Case report: atypical presentation of vancomycin induced DRESS syndrome: a case report and review of the literature

Pediatric drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: A 12-year retrospective study in a tertiary center

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction involving multiple organs. Data on DRESS syndrome among children are currently limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical features, causative drugs, systemic organ involvement, laboratory findings, disease severity score, and treatment outcomes in pediatric DRESS patients. The medical records of all pediatric DRESS patients, based on the RegiSCAR diagnostic criteria and admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from January 2010 to December 2021, were reviewed. Twenty-two cases were identified (males 54.5%) with a median age of 9.5 years. Anticonvulsants (54.5%) and antibiotics (27.3%) were the leading culprit drugs. Skin rash was reported in all cases, followed closely by liver involvement (95.5%). Eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis were identified in 54.5% and 31.8% of cases, respectively. The median latency period was 17.5 days. Liver enzyme elevation was detected at an average onset of 20.0 days and hepatocellular type was the most common pattern of liver injury. Nineteen patients (86.4%) were treated with systemic corticosteroids with prednisolone being the most prescribed medication. One case developed Graves' disease after DRESS and multiple relapses of DRESS. One case (4.5%) died due to refractory status epilepticus that was unrelated to DRESS. Anticonvulsants were the major cause of DRESS in pediatric patients. High suspicion for DRESS is crucial in patients receiving these drugs and presenting with fever, rash, and internal organ involvement.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an unusual manifestation of multi-visceral abnormalities and long-term outcome

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug induced hypersensitivity (DiHS) is a rare, however a severe hypersensitivity reaction with a mortality rate of up to 10%, accounting for 10 to 20% of all cutaneous drug reactions in hospitalized patients. The clinical features of DRESS/DiHS may be challenging to recognize and diagnose, since they are delayed, stepwise, and heterogeneous. The classic presentation of DRRSS/DiHS involves a combination of cutaneous, hematologic, and internal organ involvement with a 2 to 8 weeks latency between drug exposure and the onset of symptoms. Finding the culprit drug in our case was difficult as the patient was taking multiple antibiotics. Drugs such as vancomycin and cefepime used before the rash outbreak for post-reconstructive surgery for left toal knee arthroplasty (TKA) approximately four weeks before the onset of the rash are likely offending agents. This patient also had multi-visceral involvement with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. The current treatment guidelines for DRESS/DiHS are primarily based on expert opinion, as no randomized control trials exist. After the prompt withdrawal of the offending drug, systemic corticosteroids seem to have shown the best outcome for patients. Delaying discontinuing offending medications and initiating corticosteroid treatment may lead to poor results. The present case emphasizes that the close observation of patients with drug eruption induced by antibiotics is imperative. Primary care team should be able to promptly diagnose patients with DRESS syndrome, detect causative drug, and play a crucial role in the timely evaluation and treatment to reduce mortality rate. The later phase disease relapse or autoimmune complications may occur up to 5 years following the initial presentation. Therefore, we advised the patient to have an outpatient follow up for appropriate testing, including but not limited to genetic susceptibility due to the high risk of relapse and emerging risk of autoimmune diseases.

A rare case of infant eosinophilia induced by oral vancomycin: a case report and literature review

Oral vancomycin is mainly used to treat and prevent active Clostridium difficile infection. Because it is widely believed that there is a very low absorption rate via the gastrointestinal tract, reports of adverse reactions following oral vancomycin administration are rare. This case report describes for the first time a case of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in a 2-month-old infant treated with oral vancomycin. After oral vancomycin treatment, the number of eosinophils increased significantly and the levels gradually recovered after drug withdrawal. A review and analysis of the previously reported adverse reactions caused by oral vancomycin and eosinophilia caused by vancomycin confirm the need for physicians to pay close attention to vancomycin-related adverse reactions, to monitor the required concentration and to measure eosinophil counts in patients with rash-related adverse reactions. Patients with concomitant diseases and children should be monitored for adverse events as it is possible that they have increased gastrointestinal absorption of vancomycin following oral administration. When vancomycin causes eosinophilia, fever and rash, physicians should be alert to the possibility of organ damage.

A Case of Vancomycin-Induced Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia, Systemic Symptoms and Multiorgan Involvement Proven Using Lymphocyte Transformation Test

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also referred to as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition induced by drug hypersensitivity that leads to significant morbidity and mortality and often occurs in patients undergoing combination antibiotic therapy. Due to a recent increase in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, the occurrence of vancomycin-induced DiHS/DRESS has increased rapidly. However, because of insufficient pharmacogenetic data on vancomycin-induced drug eruptions in Asians coupled with the risk of re-eliciting the symptoms by provocation tests, confirmation of the culprit drug in vancomycin-induced DiHS/DRESS is often challenging. Here, we report a case of vancomycin-induced DiHS/DRESS, where the causal relationship was confirmed using a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). A 51-year-old woman was treated with combination antibiotics, including vancomycin, for infective pericarditis. The patient subsequently developed fever, facial edema, generalized rash followed by multiple internal organ involvement, including the kidney, lung, liver, and heart. Thus, based on the International Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria, the case was diagnosed as 'definite' DiHS/DRESS, although the culprit drug was obscured by combination antibiotic therapy. The LTT confirmed that vancomycin, but not other glycopeptide antibiotics, specifically induced T-cell proliferation in this case. Collectively, our case suggests that clinicians can utilize LTT to identify the causative medication of DiHS/DRESS when the clinical information is limited to defining the culprit drug.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by phenytoin re-exposure: case report and systematic review

Introduction: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is an adverse and severe skin reaction due to patients' susceptibility to medications, including phenytoin. The objective was to explore the characteristics of patients with DRESS secondary to phenytoin through a systematic review.Methods: We describe a case of DRESS syndrome secondary to phenytoin in a patient with previous exposure to this drug. A systematic literature review of cases of phenytoin-induced DRESS syndrome was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Web of Science until May 2019.Results: 37 articles describing 40 cases of DRESS syndrome were selected. Mean age of onset was 33 years, without gender difference. Symptoms started between two and 90 days (mean ± 23 days). Liver and respiratory tract were most frequently involved, and eosinophilia was a common feature, it was presented with an average value of 9.7%. A discussion of the case and qualitative synthesis of the evidence reported in the literature were made.Conclusion: Patients and presentation characteristics will mostly be presented according to the criteria used by RegiSCAR. It is recommended to consider adequate monitoring of adverse reactions to antiepileptic drugs such as DRESS syndrome, given its severity and high lethality.

Vancomycin-Induced Organizing Pneumonia: A Case Report and Literature Review

The long-term administration of vancomycin has increased; however, the pulmonary adverse reactions of long-term vancomycin treatment remain under-studied. A 75-year-old male patient with vertebral osteomyelitis receiving long-term vancomycin therapy developed a fever. High resolution computed tomography showed irregular ground glass opacity and consolidation in the right upper lung. The patient developed organizing pneumonia. This occurred without peripheral eosinophilia or adverse reactions in the skin and liver. The administration of vancomycin was discontinued. He recovered from organizing pneumonia after four weeks of steroid therapy. Solitary organizing pneumonia can develop during treatment with vancomycin. When pulmonary inflammation occurs and other causes of pneumonia are excluded, vancomycin therapy should be discontinued.

Antibacterial antibiotic-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: a literature review

Background

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (DRESS) is a delayed infrequent potentially life-threatening idiosyncratic drug reaction. Aromatic anticonvulsants and allopurinol are the most frequent causative agents. However, various reports of antibiotic-induced DRESS are available. In this review, we try to summarize reports of antibacterial antibiotic-induced DRESS focusing on characteristics of DRESS induced by each antibiotic group.

Methods

The data were collected by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and ScienceDirect. The keywords used as search terms were “DRESS syndrome,” “drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS),” “antibiotics,” “antimicrobial,” and names of various antimicrobial groups. Finally, 254 relevant cases with a definite or probable diagnosis of DRESS based on RegiSCAR criteria were found until 30 May 2020 and reviewed.

Results and conclusion

Totally, 254 cases of antibacterial antibiotic-induced DRESS are reported. Most of them are related to antituberculosis drugs, vancomycin, and sulfonamides, respectively. Rash and fever were most frequent clinical findings. Eosinophilia and liver injury were the most reported hematologic and visceral organ involvement, respectively. Most of the patients are managed with systemic corticosteroids. The death occurred in 16 patients which most of them experienced liver or lung involvement. The reactivation of various viruses especially HHV-6 is reported in 33 cases. The mean latency period was 29 days. It is necessary to perform thorough epidemiological, genetic, and immunological studies, also systematic case review and causality assessment, as well as well-designed clinical trials for better management of antibiotic-induced DRESS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-03005-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Glycopeptide Hypersensitivity and Adverse Reactions

Glycopeptides, such as vancomycin and teicoplanin, are primarily used in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, such as cellulitis, endocarditis, meningitis, pneumonia, and septicemia, and are some of the most commonly prescribed parenteral antimicrobials. Parenteral glycopeptides are first-line therapy for severe MRSA infections; however, oral vancomycin is used as a first-line treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections. Also, we currently have the longer-acting lipoglycopeptides, such as dalbavancin, oritavancin, and telavancin to our armamentarium for the treatment of MRSA infections. Lastly, vancomycin is often used as an alternative treatment for patients with β-lactam hypersensitivity. Common adverse effects associated with glycopeptide use include nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and Redman Syndrome (RMS). The RMS is often mistaken for a true allergy; however, it is a histamine-related infusion reaction rather than a true immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic reaction. Although hypersensitivity to glycopeptides is rare, both immune-mediated and delayed reactions have been reported in the literature. We describe the various types of glycopeptide hypersensitivity reactions associated with glycopeptides and lipoglycopeptides, including IgE-mediated reactions, RMS, and linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis, as well as describe cross-reactivity with other glycopeptides.

Pulmonary Manifestations of Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Background

The syndrome of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare, yet potentially fatal hypersensitivity reaction, most commonly associated with anticonvulsants, sulfonamides, and allopurinol. The reaction commonly manifests as a febrile skin eruption with lymphadenopathy and malaise between two and eight weeks following drug exposure. Internal organ involvement occurs in close to 90 percent of patients, and multiple organs may be involved in approximately half of those affected (most commonly the liver, kidney, and lung). Its long latency period and its variable clinical pattern of presentation have earned it the moniker of “the great mimicker,” with delays in diagnosis leading to higher morbidity and mortality. Although less commonly affected in DRESS syndrome, lung involvement is associated with more severe clinical course and potentially worse outcome. Pulmonary symptoms may precede development of the other more common symptoms and signs of the syndrome, or they might develop later in the course of the disease. Lung involvement in DRESS presents with a plethora of manifestations from mild cough or dyspnea with nonspecific interstitial changes on chest imaging to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with life-threatening hypoxic respiratory failure.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of literature from the PubMed database and selected cases of definite DRESS syndrome as defined by the European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) with a score of 6 or more who also had pulmonary involvement. Demographic data, pattern of lung involvement, culprit medication, latency period, laboratory findings, therapy, and outcome were described and compared with the literature.

Results

The most common pulmonary radiographic findings in DRESS were interstitial infiltrates in 50% of cases, followed by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) 31%. Symptoms of cough and shortness of breath (SOB) were present in 72% of patients at the time of presentation. SOB was the more common presenting symptom (81%) compared to cough (19%). In 95% of cases, another visceral organ was involved (most commonly liver or kidneys). 45% of cases were initially misdiagnosed as pneumonia and were treated with empiric antimicrobials. In a multivariate regression, a latency of 30 days or less and an age of 60 or less were associated with development of ARDS. Gender and eosinophil count were not associated with severity of pulmonary manifestations. All patients recovered, and in the vast majority of cases (95%), parenteral steroids were used for treatment in addition to supportive care and symptomatic management.

Conclusion

Albeit rare, DRESS is a potentially life-threatening syndrome which may present with a myriad of pulmonary signs and symptoms. Pulmonary manifestations are less common but are typically seen in more severe cases. Pulmonary manifestations may be a presenting sign of DRESS, and timely recognition is important in order to stop offending medication and decrease morbidity and mortality.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome after total knee arthroplasty infection and placement of antibiotic spacer

Though 2-stage revision is considered the gold standard in North America for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection, complications can be associated with use of antibiotic-impregnated spacers. We present a unique case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome in a patient with retained antibiotic-impregnated spacer placed for the treatment of a periprosthetic joint infection. Although drug reactions in general are common, severe drug reactions like the one described in this article are exceedingly rare. After discontinuation of intravenous antibiotics and the initiation of corticosteroids, the patient’s symptoms resolved, despite retention of the spacer. Steroid administration and supportive care may result in resolution of symptoms without the need for surgical intervention for spacer removal.