1
|
Jakobs KM, van den Brule-Barnhoorn KJ, van Lieshout J, Janzing JGE, Cahn W, van den Muijsenbergh M, Biermans MCJ, Bischoff EWMA. Transmural collaborative care model for the review of antipsychotics: a feasibility study of a complex intervention. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12367. [PMID: 38811680 PMCID: PMC11137011 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
General practitioners (GPs) are often unaware of antipsychotic (AP)-induced cardiovascular risk (CVR) and therefore patients using atypical APs are not systematically monitored. We evaluated the feasibility of a complex intervention designed to review the use of APs and advise on CVR-lowering strategies in a transmural collaboration. A mixed methods prospective cohort study in three general practices in the Netherlands was conducted in 2021. The intervention comprised three steps: a digital information meeting, a multidisciplinary meeting, and a shared decision-making visit to the GP. We assessed patient recruitment and retention rates, advice given and adopted, and CVR with QRISK3 score and mental state with MHI-5 at baseline and three months post-intervention. GPs invited 57 of 146 eligible patients (39%), of whom 28 (19%) participated. The intervention was completed by 23 (82%) and follow-up by 18 participants (64%). At the multidisciplinary meeting, 22 (78%) patients were advised to change AP use. Other advice concerned medication (other than APs), lifestyle, monitoring, and psychotherapy. At 3-months post-intervention, 41% (28/68) of this advice was adopted. Our findings suggest that this complex intervention is feasible for evaluating health improvement in patients using AP in a trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsti M Jakobs
- Primary and Community Care Department Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Zorggroep Onze Huisartsen, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Jan van Lieshout
- IQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost G E Janzing
- Psychiatry Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wiepke Cahn
- Psychiatry Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- Primary and Community Care Department Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise On Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marion C J Biermans
- Primary and Community Care Department Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik W M A Bischoff
- Primary and Community Care Department Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Woodall AA, Abuzour AS, Wilson SA, Mair FS, Buchan I, Sheard SB, Atkinson P, Joyce DW, Symon P, Walker LE. Management of antipsychotics in primary care: Insights from healthcare professionals and policy makers in the United Kingdom. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0294974. [PMID: 38427674 PMCID: PMC10906843 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antipsychotic medication is increasingly prescribed to patients with serious mental illness. Patients with serious mental illness often have cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, and antipsychotics independently increase the risk of cardiometabolic disease. Despite this, many patients prescribed antipsychotics are discharged to primary care without planned psychiatric review. We explore perceptions of healthcare professionals and managers/directors of policy regarding reasons for increasing prevalence and management of antipsychotics in primary care. METHODS Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 11 general practitioners (GPs), 8 psychiatrists, and 11 managers/directors of policy in the United Kingdom. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Respondents reported competency gaps that impaired ability to manage patients prescribed antipsychotic medications, arising from inadequate postgraduate training and professional development. GPs lacked confidence to manage antipsychotic medications alone; psychiatrists lacked skills to address cardiometabolic risks and did not perceive this as their role. Communication barriers, lack of integrated care records, limited psychology provision, lowered expectation towards patients with serious mental illness by professionals, and pressure to discharge from hospital resulted in patients in primary care becoming 'trapped' on antipsychotics, inhibiting opportunities to deprescribe. Organisational and contractual barriers between services exacerbate this risk, with socioeconomic deprivation and lack of access to non-pharmacological interventions driving overprescribing. Professionals voiced fears of censure if a catastrophic event occurred after stopping an antipsychotic. Facilitators to overcome these barriers were suggested. CONCLUSIONS People prescribed antipsychotics experience a fragmented health system and suboptimal care. Several interventions could be taken to improve care for this population, but inadequate availability of non-pharmacological interventions and socioeconomic factors increasing mental distress need policy change to improve outcomes. The role of professionals' fear of medicolegal or regulatory censure inhibiting antipsychotic deprescribing was a new finding in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan A. Woodall
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Powys Teaching Health Board, Bronllys Hospital, Powys, United Kingdom
| | - Aseel S. Abuzour
- Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha A. Wilson
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Frances S. Mair
- General Practice & Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Iain Buchan
- NIHR Mental Health Research for Innovation Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sally B. Sheard
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Atkinson
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Dan W. Joyce
- NIHR Mental Health Research for Innovation Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Pyers Symon
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren E. Walker
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Howe J, MacPhee M, Duddy C, Habib H, Wong G, Jacklin S, Oduola S, Upthegrove R, Carlish M, Allen K, Patterson E, Maidment I. A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness. BMJ Qual Saf 2023:bmjqs-2023-016615. [PMID: 38071586 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe mental illness (SMI) incorporates schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, non-organic psychosis, personality disorder or any other severe and enduring mental health illness. Medication, particularly antipsychotics and mood stabilisers are the main treatment options. Medication optimisation is a hallmark of medication safety, characterised by the use of collaborative, person-centred approaches. There is very little published research describing medication optimisation with people living with SMI. OBJECTIVE Published literature and two stakeholder groups were employed to answer: What works for whom and in what circumstances to optimise medication use with people living with SMI in the community? METHODS A five-stage realist review was co-conducted with a lived experience group of individuals living with SMI and a practitioner group caring for individuals with SMI. An initial programme theory was developed. A formal literature search was conducted across eight bibliographic databases, and literature were screened for relevance to programme theory refinement. In total 60 papers contributed to the review. 42 papers were from the original database search with 18 papers identified from additional database searches and citation searches conducted based on stakeholder recommendations. RESULTS Our programme theory represents a continuum from a service user's initial diagnosis of SMI to therapeutic alliance development with practitioners, followed by mutual exchange of information, shared decision-making and medication optimisation. Accompanying the programme theory are 11 context-mechanism-outcome configurations that propose evidence-informed contextual factors and mechanisms that either facilitate or impede medication optimisation. Two mid-range theories highlighted in this review are supported decision-making and trust formation. CONCLUSIONS Supported decision-making and trust are foundational to overcoming stigma and establishing 'safety' and comfort between service users and practitioners. Avenues for future research include the influence of stigma and equity across cultural and ethnic groups with individuals with SMI; and use of trained supports, such as peer support workers. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021280980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Howe
- Pharmacy School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Maura MacPhee
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Claire Duddy
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hafsah Habib
- Pharmacy School, Aston University College of Health and Life Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon Jacklin
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Sheri Oduola
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Rachel Upthegrove
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Early Intervention Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Max Carlish
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Katherine Allen
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emma Patterson
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ian Maidment
- Pharmacy School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Howe J, Lindsey L. The role of pharmacists in supporting service users to optimise antipsychotic medication. Int J Clin Pharm 2023; 45:1293-1298. [PMID: 37704913 PMCID: PMC10600309 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01630-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacists have a contribution to make in improving optimising medication use for people on antipsychotic medication. The rates of prescribing antipsychotics have increased in England with an 18% rise from 2015 to 2020. People on antipsychotic medication are not treated as equal partners in conversations about their medications. This can leave people to make decisions about their antipsychotic medications without input from their prescribers which can have significant consequences for individuals. Involving people in the decision-making process, as experts on their own condition, has the potential to improve treatment outcomes. The evidence suggests that involving pharmacists in supporting people with serious mental illnesses will lead to improved clinical outcomes. Key areas for pharmacist involvement are providing information, education and counselling on antipsychotic medication and the side effects and reducing polypharmacy especially when antipsychotics are prescribed off license.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Howe
- School of Pharmacy, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, England.
| | - Laura Lindsey
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dada S, Dalkin S, Gilmore B, Hunter R, Mukumbang FC. Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews. Res Synth Methods 2023; 14:504-514. [PMID: 36872619 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
The realist review/synthesis has become an increasingly prominent methodological approach to evidence synthesis that can inform policy and practice. While there are publication standards and guidelines for the conduct of realist reviews, published reviews often provide minimal detail regarding how they have conducted some methodological steps. This includes selecting and appraising evidence sources, which are often considered for their 'relevance, richness and rigour.' In contrast to other review approaches, for example, narrative reviews and meta-analyses, the inclusion criteria and appraisal of evidence within realist reviews depend less on the study's methodological quality and more on its contribution to our understanding of generative causation, uncovered through the process of retroductive theorising. This research brief aims to discuss the current challenges and practices for appraising documents' relevance, richness and rigour and to provide pragmatic suggestions for how realist reviewers can put this into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Dada
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sonia Dalkin
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.,Fuse (The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health), Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brynne Gilmore
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rebecca Hunter
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shakespeare J, Dixon S, Marwaha S. Primary care and bipolar disorder. Br J Gen Pract 2023; 73:104-105. [PMID: 36823056 PMCID: PMC9976825 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp23x732057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sharon Dixon
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford; GP Partner, Donnington Medical Partnership, Oxford
| | - Steven Marwaha
- Bipolar UK Commissioner; Professor of Psychiatry, Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham; Consultant Psychiatrist, Specialist Mood Disorders Clinic and Solihull Mental Health Trust, Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Duddy C, Roberts N. Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods. Res Synth Methods 2021; 13:190-203. [PMID: 34494358 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The approach to identifying evidence for inclusion in realist reviews differs from that used in 'traditional' systematic reviews. Guidance suggests that realist reviews should be inclusive of diverse data from a range of sources, gathered in iterative searching cycles. Saturation is prioritised over exhaustiveness. Supplementary techniques such as citation snowballing are emphasised as potentially important sources of evidence. This paper describes the processes used to identify evidence in a selection of realist reviews focused on primary health care settings and examines the origin and type of evidence selected for inclusion. Data from five realist reviews were extracted from (a) reviewers' reference management libraries and (b) records kept by review teams. Although all reviews focused on primary health care, they used data from a wide range of document types and research designs, drawing on learning from multiple perspectives and settings, and sourced the documents containing this data in a variety of ways. Systematic searching of academic databases played an important role, supplementary search techniques such as snowballing were used to identify a significant proportion of documents included in the reviews. Our analysis demonstrates the diverse data sources used within realist reviews and the need for flexible, responsive efforts to identify relevant documents. Reviewers and information specialists should devise approaches to data gathering that reflect the individual needs of realist review projects and report these transparently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Duddy
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|