Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on patients' health care needs and asthma control: a quasi-experimental study

The Short-Term Efficacy of a Three-Week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program among Patients with Obstructive Lung Diseases

Introduction: The recommended duration for pulmonary rehabilitation stands at a minimum of six weeks; however, this stipulation may pose constraints in various countries due to financial limitations imposed by insurance companies and/or national health funds, as is the case in Poland. Consequently, our study endeavors to analyze the short-term outcomes stemming from a condensed three-week PR regimen administered to patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and the concomitance of these conditions (COPD-A)-this is an approach that is standard in the rehabilitation protocols endorsed by our national health fund. Methods: Patients diagnosed with COPD, asthma, and COPD-A, referred to the PR program, underwent retrospective analysis to evaluate the short-term efficacy of a three-week PR program. Patients underwent comprehensive assessment by respiratory physicians and rehabilitation consultants, leading to individualized PR programs. Clinical evaluations occurred at program onset and completion. Results: 125 patients participated: 37 COPD, 61 asthma, and 27 COPD-A. Significant improvements were observed in the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the consensus-based GINA symptom control tool (GINA-SCT), the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the 6-min walk test (6 MWT) distance, as well as in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores. All groups experienced reduced dyspnea severity and improved exercise tolerance. FEV1 and FVC improved in asthma and COPD-A, but not significantly in COPD. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictive factors for PR response. Conclusions: The study supports the short-term efficacy of the three-week PR program in improving clinical outcomes, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in COPD and asthma patients. Tailoring interventions based on predictors of PR response can optimize outcomes. Further research, particularly of the COPD-A group, is needed for individualized approaches. Larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our findings.

Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for adults with severe asthma exposed to psychosocial chronic stressors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme on hyperventilation symptoms, anxiety and depressive symptoms, general fatigue, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and exercise capacity in adults with severe asthma who have been exposed to psychosocial chronic stressors.

METHODS

Data on 111 non-selected consecutive adults with severe asthma who enrolled in an 8-week home-based PR programme (weekly supervised 90-min session) was retrospectively analysed. Chronic stressors included physical, sexual and psychological violence and/or a traumatic experience related to an intensive care unit stay. Hyperventilation symptoms (Nijmegen questionnaire), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Fatigue Assessment Scale, COPD Assessment Test, Six-Minute Stepper Test and Timed-Up and Go test were assessed at baseline and after PR.

RESULTS

At baseline, participants who have been exposed to chronic stressors (n = 48, 43.2%) were younger, more often female, more often treated for anxiety and depressive disorders, and had a higher score for anxiety symptoms, hyperventilation symptoms and a poorer HRQoL, compared to those who had not been exposed to chronic stressors (p < 0.05). All the study assessments were statistically improved after PR for both groups (p < 0.001). Anxiety and depressive symptoms, fatigue and health-related quality of life questionnaires were also clinically improved based on the minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of adults with severe asthma, mainly women, have been exposed to chronic stressors at the time of starting a PR programme, resulting in higher anxiety symptoms and hyperventilation symptoms. However, it did not prevent these individuals from benefiting from PR.

A machine learning approach to characterize patients with asthma exacerbation attending an acute care setting

BACKGROUND

One of the main problems in poorly controlled asthma is the access to the Emergency Department (ED). Using a machine learning (ML) approach, the aim of our study was to identify the main predictors of severe asthma exacerbations requiring hospital admission.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with asthma exacerbation were screened for inclusion within 48 hours of ED discharge. A k-means clustering algorithm was implemented to evaluate a potential distinction of different phenotypes. K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) as instance-based algorithm and Random Forest (RF) as tree-based algorithm were implemented in order to classify patients, based on the presence of at least one additional access to the ED in the previous 12 months.

RESULTS

To train our model, we included 260 patients (31.5% males, mean age 47.6 years). Unsupervised ML identified two groups, based on eosinophil count. A total of 86 patients with eosinophiles ≥370 cells/µL were significantly older, had a longer disease duration, more restrictions to daily activities, and lower rate of treatment compared to 174 patients with eosinophiles <370 cells/μL. In addition, they reported lower values of predicted FEV₁ (64.8±12.3% vs. 83.9±17.3%) and FEV₁/FVC (71.3±9.3 vs. 78.5±6.8), with a higher amount of exacerbations/year. In supervised ML, KNN achieved the best performance in identifying frequent exacerbators (AUROC: 96.7%), confirming the importance of spirometry parameters and eosinophil count, along with the number of prior exacerbations and other clinical and demographic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the key prognostic value of eosinophiles in asthma, suggesting the usefulness of ML in defining biological pathways that can help plan personalized pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies.