Predicting reattendance to the second round of the Maltese national breast screening programme: an analytical descriptive study

Factors influencing breast cancer screening practices among women worldwide: a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

The variation in breast cancer incidence rates across different regions may reflect disparities in breast cancer screening (BCS) practices. Understanding the factors associated with these screening behaviors is crucial for identifying modifiable elements amenable to intervention. This systematic review aims to identify common factors influencing BCS behaviors among women globally.

METHODS

Relevant papers were sourced from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. The included studies were published in English in peer-reviewed journals from January 2000 to March 2023 and investigated factors associated with BCS behaviors.

RESULTS

From an initial pool of 625 articles, 34 studies (comprising 29 observational and 5 qualitative studies) with 36,043 participants were included. Factors influencing BCS behaviors were categorized into nine groups: socio-demographic factors, health status history, knowledge, perceptions, cultural factors, cues to action, motivation, self-efficacy, and social support. The quality appraisal scores of the studies ranged from average to high.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights factors pivotal for policy-making at various levels of breast cancer prevention and assists health promotion professionals in designing more effective interventions to enhance BCS practices among women.

How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France

BACKGROUND

This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a population-based screening proposal.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to women who had received three invitations to organised screenings (OS) for both breast and colorectal cancer. The categories of participants in both OS were designed from data from the regional cancer screening coordination centres in each department. Participation in opportunistic cervical cancer screening was evaluated as self-reported data.

RESULTS

4,634 questionnaires were returned out of the 17,194 sent, giving a global return rate of 27%. The highest rate of return (73.5%) was obtained from women who had participated at least once in both breast and colorectal cancer OS. An intermediate rate was obtained from women participating in breast cancer OS only (18.7%). Poor levels of return came from women who had participated in colorectal cancer OS only (3.6%) and from non-participants (4.1%). Our results suggest that women with lower educational levels tend to be the most regular attendants at OS (50.3%), compared to highly educated women (39.7%). 11.8% of women were overdue in their opportunistic cervical cancer screening. This percentage rose to 35.4% in the category of non-participants. In addition, women's comments provide a better understanding of the reasons for irregular attendance and non-participation.

CONCLUSION

Overall, similar behaviours towards screening were observed in the four departments. Our analysis suggests that participation in one cancer OS increases the likelihood of participating in others. This adhesion could be an interesting lever for raising women's awareness of other cancer screenings.

Influential factors in Black and White breast cancer survivors' beliefs about breast cancer

PURPOSE

Breast cancer beliefs are widely studied to improve preventative screening behaviors in women without cancer; however, limited research has examined breast cancer beliefs among breast cancer survivors. To fill this gap in research we investigated racial differences and the predicting role of influential factors (e.g., stage) in survivors' beliefs about their breast cancer.

METHODS

This study is a secondary analysis of data from the Narrowing Gap in Adjuvant Therapy Study (2006-2011), where Black (N = 210) and White women (N = 149) were interviewed within 20 weeks following their breast cancer diagnosis and primary surgery in Washington DC and Detroit, MI. Outcomes of this analysis were perceived susceptibility to a breast cancer recurrence and perceived severity of breast cancer. Bivariate analyses were conducted to assess racial differences in sample characteristics, and on the study outcomes. Adjusted multiple regression models examined correlates between independent variables (e.g., sociodemographic/clinical) and women's breast cancer beliefs about susceptibility of a recurrence and disease severity.

RESULTS

Most of the sample were Black women (58%), had breast-conserving surgery (64%), and were privately insured (67%). Black women reported higher perceived disease severity beliefs than White women (p = 0.004). Other associated factors with greater perceived severity beliefs included lower education (p = 0.008), public health insurance (p = 0.021) and greater levels of medical mistrust (p = 0.016). In our adjusted multiple regression models' women with lower satisfaction regarding financial aspects of their healthcare were more likely to have higher perceived severity beliefs (p = 0.007); women with stage II cancer compared to stage I had greater susceptibility beliefs to a cancer recurrence (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found racial differences in women's perceived severity beliefs, and identified theory-based clinical and psychosocial correlates in survivor's breast cancer beliefs by race. Specifically, women diagnosed at stage (II) compared to stage (I) reported greater perceived susceptibility to a recurrence. Survivors diagnosed at stage (I) and (III) cancers may serve as important target groups to monitor their surveillance and follow-up behaviors. This study contributes salient predictors in survivors' beliefs about their BC and informs navigation strategies to improve cancer survivorship recommendations in the context of psycho-oncology and follow-up cancer care.