Association between physical activity and body posture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Frontal Plane Body Posture as a Predictor of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Amateur Athletes: A Comprehensive Study of 89 Participants Over 12 Months

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate frontal plane body posture parameters as injury risk factors during physical activity in the previous 12 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study sample consisted of 41 males aged 21.3±1.1 years old and 48 females aged 20.8±0.6. To evaluate body posture, we assessed differences in the height of the acromion process (SSA) and differences in the height of the shoulder blades (LSAS), differences in the distance of the lower angles of the shoulder blades and spine (LSPD), differences in the height of the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), and the maximum deflection of spinous process line from the line C7-S1 (PTA). The Injury History Questionnaire was used for injury data collection from the previous 12 months. The parameters were assessed for their ability to distinguish between injured and non-injured individuals using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method. RESULTS The results suggest that LSPD is a significantly (P=0.028) better predictor of injury than other body posture parameters. The cut-off points for risk of injury based on the assessed body posture parameters demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy higher than chance, except for LSAS and PTA (AUC >0.5). In addition, there were no sex differences in the predictive potential of detecting injuries between males and females. CONCLUSIONS The LSPD has the greatest predictive value for musculoskeletal injuries. Our results suggest that body posture parameters, irrespective of sex, independently influence injury risk, emphasizing the need for preventive strategies targeting athletes' trunk and shoulder regions.

Effects of Stretching or Strengthening Exercise on Spinal and Lumbopelvic Posture: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Abnormal posture (e.g. loss of lordosis) has been associated with the occurrence of musculoskeletal pain. Stretching tight muscles while strengthening the antagonists represents the most common method to treat the assumed muscle imbalance. However, despite its high popularity, there is no quantitative synthesis of the available evidence examining the effectiveness of the stretch-and-strengthen approach.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, searching PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar. We included controlled clinical trials investigating the effects of stretching or strengthening on spinal and lumbopelvic posture (e.g., pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, head tilt) in healthy individuals. Effect sizes were pooled using robust variance estimation. To rate the certainty about the evidence, the GRADE approach was applied.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies with 969 participants were identified. Neither acute (d = 0.01, p = 0.97) nor chronic stretching (d=-0.19, p = 0.16) had an impact on posture. Chronic strengthening was associated with large improvements (d=-0.83, p = 0.01), but no study examined acute effects. Strengthening was superior (d = 0.81, p = 0.004) to stretching. Sub-analyses found strengthening to be effective in the thoracic and cervical spine (d=-1.04, p = 0.005) but not in the lumbar and lumbopelvic region (d=-0.23, p = 0.25). Stretching was ineffective in all locations (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Moderate-certainty evidence does not support the use of stretching as a treatment of muscle imbalance. In contrast, therapists should focus on strengthening programs targeting weakened muscles.

The effect of various therapeutic exercises on forward head posture, rounded shoulder, and hyperkyphosis among people with upper crossed syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This review study aimed to evaluate the impact of therapeutic exercises on Upper-Crossed Syndrome (UCS). The study utilized a systematic review and meta-analysis approach to investigate the effects of various therapeutic exercises on forward head posture, rounded shoulders, and hyperkyphosis associated with upper crossed syndrome.

METHODS

The study identified relevant keywords for each independent and dependent variable and conducted a search in scientific databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, without any time limitations until 12 August 2023. Overall, 4625 articles were found in the selected databases, which were reduced to 1085 after being entered into the EndNote software and removing duplicate data. The full texts of 30 remaining studies were reviewed; ten articles meeting the criteria were included. Additionally, 12 studies from the Google Scholar database were included, resulting in 22 studies. Using Comprehensive meta-analysis software (CMA ver 3), data heterogeneity was measured with I2 and the Q tests. The Funnel Plot and Egger test methods were utilized to determine the possibility of publication bias. The JBI checklist was used to assess the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

The results of the meta-analysis showed that therapeutic exercises were effective in improving forward head, rounded shoulders, and thoracic kyphosis angles (CI 95% = -1.85-1.161, P = 0.001, P = 0.001, CI95%=-1.822-1.15, and P = 0.001, CI 95%= -1.83-1.09, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, it appears that performing therapeutic exercises in the form of strength exercises, stretching, shoulder-based exercises, and incredibly comprehensive exercises that target all muscles may be effective in reducing forward head, rounded shoulders, thoracic kyphosis, and overall UCS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1