Characterizing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients using US Medicare-advantage health plan claims data

Comorbidity burden and survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the EMPIRE registry study

Background

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) frequently have multiple comorbidities, which may influence survival but go under-recognised in clinical practice. We therefore report comorbidity, antifibrotic treatment use and survival of patients with IPF observed in the multi-national EMPIRE registry.

Methods

For this prospective IPF cohort, demographics, comorbidities, survival and causes of death were analysed. Comorbidities were noted by the treating physician based on the patient’s past medical history or as reported during follow-up. Comorbidities were defined as prevalent when noted at enrolment, or as incident when recorded during follow-up. Survival was analysed by Kaplan–Meier estimates, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted for gender, age, smoking status and FVC at enrolment.

Results

A population of 3,580 patients with IPF from 11 Central and Eastern European countries was followed every 6 months for up to 6 years. At enrolment, 91.3% of patients reported at least one comorbidity, whereas more than one-third (37.8%) reported four or more comorbidities. Five-year survival was 53.7% in patients with no prevalent comorbidities, whereas it was 48.4%, 47.0%, 43.8% and 41.1% in patients with 1, 2, 3 and ≥ 4 comorbidities, respectively. The presence of multiple comorbidities at enrolment was associated with significantly worse survival (log-rank test P = 0.007). Adjusted HRs indicate that risk of death was increased by 44% in patients with IPF reporting ≥ 4 comorbidities at baseline compared with no comorbidity (P = 0.021). The relationship between number of comorbidities and decreased survival was also seen in patients receiving antifibrotic treatment (63% of all patients; log-rank test P < 0.001). Comorbidity as cause of death was identified in at least 26.1% of deaths.

Conclusions

The majority of patients with IPF demonstrate comorbidities, and many have comorbidity-related deaths. Increasing numbers of comorbidities are associated with worse survival; and this pattern is also present in patients receiving antifibrotic therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02033-6.

A systematic review on the economic burden of interstitial lung disease and the cost-effectiveness of current therapies

Background

The economic burden of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is unknown, limiting informed resource allocation and planning. We sought to conduct the first systematic review on the direct, indirect, and overall costs associated with ILD and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of current therapies globally.

Methods

We conducted systematic reviews of ILD disease cost studies and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) using MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases between 2000 and 2020. We compared ILD costs between countries according to the share of costs towards each country’s respective gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Costs are reported in 2020 USD.

Results

We identified 25 disease cost studies and 7 CEAs. The direct medical costs ranged between $1824 and $116,927 annually per patient (median $32,834; 14–180% of GDP per capita in Western countries). The leading drivers of direct costs were inpatient (55%), outpatient (22%), and medication costs (18%), based on pooled estimates. Annual indirect costs ranged from $7149 to $10,902 per employed patient (median $9607; 12–23% of GDP per capita). Among the 7 CEAs, only 1 study (14%) showed an ILD therapy (ambulatory oxygen) was cost-effective compared to best supportive care.

Conclusion

The direct and indirect costs associated with ILD are consistently high in all countries with available data, with cost-effectiveness profiles of new therapies generally undesirable. Globally, the median total direct cost for ILD equates to 51% of a country’s GDP per capita and has been increasing over time.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01922-2.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Related Costs in Chronic Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases with a Progressive Phenotype: A US Claims Database Analysis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) patterns and costs in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) and those with a progressive phenotype of fibrosing ILD in a US claims database.

METHODS

Data from the IBM^® MarketScan^® databases (1 October 2011-30 September 2015) were used. Diagnosis codes documented on medical claims on two occasions (without any claims during the 12 months prior) identified patients with incident fibrosing ILD. Patients with chronic fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype were identified by proxies for progression. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with 365 days of continuous coverage before the index date were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed for 12 months prior to identification of fibrosing ILD/progressive phenotype (baseline) and 12 months after (follow-up). Outcomes included treatment patterns, outpatient and inpatient claims, and costs.

RESULTS

We identified 23,577 patients with incident fibrosing ILD and 14,722 with the progressive phenotype. Follow-up data were available for 9986 and 5840 patients, respectively. The most frequent ILD-related medications during baseline were corticosteroids (49.4% and 56.6%). Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) annualized number of outpatient claims was 30.0 (± 26.4) and 34.1 (± 27.7) in the baseline period and 36.2 (± 28.6) and 41.9 (± 30.2) in the follow-up in fibrosing ILD and with a progressive phenotype, respectively. Mean (SD) number of all-cause hospitalizations was 0.5 (± 1.1) and 0.7 (± 1.2) during baseline and 0.6 (± 1.1) and 0.7 (± 1.2) during follow-up. Mean (SD) total costs were $40,907 (± 92,496) and $49,561 (± 98,647) during baseline and $46,157 (± 102,858) and $54,215 (± 116,833) during follow-up. Inpatient mortality during follow-up was 53.50 and 77.44 per 1000 patient-years.

CONCLUSION

HCRU and costs were high in patients with chronic fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype, likely reflecting the disease severity and the need for close monitoring and acute care. Outpatient claims accounted for a substantial proportion of the total costs.

Impact of Gender on the Characteristics of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Included in the RaDiCo-ILD Cohort

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence of gender-specific phenotypic differences among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which may affect patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

We present the characteristics of patients with IPF at inclusion in the French Rare Disease Cohort - Interstitial Lung Disease (RaDiCo-ILD) with the aim of characterizing gender-specific phenotypic differences.

METHODS

Patients with IPF who were enrolled in the national, multicentre RaDiCo-ILD cohort were included. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, pulmonary function, chest imaging, and IPF treatment were collected at inclusion and described by gender.

RESULTS

The cohort included 724 patients with IPF (54% of RaDiCo-ILD cohort), of whom 82.9% were male. The proportion of male and female patients with a prior history of smoking was 75.0% and 26.8%, respectively. Emphysema was present in 17.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.0, 24.0) of men and 5.4% (95% CI: 1.2, 9.6) of women. At inclusion, females had poorer HRQoL than males based on St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores (48.5 [95% CI: 43.9, 53.0] and 41.5 [39.4, 43.6], respectively). The mean forced vital capacity per cent predicted was 77.7% (95% CI: 76.2, 79.3) and 87.4% (83.4, 91.4) for males and females, respectively. Honeycombing on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was present in 70.8% (95% CI: 61.0, 80.6) of males and 45.8% (95% CI: 35.1, 56.5) of females.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of patients with IPF at inclusion in the RaDiCo-ILD cohort provides evidence that comorbid emphysema, lung volume reduction, and honeycombing on HRCT are more common characteristics of males than females.

Comorbidities of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Four Latin American Countries. Are There Differences by Country and Altitude?

Background: Comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affect quality of life, symptoms, disease progression and survival. It is unknown what are the comorbidities in patients with IPF in Latin America (LA) and if there are differences between countries. Our objective was to compare IPF comorbidities in four countries and analyze possible differences by altitude. Methods: Patients with IPF according 2012 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines, from two cities with an altitude of ≥2,250 m: Mexico City (Mexico) and Bogotá (Colombia) and from three at sea level: Buenos Aires (Argentina) and Lima and Trujillo (Peru). Comorbidities and pulmonary function tests were taken from clinical records. Possible pulmonary hypertension (PH) was defined by findings in the transthoracic echocardiogram of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) >36 mmHg or indirect signs of PH in the absence of other causes of PH. Emphysema as the concomitant finding of IPF criteria on chest tomography plus emphysema in the upper lobes. ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis and χ²-tests were used for comparison. Results: Two hundred and seventy-six patients were included, 50 from Argentina, 86 from Colombia, 91 from Mexico and 49 from Peru. There prevalence of PH was higher in Colombia and Mexico (p < 0.001), systemic arterial hypertension in Argentina (p < 0.015), gastro-esophageal reflux and dyslipidemia in Colombia and Argentina (p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus in Mexico (p < 0.007). Other comorbidities were obesity (28.4%), coronary artery disease (15.2%) and emphysema (14.9%), with no differences between countries. There was more PH in the altitude cities than those at sea level (51.7 vs. 15.3%, p < 0.001). In patients from Bogotá and Mexico City, arterial oxygen pressure, saturation (p < 0.001) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (p = 0.004) were significantly lower than in cities at sea level. Conclusions: In this study with a significant number of patients, we were able to describe and compare the comorbidities of IPF in four LA countries, which contributes to the epidemiological data of this disease in the region. The main results were the differences in comorbidities between the countries and more PH in the subjects residing in the cities of higher altitude, a finding that should be validated in future studies.

Clusters of comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Comorbidities are common in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and negatively impact health-related quality of life, health-care costs and mortality. Retrospective studies have focused on individual comorbidities, but clusters of multiple comorbidities have rarely been analysed. This study aimed to comprehensively and prospectively assess comorbidities in a multicentre, real-world cohort of patients with IPF, including prespecified conditions of special interest and to analyse clusters of comorbidities and examine characteristics, disease course and mortality of the clusters.

METHODS

Several measurements, questionnaires, medications and medical history were combined to assess comorbidities. Using self-organizing maps, clusters of comorbidities were identified and phenotypes characterized. Disease course was assessed using mixed effects models and mortality using Cox regression.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifty IPF patients were included prospectively. All except one patient suffered from at least one comorbidity and multimorbidity was common. Arterial hypertension, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, hypercholesterolemia, emphysema and obstructive sleep apnea were most prevalent. Four comorbidity clusters were identified. Each cluster had distinct comorbidity profiles, patient characteristics, symptom burden and disease severity. Patients with fewer comorbidities had better exercise capacity and less dyspnea at baseline, but a trend towards faster deterioration was observed. Mortality analyses showed no significant differences between clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimorbidity is prevalent in patients with IPF. Four specific clusters of comorbidities may represent phenotypes in IPF. A trend towards faster decline in exercise capacity and dyspnea was observed in patients with fewer comorbidities. Increased knowledge of comorbidities facilitates prevention and treatment of comorbidities in patients with IPF.

Ongoing challenges in pulmonary fibrosis and insights from the nintedanib clinical programme

The approvals of nintedanib and pirfenidone changed the treatment paradigm in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and increased our understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms. Nonetheless, many challenges and unmet needs remain in the management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.This review describes how the nintedanib clinical programme has helped to address some of these challenges. Data from this programme have informed changes to the IPF diagnostic guidelines, the timing of treatment initiation, and the assessment of disease progression. The use of nintedanib to treat patients with advanced lung function impairment, concomitant emphysema, patients awaiting lung transplantation and patients with IPF and lung cancer is discussed. The long-term use of nintedanib and an up-to-date summary of nintedanib in clinical practice are discussed. Directions for future research, namely emerging therapeutic options, precision medicine and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, are described.Further developments in these areas should continue to improve patient outcomes.

Prevalence of comorbidities and impact on pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes

Background

The presence of comorbid conditions could impact performance in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes. We aimed to compare the comorbidity prevalence among those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) and evaluate the impact on PR response.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study, recording comorbidities for all patients with COPD or ILD referred to PR. Participants were classified as responders to PR if they met the minimal important difference for exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The prevalence of comorbidities and impact on PR outcomes were compared by lung disease and by sex using a univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The mean number of comorbidities was similar among those with COPD (3.3±2.1, n=242) and ILD (3.2±1.9, n=66) (p>0.05). Females had a higher number of comorbidities than males in both COPD (p=0.001) and ILD (p=0.017) populations. Circulatory (64%) and endocrine/metabolic (45%) conditions were most common in COPD. In ILD, digestive (55%) and circulatory (53%) comorbidities were most prevalent. In people with ILD, those over 65 years, with musculoskeletal/connective tissue disease or circulatory disease were less likely to obtain meaningful improvements in exercise capacity. There was no impact of comorbidities on exercise capacity in COPD or on HRQoL in ILD.

Conclusions

The majority of patients with COPD or ILD enrolled in PR programmes have multiple comorbidities that may affect improvements in exercise capacity. PR programmes may be less effective for older adults with ILD and comorbid circulatory or musculoskeletal disease.

Comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an underestimated issue

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fibrosing lung disease with a poor prognosis. Between 60% and 70% of IPF patients die of IPF; the remaining causes of death may be due to comorbidities occurring in this ageing population. Interest in the role played by comorbidities in IPF has increased in the past few years. The optimal clinical management of IPF is multifaceted and not only involves antifibrotic treatment, but also vaccinations, oxygen supplementation, evaluation of nutritional status as well as psychological support and patient education. Symptom management, pulmonary rehabilitation, palliative care and treatment of comorbidities represent further areas of clinical intervention. This review analyses the major comorbidities observed in IPF, focusing on those that have the greatest impact on mortality and quality of life (QoL). The identification and treatment of comorbidities may help to improve patients' health-related QoL (i.e. sleep apnoea and depression), while some comorbidities (i.e. lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases and pulmonary hypertension) influence survival. It has been outlined that gathering comorbidities data improves the prediction of survival beyond the clinical and physiological parameters of IPF.