological, and social factors in explaining personal recovery as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), partial Spearman correlations (controlling for clinical recovery (PANSS) and functional recovery (WHODAS 2.0)) and a bootstrapped multiple regression were performed. Indirect effects on personal recovery within these factors, clinical recovery, and functional recovery were explored using a regularized partial correlation network.

RESULTS

Of the factors that explained personal recovery beyond the effects of clinical and functional recovery, social support was the strongest predictor, followed by self-esteem, internalized stigma, and insecure attachment, collectively explaining 48.2 % of the variance. Anhedonia/apathy showed a trend towards a negative correlation. Age at onset, sex, early trauma/neglect, cognition, and being married/cohabiting did not significantly correlate with personal recovery. The network (n = 143) was consistent with these findings and indicated possible mediation pathways for early trauma/neglect, insecure attachment, cognition, and being married/cohabiting.

CONCLUSIONS

Personal recovery is an important addition to traditional measures of outcome after psychosis. Various quality of life indicators, such as self-esteem and social support, explain variance in personal recovery over clinical and functional recovery.

Relationship between personal recovery, autobiographical memory, and clinical recovery in people with mental illness in the acute phase

Aim

Narratives are important in psychiatric rehabilitation. People with a psychiatric diagnosis find it difficult to recall specific autobiographical memories of events that lasted less than a day. Although personal narratives play a central role in personal recovery, the factors influencing personal and clinical recovery, such as psychiatric symptoms and cognitive function, have not been fully explored. Therefore, this study examined the associations between personal recovery and autobiographical memory, age, psychiatric symptoms, and neurocognitive function.

Method

The Self-Identified Stage of Recovery, Parts A and B (SISR-A, SISR-B), Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT), Japanese version of the Brief Assessment Scale of Schizophrenia Cognitive Function, and Brief Psychiatric Symptom Rating Scale were administered to 40 individuals with psychiatric disorders who were undergoing psychiatric rehabilitation.

Results

A significant positive correlation was found between the total number of specific memories in the AMT and total SISR-B scores. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the total number of specific memories, especially high responsiveness to negative cue words, significantly predicted greater personal recovery. Age, psychiatric symptoms, and neurocognitive function did not significantly predict higher personal recovery.

Conclusion

In psychiatric rehabilitation, negative episodes should be treated with caution; however, they may also facilitate personal recovery.

Personal meaning of recovery among persons with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Recovery in mental illness is not synonymous with cure. Personal recovery approach consider recovery as a process and not as an outcome. This approach takes into account the subjective meaning of recovery by assessing how a person has learned to accommodate and live with an illness.

AIM

To study the personal meaning of recovery among persons with schizophrenia.

METHOD

This article presents the findings of a qualitative study about what 'recovery' means to persons with schizophrenia. A semi structured interview schedule was prepared based on literature review and expert opinion. Twenty participants who met the inclusion criteria and personally consider themselves recovering/recovered from schizophrenia were selected for the in-depth qualitative interviews. Data was analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Meaning of recovery from each participant's perspective was recorded.

FINDINGS

The results indicate factors that patients deem important for their recovery are, absence of symptoms, regaining functioning, being able to work, having adequate emotional stability and not being on medicines. The findings are examined in the background of the previous studies and suggestions for clinical practice and research is also discussed.

CONCLUSION

Recovery is far more than remission of symptoms. Persons with mental illness has their own criteria of recovery, which could be very distinct from the clinical definition. Current study findings can help in identifying meaning of recovery through the perspectives of persons with mental illness and in developing and implementing recovery-oriented services.