1
|
Pham LA, Clark PJ, Macdonald GA, Thomas JA, Dalais C, Fonda A, Kendall BJ, Thrift AP. Colorectal cancer screening participation in First Nations populations worldwide: a systematic review and data synthesis. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 73:102666. [PMID: 38828132 PMCID: PMC11139771 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background First Nations populations have poorer colorectal cancer (CRC) survival compared to non-First Nations populations. Whilst First Nations populations across the world are distinct, shared experiences of discrimination and oppression contribute to persistent health inequities. CRC screening improves survival, however screening rates in First Nations populations are poorly described. This study seeks to define participation rates in CRC screening in First Nations populations worldwide. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, grey literature, national registries and ClinicalTrials.gov. All sources were searched from their inception date to 18 February 2024. Studies were included if they reported CRC screening rates in adult (≥18 years) First Nations populations. We aimed to undertake a meta-analysis if there were sufficient data. Quality of papers were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tool. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020210181. Findings The literature search identified 1723 potentially eligible published studies. After review, 57 studies were included, 50 from the United States (US), with the remaining studies from Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), Canada, Dominica and Guatemala. Additionally, eleven non-indexed reports from national programs in Australia and NZ were included. There were insufficient data to undertake meta-analysis, therefore a systematic review and narrative synthesis were conducted. CRC screening definitions varied, and included stool-based screening, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. US First Nations screening rates ranged between 4.0 and 79.2%, Australia reported 10.6-35.2%, NZ 18.4-49%, Canada 22.4-53.4%, Guatemala 2.2% and Dominica 4.2%. Fifty-five studies were assessed as moderate or high quality and two as low quality. Interpretation Our findings suggested that there is wide variation in CRC screening participation rates across First Nations populations. Screening data are lacking in direct comparator groups and longitudinal outcomes. Disaggregation of screening data are required to better understand and address First Nations CRC outcome inequities. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily A. Pham
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paul J. Clark
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Graeme A. Macdonald
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - James A. Thomas
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christine Dalais
- University of Queensland Library, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Annie Fonda
- Southern Queensland Centre of Excellence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Bradley J. Kendall
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Aaron P. Thrift
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Han E(F, Srinivasa S, Gurney J, Koea J. Cancer Screening Services: What Do Indigenous Communities Want? A Systematic Review. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300035. [PMID: 38359371 PMCID: PMC10881110 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Indigenous communities experience worse cancer outcomes compared with the general population partly because of lower cancer screening access. One-size-fits-all screening programs are unsuitable for reaching Indigenous communities. In this review, we summarize available evidence on the perspectives of these communities; with a view to informing the improvement of cancer screening services to achieve equitable access. METHODS We undertook a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using the databases MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The search terms used were "Indigenous community or Indigenous communities," "cancer screening," and "facilitators, enablers, desires, or needs." Qualitative studies published up to the August 30, 2022 investigating the perspectives of Indigenous communities on factors encouraging screening participation were included in the study. The included studies were reviewed and analyzed inductively by two independent reviewers, and key themes regarding indigenous access to cancer screening were then extracted. RESULTS A total of 204 unique articles were identified from the search. The title and abstracts of these studies were screened, and 164 were excluded on the basis of the exclusion and inclusion criteria. The full texts of the remaining 40 studies were examined and 18 were included in the review. Four key themes were identified pertaining to culturally tailored education and information dissemination, community involvement, positive relationships with health care providers, and individual empowerment and autonomy. CONCLUSION Improvements, on the basis of the key themes identified from this review, must be made at all levels of the health care system to achieve equitable screening participation in Indigenous communities. However, we recommend an investigation into the perspectives of the local Indigenous communities before the initiation of cancer screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanket Srinivasa
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jason Gurney
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Koea
- Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Belon AP, McKenzie E, Teare G, Nykiforuk CIJ, Nieuwendyk L, Kim MO, Lee B, Adhikari K. Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:128. [PMID: 38263112 PMCID: PMC10807065 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death globally. CRC screening can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, socially disadvantaged groups may disproportionately benefit less from screening programs due to their limited access to healthcare. This poor access to healthcare services is further aggravated by intersecting, cumulative social factors associated with their sociocultural background and living conditions. This rapid review systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence on the effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) programs in increasing CRC screening in populations who do not have a regular healthcare provider or who have limited healthcare system access. METHODS We used three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and EBSCOhost CINAHL. We searched for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and quantitative and mixed-methods studies focusing on effectiveness of FIT programs (request or receipt of FIT kit, completion rates of FIT screening, and participation rates in follow-up colonoscopy after FIT positive results). For evidence synthesis, deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted. The findings were also classified using the Cochrane Methods Equity PROGRESS-PLUS framework. The quality of the included studies was assessed. RESULTS Findings from the 25 included primary studies were organized into three intervention design-focused themes. Delivery of culturally-tailored programs (e.g., use of language and interpretive services) were effective in increasing CRC screening. Regarding the method of delivery for FIT, specific strategies combined with mail-out programs (e.g., motivational screening letter) or in-person delivery (e.g., demonstration of FIT specimen collection procedure) enhanced the success of FIT programs. The follow-up reminder theme (e.g., spaced out and live reminders) were generally effective. Additionally, we found evidence of the social determinants of health affecting FIT uptake (e.g., place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, gender and/or sex). CONCLUSIONS Findings from this rapid review suggest multicomponent interventions combined with tailored strategies addressing the diverse, unique needs and priorities of the population with no regular healthcare provider or limited access to the healthcare system may be more effective in increasing FIT screening. Decision-makers and practitioners should consider equity and social factors when developing resources and coordinating efforts in the delivery and implementation of FIT screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula Belon
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Emily McKenzie
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Health Evidence and Impact, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Gary Teare
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Candace I J Nykiforuk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Laura Nieuwendyk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Minji Olivia Kim
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Bernice Lee
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Kamala Adhikari
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saw KS, Sexton K, Frankish P, Hulme-Moir M, Bissett I, Parry S. Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2023; 10:e001233. [PMID: 38007223 PMCID: PMC10679982 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical test (FIT), identify risk factors for FIT-interval colorectal cancers (FIT-IC) and describe long-term outcomes of participants with colorectal cancers (CRC) in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot (BSP). DESIGN From 2012 to 2017, the BSP offered eligible individuals, aged 50-74 years, biennial screening using a quantitative FIT with positivity threshold of 15 µg haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces. Retrospective review of prospectively maintained data extracted from the BSP Register and New Zealand Cancer Registry identified any CRC reported in participants who returned a definitive FIT result. Further details were obtained from hospital records. FIT-ICs were primary CRC diagnosed within 24 months of a negative FIT. Factors associated with FIT-ICs were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS Of 387 215 individuals invited, 57.4% participated with 6.1% returning positive FIT results. Final analysis included 520 CRC, of which 111 (21.3%) met FIT-IC definition. Overall FIT sensitivity for CRC was 78.7% (95% CI=74.9% to 82.1%), specificity was 94.1% (95% CI=94.0% to 94.2%). In 78 (70.3%) participants with FIT-IC, faecal Hb was reported as undetectable. There were no significant associations between FIT-IC and age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation. FIT-ICs were significantly associated with proximal tumour location, late stage at diagnosis, high-grade tumour differentiation and subsequent round screens. Median follow-up time was 74 (2-124) months. FIT-IC had significantly poorer overall survival. CONCLUSION FIT sensitivity in BSP compared favourably to published data. FIT-ICs were more likely to be proximal tumours with poor long-term outcomes. Further lowering of FIT threshold would have minimal impact on FIT-IC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Sheng Saw
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kerry Sexton
- National Screening Unit, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Paul Frankish
- Department of Gastroenterology, Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand Waitemata, Takapuna, New Zealand
| | - Mike Hulme-Moir
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand Waitemata, Takapuna, New Zealand
| | - Ian Bissett
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Susan Parry
- National Screening Unit, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Richardson-Parry A, Silva M, Valderas JM, Donde S, Woodruff S, van Vugt J. Video Interventions for Reducing Health Inequity in Cancer Screening Programmes: a Systematic Review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023:10.1007/s40615-023-01749-5. [PMID: 37603223 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01749-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health equity can lead to disparities in cancer screening, treatment, and mortality. This systematic review aims to identify and describe interventions that used video or DVD formats to reduce health inequity in cancer screening and review the effectiveness of such interventions in increasing screening rates compared to usual care conditions. METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) published until 18/01/2023 that compared intervention versus usual care control groups, with the percentage of cancer screening uptake during follow-up as an outcome. The risk of Bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. RESULTS After screening 4201 abstracts, 192 full texts were assessed for eligibility and 18 were included that focused on colorectal (n = 9), cervical (n = 5), breast (n = 5), and prostate (n = 1) cancer screening. All were based in the USA except one and most focused on ethnicity/race, while some included low-income populations. Most of the video interventions used to increase cervical cancer screening reported positive results. Studies aimed at increasing mammography uptake were mostly effective only in specific groups of participants, such as low-income or less-educated African American women. Results for colorectal cancer screening were conflicting. Videos that were culturally tailored or used emotive format were generally more effective than information-only videos. CONCLUSIONS Video interventions to increase cancer screening among populations with low screening uptake show some positive effects, though results are mixed. Interventions that use individual and cultural tailoring of the educational material should be further developed and investigated outside of the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mitchell Silva
- Esperity, Veldkapelgaarde 30b1.30.30, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Maria Valderas
- Department of Family Medicine, National University Health System and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Shaantanu Donde
- Viatris, Building 4, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, AL10 9UL, UK
| | | | - Joris van Vugt
- Viatris, Krijgsman 20, Amstelveen, 1186DM, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramli NS, Manaf MRA, Hassan MR, Ismail MI, Nawi AM. Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Promotion Using E-Media Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18158190. [PMID: 34360481 PMCID: PMC8345994 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18158190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC)-screening reduces mortality, yet remains underutilized. The use of electronic media (e-media) decision aids improves saliency and fosters informed decision-making. This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of CRC-screening promotion, using e-media decision aids in primary healthcare (PHC) settings. Three databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies. Studies that evaluated e-media decision aids compared to usual care or other conditions were selected. Quality was assessed by using Cochrane tools. Their effectiveness was measured by CRC-screening completion rates, and meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled estimates. Ten studies involving 9393 patients were included in this review. Follow-up durations spanned 3–24 months. The two types of decision-aid interventions used were videos and interactive multimedia programs, with durations of 6–15 min. Data from nine feasible studies with low or some risk of bias were synthesized for meta-analysis. A random-effects model revealed that CRC-screening promotion using e-media decision aids were almost twice as likely to have screening completion than their comparisons (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.03–2.62, p < 0.05). CRC-screening promotion through e-media has great potential for increasing screening participation in PHC settings. Thus, its development should be prioritized, and it should be integrated into existing programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Suhada Ramli
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia; (N.S.R.); (M.R.A.M.); (M.R.H.)
- Ministry of Health, Malaysia, Federal Government Administrative Centre, Putrajaya 62514, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia; (N.S.R.); (M.R.A.M.); (M.R.H.)
| | - Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia; (N.S.R.); (M.R.A.M.); (M.R.H.)
| | - Muhamad Izwan Ismail
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Jalan Persiaran Abu Bakar Sultan, Johor Bahru 80100, Malaysia;
| | - Azmawati Mohammed Nawi
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia; (N.S.R.); (M.R.A.M.); (M.R.H.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|